Monday, November 18, 2024
More
    Home Blog Page 285

    JAMMA is Ready to Ride with the Osprey

    the JAMMA vehicle configured as an all terrain MEDEVAC vehicle. Photo: Force protection Inc.

    This light vehicle is an armor-ready hybrid vehicle, designed to transport four-occupant, designed for off-road mobility, and is transportable inside the V-22 Osprey helicopter. The vehicle is designed with power reserves providing excellent off-road and on-road performance, plus payload reserves for applying armor protection when required. The vehicle can perform reconnaissance, rescue/recovery, medevac and mobile security missions.

    A utility transport version of the JAMMA, demonstrating off-road mobility. Photo: Force Protection Inc.

    Ft. Lauderdale, FL – february 24, 2010: Force Protection Inc. has launched today the Joint All-Terrain Modular Mobility Asset (JAMMA) all-terrain Internally Transported Vehicle (ITV) at the AUSA Winter convention in Florida.

    JAMMA satisfies the requirements of special operations user groups. It has optimized rollover protection and an attachment system that can be fitted with threat-specific armor to be easily attached or removed in virtually any environment. The vehicle includes stadium seating that protects the driver while allowing 360-degree return fire.

    JAMMA all-terrain vehicle configured as an all-terrain MEDEVAC vehicle. Photo: Force Protection Inc.

    “We believe there is an ongoing need for our U.S. troops and allied forces to have access to lighter, highly mobile vehicles,” said Michael Moody, Chairman and CEO of Force Protection, Inc. “The JAMMA vehicle has been designed from the ground up to be the new standard in light tactical vehicles and its light weight, high strength structure provides a wealth of multi-role mission configurations for its end-users. The JAMMA represents a different type of survivability solution focused on speed, mobility and concealment.”

    Originally developed by North Hollywood based TAC-V corporation, the JAMMA family of vehicles claim to offer new performance levels over existing armored, all-terrain vehicles. The JAMMA platform was designed from the beginning as an internally transportable vehicle. The vehicle was developed to fit the unique dimensions of the and offer the Special Operations user an armor ready, four occupant, hybrid powered, high performance off road vehicle, capable of being internally transported inside that aircraft. The vehicle uses a unique rollover protection and modular, threat-specific reconfigurable armor adaptable to specific mission – reconnaissance, rescue/recovery, medevac or mobile security. The driver’s seat is designed to maintain optimal protection to the driver while maintaining the fire arcs of the other vehicle occupants. The arc also optimizes occupant roll-over protection with full fields of fire on the move.

    the JAMMA vehicle configured as an all terrain MEDEVAC vehicle. Photo: Force protection Inc.

    This vehicle offers enhanced off-road performance and load carrying capabilities. At a Gross Vehicle Weight of 7,500 pounds JAMMA can carry 3,000 lbs of Payload. The four wheel drive vehicle is equipped with 6 cylinder turbo diesel engine, or, with a hybrid driveline developing a combined power of 314 hp, accelerating the fully loaded vehicle to a speed of 90 mph on highway. The hybrid propulsion also optimizes the vehicle’s fuel consumption maintaining fuel efficiency of 21 miles per gallon extending maximum road range to 450 miles. The hybrid engine optimizes vehicle efficiency and generates 22kW of continuous exportable power.

    JAMMA is measures for internal transportation inside the V-22 Osprey. Photos: Force protection Inc.

    USAF Tanker program – Round 3!

    In a third attempt in nine years to replace its current 50-year-old planes, the U.S. Air Force will release the Request for Proposal (RFP) for the USD$35 billion aerial tanker competition. The Air Force is hopeful both the Boeing Company and Northrop Grumman/EADS will bid for the work. The Northrop/ EADS team won the Air Force contract in the last competition, but following a Boeing protest, the government cancelled the contract. Northrop has said the team will not bid again unless changes are made to the draft RFP released in September. The RFP, scheduled for publication today, lists 372 requirements the bidders should address within 75 days. The Pentagon will announce its decision by September this year.

    For EADS, competing for the KC-X is a strategic goal and one that it wasn’t ready to give up easily. On March 31, 2010 the Pentagon partly agreed to EADS’ request for extension, pushing back the bidding deadline by 60 days. At present the bids are due by July 9, 2010. The Air Force plans to flex its process expediting the bid evaluation process to ensure production of the tanker begins in early fall.

    After failing to find a local prime for the KC-X bid, the European conglomerate decided to pit its U.S. subsidiary EADS North America to compete against Boeing in this bid. EADS is likely to submit a derivative of its Airbus 330 Multi-Role Tanker Transport aircraft, currently undergoing flight testing. Five customers have already selected the MRTT as their future tanker. Boeing is proposing the B767 NewGen tanker, that uses elements from other aircraft, such as the P8 and B777 that still has to be tested and refined through the development program.

    Both competitors argue that the Air Forces’ orders will support and protect around 50,000 jobs across the USA, regardless of the origin of the aircraft itself. (EADS’s proposal is based on the Airbus airframe, designed by Airbus in Europe) Boeing support rely on Kansas, Iowa, Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Missouri, Oregon and Utah while Northrop Grumman’s supporting states include Alabama, where it had planned to assemble its tankers, as well as its neighboring states of Georgia, Florida, Mississippi, and Louisiana. Support for a split buy of Boeing and Airbus tankers is also a possibility, although such a decision is claimed to most expensive to the taxpayer.

    Responding to EADS’ decision to compete, and the Pentagon’s decision to revie its schedule to accommodate tem, Boeing officials stated their concern about “the ability of a heavily subsidized Airbus/EADS to accept levels of financial risk that a commercial company such as Boeing cannot. We regret that these concerns will not be addressed in the bid evaluation, even when the U.S. government has proven in a world court that those subsidies are illegal and directly distort competition between Airbus and Boeing.”

    In general terms, the two platforms – Boeing 767 and Airbus 330 represent two different approaches to the mission, one aimed at lower cost per platform and higher versatility of the fleet while the other capitalizing on more economical use of the entire air refueling assets.

    In the previous round the Air Force opted for the larger Airbus, that offered better economy over the program’s entire life cycle. Boeing argued its could offer larger aircraft but the Boeing 767 provided a lower cost platform that better conformed with the requirements set by the Air Force for the competition. Boeing said it could offer the 777 with similar capabilities to the A330 if this was the type of aircraft the Air Forces require.

    Brazil’s FX-2 – Time for Decision

    The announcement of the winner to provide the next generation fighter for the Brazilian Air Force has been postponed for at least a month, and could be delayed for a year, after the ministry of interior and prosecution have agreed to open an inquiry into the multi-billion-dollar tender in which France, the United States and Sweden are competing. The French news agency Agence France-Presse quoted sources in the spokesman office of the Brazilian interior ministry mentioning the inquiry could last as long as a year. Two days earlier the Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva cancelled the planned announcement on the winner. Originally scheduled for February, the announcement was delayed twice, and now, it has been postponed at least until mid-May.

    The selection process drew much criticism in Brazil, due to the conflict between the President Luiz Inacio Lola and Air Force commander General Juniti Saito. Lola has personally negotiated with French president Nicolas Sarkozi who agreed to grant Brazil generous technology transfer, to produce the Omnirole Rafale in-country. The Air Force has preferred the smaller, lighter and cheaper Gripen NG, which was also proposed with generous local production terms that could contribute more to the Brazilian industry.

    Saab argued that Gripen produced in Brazil could be more attractive to other Latin American countries, while Rafale could be too costly for most countries in that region. Therefore, Brazil should have to decide between the Rafale, that could maintain Brazil’s technological leading edge, addressing potential threat by Venezuelan Su-30s, and the Gripen which offers a smart, agile fighter that can be used in relatively large numbers, meeting most contemporary threats and, beyond its contribution to Brazil’s armed forces, could also establish its position in the developing Latin American market, thus generating revenues that could offset the initial investment.

    One of the primary considerations for the Ministry of defense and presidency is technology transfer and export potential, leaning toward the French Rafale while the Air Force considers life cycle cost, and operability, is favoring the Gripen. AFter the AIr Force selected the three candidates and determined that they all meet the operational requirements, the Ministry of Defense and President consider the final selection to be based on broader national interests, rather then pure economical terms.

