Wednesday, November 13, 2024
More
    Home Blog Page 365

    KC-X Program Enters the Final Round

    Boeing and Northrop Grumman submitted this week their competing bids for the US Air Force’ KC-135 tanker replacement program (KC-X).
    Boeing’s 7,000-page proposal describes a tanker uniquely designed for its primary air refueling mission, but also capable of moving cargo, passengers, patients and medical crewmembers.

    The Boeing Global Tanker Team producing the KC-767 Advanced Tanker includes Smiths Aerospace, Rockwell Collins, Vought Aircraft Industries, Honeywell, Pratt & Whitney and Spirit AeroSystems. The experienced team has proven expertise in aerial refueling systems, network centric operations, integrated avionics solutions and lean manufacturing concepts.

    The KC-30 proposal submission represents over two and-a-half years developmental effort, by the Northrop Grumman-led KC-30 Tanker Team comprising a global group of companies including Northrop Grumman, EADS, General Electric, Sargent Fletcher and Honeywell.

    Both teams highlight the vision and long term benefits of the new tanker, which will compensate for the huge acquisition cost or the tanker fleet replacement. “The competition to build the KC-X is as much a competition of vision as it is of aircraft,” said Scott J. Seymour, corporate vice president and president of Northrop Grumman Integrated Systems sector. “The KC-767 Advanced Tanker will do for refueling what the C-17 has done for airlift – it will revolutionize mobility operations,” said James Albaugh, president and CEO, Boeing Integrated Defense Systems. “Right-sized to enable access to 1,000 more bases than the KC-135, this robust aircraft allows commanders to deploy more tankers, ensures more booms are in the sky, covers more refueling orbits and offloads more fuel.”

    The KC-X program will be worth $30-40 billion. The projected life cycle cost of the new tankers has been estimated at $200 billion. The Air Force plans spending about $8.2 billion until 2010 on development and testing, and expects the first squadron of 16 aircraft to become operational by 2013.

    Based on a new version of the 767-200 Long Range Freighter, Boeing’s KC-767 Advanced Tanker’s innovations include an advanced fly-by-wire boom, new wing refueling pods, a centerline hose drum refueling unit, an advanced commercial digital flight deck and a third-generation remote vision refueling system. Boeing stresses the ‘all American’ base of its aircraft which will be designed, built and supported by 44,000 Americans and 300 U.S. suppliers. They also argue that their aircraft is more fuel efficient, and is expected to save about $10 billion in fuel costs, compared to the KC-30. Boeing plans to produce the tanker at its facilities in Everett, Washington, on the existing 767 commercial production line. Installation of military refueling systems and flight test activities will take place at the company’s finishing center in Wichita, Kansas.

    Northrop Grumman highlights the added benefits provided by the larger A330 platform. “The KC-30 Tanker will provide our Air Force leaders and combatant commanders everything they have asked for in air-to-air refueling and more.” Northrop Grumman’s KC-30 Tanker carries 45,000 more pounds of fuel than a KC-135, providing a significant boost to the U.S. Air Force’s global reach. The KC-30 is also designed to refuel Navy and coalition aircraft, and to serve as a multi-role transport aircraft to move passengers, cargo and medical evacuation patients. The KC-30 incorporates defense systems, precision fly-by- wire technology, and the ability to integrate a communications suite and a global support network. “Northrop Grumman and its KC-30 Tanker Team are in this competition to win it.” Said Seymour. Based on the commercially available Airbus A330 platform, KC30 will be assembled in Mobile, Ala. This platform was selected in the last three worldwide tanker competitions to support the air forces of Australia, the United Kingdom and the United Arab Emirates.

    Hormuz Straits come into Focus as Gulf Tension Mounts

    The London based, Arabic newspaper Al-Hayat reported last Monday, that the Iranian armed forces had raised their level of alert in anticipation of a possible attack on its nuclear facilities. What seems to be the reason for Tehran’s concern, are two developments, one interior and the other exterior. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s latest statements at Natanz enrichment plant, praising Iran’s nuclear program, sent a new signal to the international community, in particular Washington, that Tehran was clearly defying all calls to stop the ongoing momentum. Ali Larijani, Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator with the West even went as far as to warn, that Iran would review its membership of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

    A Map of the Streits of Hormuz


    The exterior event, which raised eyebrows in Tehran must have been the quite unprecedented but widely publicized visit of a high-profile military group, led by US Marine general James T Conway, to 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) aboard the multipurpose amphibious assault ship USS Baatan (LHD 5) in the Persian Gulf. In past circumstances, such visits were kept away from the public, or played down.

