Wednesday, September 18, 2024
More
    Home Blog Page 352

    ARX20 Remotely Controlled Weapon Station

    The ARX20 remotely controlled weapon station (RWS) developed and built by Nexter mounts the 20mm 10M621 automatic gun and fires 20×102 NATO ammunition at a rate of 750 rounds per minute. The new weapon station offers greater range and effect, compared to common RWS operating 12.7mm weapons while offering reduced weight and improved compactness, compared to equivalent 25-30mm turrets. Nexter maintains that the 20mm gun is particularly effective in asymmetric warfare operations, when engaging vehicle mounted, heavily gunned threats (14.5 / 23mm).

    The turret has 100 rounds in the ammunition stowage. It traverses at full 360 degrees at a rate exceeding 60 degrees per second, thus completing a full circle in about six seconds. According to Nexter, the gyro stabilized mount can be operated and fired on the move and engage targets with effective range of up to 2,000 meters. The total system’s weight is 270 kg.

    Armed Robotic Vehicle (ARV)

    The Armed Robotic Vehicle (ARV), an integral part of the U.S. Army’s Future Combat Systems’ (FCS) robotic forces is under development at BAE Systems in Santa Clara, Calif. ARV is currently in the System Design and Development (SDD) phase, conducted by BAE Systems’ Santa Clara, Calif. The company is planning to test the first prototypes in 2010, with fielding to FCS-equipped BCTs scheduled for 2012-2014.

    The semi-autonomous ARV is the largest unmanned ground vehicle planned for the FCS program. It is expected to become an integral element within platoon and companies of FCS-equipped Brigade Combat Teams. A pair of ARVs will be transportable in a single C-130 airplane. Both platforms will be equipped with Autonomous Navigational System (ANS) and Aided Target Recognition (ATR) providing the robotic vehicle with the capability to operate semi-autonomously with minimal input from the operator.

    Troops will deploy and control the ARVs at extended ranges. The ARV will be controlled from operator crew stations located inside manned ground vehicles or by FCS-Land Warrior-equipped dismounted soldiers, using ARV remote control devices. The core technologies enabling semi-autonomous operate will allow one soldier to remotely control all aspects of the vehicle. The ARVs will feature additional capabilities including chemical detection, anti-tampering, and battle command and communications equipment.

    Two versions of ARV are planned, a reconnaissance, surveillance and target acquisition platform (ARV-R) and an assault platform (ARV-A). The two variants will share a common chassis.

    ARV-A

    ARV Assault is designed to accompany FCS platoons equipped with Infantry Carrier Vehicles (ICV). The vehicle will weigh 9.3 tons, have a length of 237″ (602 cm), hull width of 99″ (251 cm) and height of 96.5″ (245 cm). The vehicle will mount anti-tank missiles, an automatic cannon and a high-rate-of-fire, suppressive machine gun. The assault variant will features an electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) sensor.

    ARV-R

    The ARV-R (RSTA) variant will be assigned to FCS platoons equipped with Mounted Combat Systems and Reconnaissance and Surveillance manned ground vehicles. The mission payload to be used by the ARV-R will be the Reconnaissance, Surveillance and Target Acquisition (RSTA) sensor suite, providing long-range standard and thermal imagery, as well as laser targeting capability. The ARV-R will feature a RSTA suite mounted on a telescoping mast; it will carry a cannon for self defense, will have the capability to disperse unattended ground sensors and conduct battle damage assessments. It will have a length of 76″, (447 cm), significantly shorted than the ARV-A

    Antey-2500 (S-300V / SA-12 / SA-23)

    Surface to Air Missile System / Almaz

    The Antey 2500 (S-300V) Mobile Universal Air & Missile Defense System (known by NATO Code Names SA-12) is produced by the Russian Almaz-Antey concern and offered as a mobile anti-aircraft and missile defense system. Unlike the Favorit, this system is transported by tracked vehicles and has considerable cross-country mobility. It consists of an array of subsystems including, radars, a command post, communications equipment, and several types of interceptor missiles. This system uses long range, all altitude, all weather, mobile universal surface-to-air missiles to protect mobile forces and fixed sites. The system is effective against tactical, theater and medium-range ballistic missiles, low altitude cruise missiles, fixed and rotary wing aircraft and UAVs. The system uses two types of interceptor missiles.

