Raytheon has developed an interactive mobile device called Raytheon Android Tactical System (RATS), designed for faster intelligence sharing, by efficiently delivering multimedia content to warfighters.
Raytheon Android Tactical System (RATS) employs an off-the-shelf mobile hand-held device powered by Google's Android operating system employing simple and intuitive graphical user interface to tap intelligence data from the Distributed Common Ground System Integration Backbone (DIB) directly to the warfighter at the lowest echelon, Photo: Raytheon.RATS device showing a geospatial persentation
According to Raytheon’s VP for Defense and Civil Mission Solutions Mark Bigham, RATS provides a ‘0last mile of connectivity’ to the warfighter, delivering images and full motion video. The system utilizes off the shelf commercial technologies enabling developers to rapidly adapt to new technology and changing requirements. The device disseminates vital intelligence data via from the Distributed Common Ground System (DCGS) Intelligence Backbone (DIB) system. Enabling users to search for and download information for instant use. Raytheon has demonstrated how the device provides the warfighter the ability to make decisions in seconds and minutes, rather than hours. The system could also employ mini-applications “wigets” for intelligence collection and analysis, including license plate reading, streaming video camera feeds and biometric collection (such as facial recognition).
The user-customized home page of the RATS provides easy access to the most commonly used applications. The device can also be loaded with 'widgets' mini-applications applied for specific tasks.Photos: Raytheon
The Swedish CV90 version proposed for FERS-SV by BAE Systems (top) and Spanish built Ascod 2, proposed by General Dynamics UK. Photos: BAE Systems and General Dynamics Europe.
General Dynamics and BAE Systems have both submitted bids to provide the British Army’s next generation of reconnaissance Armoured Fighting Vehicles (AFV). The winner of the £2bn first phase of the Future Rapid Effect System – Specialist Vehicles (FRES SV) vehicle is expected to be announced within 4-5 months, will replace the CVR(T) Scimitar, offering greatly improved protection, firepower and reconnaissance abilities.
In order to meet the tight delivery schedule, using a low-risk manufacturing approach based on proven vehicles, both bidders rely on foreign production facilities to manufacture the chassis – General Dynamics will use its Spanish based ASCOD production line while BAE Systems will utilize its Örnsköldsvik plant in Sweden.
The Swedish CV90 version proposed for FERS-SV by BAE Systems (top) and Spanish built Ascod 2, proposed by General Dynamics UK. Photos: BAE Systems and General Dynamics Europe.
Both vehicles will receive locally built turrets, the GD design selected a turret developed by Lockheed Martin INSYS while BAE system will utilize a turret designed in house. Both will mount the 40mm Case Telescopic cannon, already selected for the Warrior Lethality uplift program, offering superior firepower, having three times the explosive power of the current Rarden 30mm cannon mounted on the Warrior.
The General Dynamics team, led by General Dynamics UK, is offering a low-risk evolution of the Spanish designed ASCOD Infantry Fighting Vehicle, already in use with the Spanish and Austrian armies. GD UK plans to utilize General Dynamics UK’s indigenous Armored Fighting Vehicle integration center, based in South Wales and Gloucestershire for the processing of the vehicles. BAE Systems has also submitted its proposal, based on the latest version of its proven CV90 chassis mated with the MTIP2 turret, also proopsed for the Warrior Lethality Improvement Program (WLIP). For the British design the CV90 chassis has been shortened and given a lower profile. As with the competitor, the BAE System’s proposed vehicle will be mated with the turret at its UK facilities.
Above: The F-35B BF-1 first VTOL aircraft lands at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, where it is prepared for vertical landing flights commencing in 2010. Photo: Lockheed Martin
The first optimized conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) F-35 Lightning II aircraft made its fiest flight on Saturday, Nov. 14, 2009. This aircraft, called AF-1, is the fourth F-35 to begin flight operations. It incorporates many evolutionary improvements and updates derived from the test program of the first F-35 – the AA-1. The aircraft was assembled on the moving production line as the 31 Low Rate Initial Production aircraft now in assembly. The moving assembly line, designed to improve production quality and speed, is the first ever for a modern fighter. During the AF-1 assembly the line achieved the maximum production speed of 50 inches per hour.
The F-35 AF-1 takes off on its maiden flight November 14, 2009 from Lockheed Martin Ft. Worth airfield, TX. Photo: Lockheed Martin
Another event in the F-35 program was the transition of the F-35B The first Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II short takeoff/vertical landing (STOVL) stealth fighter arrived Sunday at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md., where it will conduct its first hovers and vertical landings through 2010. At its new location the aircraft will be supported by the F-35 Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS). This aircraft is the first F-35 to be sustained by ALIS – the worldwide support system that will monitor the prognostics and health of F-35s around the globe to ensure mission readiness. The F-35B is intended to replace the AV-8B STOVL fighters, F/A-18 strike fighters and EA-6B electronic attack aircraft in service with the U.S. Marine Corps, as well as the Harrier, and Sea Harrier in service with the Royal Air Force, Royal Navy and the Italian Air Force and Navy.