    The waters in the Arabian Gulf ( or Persian Gulf), are highly turbulent these days. The United States has bolstered its naval presence only recently, by deploying another carrier strike force – USS Nimitz, which is on its way. Already deployed there are the carrier strike groups USS Dwight D Eisenhower which is located on station in the Gulf, while the John C. Stennis Strike Group, cruises not far away, in the Arabian Sea. Also deployed in the Arabian Sea is a French carrier group, led by the Charles de Gaulle. What had already sent jitters to Iran’s military brass, were the US Navy’s most extensive maneuvers held in the Gulf region since the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The exercises involved over 10,000 US personnel on warships and aircraft making simulated attacks on enemy shipping, hunting enemy submarines and disarming mine barriers.
    Already on top of the world’s focus of interest, due to its crucial strategic posture, the Persian Gulf is a 600-mile (nearly 1000 km) long body of water that narrows to 34 miles (approx 55km) at the Hormuz Strait before connecting to the Arabian Sea. To the west are the Gulf states and Saudi Arabia and to its East spans the nearly 2500km long coast of Iran. Most of the coastal region of Iran bordering the Gulf is of rugged mountainous scenery which has significant strategic value. In those the mountains overlooking the gulf, Iranian artillery batteries are deployed, according to US intelligence reports, some even equipped with 155mm artillery shells filled with chemical agents.

    Due to its highly geo-strategic location, Iran possesses the capability to disrupt, if not completely stop, the flow of oil from the Gulf. Giant oil tanker traffic carrying daily cargo of millions barrels per day could find themselves threatened by mines or crossfire between opposing forces, a concern, which would raise insurance fees to unacceptable level. Such a development could send shockwaves throughout the oil world- and Iran’s rogue president is perfectly aware of its consequences- oil prices will sky-rocket to unprecedented proportions, filling his nation’s coffers with funding for his sinister projects!

    Due to its highly geo-strategic location, Iran possesses the capability to disrupt, if not completely stop, the flow of oil from the Gulf. Giant oil tanker traffic carrying daily cargo of millions barrels per day could find themselves threatened by mines or crossfire between opposing forces, a concern, which would raise insurance fees to unacceptable level. Such a development could send shockwaves throughout the oil world- and Iran’s rogue president is perfectly aware of its consequences- oil prices will sky-rocket to unprecedented proportions, filling his nation’s coffers with funding for his sinister projects!

    But present focus is primarily on the strategic Strait of Hormuz., by far the world’s most critical oil traffic chokepoint, which lies at the entrance to the Persian Gulf. Over 14 million barrels of oil are passing daily, round-the-clock, through this Strait. The strait itself is barely 21 miles (34km) wide. At its narrowest, the Strait consists of two 1-mile (1.5km)-wide channels for inbound and outbound tanker traffic, as well as a 2-mile (3km)-wide buffer zone.

    The Iranian Naval base at Bandar Abbas.

    But that’s not all that bothers the worlds leading shipping Barons in this dangerous stretch of waterway. The Iranian port of Bandar Abbas is poised at the head of the Straits of Hormuz and is the military nerve centre from which the Iranian defense strategy in the Persian Gulf would be coordinated in an emergency.

    Its location along the Gulf already made it a highly strategic military area since ancient history. In the 5th century BC, Darius, the king of Achaemenid Empire embarked from here for his daring expedition into India. Also, as one of the Persian Gulf’s most dominating points, the port continued its importance supporting Alexander the Great’s conquests in this region. The Portuguese navy, the Persian Safavid Empire, local Arab dynasties and the British took turns in controlling the area before it finally reverted to Iranian control in the last century.

    Bandar Abbas’s coastline already bristles with military surface radars and anti-aircraft batteries as well as sprawling navy camps. Surface-to-surface missiles capable of targeting shipping moving through the Straits of Hormuz are deployed in fortified bunkers protecting them against attack from US Navy airpower in the Gulf. The effectiveness of these coast-to-ship rockets was dramatically demonstrated by Hezbollah last year when it hit a high-tech Israeli Sa’ar missile corvette Hanit, off the Lebanese coast at the start of the five-week conflict.