    Unconfirmed sources published by the Brazilian Folha de S. Paulo daily newspaper claims that France has initially offered 36 Rafales for $8.2 billion, but sweetened its offer to $6.2, while the Gripen was still priced $4.5 billion. Maintenance costs for the aircraft were proposed separately, with Rafale estimated at $4 billion, more than twice the Gripen’s $1.5 billion. The third contender and least likely winner is the Boeing F/A-18E/F which offers a deal for $5.7 with $1.9 billion maintenance and support. France has already established a strategic pact with Brazil, signing deals worth over $12 billion for military helicopters and submarines.

    Israel’s Third UAV Squadron to Operate ‘Strategic UAV’

    A view of the the unique Gondola fairing that can be added to the Heron TP, rapidly configuring the unmanned aircraft with specific mission packages. The forward payload is a long-range, highly stabilized high-power electro-optical paylaod. Photo: Noam Eshel, Defense Update

    Israel’s Air Force (IAF) has formally accepted today the Eitan (Heron TP) unmanned aircraft – the largest UAV built in Israel, and the second largest operational UAV in the world. 210 Squadron operating from Tel Nof Air Force base was established specifically for this unique new aircraft. While Eitan is a new aircraft, considered to be among the world’s most ophisticated unmanned aircraft, it is answering an operational specification, defined by the IAF over 15 years ago.

    The prototype of Eitan seen comes to a land at the IAF base at Tel Nof. Several of these strategic UAVs have recently been delivered to the new Squadron 210 operating at the base. Photo: Noam Eshel, Defense Update

    “The launching of this airplane is another, substantial landmark in the development of unmanned aerial vehicles. From the humble beginning of their development, with initial operational results during the first Lebanon war, the substantial and professional apparatus now accompanies almost any air force operational frame-work” said Major General Ido Nehushtan, Commander in Chief of the Israel Air Force said during the inauguration ceremony.

    The IAF cooperated closely with the industry team in developing the aircraft, headed by IAI as the system development and prime ontractor. The aircraft made its maiden flight in June 2006, three years after the official program ‘kickoff’.

    A view of the the unique Gondola fairing that can be added to the Heron TP, rapidly configuring the unmanned aircraft with specific mission packages. The forward payload is a long-range, highly stabilized high-power electro-optical paylaod. Photo: Noam Eshel, Defense Update

    The aircraft adds significantly to the operational capabilities of the IAF, primarily in long endurance, long-range missions, offering new capabilities in carrying heavy payloads, on higher and longer missions than most contemporary UAVs. The IAF never confirmed the combat use of weapon-carrying UAVs, although such missions using U.S. weapons are performed by U.S. forces in Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen. One of the UAVs built by the Israelis for the U.S. Army – the Hunter, has already been configured to use weapons and is believed to have been operating on combat missions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Eitan (Heron TP) can be configured to fly 'basic ISR' missions without the Gondola. Photo: Noam Eshel, defense Update

    Whether the Eitan is capable of carrying weapons has not been officially confirmed though an IAF officer briefing on the new aircraft commented, that “Eitan has the potential to introduce new missions profiles and capabilities, as operators gather more experience with the new aircraft”. Such missions could include aerial refueling of other UAVs, extending the missions of unmanned aircraft to weeks, when necessary. Potential future missions could also include airborne early warning against missile attack, using electro-optical and electro-magnetic sensors. An extension of the missile-defense mission, could also assume the ‘boost phase intercept’ task, attempting to destroy ballistic missiles on their ascent phase, when they are most vulnerable. Israel considered this mission of UAVs equipped with air-to-air missiles known as Missile Optimized Anti-Ballistic Missile System (Moab) back in the 1990s, before embarking on the Arrow missile defense system.

    A lower front view of the Heron TP Eitan showing the flat belly, designed to offer large surface for payloads and add in generating body lift. The 'mouse' provides an air intake airflow for cooling. Photo: IAF

    Although Eitan has officially entered service this year, this UAV has already contributed its ISR services during Operation Cast Lead in January 2009. The IAF is currently operating the first batch of aircraft, with more units expected to be delivered after the new system reaches full operational capability.

    With maximum takeoff weight of five tons, the turbo-prop powered Eitan can be loaded with multiple payloads and enough fuel for mission endurance exceeding 24 hours, at an altitude over 41,000 ft (above civil aviation flight routes), at ranges exceeding 1,000 km. The top speed at the operational altitude is 200 knots, but the aircraft can also fly slower when required. The length is 15 meters, wing span is 26 meters and height is 3 meters.

    A Heron TP Eitan prototype takes off on a test flight. This aircraft is equipped with the Gondola fairing. Photo: IAI Below:

    Everywhere you look at this aircraft there is something new that hasn’t been done before” says an IAF officer briefing Defense Update about the aircraft, adding that the Eitan is designed to carry out a wide range of missions, from those similar to other UAVs, to brand new missions that are exclusive for this vehicle, given its unique combination of range, endurance and payload.

    “The aircraft is designed around an ‘open architecture’, enabling operators efficiently to introduce new systems and payloads without requiring major changes on the platform.” An IAI official told Defense Update, “the airframe combines several payloads located throughout the aircraft, in the fuselage and under the wings, and in a removable ‘gondola’-shaped fairing, located under the belly and around the center of gravity (CG), enabling rapid reconfiguration of aircraft for specific missions. Eitan can fly without the Gondola, on ‘pure ISR’ missions, or perform multifarious missions with multiple payloads, as the mission requires. A distinctive payload is the high power electro-optical system, mounted ahead of the nose landing gear, offering unobstructed hemispherical view for the telescopic thermal camera. This highly stabilized payload, unique to the IAF, offers unprecedented long-range and high altitude performance, sofar provided only by fixed wing aircraft.”

    one of the operational EItans, operated by Squadron 210. Photo: Noam Eshel, Defense Update.

    Unlike multi-mission jet fighters, designed to perform in a wide operational envelope, Eitan was designed to excel in a specific domain – relatively low speed, medium to high altitude, and long endurance. The aerodynamic design selected for the aircraft has matched these attributes – twin tail with large horizontal stabilizer, the large, unswept wing’s airfoil and profile, are optimized for cruising at high altitude. The wide fuselage, contributing to body lift, is further adding to extending endurance in cruising speed.

    According to IAF personnel, the large payload capacity of Eitan enabled the IAF to equip the aircraft with sophisticated defensive systems, similar to modern combat aircraft. Some of the systems are visible in different locations around the aircraft. The aircraft has built-in features supporting safe operation in controlled airspace, including several video cameras, on the wing and tail, providing wide field of view for ‘see and avoid’ flight. Other sensors like the Interrogator Friend and Foe (IFF) already introduced in the basic platform, provide part of the functionality required for ‘sense and avoid’ capability. Both sensors are considered mandatory for future flight certification in civil-controlled airspace, currently being formulated by civil aviation authorities in the U.S., Europe and Israel. Furthermore, the payload reserves available in the aircraft also provide for installation of TCAS systems, if required.

    Two different Heron TP ‘Eitan’ UAVs demonstrating the two configurations – with and without the missionspecific Gondola. Photos: IAI and IAF.

    Afghanistan Risks ‘Domino Effect’ After Dutch Pullout

    As the campaign in Helmand faces tough opposition from outnumbered and outgunned Taliban, NATO is facing a new threat – this time an internal one. The alliance is fearing a domino effect could follow the Dutch planned pullout from Uruzgan, following the resignation of the Dutch government, announced by Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende yesterday (20 February 2010). About 2,000 Dutch military personnel stationed in Uruzgan are expected to withdraw from Afghanistan by August, if the decision is not reversed.

    The two-year Dutch military mission began in 2006 and was due to end in July 2008. Thereafter in 2008, it was extended by additional two years and will officially end by August 1, 2010. All troops should be back before next year. Sofar NATO has made no preparations for a change of command in Uruzgan. As the Netherlands have previously suffered from problematic change of the guard in Srebrenica, Bosnia, where NATO left the 3rd Dutch Battalion (Dutchbat III) without relief after their mission ended, the Dutch are now worried this could happen again. Sources in NATO said they respect the Dutch debate over the mission in Uruzgan, but consider the best way forward would be a small Dutch presence in Uruzgan.