Facing picture: the System Design and Development test aircraft (SDD) testbed seen in flight with covers of the vertical fans opened. The picture below shows the same position on the aircraft during ground tests. Photos: Lockheed Martin.
BAE Systems has successfully flown the Mantis, largest fully autonomous unmanned aircraft ever to be built in the UK. The first flight took place October 21, 2009 in Woomera, South Australia. During subsequent flights, the twin-engine Mantis successfully completed a series of trials demonstrating the capability of the system and the potential of large unmanned systems to support future UK Ministry of Defence (MOD) operational needs. The trials have concluded the 19 month technology demonstration program, funded jointly by UK MOD and UK Industry.
The 20 meter wingspan Mantis is BAE Systems’ first all-electric aircraft. The system is intended to be easily deployable and can be broken down to fit into a military transport aircraft. Mantis is designed to be quickly reconfigured by introducing mission-specific “plug and play” elements in the mission system, and the ability to carry a wide range of sensors.
The Mantis will be able to carry multiple payloads performing wide area (radar, panoramic cameras) and narrow field (stabilized EO) payloads, performing intelligence gathering at long distances. In addition, it will be able to carry guided bombs and missiles for hunter-killer, interdiction or close-air support operations. The air vehicle is designed for fully autonomous operations, being able to execute its mission with a much reduced need for human intervention by understanding and reacting to its environment.
A close-up on the Mantis nose section, showing the main EO payload and two video/thermal cameras, providing forward view for flight monitoring, support auto-landing and could also provide input for future sense-and -avoid systems. Utilizing the fixed cameras in a forward position relieves the main payload for the reconnaissance mission. Photo: Defense Update by Noam Eshel
Such autonomy increases operational effectiveness allowing the user more focus on the mission without the usual concerns over vehicle control. It also reduces manpower requirements and the risk of accidents due to human error and the communications/data link requirements between the vehicle and the ground. Mantis shares a common UAS control infrastructure with other BAE Systems UAS’ such as Taranis and Herti. BAE partners on the program include Rolls-Royce, Qinetiq, GE Aviation, Meggit and Selex Galileo.
Originally BAE Systems and MOD were hopeful that the program could be continued further to demonstrate more of the operational capabilities, however, due to the budgetary shortage and the fact that the Reaper has already been fielded with the RAF, the chances of Mantis being funded through the full scale development and fielding is remote. Yet, the ability to fully integrate the UAV with the UK’s C4I infrastructure could significantly enhance the British sovereign operational capabilities. Sharing a common UAS control infrastructure with other BAE Systems UAS, such as Taranis and HERTI is also a strong supporting argument for further fulfillment of the potential offered by the Mantis.
A view of the Mantis, displayed at the AUVSI 2009 demonstration at the U.S. Navy Webster Field. The aircraft is shown with the air data probe boom, installed for the flight tests. It is displayed with a range of weapons and stores, including four Paveway II laser guided bombs, and two hellfire II class Brimstone mm wave guided missiles. Photo: Defense Update by Noam Eshel
A recent field experiment held by the French and German forces in Germany evaluated advanced warfighting concepts introduced by modern command, control, intelligence and weapon systems, paving the way for further studies as part of the Air-land operational digitalization study (Bulle Opérationnelle Aéroterrestre – BOA). The ARTIST experiment was managed by the French Defence Procurement Agency (DGA), the French Army, and an industry group including Thales, Nexter and Sagem.
The forces operating in the experiment included a command centre, four armored vehicles, three types of robots, a drone and two groups of soldiers, demonstrating the effectiveness of the battlefield digitization in combat mission in a built-up area, addressing intelligence preparation and reconnaissance of a village, seizing a village and repelling an enemy counter-attack.
For the experiment the units were equipped with an advanced, all-digital tactical communications system provided by Thales, connecting different units (vehicular and dismounted) providing full coordination between the French and German units, in voice, data, maps, video and fire coordination.
The vehicles included the German Wiesel II tracked light vehicle and the AMX10 VOA platform and , specially equipped with advanced armored vehicle vetronics systems provided by Nexter Systems. This electronic ensemble included battle management, observation and target acquisition systems, enabling the crew to perform observation and engage targets through a specialized Man-Machine Interface. The vehicles were also equipped with the Robot Spotter robotic control systems, provided by the French company Robosoft, enabling the control of unmanned ground vehicles such as the wheeled Miniroc and tracked Telemax, from within the armored vehicles.
Sagem provided the basis for the operational command and control segment, with a system designed to integrate with both German and French land forces combat command systems, including performing information exchange with the FELIN, employed by French infantry warfighters. Sagem has also provided multi-screen, multimedia work stations providing for the exercise control.
The BOA, performed under close partnership between the DGA, the French Army and the Thales-Nexter-Sagem industrial group was launched in 2006 to demonstrate to the Army how digitization can transform the modern battlefield. Three field experiments being conducted in the current phase (TACTIC) are scheduled to continue until 2012. ARTIST (or Architecture Real Time Integration System Testbench) was the first of the three, demonstrating the basic added value of digitization. Lessons learned from BOA will pave the way for the future force modernization, under the French Army SCORPION program.