    The port facilities built at Chahbahar. The  patrol boats seen in the photo below  are located at the piers seen on the right side of this photo.


    Five missile carrying fast patrol boats  seen here based at the Iranian naval base at Chahbahar, south of the Hormoz streitsChahbahar naval base, the closest and best access point of Iran to the Indian Ocean is being modified to serve the kilo-class submarines Iran bought from Russia in the 1990s. In 2001 the Iranian armed forces staged the Unity-80 naval exercises from here, as part of an effort to make the Chahbahar naval base and its submarines operational. The naval base at Jask is located in Hormuzgan Province, on a commanding position at the entrance to the Hormuz strait. Its highly strategic position was already widely recognized when in 1820 the English fleet fought the “Battle of Jask” against the Portuguese navy in the Gulf. In the Second World War, a British tanker, the British Venture was sunk by a Japanese submarine off Jask, which at the time held an RAF surveillance station. Currently, intelligence reports have identified Jask as the center of Chinese made long-range missiles.

    US Military analysts warn that Iran’s missile armaments pose the greatest concern for American forces in the Gulf, especially for the US Navy. Geographically, the Iranian coast facing the Persian Gulf is a looming wall of mountains that look down upon any naval forces arrayed in those waters. But the greatest threat comes from the Iranian occupied islands located off the Persian Gulf coast which are strategically sited, virtually controlling the shipping lanes of the Strait of Hormuz.

    US intelligence has located advanced anti-ship missiles are deployed at Abu Musa and two other islands, Qeshm and Sirri. Among the most dangerous, is the Russian-made 3M-82 Moskit anti-ship cruise missiles (NATO designation: SS-N-22 “Sunburn”. To demonstrate their effectiveness, one has only to be reminded of the serious incident, in which, right in these very waters, in May 1987 the USS Stark was nearly cut in half by two anti-ship missiles. The Asian Times reported recently, that Abu Musa Island, along with its mountainous areas, is teeming with Supersonic cruise missiles such as Yakonts, Moskits, Granits, and Brahmos, controlled by Iranian IRGC crews.

    In late January of 2000, US satellites monitored an Iranian Marine Brigade, with supporting artillery and SAMs, reinforcing Qeshm Island where many mobile anti-ship missiles were already located. Revolutionary Guard units also moved to reinforce the islands of Jazirezye Larak, Tunb al Kubra, and Abu Musa, as well as miscellaneous oil platforms. These surprising moves remained unexplained at the time, but raised the level of alert in nearby US military installations in Saudi Arabia and Gulf nations. At the same time the USS John C. Stennis strike group deployed to its station in the Gulf in support of the UK/US enforced no-fly zone in Sadam’s Iraq.

    An unconfirmed report quoting unidentified Pentagon sources has recently revealed a top secret Iranian contingency plan, allegedly leaked by a former Iranian intelligence defector. The document detailed a strike plan which schematically laid out Iran’s military and strategic assets from the Straits of Hormuz. Coordinated by an operational headquarters, forces would integrate Revolutionary Guards missile units, strike aircraft, surface and underwater vessels, anti-shipping missiles, mine cruise missiles, all hitting targets in the Sea of Oman and northern Indian Ocean. Senior Iranian commanders, like Rear-Admiral Ali Fadavi, of the Revolutionary Guard have expressed similar claims, although without going into operational details. While those reports should be regarded with caution, they nevertheless render an insight into the ongoing trends in Tehran’s naval strategy in the Gulf.

    Anti-ship missile positions prepared at the western coastline of Larak island.Among its options, the Iranian Navy is reviewing contingency plans to attack tanker traffic and US naval forces in the Gulf. According to reports the IRGC naval wing has recently upgraded its “swarming” raids tactics, practiced already during the Iraq-Iran war with considerable success. Using masses of small rapid-attack speed boats these tactics require light forces with substantial firepower, which are capable to mount attacks on enemy prime targets, such as fully loaded giant oil tankers. Approaching from multiple directions, out of concealed bases along the coastline, hundreds of agile boats will converge on their target simultaneously from different directions. Fast missile or torpedo attack craft, are most suitable for this kind of operation. A small-scale demonstration could be the dramatic IRGC capture of the 15 brits in the Shatt-al Arab earlier this month.