    While the Uruzgan province, located north of Helmand is generally quiet, the alliance fear a domino effect could evolve of the Dutch decision, drawing other countries where public opinion is turning against the Afghan campaign to pull back as well. Of particular concern is Canada, which suffered the biggest proportional casualty rate in the conflict, and is committed to withdrawing its 2,800 troops by the end of 2011. Australia, which has more than 1,000 Australian troops deployed, sofar refused to take over the lead role in Uruzgan. The decision comes at a time when NATO is demanded to share the burden of increased operations in the country, sending 10,000 additional troops to support 30,000 troops sent by the U.S.

    Another blow to NATO’s war effort happened today in Uruzgan, after 27 Afghan civilians were killed in a NATO air strike on a convoy. NATO officials said the attack was directed at a suspected insurgent convoy. Following the attack the troops realized there were wemen and children among the dead. The convoy was suspected to contained Taliban insurgents on their way to support military activities in the area. Uruzgan is located north of Helmand, where the battle rages between Taliban and NATO forces, around the village of Marjah.

    Defense Update thanks VHJM van Neerven, editor-in-chief, VNC communication counsel for this timely update.

    After Long Delay S-400 Triumf Finally Get to the Field

    Photo above: One of two S-400 fire units arriving to joint the air defense regiment at Elektrostal, in the Moscow Region. Photo: Novosti

    The Russian S-400 Triumph air and missile defense system was officially inducted into Russian army service – the first two systems have entered operational service with the air defense regiment stationed at the Military Space Defense joint command in Elektrostal, the Moscow Region with additional two scheduled to be deployed by the end of 2010. More systems will be delivered later, along with next generation S-500 currently in early development stage. The Russian Air-defense command is hopeful to achieving full operational capability protecting strategic sites throughout Russia with the new systems by 2015.

    The S-400 started its way in 1999 as the S-300PMU3, developed by Almaz Science and Production Association. Russian defense officials claimed in 2006 the missile has been inducted in late 2006 and was due to become operational later in 2007. Suffering from teething problems, this milestone has been delayed three years, allowing designers to work on the ‘baseline system’, awaiting the completion of the full capability version, by early 2010. Russia plans to buy up to 200 launchers (each with four missiles) by 2015, and phase out the older S-300 and S-200 systems. This would mean deploying at least 18 battalions in the next six years, and perhaps more than twenty.

    Triumf, a new air defense missile system based on the heritage of the S-300 is considered one of the world’s most advanced SAM, is capable of destroying any air target, manned and unmanned, as well as cruise and ballistic missiles, within a range of 400 kilometers (250 mi) and an altitude up to 30 kilometers. It is capable of intercepting medium range ballistic missiles (fired from distances up to 3,500km). According to James Dunnigan at Strategy Page, the missile weigh 1.8 tons and is eight meter (26 feet) long and about 50 cm (20 inches) in diameter. The missile can hit targets as high as 100,000 feet. It has a 145 kg (320 pound) warhead. The S-400 system actually has two missiles, one of them being a smaller, shorter range (120 kilometers) one and the other, designed for long range engagement and missile defence.

    One of two radar systems supporting the new S-400 formation deployed in Elektrostal. Both are employing advanced active, plannar electronically steerable phased array tehnology, resulting in significantly smaller and lighter applications, compared to past air defense radars. The radar in the photo above seems to be the target acquisition radar, functioning similar to the Grill Pan radar that supports the S-300P. Another radar is functioning as a fire control radar, in place of the Flap Lid radar that supports the S-300V. Photos: Novosti

    The S-400 is considered effective against all types of manned and unmanned aerial targets, including ‘stealth’ aircraft and Early Warning and Control (AWACS) and other electronic support platforms flying hundreds of kilometers from the protected sites. The system is claimed to be three times more effective than its domestic or international counterparts. Since Moscow have added the S-400 to its export portfolio last year, several countries expressed interest in the system, among them Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Gulf countries.

    Field transportable, the S-400 Triumf can be rapidly deployed. The system comprises two radars – an area search and target acquisition radar and separate fire control radars. Other elements include the command and control vehicle, communications segment and fire units, carrying four missiles each. The missiles are vertically launched from the launch containers. The S-400 radar, command and control and support vehicles share similar automotive platforms with the S-26 Iskander M while the fire unit employs an independent, eight wheel bed hauled by a 4×4 truck. Unlike its S-300 predecessors, the Triumf is equipped with an active, homing seeker and therefore, can be employed beyond the range of its guidance radar. The target acquisition radar has a range of 700 kilometers.

    Russia is also working on a new class of air defense systems, designated S-500. The new system development is expected to be completed by 2012. The missile is designed to intercept primarily medium range missiles – what Russia considers ‘a new type of threat’. The S-500 is expected to have an extended range of up to 600 km and simultaneously engage up to 10 targets. The system will be capable of destroying hypersonic and ballistic targets. S-500 will be a successor of the S-300 developed in the 1990s and operate in tandem with the S-400 currently entering service with Russian air defense forces.

    MultiCam Camouflage Pattern Selected for U.S. Army Uniform and Equipment

    Photo above: Soldiers wearing Multicam while demonstrating Future Force Warrior project. Ft. Bliss, Texas. Photo: U.S. Army

    Following four months of evaluations of alternative camouflage pattern colors, the U.S. Army selected the MultiCam pattern for the uniforms provided for all soldiers deploying to Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, starting the August of 2010. Multicam Gear will be shipping to units in Afghanistan by October 2010.

    Unlike conventional camouflage that blends into the environment by color matching, the MultiCam camouflage pattern patented by Brooklyn NY based Crye Precision is designed to blend and reflect some of the surrounding colors of the environment, thus blending in with the environment. The new pattern is designed to deceive the human eye and brain to accept the concealed object as part of the background. Furthermore, the pattern’s complex, curved elements are shaped to efficiently maintain concealment by effectively managing scale and contrast at long and close range.

    Several camouflage patterns were evaluated by the U.S. Army in 2009. Six such patterns are shown above, where members of the camouflage assessment team wearing the different camo patterns they evaluated. From left: AOR II, UCP, MultiCam, Desert Brush, UCP-Delta, and Mirage. The photo was taken in Khost province, close to the Pakistan border, in late October 2009. Photo: U.S. Army PEO Soldier.
    The two patterns selected for the final evaluation were the MultiCam (above) and UCP Delta (below). Photos: U.S. Army PEO Soldeir - above and Crye Precision - below.

    The U.S. forces encountered problems with their camouflage patterns soon after the invasion into Afghanistan in 2002, as warfighters deployed to the mountains of Afghanistan and the deserts of Iraq wearing Desert BDUs and Woodland gear. To improve and standardize the uniform the Army introduced the Army Combat Uniform in 2004, applied with the pixelated Universal Camouflage Pattern (UCP). Since then, more than 26 improvements have been implemented with the ACU.

    A new initiative to improve the camouflage patterns for Afghanistan was launched by fall 2009, when two battalion-size elements in Afghanistan were equipped with uniforms and associated gear in patterns other than the standard-issue universal camouflage pattern (UCP).  One unit received uniforms and gear in MultiCam, and the other in a variant of UCP known as UCP – Delta was used another battalion. The Army deployed a team of experts to Afghanistan in order to gather field data and photos on the diverse environments of Afghanistan, where soldiers often travel through multiple environments in a single mission, from snow to woodland to desert.

    This data provided the baseline for a photo simulation study distributed to nearly 750 soldiers who had deployed to Afghanistan.  The study asked them to compare six patterns against eight different environments.  The results, along with surveys of soldiers in the two battalions who received alternate camouflage, formed the basis for the Army’s decision on MultiCam. Camouflage alternatives represent one facet of the Army’s ongoing efforts to improve the Army combat uniform.

    Since 2004 the U.S. Army Combat Uniform (ACU) are the standard combat uniform, applied with the Universal Camouflage Pattern (UCP). The new pattern was found to offer supperior concealment over a wide range of environments and field conditions. Photo: U.S. Army, PEO Soldier

    The soldiers will be provided with the new, fire resistant Army combat uniforms finished in MultiCam patterns, which will also be applied to all associated equipment including body armor, rucksacks, and helmet covers. Selection of the new camouflage patterns is the third phase of a four-phase plan to improve the Army’s camouflage. In the next phase the the Army will evaluate long-term Army combat Uniform camouflage options for all soldiers.