Photos above: top: the AMX-10 VOA taking part in the experiment was a unique vehicle, equipped with mast-mounted, stabilized multi-sensor electro-optical surveillance system and digital vehicle electronics (Vetronics) and Robot Spotter robotic control system, enabling the crew to provide area surveillance, targeting and control operations of unmanned ground vehicle (UGV), such as the six-wheeled French Miniroc (left) and four-track German Telemax (right). Photos: French Defence.
The multipurpose amphibious assault ship USS Batan (LHD 5) launched 10 MV-22B Ospreys from the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit to fly into Camp Bastion, Afghanistan, Nov. 6, in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. Before their deployment to the Indian Ocean, the Batan and its Ospreys participated in Bright Star 2009, the joint U.S. - Egyptian exercise. (U.S. Marine Corps photo)
The U.S. Marine Corps has deployed the first detachment of MV-22B Osprey tilt rotor aircraft to Camp Bastion, in Hellmand province, Afghanistan. The ten aircraft are supporting Task Force Leatherneck area of operations. The aircraft are part of the U.S. 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit, deployed aboard USS Bataan in the Indian Ocean.
The first wave of MV-22B ‘Osprey’ entering the Taskforce Helmand area of operation. Making military history, the Osprey are the first of their kind to be used in Afghanistan. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Thomas J. Hermesman)
This video provides an initial report about the Osprey MV-22B in Iraq. Official U.S. Defense Department video.
The new aircraft are capable of flying faster than helicopters, and operate more effectively at high, hot desert conditions. The Ospreys were launched from the Batan in three waves, making the 510 nautical mile flight in just over two hours. The Ospreys, which formed the bulk of VMM-263 (Rein) with the 22nd MEU will join Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 261 as part of MEB-Afghanistan’s aviation combat element, Marine Aircraft Group 40.
The multipurpose amphibious assault ship USS Batan (LHD 5) launched 10 MV-22B Ospreys from the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit to fly into Camp Bastion, Afghanistan, Nov. 6, in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. Before their deployment to the Indian Ocean, the Batan and its Ospreys participated in Bright Star 2009, the joint U.S. - Egyptian exercise. (U.S. Marine Corps photo)
The 22nd MEU was the first Marine Expeditionary Unit to conduct a ship-based deployment with the tiltrotor aircraft. VMM-263 (Rein) attached to the MEU in September, 2008, and was also the first squadron to deploy with the aircraft to Iraq in 2007. The recent mission to the Indian Ocean was the first operational deployment abroad the amphibious landing ships.
A U.S. Air Force CV-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft crashed in southeastern Afghanistan Thursday April 8, 2010 killing four – the three crew members and a government contractor. The CV-22 regularly operates with the Air Force’s Special Operations Command (AFSOC). Officials said the aircraft was carrying U.S. troops when it crashed seven miles west of Qalat City in Zabul province. The injured were transported to a nearby base for medical treatment.
Conclusion of the the first tour of the MV-22 Osprey in Anbar, western Iraq where the aircraft operated with the 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing (Fwd). .S. Marines Video.
According to ISAF announcement, the aircraft went down after dark, about 7 miles (11 kilometers) from Qalat, the capital of Zabul province. This event was the first combat loss of the Osprey tilt rotor aircraft. The Taliban claimed its forces have shot down the aircraft but NATO officials said the cause of the crash is unknown and that an investigation is underway. The Taliban regularly take responsibility anytime a coalition aircraft crashes, often after a NATO press release has been issued. In this case, the Taliban claimed responsibility long before NATO acknowledged the crash. A U.S. Air Force investigation ruled out such possibilityion the accident report published December 17, 2010.
An MV-22B Osprey receives aerial refuelling from a Marine Corps KC-130J Hercules during an exercise over Yuma, Arizona. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Gunnery Sgt. Bill Lisbon )
The CV-22, a modified version of the Marine Corps MV-22, conducts long-range infiltration and resupply for U.S. forces. It employs tilt-rotor technology that allows it to take off and land as a helicopter, and fly like a fixed-wing aircraft.
The Lynx Wildcat (AW159) multi-role military helicopter has successfully completed its maiden flight at AgustaWestland’s Yeovil facility (video), with AgustaWestland Chief Test Pilot, Donald Maclaine, at the controls. This first aircraft is one of three helicopters being built, for the flight testing program, scheduled for 2010. Delivery of the first of the 62 multi-role military helicopters is expected in 2011. The Lynx Wildcat is scheduled to become fully operational with the British Army in 2014 and the Royal Navy in 2015. The six-ton class helicopter comes in two versions. The Royal Navy variant will provide an agile maritime capability providing anti-surface warfare capability and force protection and will operate in support of amphibious operations and be an important element in defending ships against surface threats. Both versions will have a high degree of commonality, enabling the military to switch roles easily, principally through the changing of role equipment. The AW159 is powered by two new generation CTS800 engines, each capable of continuously producing 1281 shp giving the aircraft exceptional hot and high performance. The aircraft has an all up mass of 5,790 kg with a built in capability to increase that to 6,250 kg.
