View the CBS News Photo
Essay on the Gaza - Rafah situation
Gaza Exodus Threatening Repercussions on Egypt's Future - By
David Eshel
January 26, 2008: These are moments of glory for Hamas. It conducted
its campaign brilliantly last week, and as it seems, so far, with
complete success. At no stage did Israel have sufficient response
to counter the initiatives of Hamas: Its excellent intelligence
community, normally capable of pinpointing Hamas leaders for targeted
killings, failed to alert on the organization's preparations along
Philadelphi border line separating the Gaza strip from Egypt.
But in fact, not intelligence gathering, nor experts, just plain
common sense was the only thing needed to realize, that breaking
the barrier between besieged Palestinian Rafah and free Egyptian
Rafah, was only a matter of time.
It
was also an impressive engineering feat. To plan, plant, implement
and execute simultaneous explosions, creating a domino effect,
toppling such a strongly built infrastructure, required high level
professionalism. Analysts doubt that Hamas, alone could not have
done this, without professional outside help. Intelligence sources
suspect, that Iranian demolition experts arrived in Gaza, mingling
with the pilgrims from Hajj in Saudi Arabia three weeks ago, when
Egypt allowed them, reluctantly to return, without sufficient
security checks.
Hamas operatives had been sawing away the foundations of the
wall between Egyptian and Palestinian Rafah for a few months,
preparing it to blow it up when the time came, a source close
to the Popular Resistance Committees (PRC) in Rafah told 'Haaretz'
newspaper on Wednesday.
Explosions were set at no less than twenty points along the border
fence, clear evidence of a campaign that was planned and coordinated
well in advance. In destroying the wall separating the Palestinian
and Egyptian sides of Rafah, Hamas chalked up another impressive,
if not strategic coup. The organization demonstrated once again,
that it is a disciplined, determined entity and an opponent that
is exponentially more sophisticated than the Palestine Liberation
Organization in Ramallah.
While thousands
of Gazans spilled over into Egypt, Hamas military used the confusion
to seize Egypt's strategic deep water port of Rafah on the Gaza
Mediterranean coast.
But there was much more at stake here. While thousands of Gazans
spilled over into Egypt, Hamas military used the confusion to
seize Egypt's strategic deep water port of Rafah on the Gaza Mediterranean
coast. In August 2005 the Sharon government granted Egypt naval
control over the territorial waters off the Gaza Mediterranean
coast up to Ashekelon. Egypt constructed a new 300-meter pier
for six 300-ton naval ships on the shore of Rafah, the town which
was divided by mutual agreement between Egypt and the Gaza Strip.
Meanwhile a few miles southwest of the border, the Egyptian authorities
desperately attempted to set up a more organized line of defense,
trying to turn back Palestinians reaching El Arish town, halfway
to the Suez Canal zone. But for thousands of Palestinians who
flooded through the border breaches, it was the Eastern Mediterranean
version of the ancient Bible exodus - only this time in reversed
form. It opened a floodgate of people and there was no stopping
them, apart from opening fire on the surging crowds, which the
Egyptians could not afford.
the
Egyptian border police redeployed to a new line, covering El Arish,
Bir Lahfan and Abu Agheila
An interesting development which already seems
to emerge is, that on President Mubarak direct orders, the Egyptian
border police redeployed to a new line, covering El Arish, Bir
Lahfan and Abu Agheila. This step would effectively hand over
to the control of Hamas-led Palestinian terrorist organizations
a Northern Sinai void of roughly 855 sq, km., almost twice the
area of the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.
Implementing
the Grand Design
It is little known, that in 2004 retired Major-General
Giora Eiland, former chief of Israel's National Security Council,
made a similar proposal to then prime minister Ariel Sharon,
calling for a regional solution of the Gaza dilemma. His proposal
included adding 600 square kilometers to Gaza in northern Sinai,
allowing for the construction of an international port and airport,
and a city in which millions of Palestinian refugees could live.
Eiland "grand design" plan (see map), sought compensating
Egypt with 150 square kilometers in the southern Negev and offer
a tunnel connecting Egypt's Central Sinai with Jordan, north
of Eilat. Unfortunately nothing came of General Eiland's plan.
Instead Sharon opted for the unilateral disengagement from Gaza
in August 2005, which, turned into a strategic disaster-creating
Hamastan, with all its painful "trimmings".
Egypt's Security at Risk?