    The 9M83ME (Type I, also known by NATO code name SA-12A Gladiator) missile can be used against short and medium range ballistic missiles (range up to 1,100 km, velocity of 3,000 m/sec) and aircraft at short to medium ranges (up to 75 km) and altitudes up to 25 km. The Gladiator reaches a maximum speed of 1,700 m/sec. The 9A82ME (Type II, also known by NATO code name SA-12B Giant) missile can be used against medium range ballistic missiles (MRBM ranges are up to 2,500 km, and velocities of up to 4,500 m/sec) and similar targets at ranges up to 200 km and altitudes up to 30 km. This missile has a maximum speed of 2,600 m/sec. The Antey 2500 system is comprised of an early warning radar, one or more sector scanning radars, a command post, and one or more multi channel missile guidance units. The firing units are comprised of mobile tracked missile loader/launchers loaded with four Type-I missiles or launcher-only units with 2 Type II missiles. Typical launch unit groups consist of either medium range interceptor launchers, or combined medium and long range missiles.

    Moscow is also stepping into an existing market void with an upgraded version of the Almaz S-300 Air and Missile Defense System. The basic system has already been purchased by China, Vietnam and Cyprus, which later transferred their system to Greece. Most recently, an S-300 system was sold to Algeria as part of a large weapons export transaction. Sales negotiations are currently underway with Iran and Syria is also interested in the system. The upgraded system is intended to be interoperable with NATO’s integrated systems. (Previously Greece had claimed that the TOR-M1 was unable to operate with other air defense systems.) An interoperable system could further promote interest in the integrated S-300/ Tor M-1 system, which is already being considered by Iran and Algeria. Turkey is also reported to be interested in the S-300 and is evaluating it in competition with the Israeli Arrow. Russia is currently working on integrating the Russian made Tor M-1 and S-300 PMU-1 systems into a unified air defense system.

    Armoured Mortar System II (AMS II)

    BAE Systems Royal Ordnance Defence in partnership with General Dynamics Land Systems has designed the turreted 120mm mortar. Based on an operational analysis performed at the RO Defence center Shrivenham which recognised the changing operational demand for tactical fire support doctrine, a low-weight and cost-effective platform mounting a breech-loaded 120mm mortar system was conceived. The result was the 2.5 ton AMS II mounted on light and medium armoured, wheeled or tracked armour vehicles, allowing strategic air portability.

    The AMS II has a single smoothbore breech-loading 120mm mortar weapon, capable of firing a full range of munitions to 10,000m. Claimed neutralising fire mission on target is 15 seconds, from vehicle stop, with 13 rpm engagement rate. The AMS II has point target capability for direct fire up to 1200m. Add-on ballistic modular armour suites, can upgrade the vehicle protection if required. Sofar, 73 AMS have been delivered to the Saudi Arabian National Guard where they are mounted on 8 x 8 LAV chassis.

    Apache Modular Aircraft Survivability Equipment (AMASE)

    Northrop Grumman recently tested a pod mounted laser Directional Infrared Countermeasures (DIRCM) carried on a Dutch AH-64D Apache helicopter against heat seeking missiles, meeting all the requirements set by the Dutch Air Force and the manufacturer.

    This was the first application of a self-contained, removable DIRCM countermeasure pod on a military helicopter. The tests are part of the Royal Netherlands Air Force Apache Modular Aircraft Survivability Equipment (AMASE) upgrade of the infrared missile protection systems used by its AH-64D attack helicopters. Each helicopter will carry two DIRCM-modified pods.

    XM-25 – Individual Airburst Weapon System

    Individual Airburst Weapon System is currently under development and intended to address the capability gap of defeating defilade targets. The weapon has the capability to hit point targets at a distance of 500 meters and area targets at 700 meters. 25mm munitions currently in development include High Explosive Air-Burst (HEAB), armor piercing, door breaching, anti-personnel, and two types of non-lethal munitions – blunt and agent dispersing airburst.

    XM25 will be able to set the fuse of each round to explode over the target, to create maximum effect. After placing the aimpoint on the target and activating the laser rangefinder, the system calculates the range to the target, and converts it to time of flight for fuse setting. XM25 will utilize the XM116 integral fire control system, which will include day and night channels, laser rangefinder, fuse setter, compass, ballistic computer and an internal display. At AUSA 2006 the XM116 sight was displayed by L3 (Formerly Brashear).

    A predecessor of the XM-25 was the XM29 Objective Individual Combat Weapon (OICW), which was developed as a future replacement to both t M16/M4 and M203 individual weapon system. The program was cancelled, as the U.S. Army favored a more capable 25mm ammunition, which required the use of a separate weapon rifle and grenade launcher.