A day after the AW159's first flight, AgustaWestland announced the first flight of the first prototype of the AW149 multi-role military medium twin engine helicopter. This flight was performed at the company's Vergiate plant in Italy.
The cockpit includes a fully integrated display system utilizing four 10×8 inch primary displays. Sensors include a nose mounted IR/TV imager with built in laser designator and for the maritime variant the Selex Galileo 7400E 360 degree active array radar. The AW159 also has a comprehensive integrated defensive aids suite comprising a missile warning system, radar warning receivers and a countermeasures dispensing system. Additionally the AW159 will e capable of carrying a range of weapons including machine guns, torpedoes, depth charges and the Future Anti-Surface Guided Weapon (FASGW). AgustaWestland is the prime contractor for the British MOD Lynx Wildcat program. Among the key supplier on the AW159 program are Selex Galileo, a Finmeccanica company; GKN Aerospace, LHTEC – a partnership between Rolls-Royce and Honeywell, General Dynamics UK, Thales UK and GE Aviation. Link to video: http://www.agustawestland.com/sites/all/themes/custom/agusta/gallery_video.html?movie=http%3A//www.agustawestland.com/sites/default/files/AW159FFCLIP.flv&title=AW159&tags=AW159&category=First%20Flight%20AW159,%20AW159&selCategory=%3CAny%3E&selIdCategory=0&keywords=
As the JSF founding members squirm for excuses to cut projected orders, anticipating the program’s soaring costs consuming growing shares of local defense budgets, Israel is expected to become the first international customer to commit to the next generation stealth fighter, although the country has not formally joined the program as one of the ‘founding members’.
Bowing under unprecedented financial pressure, the U.K. is moving to axe the planned construction of one aircraft carrier, along with up to 88 F-35B (V/STOL) fighters that would be operating on board, saving about £7.6 billion in out-year budget.
Financial issues have also led the Australian government to defer the decisions to commit on the planned procurement of 3-4 squadrons. By delaying procurement decisions to 2010 and possibly cutting the number of aircraft operating with each squadron, from 24 to 14, Canberra is hopeful the A$16 billion investment could be approved next year. Netherlands and Denmark have not made their final decision about the aircraft yet, although both are supporting the acquisition of the American stealth fighter. Norway has decided in favour of the JSF but hasn’t ordered the aircraft to date. Even the U.S. Air Force ahs not placed orders for serial production fighters to date.
With such malleable backing to their program, no wonder that the U.S. is aiming at the ‘captive’ markets – clients dependent on U.S. aircraft – such as the Israelis and Turks – to stabilize the program. Turkey has embarked on a shopping spree for defense systems, investing well over $30 billion in arms procurement over the nbext 5 years. As a program member Turkey is planning to produce about 100 of the 130 F-35As it plans to buy over the next decade. Turkey has also produced hundreds of F-16s for its air force. Israel plans to replace at 2-3 F-16A squadrons with the F-35A, however, unlike the Turks, Israel has not received any commitments for its local industries, neither arranged for local assembly. Italy is also considered a strong candidate, although Rome has not yet committed to the procurement phase, the F-35Bs will be needed sooner or later, to replace the Sea Harriers on its aircraft carriers. However, the number of aircraft to be fielded will undoubtedly be influenced by the British decision and the flyaway cost of the F-35B, which is currently supported by the U.S. Marine Corps and the U.K.
Despite the recognition that the IAF needs the new stealth fighter to maintain its qualitative edge within the Middle East, Israel has sofar delayed its decision due to a number of reservations by the Air Force, regarding the aircraft operational range, payload and avionic suite. Through all its recent aircraft acquisitions, Israel insisted including a comprehensive array of electronic systems, primarily electronic warfare suits, command, control and communications, as well as specific weapons operated by the IAF, that provided the Israeli variants of such fighters a qualitative edge over similar types operated by Egypt, Jordan or Saudi-Arabia. These systems also provided the new fighters to be fully integrated within the Israeli command and control system, optimally operate under all conditions, and be prepared to employ indigenously developed weaponry, such as the Spice EO standoff guided weapon or Delilah loitering missiles, which have to be individually integrated into the operating systems of IAF fighters.
However, the architecture that provided the baseline of the JSF design prevents such changes, as they are effecting the entire aircraft operation. Alternatively, users are provided with selective access to the operational system, enabling limited integration of weapons, and avionics systems to operate with on-board assets. While such approach provides more flexibility for users with limited requirements, it does not allow for close linking with on board functions and capabilities, required to maintain the fighter’s stealth and low electronic emission.
As for the limited range, Israel has a relatively unique operational requirement – to nbe able to extend its strike capability over thousand miles inside enemy territory, reaching as far as Iran, while flying within potentially hostile airspace. Stealth was considered a key capability for gaining operational flexibility for such operations, which would be based on the fighter’s unrefuelled range – internally carrying both fuel and ordnance over extended range. While the basic F-35A has an operational radius of 610 nautical miles, an extra fuel tank could extend its range considerably, matching the proposed stealthy F-15SE ‘Silent Eagle’ that could be offering an operational radius of 800 nautical miles, with limited stealth capability.