    By adapting to varying local lighting conditions, visible and near-infra-red, the pattern blends well into many environments, elevations, seasons, weather conditions, and times of the day. The design takes advantage of the way the human eye and brain perceives shape, volume, and color, taking advantage of human brain interpretation of the patterned object as part of the background, rather than a distinguishable object. This helps the wearer’s profile begin to lose its edge and fade into whatever color or shape surrounding him. The pattern uses curved, rather than pixilated elements to optimally blend in by using pattern element scale and contrast to further conceal the protected object when observed from distance or at close ranges. MultiCam relies more on a blending effect than a contrast effect to disguise the wearer.

     

    BAE Systems new Caiman Multi-Theater Vehicle (MTV)

    At the upcoming AUSA Winter event taking place in Ft. Lauderdale, FL this month, BAE Systems is introducing the Caiman Multi-Theater Vehicle (MTV) – a new configuration of the combat-proven Caiman Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle, implementing lessons learned from Iraq in a platform designed to operate effectively in Afghanistan. “As the requirements for MRAPs increase, the Caiman MTV is an essential solution designed to meet the tactical mission requirements in Afghanistan” says Chris Chambers, vice president and general manager GTS Programs. “With the most armor-protected useable interior space than any other MRAP, coupled with its all terrain mobility, this vehicle can handle both the extreme terrain and environment of the Afghan theater and the evolving threats our soldiers face there” Chambers added.

    Through modifying Caiman capsules pulled out of Iraq, using reset staff and facilities in Kuwait, BAE Systems will be able to build up to 50 Caiman MTV rolling chassis insertion kits per week in theater starting in 2010. These vehicles could then be deployed directly to Afghanistan, relying on the logistics chain already in place. A vast majority of the Caiman MTV parts are already stocked in theater supporting different types of BAE Systems’  Family of Medium Transport Vehicles (FMTV) and Low Signature Armored Cab (LSAC) platforms.

    The Caiman MTV maintains a balanced combination of protection, weight and mobility enabling the vehicle to withstand the large IEDs typical encountered in Afghanistan. The vehicle can also accommodate effective protection against other threats, including Explosively Formed Penetrators (EFP) and  Rocket-Propelled Grenades (RPG). The enhanced monolithic floor, a concentrically-formed C-channel frame and high performance blast absorbing seats considerably improve protection from blast effect. The monolithic floor plate, employed on the Caiman MTV, eliminates floor separation during an IED blast comparable to the MRAP Capability Development Document (CDD) objective requirement.

    Caiman MTV demonstrates it has 'the right stuff' protecting troops going trough the rough terrain of Afghanistan. Through modifying Caiman capsules pulled out of Iraq, using reset staff and facilities in Kuwait, BAE Systems will be able to build up to 50 Caiman MTV rolling chassis insertion kits per week in theater starting in 2010. Photos: BAE Systems

    The new version of Caiman is designed for a maximum gross vehicle weight of 69,000 pounds; It is equipped with a Caterpillar C9 engine and two-speed transfer case combination for increased torque to navigate harsh terrain.  The vehcile has a wider wheel base and more robust independent suspension and power-train systems suitable for operation in harsh terrain. Unlike the 4×4 wheeled MRAP configurations challenged by excessive ground pressure, the new Caiman provides all-terrain mobility with 6×6 wheel soft-soil advantage. Nevertheless, the vehicle retains the interior capacity and survivability of the MRAP, providing effective, protected and deployable platform for specialized vehicles including Command and Control On-the-Move (C2OTM), an ambulance accommodating four litters and a medical crew or protected troop transport, carrying 10 soldiers and a gunner on troop transport missions.

    BAE Systems claims the new Caiman offers more useable interior volume under armor than any fielded MRAP and therefore, it is ideal for specialized vehicle requirements based on lessons from Afghanistan. To support operations in cold or hot environment, the entire armored protected capsule is supported by a 5-ton HVAC temperature control system provides optimum climate control to protect soldiers and critical computer equipment from hot and cold extremes. The independent suspension system employs a scaled-up system developed by Arvin Meritor.

    The new Caiman MTV was introduced to Army leaders at the Michigan Proving Grounds. It was then transferred to the Nevada Automotive Test Center (NATC) and participated at the Vehicle Systems Demonstration Technology Rodeo in Nevada, earlier this month. “The Caiman MTV performed extremely well during its recent demonstrations in Michigan and Nevada” said Dennis Morris, president, BAE Systems, Global Tactical Systems. “We are now in a position to field this platform very rapidly and support critical troop level increases in Afghanistan while being sensitive to extreme defense budget pressures.”

    Double Game of the Secret Coalitions in Pakistan

    While coalition forces are fighting alongside with Afghan National Army and police are inching forward to gain control of areas in Helmand, another coalition – formed by CIA and the Pakistani Military Intelligence Service – the Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI) is making significant progress in eliminating Taliban strongholds south of the border, in Waziristan, sofar considered a safe haven for the Afghan guerillas. The most significant success was the arrest of Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Afghan Taliban’s operational commander and the top deputy to Mullah Omar. Baradar was captured last week (early February) in Karachi.

    It is unclear if the arrests of Baradar represent a true shift in policy regarding the Afghan Taliban, or if the Pakistani government and military have facilitated the arrests in order to secure control of potential negotiations between the Afghan Taliban and the Afghan government, while currying favor with the US. Baradar is said to have been amenable to talks with the Afghan government; his removal from the Taliban leadership would put Pakistan in the driver’s seat as the primary broker in any negotiations.

    In the past US officials have accused the ISI of knowing the exact locations of members of the Quetta Shura and other senior Taliban commanders. If the Pakistanis have changed their outlook on the Afghan Taliban, then more arrests should be forthcoming.
    Few days after Baradar’s arrest, the mutually suspicious CIA-ISI coalition presented another success. This time, it was the shadow governor of Kunduz, Mullah Abdul Salam. He was captured with Mullah Mir Mohammad, the Taliban’s shadow governor of the northern Afghan province of Baghlan, along with two other Taliban operatives in the town of Faisalabad in the Eastern province of Faisalabad, as they set to meet Baradar, unaware of his arrest, which was kept secret sofar. Salam’s capture came as a surprise, being number one on the Coalition’s 10-most-wanted list for Kunduz province for several months, NATO believed he was killed in a firefight in September last year, along with 90 Taliban and Central Asian fighters. Back then the Taliban denied his death – a report which now seems somewhat premature…

    Apparently Salam managed to escape south to Pakistan. In the Taliban Hierarchy, Salam operated directly under the Quetta Shura, the Taliban’s executive council, based in Pakistan’s Waziristan province. Mohammad and Salam have succeeded in reestablishing the Taliban in Kunduz and Baghlan over the past two years. The Quetta Shura was led by Baradar before his capture. In the past, the US and other Western countries have accused the Pakistani military of directly aiding the Afghan Taliban, or of looking the other way as the Quetta Shura operates freely. The capturing of two senior leaders apparently confirms this claim, but does it signify a change of wind toward the Taliban, among Pakistan’s secret services?

     

    This 7 part Frontline video documentary was produced in 2006. It provides a thorough study of the war fought south of the Afghan border in Pakistan, Four years after, it is valid and relevant. (PBS)

    Few days later, on February 17, Sheikh Mansoor, a key al Qaeda military leader in Pakistan was killed in a drone attack. Mansoor was a leader in the Pakistan’s Taliban-controlled tribal group al Qaeda’s Lashkar al Zil – the ‘Shadow Army’. Another UAV attack was conducted a day later, as supporters gathered for his funeral, killing two additional operatives of the notorious Haqqani group. According to the blog ‘The Long War‘, the US has struck at these external cells using unmanned Predator aircraft and other means in an effort to disrupt al Qaeda’s external network and decapitate the leadership.

    Such attacks are gathering momentum and success in recent months. Since Dec. 8, 2009, air attacks in Pakistan has killed three senior al Qaeda leaders, a senior Taliban commander, a senior Haqqani Network commander, two senior al Qaeda operatives, and more recently, two mid-level Haqqani operatives. Another terrorist killed in those strikes was Jamal Saeed Abdul Rahim, a ‘veteran’ Palestinian terrorist, former member of Abu-Nidal group, as a member of the former Abu-Nidal group Rahim participated in the 1986 hijacking of Pan Am flight 73 that resulted in the killing of 22 hostages.