    AGM-88E Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM)

    AARGM is a supersonic, air-launched tactical missile that will be integrated on the F/A-18 C/D, F/A-18 E/F, EA-18G and Tornado IDS/ECR aircraft. The missile is also being designed to be compatible with the EA-6B and U.S. and Allied F-16, and F-35 JSF aircraft. Its advanced multi-sensor system, including a Millimeter Wave (MMW) terminal seeker, advanced digital Anti-Radiation Homing (ARH) receiver and a GPS/INS, is capable of rapidly engaging traditional and advanced enemy air defense targets as well as non-radar time-sensitive strike targets.

    The AARGM MMW seeker can operate in concert with the ARH to counter RF shutdown tactics or in a stand-alone mode to discriminate non-emitting time sensitive targets. AARGM is a network-enabled weapon that directly receives tactical intelligence information via an embedded data link and provides near real-time Weapon Impact Assessment (WIA) reports.

    In May 2007 of this year, AARGM demonstrated its significant capability by successfully completing a development-phase guided missile test firing at the Naval Air Warfare Center China Lake, California test range. The success of the AARGM System Development and Demonstration (SD&D) phase builds on the tradition of success established with the Quick Bolt Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) and AARGM Advanced Technology Demonstration (ATD) phases of the program. During these earlier program phases, AARGM was seven of seven in a series of successful missile firing tests. The AARGM program plans a series of additional launches during the SD&D phase and expects to begin Low Rate Initial Production in FY08.
    Alliant Techsystems (NYSE:ATK) and German defense contractor MBDA LFK-Lenkflugkorpersysteme GmbH will jointly pursue potential international sales of the AGM-88E Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM). The cooperation focuses particularly on the interest of the German Ministry of Defense in product improvement of the AARGM and additional derivatives of the AGM-88 High-speed Anti-Radiation Missile (HARM). Italy has already partnered with ATK on the AARGM two years ago.

    The U.S. Navy, and the Italian Air Force performed two missile firing tests of the AGM-88E Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM) on August 2008. The tests were performed at the Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, as part of the missile’s Operational Assessment, preceding a forthcoming ‘Milestone C’ Decision to begin Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP). The recent test involved an operationally realistic scenario, where AARGM’s demonstrated its lethality against modern, advanced air defense systems employing shutdown tactics.

    AGM-88E Completes System Development and Demonstration (SDD) program

    Alliant Techsystems, the U.S. Navy and the Italian Air Force successfully completed development testing (DT) of the AGM-88E Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM) in August 2009. The eights and final AARGM DT shot was launched from a U. S. Navy FA-18C Hornet in a scenario designed to test the missile’s capabilities to maneuver and perform in a short time-of-flight profile under heavily counter-measured conditions. During missile flight, AARGM successfully detected, identified, and located an enemy air defense unit (ADU) using its anti-radiation-homing (ARH) receiver. Additionally the missile demonstrated its designed ability to minimize collateral damage and friendly fire by navigating clear of pre-planned impact avoidance zones. In the terminal phase, AARGM used its multi-mode sensor suite to overcome advanced target countermeasures, accurately guiding towards and directly hitting the enemy ADU target. AARGM Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) commenced in December 2008. Once Fleet IOC is established in November 2010, AARGM will be the only tactical extended-range, supersonic, multi-role strike weapon in U.S. and Italian inventory.

    Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)

    Lockheed Martin has been awarded a $619 million contract to begin production of two lead systems of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Weapon System scheduled for fielding by 2009. Once fielded, THAAD will network with other systems and sensors to provide the layered missile defense capability required for the future. The program is managed by the Missile Defense Agency (MDA).

    THAAD is designed to defend U.S. troops, allied forces, population centers and critical infrastructure against short- to intermediate range ballistic missiles. THAAD comprises a fire control and communications system, interceptors, launchers and a radar. The THAAD interceptor uses hit-to-kill technology to destroy targets, and is the only weapon system that engages threat ballistic missiles at both endo- and exo-atmospheric altitudes. The contract includes funding for 48 interceptors, six launchers and two fire control and communications units.

    In 2006 the THAAD weapon system transitioned from development to production, and conducted two successful flight tests. The first test demonstrated the entire weapon system, utilizing all major elements of the system and proving its capability. A second test last year resulted in the intercept of a Hera unitary target.