    Among Iran’s somewhat larger boats are ten Houdong-class patrol boats purchased from China for the IRGC (Pasdaran) Revolutionary Guard Corps. These ships displace 205 tons, carry four C802 missiles, a twin 30mm gun, and a twin 23mm gun. Also in service are ten 275 ton Karman class (French built Combattante II ) missile boats, armed with 76mm guns and C802 missiles.

    Four Iranian Navy Alvand (VT 5 class) corvettes, seen here based at Bandar Abbas naval base.

    It seems quite obvious that neither the Iranian navy nor its air force is a match against US Navy firepower deployed in the Persian Gulf. However, by using sophisticated asymmetric naval tactics against vulnerable prime targets, combining protected coastal and island deployed anti-ship missiles, mining operations with swarm tactics, the Iranian IRGC naval wing can cause substantial losses to strategic shipping lanes, as well as pose considerable challenge to US Navy strike group commanders, in their mission to defend this strategic lifeline for the benefit of global economy.

    Bundeswehr Receives first EADS’ TETRAPOL radios

    EADS Secure Networks has started to deliver the TETRAPOL bw to the German Army (Bundeswehr). TETRAPOL is a military communications system serving subscribers over a large area, similar to a commercial cellular (mobile phone) network. Unlike commercial phone services, the TETRAPOL system utilizes the TETRA standard, designed to serve law enforcement and first responders. The TETRAPOL bw system will support German Army forces in out-of-area operations. The €55 million procurement project includes the delivery of 30 mobile, fully autonomous digital radio systems for out-of-area operations by the end of 2007.

    The TETRAPOL bw communications system will enable the Bundeswehr to deliver mobile voice and data communication to deployed forces, in a secure and fail-safe network at all tactical communication levels. The system utilizes base stations, deployable, container-based communications modules serving an area at a range of 25 km. The current system will serve 10,000 digital radio terminals (phone handsets). Each handset can also establish direct communication with other handsets, at close range of up to 2.5 km. The German Army has already fielded TETRAPOL systems in Afghanistan and Kosovo, where such systems were deployed as a communication platform and integrated into the command and control system.

    TETRAPOL bw will operate at the frequency range of 385-390/ 395-399.9 MHz, which is compatible with international spectrum availability. The system will enable low rate data transfer at 2.4 kBit/s – 7.2 kBit/s, depending on load and availability.

    Navy Cancels Construction of 3rd Littoral Combat Ship

    The Secretary of the Navy Donald C. Winter announced yesterday (April 12, 2007) terminated the construction of the third Littoral Combat Ship (LCS 3), after the Department of the Navy and Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) failed to reach an agreement on the terms of a modified contract after the Navy realized that the cost of the first Lockheed ship would cost up to $375 million, far above the initial projection of $220 million. “LCS continues to be a critical warfighting requirement for our Navy to maintain dominance in the littorals and strategic choke points around the world,” said Winter. “While this is a difficult decision, we recognize that active oversight and strict cost controls in the early years are necessary to ensuring we can deliver these ships to the fleet over the long term.”


    The first and third LCS ships, constructed by Lockheed Martin under a cost-plus contract experienced significant cost overruns which led the Navy to stop the construction of the first LCS 3 in January 2007. The construction of the LCS-1 (USS Freedom) is currently underway at Lockheed Martin. Construction of two additional vessels, LCS-2 (USS Independence) and LCS-4 is underway at General Dynamics. The Navy announced it will closely monitor their cost performance at General Dynamics’, to prevent the repetition of such problems. “General Dynamics’ ships will continue on a cost-plus basis as long as its costs remain defined and manageable. If the cost performance becomes unacceptable, then General Dynamics will be subject to similar restructuring requirements.” Resulting from these problems, the Navy plans to transition to a single seaframe configuration in fiscal year 2010, following an operational assessment.

    “we are greatly disappointed by the cost growth experienced on the first LCS and by our inability to reach a satisfactory conclusion with our Navy customer on a path forward for the second ship,” said Lockheed Martin Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Bob Stevens. “We committed to a course of action that was intended to break the long-standing cycle of first-in-class ship cost growth and, while achieving several important program objectives, did not meet that goal.”

