|

Return to current Issue
Back Issues: 1-04, 2-04,
3-04, 4-04,
1-05, 2-05,
3-05, 1-06
Topics & Features:
Armored Fighting Vehicles
C4ISR / Wireless
Networking
Combat Aircraft
Electronic Warfare
Fire Support
Future Combat Systems
Homeland Defense
Infantry / Urban Warfare
Logistics & support
Naval Systems
Net Centric Warfare
Precision Strike
Protection & Survivability
Spec-Ops, Counter Terror
Training and
Simulation
Unmanned Systems
Defense Exhibitions
RSS News Feed

|
Infantry Systems at
Eurosatory 2004
|
< Page
8
of 9 pages > |
|
Recent combat lessons reemphasized the lack of availability in
weapon systems suitable for urban warfare. Among infantry systems on
display at Eurosatory 2004, were many familiar models were modified
for urban environment combat.
Many programs are currently underway with different armies, to
replace, improve or add anti-structure weapons capability to their
infantry units. Current shoulder fired missiles and rockets are
designed primarily to defeat tanks and armored vehicles, but
inadequate when fired against brick walls or fortified concrete
targets. Another deficiency of most current weapons is the fact that
they cannot be fired from enclosures, such as rooms or bunkers,
rendering the user vulnerable to enemy fire. Dedicated
anti-structure weapons should give the infantry soldier capability
to defeat buildings, bunkers or fortifications, a task previously
provided only by heavier artillery or direct fire from tank guns.
There are various types of anti-structure weapons. Two programs are
currently in advanced stages – the US Marine Corps is evaluating two
types of weapons for its Follow-On To SMAW (FOTS) program, which is
expected to be followed by similar program to be launched by the US
Army. The systems are under development at Lockheed Martin (teamed
with IMI, based on the
Shipon design) and General Dynamics (teamed with Dynamit Nobel
and RAFAEL, based on the
Panzerfaust
design). FOTS is designed for ranges of 10 – 500 meters in urban or
open terrain, and be capable of operation from confined spaces. The
weapon should be effective as an anti-structure, anti-tank weapon,
against soft targets and means to force man-sized openings in triple
line brick walls. The Israeli Army is expected to follow the US
decision after system selection is announced.
A British Army requirement for a similar system with a weight of
less than 10 kg and an effective range of at least 200 meters, is
expected to be available for operational use by 2009. Both Dynamit
Nobel Defense and versions of the Saab Bofors Dynamics are competing
on this program. Saab Bofors Dynamics offer two weapon's families
compatible with these requirements, based on the
AT4 weapon and
M3 Carl Gustaf
weapons. Companies currently developing or offering such weapons
include the Russian Basalt, developed of the
RPG-7, Dynamit Nobel with
the Panzerfaust
weapon, the new anti-structure version of IMI
Shipon, IMI also
develops with Lockheed Martin a special weapon for the US Marine
Corps Follow-on to SMAW program, a program which RAFAEL is also
competing on. RAFAEL has also developed the Wallbuster and
MPM90
multi-purpose weapons.
|
|
Start -
Previous -
Next |
|
|