    The success of the air campaign comes in parallel to closer cooperation between the CIA and Pakistan’s ISI. Following the arrest of two Taliban leaders in Pakistan, another senior Afghan Taliban leader was arrested in a raid in the northwest Pakistan. This time it was Maulvi Abdul Kabir, Taliban’s former shadow governor of the eastern Afghan province of Nangarhar, who led the group’s council in the city of Peshawar.

    The announcements of the CIA-ISI successes brought Pakistan’s Defense Minister to openly admit, for the first time, the existence of the Afghan Taliban’s Quetta Shura. He claimed that Pakistan’s security forces had taken on the Quetta Shura and damaged it to such an extent that it no longer posed any threat. Until this admission, the Pakistani authorities flatly denied the existence of any Taliban leadership or the Quetta Shura in Balochistan’s capital.

    Apparently, ISI decided to offer the CIA a head of a Taliban, as farthest as possible from their border – the one that is least under their control, and having the most access to foreign influence. Nevertheless, they maintained the protection of those closer to home. Taliban influence in Kunduz was limited in the first years after the U.S. invasion in 2002 but in recent years the extremists are growing in power. The Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), a grouping of al Qaeda-backed Central Asia extremists, is known to operate in Kunduz with the local Taliban, where they attempt to ambush NATO supply lines from Tajikistan. The region also shares borders with several Central Asian nations, providing Taliban multiple avenues of support as alternative to Pakistan.

    By March 5, 2010 unconfirmed reports from Pakistan indicate that a senior al Qaeda military commander and a top Taliban leader have been killed during airstrikes earlier today in the Mohmand tribal agency. Pakistani military officials claimed that Qari Zia Rahman and Faqir Mohammed were among 30 Taliban and foreign fighters killed during helicopter and airstrikes in the Pindyali region in Mohmand. The air strikes came in retaliation to an assault launched by more than 200 Taliban fighters on a military checkpost yesterday, killing a Frontier Corps soldier.

    This is not the first time Faqir and Rahman are claimed to be dead. Rahman was reported killed in 2009 during a battle with Pakistani forces and Faqir was claimed killed while transporting weapons in 2008. The current reports of Faqir and Rahman’s deaths come as six top leaders of the Afghan Taliban’s Quetta Shura, or executive leadership council, have been detained in Pakistan. Mohammed is the leader of the Taliban in the Bajaur tribal agency; serving as the second in command of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, and a close ally of al Qaeda and of its second in command, Ayman al Zawahiri.

    Whether the ISI is getting closer to the U.S. still remains a big enigma, but ISI is not the only problem the U.S. is facing in the region – support to the Taliban and other extremist Islamic groups is rapidly spreading into the Pakistani military. Previously considered the exclusive territory of ISI, Islamic terror cells have also made strides into the ranks of the Pakistani Army. Recruitment for the Pakistan army and the extremist organizations occur from the same provinces, sometimes same villages, making the connections much deeper than otherwise appreciated. The extremists are also building on resentments to the government’s policy toward the U.S. and its war in Afghanistan.

    In January 2010 four officers were facing court martial in Pakistan. Colonel Shahid Bashir, another unnamed colonel, and two former officers, Nadeem Ahmad Shah, a former air force pilot who is now an advocate, and Awais Ali Khan, an engineer who served with the military’s Air Weapons Complex, are standing trial on court-martial. These men could be sentenced to death if the charges against them can be proven.
    Suspected to be operatives of the extremist Islamic terror group Hizbul Tehrir, the officers were arrested in Balochistan and are being court-martialed in the Pakistani region of Kashmir, on charges they provided the Taliban information assisting terrorist attacks on military establishments inside Pakistan. Among those targets was the Shamsi air base in Balochistan, a known CIA base, from where armed unmanned aerial vehicles operated by the CIA are launched, in pursuit of al-Qaeda and Taliban in Balochistan and Southern Afghanistan. The arrest did not prevent terrorists from pursuing their attacks.

    On February 3rd 2010 three US trainers died in a suicide attack in the Lower Dir area, with another terror organization – Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claiming responsibility for the attack. According to the TTP, the foreigners killed belonged to Xe Worldwide – a company supporting CIA operations in Balochistan. TTP also claimed responsibility for the attack on CIA Camp Chapman in Afghanistan, where seven CIA agents were killed by a double agent. The Camp Chapman attack was the heaviest blow the CIA suffered in years, and it may have triggered the changed of wind on the Pakistani side as well.

    The attack in Lower Dir was aimed at civilians supporting the CIA operations. Xe Worldwide is traced back to the Blackwater Company, a name causing much tension between Pakistan and the U.S., as its bad reputation draws much resentment among the Moslems around the world and particularly Pakistani people.

    Paul Bremer, the U.S. ambassador in Iraq initially used Blackwater security guards for his personal protection and subsequently expanded its role to avoid US casualties. Blackwater’s role in Afghanistan began in early 2002 when the CIA hired the private company to guard the perimeter around its station in Kabul’s Ariana Hotel, the newspaper reported. The Times said Blackwater’s role changed sharply when its guards began providing security for CIA operatives in the field, sometimes during offensive missions in conjunction with Delta Force or Navy Seals teams.

    Raids on suspected insurgents in Iraq, known as ‘snatch and grab’ operations, began happening almost nightly during the worst years of the war between 2004 and 2006. In December 2009 The New York Times quoted several former Blackwater guards as saying, operations to capture and kill militants in Iraq and Afghanistan became so routine that Blackwater personnel sometimes became partners in the missions rather than simply providing the security for the CIA officers. The Times reported in August that CIA also hired Blackwater contractors for a secret program, to track and assassinate senior Al-Qaeda figures. The program cost millions of dollars but never captured or killed any militants. Blackwater rebranded itself Xe after the shooting in a Baghdad square, that left 17 Iraqis dead.

    According to the Times that CIA Director Leon Panetta terminated the agency’s contract with Xe Worldwide, which was providing ground support for the drones operating at Shamsi base. CIA operations at the base were kept secret until recently. Shamsi is one of several air bases hosting open and secret U.S. operations since 2001. Other bases include Jacobabad, Pasni and Dalbaldin in Balochistan, leased in 2001 to support the U.S. invasion into Afghanistan and Terbela, developed to support CIA drone operations in the Northwest Frontier. At present, at least Shamsi and Terbela seem to be operational – satellite images of both locations are showing considerable development of infrastructure.

    Three Indian Teams Unveil Mine Protected Vehicles, Anticipating a Growing Local Market for Armored Vehicles

    The Mine Protected Vehicle developed by Tata Motors. Photo: Tata Motors.

    Several teams headed by Indian largest vehicle manufacturers Tata Motors, Ashok Leyland and Mahindra and Mahindra are introducing Mine Protected Vehicle in anticipation of Indian Ministry of Defense procurement of hundreds of new mine protected vehicles. The growing market for such vehicles is evolving around the military and security forces need to support growing tension in the North East, North West, and Anti-Naxal internal security operations.

    The Mine Protected Vehicle developed by Tata Motors. Photo: Tata Motors.

    Defence Land Systems India, a joint venture between the Indian company Mahindra and Mahindra and global defense manufacturer BAE Systems, introduced the new Mine Protected Vehicle India (MPV-I). The company, a Joint Venture between BAE Systems and Mahindra has based its design on BAE System’s RG family of vehicles, which relates back to the successful family of mine protected vehicles from South Africa. The 6×6 MPV-I is based on BAE Systems’ three decades of protection experience, that resulted in the highly successful RG 31, which has a proven track record and is currently in service with US, Canadian, UAE and a number of other forces including the UN. The MPV-I has been developed for the counter insurgency and anti-Naxal operations of Indian armed and paramilitary forces. The vehicle was recently tested and survived a blast in which 14 kg of explosives were used. The MPV-I can accommodate 18 personnel, capable of transporting a complete operational team of army or police forces involved in anti-terrorist and anti-Naxal operations.