    Stevens admitted that while Lockheed Martin maintained the ship’s schedule and improved on its design, cost overruns have occurred. The company responded to the Navy’s request to restructure the contact for the second LCS ship but failed to reach an agreement. “We believe that our proposal was fully consistent with the Secretary’s stated desire to bring the benefits of increased competition to shipbuilding while holding the Navy’s industrial partners accountable for cost performance within their control”. “Our team is understandably frustrated that, having invested nearly three years of dedicated effort and significant corporate resources to bring LCS 1 to within 20 percent of completion, we will not have the opportunity to apply lessons learned to a second ship”

    ViaSat to Upgrade FBCB2 Satellite Network

    ViaSat, Inc. (Nasdaq:VSAT) will provide an upgrade for the satellite network serving the US Army main tactical situational awareness system, known as FBCB2-BFT (follow-on Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below – Blue Force Tracking).

    As part of the upgrade, ViaSat will build a prototype network and terminals that are designed to increase network capacity and improve accuracy over the current system. The company was awarded an initial $9.3 million contract from Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC), the Army’s system integrator for FBCB2. ViaSat and the RF Communications Division of Harris Corporation (NYSE:HRS) have cooperated in winning this effort. Work under the contract is scheduled to be complete in one year, and production and delivery of FBCB2-BFT replacement terminals may begin as early as 2008.

    Current military operations require improvements in BFT network capacity, accuracy, and operating costs along with expanding coverage worldwide. The ViaSat approach is based on its ArcLight spread spectrum technology which can yield significant latency reduction and increase the number of simultaneous users in high density operational environments. In addition, the terminal will be designed to operate in a dual mode that enables it to use commercial communication satellite resources, on-demand, in less dense environments.
    ViaSat will also provide a prototype network operations center, upgrading a satellite ground station hub, and development of new transceiver prototypes for aircraft and land vehicles.

    ViaSat to Upgrade FBCB2 Satellite Network

    ViaSat, Inc. (Nasdaq:VSAT) will provide an upgrade for the satellite network serving the US Army main tactical situational awareness system, known as FBCB2-BFT (follow-on Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below – Blue Force Tracking).


    As part of the upgrade, ViaSat will build a prototype network and terminals that are designed to increase network capacity and improve accuracy over the current system. The company was awarded an initial $9.3 million contract from Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC), the Army’s system integrator for FBCB2. ViaSat and the RF Communications Division of Harris Corporation (NYSE:HRS) have cooperated in winning this effort. Work under the contract is scheduled to be complete in one year, and production and delivery of FBCB2-BFT replacement terminals may begin as early as 2008.

    Current military operations require improvements in BFT network capacity, accuracy, and operating costs along with expanding coverage worldwide. The ViaSat approach is based on its ArcLight spread spectrum technology which can yield significant latency reduction and increase the number of simultaneous users in high density operational environments. In addition, the terminal will be designed to operate in a dual mode that enables it to use commercial communication satellite resources, on-demand, in less dense environments.
    ViaSat will also provide a prototype network operations center, upgrading a satellite ground station hub, and development of new transceiver prototypes for aircraft and land vehicles.

    US Marines’s Forward Observers Gear up For Excalibur

    The US Marine Corps plans to field hand held Target Location, Designation and Hand-off Systems (TLDHS) to equip artillery forward observers with entry device designed to “speak” with new Excalibur Unitary GPS Precision Guided Munitions expected to be fielded with teh corps’ M-777A2 155-mm howitzers by the third quarter of fiscal year 2007.

    The system will enable forward observers to perform target acquisition, then hand targets off to fire support units using formatted messages transmitted through existing and tactical data systems and planned communications equipment. Stauder Technologies will deliver 448 units under a $15 million contract awarded by the US Navy this. Delivery is expected to complete by April 2008.

    Spartan Chassis Expands Manufacturing Capacity With Two Additional Plants

    Spartan Chassis, Inc., a subsidiary of Spartan Motors, Inc. (NASDAQ:SPAR), is expanding its chassis production capacity, with the purchasing of two manufacturing facilities near its headquarters in Charlotte, Mich. The company is currently completing the production of Cougar based Iraqi Light Armored Vehicle (ILAV), under contract from BAE Systems. Spartan is gearing up to meet the surge in demand for Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles, while maintaining its commercial vehicles production.