    The THAAD System:

    The THAAD interceptor uses hit-to-kill technology to destroy targets, and is the only weapon system that engages threat ballistic missiles at both endo- and exo-atmospheric altitudes. The “kill vehicle” uses an infrared (thermal) imaging seeker, built by BAE Systems, to detect and track the targeted warhead at the terminal phase, when the THAAD is homing in for a ‘Hit to Kill’ maneuver. The kill vehicle maintains maneuverability using the Divert and Attitude Control System (DACS) supplied by from Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR). The system provided roll control of the missile during booster flyout and maneuver of the kill vehicle using small, liquid-fueled thrusters that allow the interceptor to alter direction and attitude.

    Another key element in the system is the phased array radar, developed by Raytheon IDS. The THAAD radar is capable of search, threat detection, classification, discrimination and precision tracking at extremely long ranges. This radar acquires the target, discriminates the lethal object from other debris, provides track and discrimination data to the fire control which engages the target and initializes the launch sequence. Target acquisition and tracking are also performed by the interceptor’s seeker, through the terminal phase of the flight. The system communicated with the in-flight THAAD interceptor providing target updates during the flight.
    PMRF is the world’s largest instrumented multi-environment range capable of supporting surface, subsurface, air, and space operations simultaneously. The THAAD program began flight testing in November 2005 at White Sands Missile Range (WSMR), NM. Three successful THAAD tests were conducted at WSMR including the intercept of a unitary target in July 2006. The first tests conducted in 2007 (January and April) were the first in a series of intercepts to be tested at the Pacific Range (PMRF) scheduled for the next 24 months leading to operational fielding in fiscal year 2009.

    Nanotech-enabled lithium-ion batteries

    Technology Comparison

    New nanotech-enabled lithium-ion batteries developed by the US based A123Systems company deliver up to 10X longer cycle life, 5X power gains and five minute charge time. The new battery performance was validated by independent testing at Motorola and government research labs. The new technology uses nanoscale electrode technology, licensed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The new family of batteries is targeted at applications that require high power, high levels of safety, and longer life. Initial implementation of the new technology is aimed at the cordless power tools market. For hybrid electric/gasoline cars, currently using nickel-metal-hydride batteries, A123 believes its new lithium-ion batteries could provide equivalent power density and discharge rate at 20% of the weight. Other applications include advanced medical devices, hybrid electric vehicles, mobility products, robotics, and consumer electronics.

    Technology Comparison

    A-10C Warthog Upgrade for the U.S. Air National Guard

    The A-10 Prime Team led by Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) has received a $48 million award from the U.S. Air Force to produce 107 Precision Engagement (PE) modification kits for the Under the Precision Engagement (PE) upgrading program, the A-10 close air support fighter is modified into the A-10C.

    From a clear weather, visual only attack aircraft the A-10C is transformed into an all-weather, multi-mission precision weapons delivery platform, capable of employing the Joint Direct Attack Munition and the Wind Corrected Munitions Dispenser. The program is integrating advanced sensors, a datalink and the LITENING AT and Sniper XR targeting pods onto the aircraft, which will boost pilot situational awareness, targeting capabilities, survivability and communication with other coalition ground and air elements.

    Comprising hardware and software upgrades, each installed kit transforms the legacy A-10A aircraft enabling precision weapons capability. Each PE kit consists of a new cockpit instrument panel with two 5×5 inch multi-function color displays, a new stick grip and right throttle to provide true hands-on-throttle and-stick fingertip control of aircraft systems and targeting pod functionality, and six pylons upgraded to ‘smart’ weapons capability. A new computer called the Central Interface Control Unit manages the avionics and the integrated Digital Stores Management System (DSMS), which controls weapons functionality.

    Lockheed Martin is expected to deliver a total of 356 kits over five years for an estimated $168 million. Kit production will run to 2008 with kit installation scheduled to go to 2009. To date, 21 aircraft have been modified at Ogden Air Logistics Center at Hill Air Force Base, Utah; 356 total aircraft are to receive the upgrades, constituting the entire fleet, including active duty, Reserve and Air National Guard. Flight testing of the A-10C aircraft’s DSMS and digital map is taking place at Eglin Air Force Base, FL, and at Nellis Air Force Base, NV. Maryland Air National Guard 175th Wing at Warfield Air National Guard Base in Baltimore will be the first unit to convert to the modified aircraft.

    As A-10 prime contractor and systems integrator under the direction of the Air Force A-10 program office (508th Aircraft Sustainment Squadron), Lockheed Martin Systems Integration – Owego leads a team composed of BAE Systems, Johnson City, NY; Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio TX; and Northrop Grumman, St. Augustine, FL.