Despite these obstacles, Israel apparently decided to remove these requirements, at least for the first batch of 25 aircraft, realizing that the required changes could drive the acquisition cost of the Israeli F-35A variant to beyond $130 million a peace, delaying delivery schedules far beyond Israel’s requirements. The indigenous systems would mean the stealth fighter would maintain a qualitative edge over similar fighters, if (or when) delivered to other U.S. allies in the region. The inclusion of additional internal fuel would contribute to more flexible mission planning, particularly in the ‘outer circle’ where Israel is required to operate deep inside enemy or hostile territory, beyond 1,000 km, as far as in Iran, where stealth capabilities are mandatory and aerial refueling may not be possible.
Once the special requirements of the IAF are relieved, the aircraft cost could return to just over $80 million a piece. The IAF is expecting the first aircraft to be delivered in 2014 to replace the first F-16As that would be phased out by that time. The projected modifications could delay this schedule by at least 24 months.
However, the Israelis could be eluding themselves with $80 million cost per aircraft, as the Pentagon is already preparing the ground for major cost increase. According to a recent report by the Department of Defense Joint Estimating Team (JET), the JSF program may be exceeding budget by $16 billion, and slip off schedule in the next five years. This bleak prediction is not shared by the joint program office, which stresses that development and testing are progressing well and within schedule.
Two videos showing two of the primary advances sensors used on the JSF. above, prthe APG-81 active electronically steered array (AESA) radar in the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. A key sequence in the video – real radar test data, the company says – shows how fast the AESA scans, detects and tracks multiple targets – more targets, more quickly than a conventional fighter radar with mechanically scanned antenna. The video below depicts the electro-optical distributed aperture system (DAS) and its contribution to the aircraft. (Videos by Northrop Grumman)
One of the arguments for not having to integrate locally developed systems is the high quality of the advanced systems already integrated into the aircraft. The two videos above show the radar and distributed EO systems. Below, an example of the high definition, integrated targeting system is demonstrated, This system replaces the traditional targeting pods such as the Sniper or Litening, used on other tactical aircraft.
Video below: An alternative to the F-35, yet on paper, is the Silent Eagle F-15SE proposed as an upgrade for F-15Es or new built aircraft. (a Boeing marketing Video). The first F-15SE technology demonstrator is scheduled to fly in mid 2010.
Rafale flying with the Reco NG (AREOS) recce pod. The new pod, currently undergoing flight testing, will be introduced with Air Force and Naval Rafale units by 2012. Photos: Dassault.
The French Air Force has initiated flight testing with the Reco NG aerial reconnaissance (AREOS) pod developed by Thales. Flight testing on board the Rafale is expected to continue for about six months.
Currently, the French Air Force’s tactical recce operations are limited to the obsolete Mirage F1 CR, using its internal sensors and the Presto pod. The new pod will enable the Rafale to assume this role. Reco NG is able to capture digital imagery both day and night, from high, medium and low altitudes.
Rafale flying with the Reco NG (AREOS) recce pod. The new pod, currently undergoing flight testing, will be introduced with Air Force and Naval Rafale units by 2012. Photos: Dassault.a French Navy Rafale carries a Reco NG pod on a test flight.
The pod can be operated in fully autonomous mode, without any intervention by the crew. The French air force has ordered 12 pod systems with three ground systems to equip Rafale F3 fighter. The French Navy will get six more systems. Thales is expected to complete the delivery of all 18 pods by April 2012.
a close-up view of the pod
The pod began flight testing a year ago, assisting the integration of the shipborne station on the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier, using a Mirage 2000D platform. During these flights, datalink transmissions between the pod and the embedded shipborne station were validated, including very high-speed Ku-band datalink from the pod to the shipborne station for downlink of useful sensor data and the UHF datalink (based on the L22 TDMA) between the pod and the shipborne station for coordination.
The imagery gathered by the Reco NG pod is displayed on the MINDS-NG multi-sensor image interpretation and dissemination system (known as SAIM-NG in French), developed by Thales Communications / Intelligence Surveillance & Reconnaissance and also integrated on the aircraft carrier.
Soldier using the Multi-sensor Image iNterpretation and Dissemination System (MINDS) is designed to operate with the ground segment of the Recce NG system. MINDS consists of an image processing and exploitation subsystems capable of handling high definition images and analysis tools assisting intelligence analysts in their work.
At Milipol 2009 Israel Weapon Industries (IWI) is displaying the X95 (Micro Tavor), designed for special units, offers high reliability and accuracy under extreme operating conditions. With the aid of a conversion kit, the weapon can be converted from 5.56mm into a 9mm caliber SMG. The X95 comes with an integral optical sight and multiple rails mounting configuring various accessories specially designed for specific applications. The optimization of the weapon’s elements were designed employing advanced human ergonomics, resulting an a compact and comfortable weapon, yet highly accurate and effective, offering high level of confidence to the user.