    The new facilities will add 80,000 square-feet by Q3/07, providing floor space for the integration of key chassis components for the vehicles. According to Richard Schalter, president of Spartan Chassis, The company has recently constructed 107,000-square-foot facility for fire truck cab and chassis production.

    $150 Billion Cash Influx Fuels Satellite Market’s Up-Cycle

    After a five years of stagnation, the satellite market is finally rising and is expected to enter positive cycle; compared to 80 satellites launched per year, in the period 2000 – 2005. However, in 2006 the wind has changed with 32% increase in the number of satellite launched. According to Marco Caceres, senior space analyst for Teal. “But something changed in 2006. We launched 107 satellites, or a 32% increase over each of the previous two years. This represents more satellites than we have launched since 2000.”


    The total value ($9.39 billion) of the satellites launched last year was also higher than it has been since 1999. This trend is expected to continue, resulting from influx of investments in spacecraft and demand for services. “We have now seen two consecutive years of growth in the number of geostationary (GEO) commercial communications satellites launched and ordered during 2005-2006, says Caceres. “This is important, given that this segment of the satellite market is a key indicator for the overall market.”

    Teal Group released highlights of its study “Prospects for Growth in the Satellite Market” at the Space Foundation’s 23rd National Space Symposium. The overview emphasizes those segments within the world satellite market that offer the most significant opportunities for growth during the next 5-10 years.

    The study seeks to answer whether the growth was meaningful and marks the beginning of a consistent trend, or whether it was simply an anomaly. It notes, for example, the positive numbers for geostationary (GEO) commercial communications satellites.
    In order to pay for the construction and launch of these satellites, operators are attracting increasing levels of investment capital to their programs. Investor interest in both GEO and low earth orbit (LEO) satellite systems is on the rise, and this is good news for the satellite manufacturing and launch services industries. The GEO satellite market alone will be worth approximately $25 billion over the next 10 years, with an estimated 231 satellites built and launched, while the LEO mobile replacement satellites for in-orbit systems such as Globalstar, Iridium and Orbcomm will add up to $4 billion in market value through 2016.

    The emerging cycle within the commercial satellite market will coincide with an up cycle in the military satellite market, led by over 200 new- generation US military satellites valued at about $120 billion. “Many of these military satellites have been delayed and are severely over budget, but they will be built and launched because the requirements for them exist regardless,” says Caceres.

    DOD, Intelsat to Test Space Based Internet Routing

    The U.S. Department of Defense is planning to demonstrate ‘Internet Routing In Space’ (IRIS) under a Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) program recently awarded to Intelsat. According to Bill Shernit, President and CEO of Intelsat General, “IRIS extends the Internet into space, integrating satellite systems and the ground infrastructure for warfighters, first responders and others who need seamless and instant communications,” The IRIS payload will support network services for voice, video and data communications, enabling military units or allied forces to communicate with one another using Internet protocol and existing ground equipment.


    The IRIS payload will support network services for voice, video and data communications, enabling military units or allied forces to communicate with one another using Internet protocol and existing ground equipment.
    IRIS will serve as a computer processor in space, merging communications being received on various frequency bands and transmitting them to multiple users based on data instructions embedded in the uplink. The IRIS payload will interconnect one C-band and two Ku-band coverage areas. Its architecture and design allow for flexible IP packet (layer 3) routing or multicast distribution that can be reconfigured on demand. With the on-board processor routing the up and down communications links, the IRIS payload is expected to enhance satellite performance and reduce signal degradation from atmospheric conditions. “The IRIS architecture allows direct IP routing over satellite, eliminating the need for routing via a ground-based teleport, thereby dramatically increasing the efficiency and flexibility of the satellite communications link,” said Don Brown, Vice President of Hosted Payload Programs for Intelsat General. “IRIS is to the future of satellite-based communications what ARPANET was to the creation of the Internet in the 1960s.”

    Space Systems/Loral IS-14, the satellite selected to carry the IRIS payload is set for launch in the first quarter of 2009. It will be placed in geostationary orbit at 45 degrees West longitude with coverage of Europe, Africa and the Americas. The Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) will have overall responsibility for coordinating use of the IRIS technology among the government user community and for developing means of leveraging the IRIS capability once the satellite is in space. Awarding a JCTD for the IRIS program had the strong support of the U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM), which sees the program as a path to more efficient communications between warfighters around the globe. USSTRATCOM is a joint military command whose responsibilities include space operations, missile defense, intelligence, reconnaissance and global command and control.