    Israel’s immunity gesture will restore terror infrastructure in West Bank

    The Palestinian terror infrastructure in the West Bank has been embroiled in an existential ordeal for at least a year: The IDF’s successful nightly targeted killings, which employed the element of surprise, have completely impeded its operations.

    Instead of plotting terror attacks against Israel or against Israelis, Fatah activists, particularly those operating within the ranks of the al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades, as well as Jihad activists are busy seeking refuge, escaping and living underground in constant fear of the IDF. This is one of the IDF’s key successes in the war against terror that has completely shattered what has remained of the Palestinian intifada.

    The collapse of the terror infrastructures was very perplexing for the Palestinians because albeit it being originally established against Israel, it also represented Fatah’s strength against Hamas. Fatah demanded a truce from Israel that would also include the West Bank (and in exchange guaranteed progress in the Gilad Shalit affair – although it has no control over his destiny) and in any case asked for immunity for hundreds of persecuted activists.


    Now Fatah activists will get what they wanted from the Israeli government. The West Bank will once again become an immune paradise; anti-Israel terror will be restored without interference and will pose a serious threat to Israeli society, which has experienced relative stability and calm in recent years.

    Disengage from Palestinians

    True, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert wants to bolster Fatah and the nationalist stream vis-Ă -vis Hamas, yet these very same people also perpetrate terror acts against Israel. The IDF knows from the experience it gained in prisoner release deals with Ahmed Jibril and Hizbullah that 80 percent of released Palestinians, all of whom had made a commitment not to be involved in terror, immediately resumed their terror acts against Israel.

    In 2005, for example, a few prominent prisoners were released as a gesture to Mahmoud Abbas – yes, that very same Abbas. Within a month they were apprehended for preparing the infrastructure for firing rockets at Israeli communities in the West Bank, no less. They even climbed a rung in their acts of terror.

    Why does this happen? For released prisoners, terror is livelihood, a way of life, their honor and self determination. Moreover, those released within the framework of a prisoner deal must prove that they have not changed; they must reaffirm their status, and the only way to do so is by means of perpetrating terror acts against Israel.
    Perhaps the Israeli government has still not internalized the disengagement mentality that is required here, because any involvement in Palestinian issues on our part always ends in a big bang. What we think bolsters Mahmud Abbas usually serves to weaken him and vice versa. Moreover, will one immunity deal or another change the face of the huge conflict raging between the nationalist stream and political Islam in the Arab world?

    As we are not familiar with the rules and as real risks to Israel’s security are at stake, such gestures should be avoided as should involvement in the Palestinian world – which is entirely delusional as far as we are concerned.

    Should Israel worry about convening the Palestinian national council? Should it bring Naif Hawatmeh here? What’s going on? Have we returned to the delusional years of Oslo? These are delusions whose time has passed, and the Israeli government would do well to avoid the self-deception, the involvement and the ensuing disappointment that will inevitably occur when it all explodes in its face.

    Israel would do well to announce it will no longer interfere in Palestinian life. Not in punishing Hamas nor in compensating Fatah; not in unnecessary targeted killings nor in delusional prisoner releases.

    We should disengage from the Palestinian world, for better or for worse, and focus on ourselves alone.

    The writer, Dr. Guy Bechor is head of Middle East Studies
    at the Interdisciplinary Centre in Herzliya. More publications and commentary articles by Dr. Bechor are available at: www.gplanet.co.il

    The Jordanian Badr Brigade – Can it Save Abu Mazen’s West Bank?

    Last month, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (aka Abu Mazen) insinuated that he would like to ask Jordan to dispatch the so-called Badr Brigade to bolster his security forces in the West Bank. The military unit known as Badr Brigade, is a 2000 man military trained unit, under command of the Royal Jordanian Army, but manned entirely by Palestinian Fatah loyalists. Abbas expected PM Ehud Olmert to approve entry of Palestinian Badr Brigade forces to preserve his control over West Bank; The Palestinian leader and also requested Israel’s permission to transfer dozens of armored vehicles from Egypt, or Jordan to Palestinian territories to preserve his control in the West bank territories.

    Israel’s defense community officials said last Saturday, that a request had been made by Chairman Mahmoud Abbas to allow a brigade of Palestinian soldiers trained in the Jordanian army, the Badr Brigade, to cross the Jordan River and take up security duties in the West Bank, but that the presence of these troops would interfere with IDF activity in the area, the officials said.