Personal Gear & Protection
At Milipol 2009 Rabintex is launching the Rabintex Ballistic Helmet (RBH) Air Crew helmet, a new member of the RBH line which already includes some of the popular helmet types such as the PASGT, MICH and Attack helmets. The new helmet is fabricated from Aramid to offer Level IIIA protection, providing combat air crews the same level of protection provided for soldiers, with added ear mufflers and piccatinny. The company is also launching RAV ‘Ladies First’ body armor. This bullet proof vest is designed with seamless panels at the front, made to fit women’s bust shape. The vest can be applied with an outer shell for regular use or a special outer shell design for concealed use. The vest is made of Aramid fibers, weighs 2.6 kg and meets protection Level IIIA NIJ 0101. 05.
Lior Textile’s ‘Star Guard’ is designed especially for undercover work, providing field agents a high level of protection against bullet and knife stab, in a concealed format. The vest offers a clean front and back surface with special closing that wrap around the waist to eliminate contours that might hint the existence of body armor. Ergonomically designed to provide optimal freedom of movement and protection, the Star Guard offers an expanded surface area of protection, superior to common concealable protection. The ergonomic, flexible and lightweight vest fits nicely under the shirt or jacket and is used by businessmen, detectives and bodyguards requiring maximum ballistic and stabbing protection in a concealed format.
Marom Dolphin is offering a wide range of backpacks designed for special operations forces and special weapons teams. The new range includes the Commander line of modular backpacks that comes with several cutaway pouches for an emergency runaway. The bag can be added with more pouches assembled with the use of MOLLE straps. Made of heavy duty fire retardant mesh, reducing back sweating, the bag has an integrated rain cover and a removable 15 liter front bag with integral carrying straps, which can be used as separately of the main backpack. The chest rig for Special Forces is a new addition to the company’s line of products. It can be used as a full vest with front and back parts, or as a chest rig with only the front part. The rig is equipped with integrated M16 magazine pouches at the front, and an integrated water pack inside the back part. The internal part of the vest is made using an anti flame mesh with 2 back support padding’s.
Homeland Security Technology from Israel: Correctional Facilities
Dealing with criminals and convicted felons doesn’t end in court ruling; advanced technologies developed for riot control, security, countering-explosives are also implemented behind bars, when matters get rough.
For example, Beit Alfa Trailers (BAT) is introducing the ‘Ranger Eye’ – computerized incident management system, employing their patented water cannon and an innovative thermal imaging system, developed at Opgal. The Ranger-Eye continuously monitors an area day and night, reports incidents, or an emergency and enables guards to activate various types of response and countermeasures, by employing water cannons as non-lethal deterrents, or using available fire fighting equipment for this activity.
Mobile phones are providing essential personal communications for everyone, but these privileges are normally denied to detainees, incarcerated in correctional facilities. Therefore, unauthorized phones become an important asset much sought after by criminal inmates. To combat these unauthorized cellphones, communications-monitoring and jamming are used in prison facilities, to deny inmates the use of such devices. Jamming is activated selectively, to enable authorized users operate mobile phones for official and personal use. Systems such as the Cellular Detectors MS from Netline can intercept a non-authorized device activated in a restricted area.
Such systems provide alerts whenever cellular activity is detected: phone conversations, short text/media message or standby-mode registration, alert wardens on suspected activity, leading to search, locate and confiscate hidden, unauthorized cell phones. When the operational policy allows for active countermeasures to be taken, jamming signals can instantly be activated by Netline’s C-Guard Hammer cellphone detector and jammer, against the intercepted device, denying link establishment. The C-Guard Hammer is suited for different coverage areas and applications, from small rooms to wide range complex sites, indoor and outdoors, employing different RF transmission power levels for each application.
Wireless cuffs have been used for several years enabling the correctional services system to provide inmates, held in low-security institutions, to be released back to the community under limiting conditions. Similar techniques can also be implemented behind bars, to protect wardens or track individual detainees in high security facilities, providing electronic personal surveillance and improve the security of both officers and inmates. The TRaCE system, developed by ELMO Tech performs location supervision and tightens inmate control. The system uses field-proven monitoring technologies, tailored for stringent security and safety requirements of correctional facilities. It provides real-time inmate and staff location-tracking, headcounts, officer’s ingress and egress notifications and can quickly alert on ‘man-down’ incidents.
C-Pass, a complete solution that matches e-Passport facial data to passengers’ faces in real time was unveiled earlier in 2009 by C-True. The system obtains the passport's holders biometric and personal data from the e-passport, and authenticates it with the passports' printed information. Photo: C-True
The Israeli company C-True is displaying in Milipol 2009 a family of security systems utilizing the company’s face recognition biometric system. Combining image capture, display and image processing of face recognition technology, C-True has developed a family of unattended systems designed to perform check-in and boarding control at airports, handle e-passports at immigration gates and provide access control to secured areas, from high security operations areas to members-only clubs and backstage areas.
Initiating a dialog with a new customer, the system performs a quick 3D scan of the subject’s face, employing an algorithm that analyzes facial features and assigns the persons a unique ID. The system performs this process autonomously, without any operator support. C-True employs a combination of face recognition identification techniques, including mapping face features and special distinguishing marks, skin tone and skin texture. Under normal conditions, the system provides high probability (99.99%) positive identification. The company has implemented the technology in a line of products solutions, including the C-Gate passenger authentication system used at airports and the C-Pass, providing a comprehensive e-Passport authenticating systems, processing passengers through immigration point of entry. The system is also providing access control.