Now Egypt is watching with mounting alarm as the
crisis in the Gaza Strip threatens to spill over onto its own
heartland. This is part of a nightmare which was haunting Cairo's
security services for years, since Hamas became dominant in
the Gaza strip, right on Egypt's doorstep. Now it seems, that
the unpredictable Middle Eastern scenario, in which the ever-volatile
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, getting dangerously out of hand,
has already matured into a real threat. President Hosni Mubarak
is facing a painful dilemma: on the one hand he wants to maintain
his, well paying US sponsored, relationship with Israel. On
the other he must avoid the impression that he is abandoning
the Palestinians, including the hated Gazans, which are Egypt's
traditional pain-in-the neck.
Meanwhile, President Mubarak is pulling out the
stops to get Israel to ease its restrictions, limiting the number
of his security forces in the Sinai Peninsula, according to
the 1979 Peace demilitarization agreement, which allowed only
a restricted number of police forces deployed at the Rafah border
and even the overall troops levels in Sinai.
Egypt’s security services are already on high alert after
learning that the 130,000 Palestinians, living in communities
around Cairo, Alexandria and the Suez Canal cities, are preparing
to help their Gazan brothers steal into Egypt.
Gaza's links to Egypt go back to 1948, when it
annexed the strip - then part of British-ruled Mandatory Palestine
- after the war with Israel, with its population swollen by
newly-arrived refugees. Israel occupied it for a few months
after the 1956 Suez war but Egyptian rule was restored until
the next round in 1967.
There are already significant repercussions to
the Hamas coup in Rafah. According to rumors spread among Palestinian
media reports, early Thursday, Jan. 24, apparently American
forces and equipment were to have wihdrawn from the Multinational-force
and Observers (MFO) airbase at El Gora northeast of al Arish.
However, a former member of MFO has informed us that this report
was factually incorrect. Having contacted MFO officials stationed
at North Camp El Gorah there were no plans, at this stage to
redeploy or withdraw MFO contingents from this location. This
message we find most reassuring to stability in this volatile
region and wish to apologize for our earlier report, which seems
to have been spread by intentional disinformation from involved
sources, during the turmoil which aroused Northern Sinai.
But the danger to Israel's security in now real
and imminent from another direction.
Hamas and other terrorist organizations in the
Gaza Strip, have already used the newly open border with Egypt,
to dispatch numerous terrorists into the Sinai peninsula over
the last two days, with the goal of sending them from Sinai
into Israel to commit attacks, defense officials said Thursday.
Carrying out spectacular attacks has been a long seeked aim,
but was effectively thwarted by the sophisticated Gaza fence
barrier. Accordingly, the Israel Defense Forces, the police
and the Shin-Bet general security service have consequently
beefed up their forces and their alert to highest level, along
the Israeli-Egyptian border in an effort to thwart infiltrations.
But all these efforts must be regarded virtually as 'mission
impossible', as the desert stretch from Rafah to Eilat is over
two hundred kilometers long, and mostly negotiable by 4x4 vehicles
or on foot.
Now that Gazans have 'exploded' out of their
long besieged enclave, it may be up to Israel to seal up the
border again, since the Egyptians are showing no signs of doing
so. US Secretary Condoleezza Rice and David Welch, her assistant
for the Middle East, made a point of warning Mubarak that he
must act expeditiously to restore border security, because the
entire Washington Palestinian strategy, hinging on Abbas and
the Annapolis declarations, hangs in the balance.
Wake-up Call ending "Pax Americana"
illusion
But the Americans have no one to blame but their
own president, who, through his dangerous "pax Americana"
illusion, tried to bring democratization into a region, where
this is still regarded as counter productive, if not catastrophic.
It started in Iraq and Afghanistan, spilled over to Egypt, Lebanon
and culminated with the 2006 Hamas elections, their July 2007
coup and now, finally the "Sinai exodus". This latest
development could well announce the next step - a possible Moslim
Brotherhood takeover bid for the post Mubarak era in
Egypt. The Egyptian president already hinted his main worry
is not the Palestinian issue but concern that his own opposition,
led by the Muslim Brotherhood, may adopt Hamas tactics and stir
up trouble in his cities. Foreboding signs are already evident:
Underlining domestic sensitivities, 460 members of the semi-outlawed
Muslim Brotherhood were arrested Friday, while heading for a
demonstration outside the Cairo HQ of the Arab League.
High concern is voiced by analysts over Egypt's
Muslim Brotherhood gains in the recent elections. The Egyptian
authorities received a shock last fall, when the Muslim Brotherhood,
an officially banned, but venerable and tolerated fundamentalist
group, won some 20% of parliamentary seats. The Muslim Brotherhood,
established in 1928 became outlawed in Egypt since 1954.