    In fact, the presence of Jordanian forces mingling in with IDF activities in the confines of the West Bank terrorist refuges in the densely populated refugee camps needs highly professional experience and sensitive action to prevent serious conflagration with the non-combat civilian population. The IDF has gained valuable experience in such activities, which have already paid off handsomely to virtually nullify suicide attacks on their territory. Should “Jordanian outsiders” venture into similar operations, even if capable in doing so, it would immediately create an alienating confrontation, which could chase these loyal troops into the ranks of Abbas’s opposition, not to mention, entangle them in fighting with the IDF.

    This request, by Palestinian authorities is not the first. Prior to Hamas’ takeover of Gaza, Mahmoud Abbas asked that Badr forces be allowed entry to the Strip, but Israel refused. Analysts doubt, if the presence of these troops in Gaza would have stopped the Hamas offensive last month. It should be remembered, that nearly 40,000 armed Fatah loyalist security forces had been trained by US military instructors and equipped with thousands of US supplied weapons, scores of armored cars, all of which fell within days into the hands of Hamas, virtually without opposition.


    But in an unexpected surprise move, opposition leader Binyamin Netanyahu has expanded on his general call for Egyptian and Jordanian intervention in the PA, and says Jordan should send over its PLO manned brigade.

    Speaking with Israeli reporters in Washington on last month’s visit, the former Prime Minister said that Fatah chief Abu Mazen cannot be expected to maintain law and order in Judea and Samaria on his own. He said that Jordan should dispatch its Palestinian force, known as the Badr Brigade. “The Badr Brigade, which is Jordanian-Palestinian, can create law and order,” Netanyahu said.

    Analysts assume the logic behind Netanyahu’s proposal being to roll the problem of the Arabs of Judea and Samaria onto Jordan’s doorstep. Netanyahu is known as a clever politician, who usually does not speak out of turn in such sensitive matters. He clearly understands that King Abdullah II is sensing the heat of the events in Lebanon and Iraq, on his northern border. He realizes that if an Islamic revolution makes its way from Gaza to Judea and Samaria — on his eastern border — he will be placed in an Islamic pincer that will quickly close in on his Hashemite Kingdom. Earlier this year, the king already warned of the “Shi’ite Crescent” threatening the Sunni nations in the Middle East, a signal, which already reverberated throughout the moderate Arab region. The Israeli government shares Jordanian concern over both Sunni and Shi’ite terrorist networks and both countries see Iran as a long-term strategic threat.

    Preserving the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan’s last hope is linked to Israel, and not for the first time. During the so-called 1970 “Black September” PLO riots, backed by Syria and Iraq, the Jordanian Army came under two-pronged attack from its former allies and nearly succumbed, when Israel intervened to save King Hussein’s Hashemite household by concentrating its forces on Syria’s border. The late king, reiterated Israel’s gesture, by secretly informing then Prime Minister Golda Meir that Egypt and Syria were about to attack on October 1973. Unfortunately, Mrs Meir failed to respond in time to head the King’s warning!

    Formally, the Badr Brigade was one of four brigades of the Palestine Liberation Army (PLA) established by the PLO in various Arab countries (including the Ain Jalut Brigade in Egypt, the Qadissya Brigade in Iraq, the Hittin and Yarmuk Brigades in Syria, and the Badr Brigade in Jordan). Over time, however, the PLO lost control as these brigades came under the sway of their host countries and, in Jordan, they became a part of the regular Jordanian army while still keeping their Palestinian allegiance.

    The Palestinian Liberation Army (PLA) was set up as the military wing of the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) in 1964, with the mission of fighting Israel, but has never been under effective PLO control, but rather controlled by its host governments. At its largest peak, the PLA comprised eight brigades with a total of some 12,000 uniformed soldiers. They were equipped with small arms, mortars, rocket launchers and wheeled armored vehicles and even T-34 tanks. However, the PLA was never deployed in the form of a single fighting unit for the PLO, but instead utilized battalion-size elements as a kind of auxiliary force by its controller governments. The PLA, which became a strong element in Shi’ite South Lebanon, equipped with a massive arsenal, was largely destroyed as a fighting force during the 1982 IDF invasion into Lebanon.

    PLA officers later became the core of the Palestinian National Guard, after the signing of the 1993 Oslo Accords, and allowed to re-enter the occupied territories to take up leadership positions in Arafat’s loyalist Fatah security forces. Unfortunately, many of them later side-stepped to bolster the anti-Israeli al Aqsa Martyr’s brigades, leading terrorist activities against Israeli civilians during the “second intifada”. Many of these were killed or captured during the 2002 “Defensive Wall” counter-terrorist offensive in the West bank, which virtually destroyed its infrastructure in one of the largest scale CT operations.