An implementation of C-True technology is the ‘C-Gate’ passenger authentication system (Photo at left), utilizing facial recognition to visually match passengers that have checked in, with passengers boarding the aircraft at the gate. This procedure addresses an IATA requirement that specify that only the person that checks in can board the aircraft. The C-Gate captures an image of the passenger at the check in desk. Enrolment through the system takes less than a second, requiring merely the passenger looking into the system. The images captured at check-in are processed to deliver a personal ID, matched with the passengers’ destination and flight. From this point till departure, passengers can be identified, tracked and eventually cleared to board an aircraft with a high degree of confidence and minimal intrusive and delaying security checks. Security systems can also leverage the airlines frequent flying members lists or other providers loyalty programs such as rent-a-car agencies, shopping clubs, VIP lounges etc., facilitating rapid and automatic ID verification, routing known passengers through a ‘green path’ with high level of confidence.
Since 2005, governments have been issuing electronic passports (e-Passports) with integrated circuits, to permit storage of a digital image of the passport photograph for use with face recognition technology, which is used to improve identity verification and reduce identity-related fraud. Leveraging the wide distribution of e-Passports, C-True has also launched the C-Pass, a complete solution that matches e-Passport facial data to passengers’ faces in real time.
C-True has introduced C-Entry as a biometric access control gatekeeper that uses individual's face as a key to grant access of use to premises which needs to be secured against unauthorized individuals. Photo: C-True
The system obtains the passport’s holders biometric and personal data from the e-passport, and authenticates it with the passports’ printed information. The solution is fully compliant with Machine Readable Travel Document (MRTD), with ICC/chip, as per ICAO (DG2, ISO/IEC 19794-5:2005).
The new system will assist border control, customs and security officials to verify passenger’s identity, allowing for rapid processing, while increasing security, control and response to heightened alerts. The system could also be integrated in self service kiosk for passenger authentication. Such technology is already implemented in C-True’s “SmartGate” kiosks, employing the C-Entry access control system and C-Gates, a document authentication system.
The Israeli company TAMAR Explosives is introducing at Milipol 2009 the X-test range of explosive simulants, products specifically designed for training and testing of homeland security personnel. The X-test products realistically simulate the actual explosives they represent, in appearance, texture, odor, and density. It can be used for the training of EOD technicians and security inspectors, performing searches for explosive devices in passenger baggage.
They also represent similar chemical properties, such as effective atomic number (Zeff) computed tomography (CT number) to effectively represent the explosive material to advanced detection systems, such as millimeter wave and X-ray diffraction sensors. The company has also developed a range of improvised explosive devices training devices in which its explosives simulants are used, along with simulants of detonators, detonation cords, and a variety of initiation devices. Explosive vests, pipe bombs and other items – all inert – complete the assortment, allowing high fidelity train of security agents for high threat environments.
Being inert materials, such simulants enable trainees, instructors and inspectors to handle explosive training devices with relative safety, allowing trainees to get a feel of the actual explosives and IEDs, and also to train in detection via hand search or a variety of detection technologies. X-Test materials are used for the training of security agents performing manual checks aimed at detecting explosive materials, assisting agents in becoming familiar with the visual and tactile properties of various explosive materials and easily recognize them during the course of their work. Other uses are in the instruction of operators of detection systems such as X-ray and EDS, searching for explosives concealed in baggage and other personal belongings. The operators learn to distinguish the concealed simulants by detecting their images on their screens, even when hidden among other items. Such materials are also used in exercises carried out by regulators and airport authorities as well, to preserve the operation of the security setup at a constantly high state of alertness. These “red team” exercises also comprise a fundamental component of airports’ quality assurance program. Simulants can also be used for the training of dogs (K-9), taught to identify and spot explosive materials.
Cellphones and other wireless communications devices are providing terrorists an effective means of control. By separating the device preparation and placement from the actual activation, IEDs can be planted in different locations and be activated by remote command, in response to the target’s behavior – such as speed of movement, specific target vulnerability, local situation (vis-à-vis nearby civilians) or when a specific VIP is being targeted in a convoy.
As improvised explosive devices proliferated throughout the world, adversary operating techniques have also evolved, utilizing advanced triggering devices, enabling perpetrators to activate these explosive devices with devastating timing and accuracy, to overmatch passive and active means of protection such as ballistic armoring and evasive maneuvers.
To counter such remote-controlled devices (RCIED), electronic countermeasures IED defeat solutions are employed, including jamming, pre-activation and neutralization techniques. Originally known as ‘bomb jammers’ these devices were utilized by EOD/ bomb disposal teams, to deny an adversary to trigger a device under inspection by the EOD technician. These jammers are also used by first responders when arriving at terror scenes, in effort to deny the activation of secondary explosive charges planted at the site, aimed against the rescue teams.