    The Mine Protected vehicle developed by Ashok Lelyand and the South African Paramount Group. Photo: Ashok Leyland.
    Two new vehicles were presented by Tata Motors. Above: The Light Specialist Vehicle (LSV)

    “With enhanced protection technologies, the new vehicle provides the highest levels of crew protection available in India today.” Said Brig Khutub Hai, Mahindra Defence Systems (MDS) chief executive. “The MPV-I  will be our first new product offering from the joint venture company.” The MPV-I will be manufactured at the Defense Land Systems, India plant at Prithla near Faridabad. “The high power to weight ratio and very high torque makes the vehicle suitable for Indian terrain, especially the mountainous region of Jammu and Kashmir and the rough topography of the Naxal dominated areas.” He added. Ashok Leyland has also introduced a version of the Mine Protected Vehicle, based on its Stallion 4×4 armored car. For this development Ashok Leyland has teamed with the South African company Paramount Group. This multipurpose, all-terrain vehicle offers high mobility, high protection and multi-mission capabilities, to Troop Carriers, Armored Personnel Carriers, Command Vehicles, Border Patrols, Riot Control, Internal Security and Counter Terrorism. The MPV-I has a power-to-weight ratio of 13.5 kW/Ton, accelerating the vehicle to a maximum road speed of 90 Km/hr, and a road range exceeding 1000 kilometers without refueling. The basic configuration offers STANAG level 1 protection (7.62 SLR Ball, 5.56 INSAS and 7.62 AK-47/56 Rifle) with mine blast protection exceeding STANAG 4569 level 4, safely absorbing blasts of 14 kg TNT under hull and triple anti tank mine protection – 21 kg TNT under wheels. Extra features includes add-on armor kits, run flat tires inserts, roof mounted air conditioners, radios and intercom systems, 8 ton winch, GPS Navigation, roof mounted weapon stations and gun mounts, gun ports. “Our entry into armored vehicles is in answer to an ever-increasing demand from the Armed Forces for well-engineered, high-mobility, high protection, tactical vehicles that can be used in counter-insurgency and counter-terrorist operations,” said Mr. Vinod K Dasari, Chief Operating Officer and Whole Time Director, Ashok Leyland.

    The new 6x6 MPV-I from Defence Land Systems India - a new JV formed by BAE Systems and Mahindra and Mahindra, on display at DefExpo 2010. Photo: LiveFist Blog
    High mobility 8x8 multi-purpose wheeled Weapon Platform. Photo: Tata Motors.

    Tata Motor is also entering the MPV arena – the new Mine Protected Vehicle from TATA is based on a modular design, implementing a V shaped hull for blast protection. The vehicle is designed for counter-insurgency operations. In addition to mine-and blast protection, the hull is protected against small arms to a NIJ Level 3BP. The roof mounted turret mounts a light or heavy machine gun, covering uninterrupted 360 degrees, two roof hatches to troops for observation and counterfire. In addition, 9 firing ports offer firing from within the vehicle. The air conditioned cabin can be configured to accommodate 8 or 12 soldiers, or to be tailored for mission-specific roles such as command, or medical evacuation. The vehicle is powered by a 245 PS diesel engine, and is capable of a top speed of 100 kmh, negotiating gradient of 60%. The vehicle has 860 mm ground clearance and can ford of 1000 mm water obstacles without preparation. Besides the Army, Tata Motors will also offer the vehicle to paramilitary and police forces. According to P.M. Telang, Managing Director (India Operations) of Tata Motors, TATA’s aim is to ‘participate in the entire defense value chain’, among this, the manufacturing of tactical vehicles and equipment, in addition to upgrades and life extension of systems. In addition to the MPV, Tata is also offering a 8×8 wheeled Weapon Platform, designed to accommodate heavy loads such as air defense systems, rockets or artillery guns, surveillance equipment, communications shelters etc. With ground clearance of 400 mm, compensating bogey suspension and wide wheel tracks, the truck offers impressive cross country mobility, including fordability of 1.2 m water obstacles and trench crossing ability of 2 meters. The tiltable cabin is compatible with add-on armor and NBC protection. The vehicle is powered by a 380/420 PS engine. Another military vehicle unveiled by Tata is the Light Specialist Vehicle (LSV), configurable for reconnaissance missions, counter-insurgency operations or as an ambulance.

    The new Armored Stallion. Photo: Ashok Leyland.

    Ashok Leyland is showing three new armored vehicles, all based on the proven Stallion platform – the 4×4 wheeled Mine Protected Vehicle, a Multi-Purpose Armored Carrier (MPAC) and an armored bus. MPAC uses the Stallion 4×4 platform upgraded with an armored sleeper cab and a protected load body for cargo into a versatile platform, configurable into a troop carrier, logistics support vehicle, riot control, communication vehicles, command post or ambulance.. The cab and load body offers protection against AK-47 Kalashnikov 7.62x 39 mm on both the sleeper cab and load body. Ashok Leyland’s new armored bus is also based on the Stallion. It was developed in response to the Indian Army’s requirement to transport army personnel and their families throughout insurgency infected areas. The armored bus is designed to offer all round protection against 7.62 x 51 ball (SLR), 5.56 mm INSAS and AK – 47/56 projectiles fired from a distance of 10m. The design features a unique approach to blast protection of a large cabin – the roof-hung floor. The seats in the bus are mounted on a floor which is hung from the roof, mitigating the blast effect, caused by mine or IED explosion under the vehicle. The floor is also covered by spall liners offering additional protection from penetrating fragments.

    Photo below: The new Armored bus. Photo: Ashok Leyland

    New ‘MaxxPro Dash’ MRAP to Get Independent Suspension

    The new MaxxPro Dash is fitted with the DXM suspension system, provided by Hendrickson Truck Suspension Systems and AxleTech International. Photo: Navistar Defense.

    Navistar Defense was awarded a $752 million contract to produce 1,050 enhanced ‘MaxxPro Dash’ Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles. Unlike previous version of the MRAP, the new models of the lighter ‘Dash’ will be fitted with DXM independent suspension systems provided Hendrickson Truck Suspension Systems and AxleTech International. This vehicle upgrade further improves the vehicle’s off-road capabilities, which is vital given Afghanistan’s lack of road infrastructure. Navistar will conduct work at its Garland, Texas, and West Point, Miss., assembly plants. Deliveries will begin in April and will be completed by the summer of 2010. Parts are not included in the contract.

    The new MaxxPro Dash is fitted with the DXM suspension system, provided by Hendrickson Truck Suspension Systems and AxleTech International. Photo: Navistar Defense.

    “After conducting an extensive trade study, we selected a no-compromises suspension system for our MaxxPro,” said Archie Massicotte, president, Navistar Defense. “The design also minimizes the effort needed to integrate the system onto existing vehicles, which will accelerate the delivery of this important modification should the Army be interested in retrofitting our MaxxPro and 7000 Series fleets.”

    Since May 2007, Navistar has received orders for a total of 7,494 MaxxPro MRAP vehicles to help combat improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and other threats. In late 2008, the company modified its design for added mobility and produced the MaxxPro Dash MRAP variant. The addition of an independent suspension solution further improves mobility and is one of several capability insertions that will be incorporated into the next 1,050 MaxxPro Dash units.

    Navistar also has provided more than 8,100 International 7000 Series vehicles to the Afghan National Army and Afghan National Police.

    Psyops and the Battle for Marjah


    Photo above: F Company (Fire Support) 1 Royal Welsh in position in the area of west of Gorbay Noray, as part of Operation Moshtaraq. February 14, 2010. Photo credit: SSgt Mark Jones British Army, Crown Copyright.

    As the campaign to take over the town of Marjah enters its second day, the fog of battle has somewhat dissipated, bringing to light one of the untold truths over what the real battle is all about. Coalition forces conducting the operation are trying their utmost, to emphasize the role of the Afghan National Army as an equal member of the engaged military force, and lead element representing the interests and authority of the central government in Kabul. But the battle is not fought over the land, but on the hearts and minds of the local Pashtun tribe people, torn between their fear and loyalty to the residing Taliban, and the hope, while suspicion of the foreign-backed puppet regime in Kabul, promising the residents economic development and better living conditions.

    Troops ready to leave Camp Bastion as part of the 15,000 soldiers assembling the multinational force set to secure the town of Marjah, once a Taliban stronghold. Below: Marines from Weapons Platoon, Charlie Company, 1st Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment gather materials for assembling an outpost in their new position.