    Military experts familiar with the training standards of the Jordanian backed Badr Brigade troops and their leadership claim that their effectiveness in establishing law- and order throughout the Palestinian West Bank, not to mention, the Iranian/ Hezbollah/ al Qaeda backed Hamas in the Gaza strip is at best highly limited. These troops have never seen any action, apart of some training in anti-riot tactics. To set these against the war seasoned Hamas, or even Fatah affiliated combat groups, opposing Abu Mazen, seems quite senseless, as they will quickly be overwhelmed by years of tactical experience by the insurgents. Moreover, Abu Mazen can hardly claim to control the various townships in the West Bank. Major cities, like Jenin, Nablus, Bethlehem and Hebron are virtually controlled by local warlords, commanding highly effective forces. Their loyalty to the Ramallah authorities is questionable at best, but mostly highly suspicious to people at the helm. Even the highly venerable Yasir Arafat skipped his most widely anticipated stop in May 2002 to the war devastated Jenin refugee camp, when his helicopter was prevented from landing by hostile elements in the stronghold for Islamic militants.

    There is still no Palestinian direct communications link between Samaria in the North and Judea, in the South, with Israeli full in control of all major throughfares in Jerusalem. With the present security risk still high, Israel cannot afford to allow free-and uncensored traffic of Palestinian armed forces, even those loyal to Abu Mazen through Greater Jerusalem, pending infiltration of highly potent terrorist element into the Holy City. Under these complex circumstances what can a few thousand troops achieve that has not been tried before?

    Nevertheless, recently interviewed members of the Badr Brigade – they have kept their unit’s name – expressed their eagerness to project a new image of Palestinians. No longer brutal terrorists; not dust-caked guerrillas staging night raids across the Israeli border, just ordinary cops with polished boots and well-pressed uniforms, assisting in the splendidly routine business of maintaining law and order among their own people. But Wether those troops can bolster Abbas’ loyalist forces in keeping the chaos ridden West Bank and their Warlords under a new law-and order regime, setting a new era in Palestinian-Israeli relations remains highly dubious.

    Benefits of Laser Eye Surgery for the Warfighter

    Start < Page 8 0f 11 >

    Soldiers wearing prescription lenses are usually become more problematic with protective eyewear, due to the limited options and discomfort associated with wearing goggles and glasses (contact lenses are prohibited in theater). This problem has been solved partially, with the use of ‘optical inserts’ with some of the protective eyewear, however, these inserts may cause even more problems in combat situations, even when they are worn with ballistic eyewear. While the goggles themselves can survive an impact or even endure an IED blast, if the optical insert is not designed to endure the impact, it can shatter and cause even more damage, as it is located closer to the eye.

    For an increasing number of service members, laser eye surgery is not a cosmetic nor convenience issue. It is all about saving lives on the battlefield. The military has come a long way since 2000, when DoD first began allowing people with two common forms of laser eye surgery to enter the military with a medical waiver. People who had corrective eye surgery were previously ineligible for military service. That move was based largely on groundwork laid by the Navy. Naval Medical Center San Diego launched the military’s first refractive-surgery program in 1993, primarily serving Navy SEALS who had problems losing contacts or eyeglasses while parachuting or in the water.

    Laser refractive surgery is now permitted for all warfare communities within the Navy and Marine Corps. The Air Force Warfighter Photorefractive Keratectomy Program went active at the end of 2001. The Army’s first Warfighter Refractive Eye Clinic, at Fort Bragg, opened its doors in May 2000. The most common types of laser eye surgery offered are photorefractive keratectomy, or PRK, and laser in-situ keratomileusis, often referred to as LASIK. In the past some 80 percent of the patients chose PRK, a procedure that requires a slightly longer healing time but poses reduced risk of complication. In early November 2006 the US Navy allowed, for the first time, to four of its aviators to undergo LASIK surgery with the IntraLase method. Although LASIK is not yet officially approved in the U.S. military aviation community, this is a first step in that direction. In the past, concern about the harsh aviation environment has prevented the use of LASIK as a method to treat the eyes of military pilots, Dr Dello Russo explained. High altitude, dry air, and wind blast are just some of the extreme conditions that these pilots encounter, but years of LASIK trials on non-aviation personnel encouraged the Bureau of Naval Medicine.