The IED jammer effectively cuts off radio communications from the triggering transmitter to the device attached to the bomb, thus temporarily preventing bomb detonation while the jammer is in effective range.
At Milipol 2009, two Israeli companies – Netline and SESP are displaying advanced high-power jammers, among them devices designed for EOD and VIP applications.
The photo on the right depicts an x-ray image of a cellphone, planted inside a metal pipe commonly used for pipe-bomb type IEDs. Image: by Vidisco Fox-Rayzor.
Cellphones and other wireless communications devices are providing terrorists an effective means of control. By separating the device preparation and placement from the actual activation, IEDs can be planted in different locations and be activated by remote command, in response to the target’s behavior – such as speed of movement, specific target vulnerability, local situation (vis-à-vis nearby civilians) or when a specific VIP is being targeted in a convoy.
Jammers combat insurgents’ wireless and mobile phone triggering ‘dial a bomb’ IEDs
The photo on the right depicts an x-ray image of a cellphone, planted inside a metal pipe commonly used for pipe-bomb type IEDs. Image: by Vidisco Fox-Rayzor.
As improvised explosive devices proliferated throughout the world, adversary operating techniques have also evolved, utilizing advanced triggering devices, enabling perpetrators to activate these explosive devices with devastating timing and accuracy, to overmatch passive and active means of protection such as ballistic armoring and evasive maneuvers. IED jammers are designed to cut off radio communications from the triggering transmitter to the device attached to the bomb, thus temporarily preventing bomb detonation while the jammer is in effective range.
At Milipol 2009, two Israeli companies – Netline and SESP are displaying advanced high-power jammers, among them devices designed for EOD and VIP applications. (read more…)
An X-ray view into an improvised explosive device (IED) top left, timing and activation mechanism (above right) and another fuze, chached inside a bottle in an attempt to mask it from scanner. Photo: Vidisco, taken by the FoX-Rayzor flat scanner.
While jamming temporarily eliminates the threat of IED, the device remains highly dangerous until it is deactivated and eliminated. EOD teams tasked with this dangerous mission utilize robotic systems to inspect the suspicious devices and deactivate it by disrupting or eliminating the activation mechanism. While sophisticated equipment is available for visual inspection of the devices, looking through the devices, by X-ray or computer tomography is still a complex task handled by professionals. (read more…)
Another aspect of handling IEDs is the training of EOD, and security inspectors performing searches for such devices in passenger baggage. The Israeli company TAMAR Explosives is introducing at Milipol 2009 the X-test range of explosive simulants, products specifically designed for training and testing of homeland security personnel. The X-test products realistically simulate the actual explosives they represent, in appearance, texture, odor, and density. (read more…)
Lockheed Martin Skunk Works® and XTEND have achieved a major milestone in JADC2 by integrating the XOS operating system with the MDCX™ autonomy platform. This technical breakthrough enables a single operator to simultaneously command multiple drone classes, eliminating the friction of mission handoffs. From "marsupial" drone deployments to operating in GPS-denied environments, explore how this collaboration is abbreviating the data-to-decision timeline and redefining autonomous mission execution.
As traditional defense primes face mounting competition from agile “neoprimes” such as Anduril, Palantir and Helsing, the balance of innovation is shifting toward software-defined warfare and scalable, dual-use technologies, while global industry consolidation—marked by Boeing’s integration of Spirit AeroSystems and other strategic mergers—signals an intensified race to secure control over the defense technology value chain. Our Defense-Tech weekly report highlights these trends.
In early October 2025, a coordinated wave of unmanned aerial system (UAS) incursions—widely attributed to Russia—targeted critical infrastructure across at least ten European nations. The unprecedented campaign exposed the fragility of Europe’s air defenses...
Executive Summary
The past week (September 18-25, 2025) represents an inflection point where strategic defense concepts have transitioned from doctrine to tangible reality. An analysis of global events reveals four primary, interconnected trends shaping an...
At the 2025 Air, Space & Cyber Conference, U.S. Air Force and Space Force leaders unveiled major updates on next-generation fighters, bombers, unmanned systems, and space initiatives, highlighting both rapid innovation and critical readiness challenges as the services race to outpace global competitors. A short version is available here, with a more detailed version for subscribers.
The Taipei Aerospace & Defense Technology Exhibition (TADTE) 2025 crystallized around four dominant strategic themes that collectively illustrate Taiwan's comprehensive approach to defense modernization amid escalating regional tensions. Based on a detailed report by Pleronix (available upon request). Includes a Podcast discussion on TADTE 2025's highlighting Taiwan's four strategic themes beyond the post's coverage.
Israel’s Iron Beam 450 high-power laser system has completed final testing, marking a major leap in air defense. Developed by Rafael, it offers precise, cost-effective interception of rockets, UAVs, and mortars, and is set for IDF deployment by 2025.
The forces operating in the experiment included a command centre, four armored vehicles, three types of robots, a drone and two groups of soldiers, demonstrating the effectiveness of the battlefield digitization in combat mission in a built-up area, addressing intelligence preparation and reconnaissance of a village, seizing a village and repelling an enemy counter-attack.