The big question will be, whether Mubarak will
allow Israel to mount a decisive military foray into northern
Sinai and rout Hamas before it can deploy sufficient power,
or link-up with terrorist forces, already strongly established
in the barren Sinai mountains. For an effective counteraction,
time is critical- any hesitation or political haggling can be
catastrophic.
Sinai: Safe House for Terrorism
While the Egypt-Israel 1979 Peace Agreement has
de-militarized the entire Sinai Peninsula, it also made it into
a giant safe house for terrorism. Sinai's geographical position
places the Sinai Peninsula in a highly strategic area, astride
of some of the most ancient smuggling routes through unpopulated
desert and extremely difficult topography, making excellent
hide-outs in mountain caves. Iran and Al Qaeda have focused
on Sinai long ago, but increased its clandestine operations
base, with growing emphasis, following the US campaign against
Taliban in Afghanistan.
These smuggling routes are of highly strategic
importance in Middle East conflicts past, present and future.
Counter intelligence sources estimate that major routes lead
from as far as the Black Sea to the shores of El- Arish in northern
Sinai ferrying arms and contraband in both directions. Now with
Hamas in control in parts of Northern Sinai, and realizing that
Iran is actively supporting the Islamic organization- an utmost
dangerous situation can develop, in which the Iranian Revolutionary
Guard Corps (IRGC) will finally establish its long sought forward
base along the Mediterranean.
Logically there might be a solution to this insoluble
dilemma. Israel could agree to redraw the security annex of
the 1979 Egypt-Israel agreement and allow Egypt to deploy several
divisions into Sinai, deploying sufficient forces to restore
its authority in the lawless peninsula. Taking such a step would,
however be extremely dangerous for Israel, taking into account
that a major change could occur in a post-Mubaraq regime, in
which the Moslem Brotherhood will form a new government and
make all agreements with Israel null and void. Under such circumstances,
Israel would be faced by no less than four potential frontlines:
Hezbollah in Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank ( under Hamas), Gaza
Hamastan and a hostile Egyptian Army equipped with the latest
US military equipment, matching its own arsenal.
Triggering a Spillover Effect?
But there is more at stake on the immediate outlook.
There is little doubt that Hamas's impressive gains will affect
many Arab nations in the Middle East and primarily those, with
a growing populating living under squalor and deprivation. Foremost
of these will be Jordan, which is populated by over sixty percent
Palestinians, many of which admirers of Hamas. Should these
rise against the Royal Hashemite Kingdom rule, which they already
tried in September 1970, this could prove disastrous to Israel
and the United States Middle East policy.
On Friday Muslim Brotherhood activists marched
in Amman to protest Israel's closure on Gaza, and call on Hamas
to resume suicide bombings. About 8,000 activists from Jordan's
mainstream Muslim Brotherhood took to the streets in support
of their ideological brethren, the Palestinian Hamas group.
Jordanian officials have been alarmed. They fear it broadens
the popularity of the Islamist movement among a majority of
poor Jordanians, many of them living in refugee camps and long
disenchanted with the US-led Middle East peace process. "Hamas
is winning more supporters every day because it represents the
conscience of the nation," Sheikh Hamza Mansour, a leading
Islamist deputy said.
There is however one bright element in these,
otherwise all bleak developments: Egypt actually helped Israel
on Wednesday, to complete the 2005 disengagement from the Gaza
Strip. Moreover, it clearly signaled Hamas' disengagement from
the insignificant and powerless, Ramallah leadership. The obvious
would be a long term solution under which the Gaza Strip will
be aligned with Cairo, while the West Bank- eventually to Jordan.
A two-state Palestine, in which a non-territorial connected
Gaza and West Bank can be functioning, is really unthinkable,
under such abnormal terms. As matters stand this week, it seems
logical, that further talks with the 'impotent' Abbas-Fayad
team, which is not even ruling the West Bank, is a sheer waste
of effort for Israel, which should now concentrate to find a
viable solution to the new challenges - which are facing its
security.
President Bush's Annapolis Palestine statehood
dream seems no more than wishful thinking under the new circumstances.
It is high time for the Washington administration, to wake up
to Mid Eastern realities and discard their pipe dream policies,
which have already backfired on every futile attempt. Why should
Israel not start thinking on its own and decide what's best
for it. It certainly would not be a "Two -Palestine"
state.