    In this series Defense Update covers the following topics:

    Eyewear Protection for the Warfighter

    Start < Page 7 0f 11 >

    While the high death toll from roadside bombs in Iraq is well known, fragmentation explosions and blast effects are taking their toll among severe casualties. Frequent occurrences are eye injuries. According to Army medical records, 16% of the medical evacuations from combat zones since March 2003 have included serious eye injuries – compared to 9% in Vietnam and the 1990- 91 Gulf War. Yet, many of such eye injuries could be avoided with proper use of protective eyewear.

    Dust, low-velocity fragments, high velocity impact and laser radiation are posing significant threat to warfighters in combat and training. Yet, almost all ballistic injuries can be prevented by using polycarbonate shields currently available with spectacles and goggles. “It is imperative that commanders ensure that their soldiers use their protective eyewear whenever engaging in field tactical operations – in combat, security and training” a recent US Army research recommends. Yet, using any ‘performance eyewear’ is not enough, and could, sometime, be extremely hazardous. 

    Military medical professionals reminding troops that not all “ballistic eyewear” provides the same protection and some styles might pose more danger than defense. In fact, some brands have been banned by the military because they do not pass safety tests. Wearing protective eyewear designed for sports or ‘performance’ can result in combat-related eye injuries which could be avoided with tactical eyewear designed for combat.

    The solution to laser protection is more difficult since military lasers operate in different wavelengths that have to be addressed with specific filters. In theory, to be effective, the soldier will have to carry and install the appropriate filter according to a reading from a laser detector, prior to an attack. A more practical concept will deploy a multi-band filter that could sense and block specific threats as they are detected by the individual or the combat unit.

    The standard issue protective eyewear includes Ballistic Laser Protective Spectacles (BLPS), Special Protective Eyewear Cylindrical System (SPECS), and Sun, Wind and Dust Goggle (SWDG). The Army determined that when laser protection is required, soldiers should continue to use SPECS, BLPS, or SWDG at this time. However, when laser threat is not imminent, a wider range of more stylish protective eyewear is available for troops. These products are tested by the Army for durability and ballistic protection, has been approved for use and are now available for soldiers to choose from. All military approved, commercially available products offer ballistic and UV protection, and are available in clear and gray sunglass tainted lenses. While the new eyewear is offering modern design and attractive style, lens tints other than clear or gray are not authorized, including yellow, orange, rose, and others known as “blue blockers” as they degrade color recognition and therefore could have adverse effect on mission performance.

    Soldiers requiring prescription lenses for goggle applications also have more choice among several modern designs, including the Uvex XC spectacles, ESS ICE 2, Revision Sawfly and Body Specs Pistol models.

    ESS Land Operations and ESS Vehicle Operations may be used as alternatives to the standard SWDG for wear over prescription eyeglasses or, ESS Profile NVG goggle may be used with its designated prescription lens carrier. The Army stressed that wearing non approved spectacle or goggle may result in serious injury.

    You can check a partial list of approved tactical eyewear here.

    In this series Defense Update covers the following topics:

    U.S. Army Selects New Small UAS for Company-Level Operations

    0
    The U.S. Army has taken a significant step forward in modernizing its reconnaissance and surveillance capabilities at the company level. In a recent announcement, the Army revealed its selection of two Small Uncrewed Aircraft...

    Barracuda: A New Family of Low-Cost Autonomous Cruise Missiles from Anduril

    0
    Anduril Industries has recently introduced its new "Barracuda" family of autonomous cruise missiles, addressing air forces’ need for affordably increased stockpiles of precision weapons. The Barracuda missiles are currently in the company flight-testing phase....

    BAE Systems Australia Unveils an Uncrewed Collaborative Combat Vehicle – the ATLAS

    0
    BAE Systems Australia has introduced a wheeled uncrewed ground vehicle (UGV) designed to support dismounted and mechanized forces in combat. The Autonomous Tactical Light Armour System (ATLAS) Collaborative Combat Variant (CCV) is an 8x8...

    Defense-Update Weekly Summary

    0
    Dive into the latest global defense and military technology developments with Defense-Update Weekly News. Visit Defense-Update to dive deeper in this week's news: Highlights: New Russian EO/IR payload for drones Ukraine's "Dragon's Breath" FPV drones ...

    Kongsberg secures $95 Million JSM Order from Australia

    0
    The Norwegian KONGSBERG Defense company secured a $95 million contract to supply Joint Strike Missiles (JSM) for Australia's F-35A aircraft, enhancing the country's long-range strike capabilities. Australia joins Norway, Japan, and the United States...