    The military assembled a divisional size battle group, numbering over 15,000 men, including U.S. Marines, British forces and Afghan National Army and police. To facilitate safe entry into the town, suspected to be heavily mined, and booby-trapped with IEDs deployed everywhere by Taliban warfighters, coalition troops are supported by mine breeching systems, designed to clear safe lanes for the heavily protected MRAP vehicles, approaching the town. This formidable show of force has no doubt made its mark on the local population. Once established inside the town, troops could encounter significant trouble, if the Taliban will choose to stay and fight. Operation Mushtarak (“Together”) proceeded with a well publicized and seemingly convincing military effort, demonstrating NATO’s determination to change things in the area. Just before the campaign started, commanders even publicized their willingness to accept the Taliban laying down their arms, but declaring they will relentlessly pursue those that insist to continue fighting.

    The Afghan guerillas have no intentions to make things easy for the coalition, nor do they have plans to ‘play by the rules’. Most probably they will choose to disengage the attackers, which is the traditional guerilla tactic.

    After all, they played this game many times before. Retreating to the mountains and desert, the Taliban stick to their turf – poor land-locked and isolated country, that has little to offer the new world, but growing illegal opium crops. In the past these mountain tribes were thriving in ‘protecting’ transportation routes, ‘taxing’ convoys carrying herbs, spices and exotic goods from India to Europe, which had to pass through their land. In the 20th century this source of income has dissipated, leaving the proud robbers with nothing but opium farming to live on. Those that opted to continue and live on their swords found new causes to fight for, joining the Taliban depending on foreign support by the Islamic jihad. In the past three decades this support proved to be dependable and also profitable, as Islamic warfighters gathered here to fight against the communist invasion in 1980. In recent years, the combination of opium and jihad war seems to have been particularly successful.
    Having assessed the situation well in advance of the coalition attack, the Taliban made it clear to the population, that despite the newcomers’ declared eagerness to improve their livelihood, they will not stay in the area forever – but the Taliban certainly will, as it is their very environment.


    Taliban will most likely avoid direct confrontation with superior armed coalition forces, and fight back only where it is pressed against the wall. Therefore, paradoxically, heavy fighting will most likely be the places, where coalition forces have succeeded in surprising the Taliban by disrupting their escape routes. On the other hand, Taliban’s battle plan would most likely revert to contain the attack, wait for the new troops to settle in, learn their routines and focus on the main objective – disrupting the coalition’s approach to the win the support of the local population. Therefore, ambushes would not merely aim to kill soldiers, but likely to expose the population to coalition counterfire, taking place in areas where communications and coordination do not work properly, identification of friends and foes are made problematic and innocent people are abundantly present , resulting in dramatic rise in collateral casualty rates. Lessons learned from the devastating attack on abandoned fuel tankers in northern Afghanistan, that took the lives of many innocent Afghans were undoubtedly well digested by the Taliban and will soon become part of their operational planning in their attempt to disrupt the government effort to impose their rule in Helmand province.

    In order to convince the people on their good intentions, Coalition forces will have to dismount from their heavy armored cars, exposing themselves to potential Taliban attacks by snipers, ambushes, and cleverly camouflaged IEDs. The growing transportation on the roads will also provide more opportunities for attacks and robbery. Furthermore, billions of dollars pouring in through the corrupted Kabul government are likely to open new opportunities for the Taliban, rather than protect the south from this menace.

    An indispensable weapon in this asymmetric battle is reducing support by the local population to Taliban. Psychological ‘manipulation’ could become a useful tool in denying the guerilla from getting such support. Winning popular support among the people of Helmand could enable the coalition to gain access to human intelligence, receive early warning about IED placements, pre-empt Taliban movements, preparations and regrouping.

    A perception of ‘success’, uninterrupted by excessive civilian or military casualties, is imperative not only for the administration in Washington, London and Kabul, but also for the people in Helmand itself – where a succession of positive events could lead to a ‘change of heart’ among the locals, toward Kabul, eventually opening the coalition partners an escape hatch from this unforgiving war-torn country.

    Operation Moshtarak is the first major operation under General McChrystal’s new strategy, that involves Afghan and ISAF forces working in partnership, with a clear focus of protecting the population. The operation has been planned to remove insurgents from areas of central Helmand not previously cleared by ISAF troops. The British and their Afghan partners focusing on the areas around Nad ‘Ali, and the Americans and their Afghan partners focusing on the Marjah region. This area, located 15-20 km west and southwest of the region capital Lakshar Gar in central Helmand, have been within the control of the Taliban for quite some time. Relatively isolated from the main roads, but close enough to NATO bases, the area became an important center of the insurgency.

    The clearing phase of operation Moshtarak began February 13 and continued Feb 14, with the combined forces conducting a number of mounted and dismounted patrols. Elements of the combined force have been engaged in periodic small arms fire fights, and sniper fire. According to ISAF sources, a number of insurgents have been either killed or detained. No losses were reported among copalition forces in the second day, although some warfighters have sustained some injuries. On the first day ISAF reported two causalties – one briton and one U.S. Marine. There were wounded among the Afghan forces as well.

    In a stark contrast to the low causalty rate among the warfighters on both sides, Afghan civilians have suffered the most – Two rockets from a High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) launched at insurgents firing upon Afghan and ISAF forces killed 12 civilians as they impacted approximately 950 feet (290 meters) short off their intended target, a Taliban stronghold in the Nad Ali district, in the Helmand province. Following the attack the use of HIMARS has been suspended and resumed two days later after an investigation cleared that the blame was not in the weapon system. Afghan sources have claimed that only nine among the 12 killed were civilian.

    F Company (Fire Support) 1 Royal Welshmove through the fields near Gorbay Noray, after landing in a wave of three Chinook helicopters, bringing the troops close to their objective. The prevalent IED threat meant the most suitable landing sites for the helicopters were ploughed fields which meant extremely hard going through mud, ditches and water for the troops.

     

     

    Photos by: SSgt Will Craig (British Army) Crown Copyright

    The clearing phase began before dawn on 13 Feb, through a ground assault combined with heliborne assault and air support, aimed at securing key objectives in Western Babaji, Nad-e Ali and Marjeh areas. Afghan units have been partnered with ISAF units throughout the operation and Afghan elements participated in all the planning stages. Immediately after seizing their objectives, the military invited local leaders for meetings to discuss future activities. In one such ‘Shura’ in the Showal District Centre, over one hundred locals attended. According to ISAF reports, “local elders across the area have expressed their support for the operation and indicated real enthusiasm for a permanent security presence and for the Afghan Government’s efforts to re-establish governance in the Nad-e Ali district.”

    “I think one can see that in other areas where we had been providing the requisite degree of security for long enough, the ISAF strategy is clearly working.’ Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup British Chief of the Defence Staff added.

    After conducting a Shura with the village elders, the unit deploys a first patrol, led by thr Afghan National Army (ANA) element, moving into the Nad e Ali area of Helmand Province, an area once a Taliban stronghold. Photos above and below: SSgt Mark Jones MOD Crown Copyright

    Marines with Alpha Company, 2nd Combat Engineer Battalion employ a buldozer to establish a temporary passage through a trench dug by U.S. engineers bac in the 1970s. Alpha Company built numerous makeshift bridges in order for Marines and vehicles to have a route into the Taliban stronghold of Marjah, less than 20 km southeast of the region capital Lashkar Gar. During the construction of their last bridge, Alpha Company encountered an improvised explosive device, no Marines were injured. (photo above: Lance Cpl. Walter Marino, USMC.) The marines have assembled with construction materials and pipelines to aid the civil reconstruction teams moving in for the follow-on phase. Photo bBelow: Lance Cpl. Walter Marino, USMC.

    Highlighting the role of the Afghan National Army (ANA) in this operation is critical for building confidence in the Afghan forces, which so far were not much appreciated by the coalition. This is probably the reason why an assault on a desolate, minor objective as Marjah is blown out of proportion in such a scale.

