The total cost of the program is currently estimated at $160
billion. The lead systems integrator team (led by Boeing and
SAIC) is contracted $21 billion for FCS System Development
and Demonstration (SDD) phase spanning 11 years, from 2003
through 2014. Unlike individual programs of record, FCS is
designed as an integrated system of systems, and the aggregate
contract cost is not broken out by either individual pieces
or platforms. One of the most innovative and essential elements
of the program is that all of the systems have been designed
from the outset to work together seamlessly.
Army officials said they have adopted a phased development
approach for FCS. This plan allows the Army to deploy the
most mature and urgently required elements, while maintaining
other systems in developmental phase, allowing the resolution
of problems and technical challenges without disrupting the
Army’s entire FCS modernization effort. There are three
planned 'Spinout' phases for the program – Unattended
sensors and small unmanned vehicles are included in the first
Spinout. Sensors, active protection systems, a larger unmanned
system and the FCS Battle Command Network are candidates for
the second and third Spinouts.
The
FCS family of vehicles is introducing many new capabilities
to the Army. One of the most obvious, is the introduction
of electrical propulsion for combat vehicles. "Every
Manned Ground Vehicle (MGV), is going to be hybrid electric,"
According to FCS Program Manager Maj. Gen. Charles Cartwright,
during a session at the Association of the U.S. Army's Institute
of Land Warfare Winter Symposium and Exposition, each of the
FCS Manned Ground Vehicles (MGV) will have an electrical power
generation supporting 420 kilowatts, required to support the
hybrid-electric propulsion and myriad of electronics systems
on board. All eight MGV types will be powered by electric
motors providing the traction drive. The motors will be powered
by batteries, which are charged by side mounted high-power-density
diesel generators. As technology matures, the diesel engine
will be replaced by fuel cells for power generation, Cartwright
said. The vehicle also uses active suspension system facilitating
increased speed and agility and cross-country mobility, negotiating
vertical and trench obstacles.

The first prototype of the Non Line Of Sight Cannon (NLOS-C),
the lead vehicle in the FCS family of manned platforms is
already in production; it is the first of five prototypes
to be tested by the army beginning to be delivered this year.
Another vehicle type, well underway is the Mounted Combat
System (MCS). This vehicle will be the 'tank' of the FCS unit.
MCS will have a crew of three - a commander/driver (common
crew) and a gunner. The vehicle will carry a lightweight,
low-recoil 120mm cannon, firing standard (line of sight) and
beyond line of sight (MRM type) ammunition. The firing platform
for the program's Mounted Combat System 120mm cannon will
enter production soon.
Elements
of the common sensors to be used with each of the FCS MGVs
were shown at AUSA Winter. The Multi-Function Radio Frequency
system (MFRF) and Medium Range EO Infrared sensor System (MREO),
both developed by Raytheon, are part of the sensor suite used
on all FCS vehicles. These RF/EO elements will operate as
'networked sensors' connected through the C4ISR interface
computer to provide the crew with real-time situational awareness,
surveillance and targeting data. The same data could also
be shared across the FCS combat team over the Common Operating
Picture (COP) generated by the FCS 'system of systems' networking
infrastructure.
Beside
this family of vehicles, the FCS combat unit will field a
number of unmanned systems, optimized for different combat
roles. The largest unmanned element is the Multifunction Utility/Logistics
and Equipment vehicle, (MULE), which was selected to be one
of the candidates for the third technology 'SpinOff' scheduled
for the next decade. This 2.5 ton unmanned ground vehicle
(UGV) is designed to support dismounted and air-assault elements
of FCS' unit of action. There are three MULE versions in the
planning - all are built by Lockheed Martin. These versions
share a common mobility platform equipped with unique 6x6
independent articulated suspensions, in-hub electrical motors
for each wheel, and a new suspension system enabling the MULE
to negotiate rough terrain, far exceeding that of vehicles
utilizing conventional suspension systems. The MULE will be
equipped with one of three mission equipment packages –
a transport, weapon and sensor/carrier and countermine platform.
Two of the ground sensors are already in an advanced stage.
The urban Unattended Ground Sensor (U-UGS) is designed to
be a "left behind" asset for constant, 24-7 surveillance.
Soldiers could leave an UUGS in a house that they cleared,
and thereby eliminate the need for a Soldier to stay behind
and monitor that structure. The UUGS would alert the Soldiers
to the re-emergence of enemy combatants or insurgents.
Other
unattended systems include the Tactical UGS (TUGS) –
these 'left behind' assets are designed to support intelligence,
surveillance and reconnaissance operations, providing persistent
presence in area of interest to the unit. Two classes of UGS
are in development – an urban and a tactical unmanned
ground sensor. According to Gen. Cartwright, both have been
delivered to the Army Evaluation Task Force at Ft. Bliss for
Soldier Evaluation. Recent exercises conducted at Ft. Bliss
also involved the Small Unmanned Ground Vehicle, (SUGV), and
the 'Class I' Unmanned Aerial System (UAS). According to Gregg
Martin, vice president and program manager, 25 SUGV and the
11 Class 1 UAS, (called Block 0) were delivered and are being
used for testing, "We’ll deliver the rest of those
new FCS systems in the April timeframe; they will then go
through a Soldier evaluation around July." said Martin.
When the Army adjusted the FCS program, it dropped two unmanned
aerial systems from the FCS systems lineup. As a result, specific
roles, such as target designation functions (by laser) are
to be integrated with the Class 1. Since the vehicle's small
size and limited payload capacity were inadequate for the
new payload, the MAV required redesign to accommodate a bigger
engine to account for the additional weight. The Class IV
UAV, a joint Army-Navy program, will take delivery of its
sensor package within the next two years, Martin said.
The software backbone of FCS is the 'System of Systems Common
Operating Environment' (SOSCOE), a key element of the FCS
network service layer that will be the operating system driving
all FCS elements. "We're at roughly 70 percent complete
on the application build off of SoSCOE," Martin said.
SOSCOE is "performing very well on the application side.
We're about 40 percent through our software development, so
we just completed integration of Build 1, which accounts for
about a third of the software. The second phase (Build 2)
will make another third of the software, and is broken into
two parts, the first is scheduled to start to drop in the
April 08 timeframe, and start the integration process throughout
the summer.
Progress is made on the FCS network which is addressed in
five specific layers: sensors, applications, services, transport
and standards. In the transport layer, the Joint Tactical
Radio System (JTRS) ground mobile radios (GMR) is the element
required to interface and work with existing forces using
current technology. "On radio side we have GMRs out in
the field, working well," Martin said. Current systems
are pre-engineering developmental models and will be followed
by more mature systems in late 2009. Other JTRS radios to
be included in the system are handheld, manpack, and small
form-fit radios that will be integrated into the various unmanned
systems. Currently the Small Form Fit (HMS) radion is being
integrated with the Class 1 MAV with testing scheduled to
begin in Summer 2008.