    NATO forces, primarily American and British, are training and mentoring thousands of ANA soldiers each month at the Military Training Centre, Kabul (KMTC). “It is absolutely fundamental we get this right.” says Lieutenant Colonel Nick Ilic, a British infantry commander in charge of the training. “This is our exit strategy. The guys down south in Helmand and elsewhere are holding the line, creating a safe environment for us to train the Afghan National Army (ANA) to the right standard and quality so they can take on the fight when they’re ready.” Photo below: ANA recruits march through the training center.

    Photo: Lt Sally Armstrong, RN / MOD (Crown Copyright)

    Airborne Laser Demonstrates First Ballistic Missile Intercept

    The Missile Defense Agency successfully achieved a major milestone in the missile defense program, demonstrating the airborne laser can effectively destroy ballistic missiles in flight. The recent test series marks the first time a laser weapon has engaged and destroyed an in-flight ballistic missile, and the first time that any system has accomplished it in the missile’s boost phase of flight. ALTB has the highest-energy laser ever fired from an aircraft, and is the most powerful mobile laser device in the world.

    ALTB is ‘one of a kind’ aircraft, and, despite its potential, the program’s funding was reduced significantly last year, eliminating funding for follow-on aircraft and more testing, along with the Pentagon’s thrust toward sea-based missile defense. However, the successful results could get the program back on track. “We’ve been saying for some time that the Airborne Laser Testbed would be a pathfinder for directed energy and would expand options for policymakers and warfighters,” said Michael Rinn, Boeing vice president and ALTB program director. “With this successful experiment, the Airborne Laser Testbed has blazed a path for a new generation of high-energy, ultra-precision weaponry. ALTB technology and future directed-energy platforms will transform how the United States defends itself and its friends and allies. Having the capability to precisely project force, in a measured way, at the speed of light, will save lives.” Said Rinn.


    During the test conducted yesterday evening the Boeing 747-400F based Airborne Laser Test-Bed (ATLB) intercepted an ascending liquid-fuelled ballistic missile in the first attempt to shoot down a ballistic missile by high power laser beam. A second attempt, conducted less than an hour later, involved a solid-fuelled missile launched from a land-based site on San Nicolas Island. The laser engaged the second target but terminated lasing short of destroying it. A similar target was destroyed by the laser last week (February 3rd) in a previous test of the system.

    At 8:44 p.m. (PST), February 11, 2010, a short-range threat-representative ballistic missile was launched from an at-sea mobile launch platform. Within seconds, the ALTB used onboard sensors to detect the boosting missile and used a low-energy laser to track the target. The ALTB then fired a second low-energy laser to measure and compensate for atmospheric disturbance. Finally, the ALTB fired its megawatt-class Chemical Oxygen Iodine High Energy Laser, heating the boosting ballistic missile to critical structural failure. The entire engagement occurred within two minutes of the target missile launch, while its rocket motors were still thrusting.

    The experiment, conducted at Point Mugu Naval Air Warfare Center-Weapons Division Sea Range off the central California coast, serves as a proof-of-concept demonstration for directed energy technology. The ALTB is a pathfinder for the nation’s directed energy program and its potential application for missile defense technology. The revolutionary use of directed energy is very attractive for missile defense, with the potential to attack multiple targets at the speed of light, at a range of hundreds of kilometers, and at a low cost per intercept attempt compared to current technologies.

    Northrop Grumman developed the liquid-fuelled megawatt-class High Energy Laser, which utilizes the Beam Control/Fire Control system developed by Lockheed Martin. The Battle Management System developed by Boeing, which is also the Airborne Laser Testbed prime contractor.

    BAE Systems Unveils the New CV-90 Recce Candidate for MOD FRES-SV Program

    BAE Systems unveiled the latest version of the CV-90 medium weight, tracked armored vehicle at the International Armored Vehicles exhibition last week in London. The demonstrator vehicle is proposed as one of two candidates for the FRES Scout Vehicle (FRES SV). The vehicle has been undergoing extensive testing and field trials, part of which is shown on the attached video. The chassis is based on the CV-90, applied with additional modular armor skirts for enhanced side protection. The vehicle carries the MTIP-2 manned turret, employing the CT40 automatic cannon firing case-telescopic rounds and a coaxial machine gun. The turret is also applied with modular armor, designed with attachments similar to the hull. All photos: Noam Eshel, Defense-Update

    The main gun is the CT-40 automatic cannon, firing 40mm case-telescopic rounds. The demonstrator vehicle was displayed with enhanced protection for the barrel and massive protecting for the cradle, eliminating a potential weak point in the vehicle’s frontal arc. Unlike conventional ammunition, the case-telescopic projectile is encased within a cylindrical container packing the propellant. Compared to the current 30mm Rarden gun and 40mm Bofors cannon, the CT-40 offers 30% saving in the weight in volumetric dimension while increasing lethality.

    Forward and side views of the MTIP-2 turret on the CV-90 Recce vehicle, showing the main gun, coax, and multiple optronic systems.

    Also visible on the turret were four electro-optical devices – two fixed day/night sights, the gunner’s main sight that can be slaved to the commander’s line of sight, and the secondary sight coupled with the gun, a third, multi-sensor stabilized observation system can be operated by the commander in a ‘hunter-killer’ configuration as well as for teh vehicle’s primary scout and recce role.

    The vehicle on display has not been equipped with all-round vision, but all three crew stations are fitted with large vision blocks, day and night vision systems, covering wide field of view. The commander’s sight used on the vehicle comprises an elevated, stabilized, electro-optical multi-sensor payload which fulfils the vehicle’s primary scout mission. Attached to a fixed assembly well above the turret’s level, this payload provides the crew with clear line of sight for observation and engagement, from defilade positions, maintaining the vehicle relatively protected and combat ready. (Modern scout vehicles have commonly been fitted with more complex telescopic masts carrying the electro-optical system, but this is not the case in this configuration)

    The driver's hatch attached with the new Driver Thermal Viewer on top.

    The driver shares the same, large three-part vision block similar to those provided to other crew members, providing a wide field of view. An addition three-element Driver Thermal Viewer assembly installed above the driver’s hatch, covering the same field of view provides the driver with continued visibility under limited visibility, at night, through dust, smoke and fog. The driver is also provided with rear-view camera to improve reverse movements.

    The vehicle’s electronic systems design is based on open and scalable architecture employing the new standard-based Generic Vehicle Architecture (GVA) – a new technological initiative launched by the British MOD and industry. This architecture was first demonstrated in the Panther and is applied to the CV90 Recce and Warrior Capability Sustainment Program (WCSP) programs.

    Diehl’s Sky Sphere set to Defeat UAS, OWA Drones Head-On

    0
    Diehl Defence has teamed up with Skysec to develop a drone interceptor. Diehl works with Skysec’s subsidiary, Skysec Defence, to modify the original civilian-oriented net-arresting interceptor into a hard-kill system suitable for military missions....

    Defense Update Weekly News Summary

    0
    Welcome to the latest episode of Defense-Update News Summary! In this episode, we dive into this week’s developments in defense technology, military acquisitions, and strategic partnerships worldwide. Some of this week's highlights include: Elbit Systems...

    Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle Program Launches as Part of Rafale F5 Standard

    0
    The French Ministry of Armed Forces has officially launched the Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle (UCAV) program as part of the Rafale F5 standard development. This event marks the beginning of a new era in...

    Air Defense & C-UAS Innovations at the AUSA 2024 Exhibition

    0
    Army Air Defense Undergoes Significant Modernization to Counter Drone Threats The U.S. Army's air defense branch has experienced its most substantial modernization and growth in over four decades, primarily driven by the need to counter...

    Elbit Systems Address US Army Artillery Modernization with Sigma 155×52 Wheeled Howitzer

    0
    Elbit Systems of America showcases the Sigma Next Generation Howitzer at AUSA 2024, where competing systems from Sweden, South Korea, France, and Germany are likely to be presented, some in models, others in full...

    Defense-Update Weekly News Summary

    0
    Welcome to the latest episode of Defense-Update News Summary! In this episode, we dive into this week’s developments in defense technology, military acquisitions, and strategic partnerships worldwide. Some of this week's highlights include: Elbit Systems...

    Israel Revamps Aerial Bomb Production

    0
    Elbit Systems has signed a 1.5-billion-shekel (approximately $400 million) contract with Israel's Ministry of Defense to establish an aerial bomb manufacturing bombs for the Israeli Air Force. In the past, the government-owned IMI operated...