    The demonstration will be conducted by Intelsat General Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelsat Ltd. Other team members participating in the tests are Cisco providing the IP routing technology and space hardened router producer SEAKR Engineering Inc. Following the demonstration, the equipment produced for the JCTD will be converted to commercial use.

    HUD-less JSF Test Flys Helmet Mounted Display System

    A Helmet Mounted Display System (HMDS) made by Vision Systems International, LLC (VSI) recently flew for the first time on an F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft. It was worn by Lockheed Martin’s Jon Beesley, who piloted the advanced fighter. The HMDS provides the pilot video with imagery in day or night conditions combined with precision symbology to give the pilot situational awareness and tactical capability. Also, by virtue of precise head tracking capability and low latency graphics processing, it provides the pilot with a virtual heads-up display (HUD). As a result, the F-35 is the first tactical fighter jet in 50 years to fly without a HUD.


    “Since the F-35 has no HUD, providing virtual HUD capability has become a mandatory requirement, entailing precise head tracking and display operation near zero latency. We are proud to be a key partner to the F-35 industrial and government team,” said VSI President Drew Brugal.

    The HMDS provides critical flight information to the pilot throughout the entire mission. In addition to standard HMD capabilities, such as extreme off-axis targeting and cueing offered on VSI’s other HMDs, Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS) and Display & Sight Helmet (DASH), this system fully utilizes the advanced avionics architecture of the F-35.

    F35 JSF seen during one of its recent test flights. The new helmet display and sight will provide th epilot a virtual HUD,. the basic aircraft does not have  built-in HUD, but uses the combination of wide area flat screen  and helmet display .

    The HMDS has been in development for five years and recently completed all required safety of flight tests, allowing in-flight seat ejections up to 450 KEAS (knots equivalent air speed). It hasThe JSF is the first aircraft in 50 years that is not equipped with HUD, instead it is fitted with wide area flat screen and the helmet display and sight system. This aircraft is flown by Jon Beasley,, wearing a standard (non HMDS) helmet.demonstrated structural integrity to 600 KEAS as a critical risk mitigation step towards full flight certification.

    Principal suppliers include Elbit Systems Ltd. (ESL), which provides the Display Management Computer for the Helmet that contains advanced graphic processing and head tracking; Rockwell Collins, which builds the Helmet Mounted Display, including advanced optical design; and Helmet Integrated Systems Ltd. (HISL) of the United Kingdom, providing the helmet shell and pilot personal fitting system.

    L-3 to Produce Uncooled FLIRs with new 1024×768 FPAs

    L-3 Communications Infrared Products is introducing an uncooled focal plane array (FPA) with 1024 x 768 pixel resolution. When integrated into thermal viewing modules, the new thermal sensor will offer significantly longer viewing range, with appreciably greater scene detail and considerably more capable electronic zoom. As an uncooled module the new FPA will cost significantly less than comparable high-resolution cooled FLIRs. The 1024 x 768 BFE262 FPA was developed by prime contractor Black Forest Engineering (BFE) on a Phase II SBIR for NASA Langley. The new product will be manufactured with L-3’s new 17 micron technology. Production is expected to begin in the next 12 to 18 months.

    Trophy Active Protection System

    The Trophy Active Defense System (ADS) was developed by RAFAEL under an Israel Defense Research & Development Directorate (DRDD) support, aiming to provide armored vehicles with a new level of protection against most current anti-tank threats. RAFAEL cooperated with IAI/Elta and has signed a marketing agreement with General Dynamics, offering the system to US and other armies worldwide. GD planned to introduce the system with every new and existing combat vehicle it produces, including Stryker, M-1A2 and FCS. According to GD officials, the system can be adapted to US requirements and enter production within two years. through hundreds of live firing tests with the Israel Defense Forces and abroad, where the system demonstrated effective neutralization of anti-tank rockets and guided missiles, high safety levels, insignificant residual penetration and minimal collateral damage. By mid 2007, Trophy was selected to equip the Israeli Merkava Mk4 main battle tanks, and it is also a candidate for integration into the Namer, the future Merkava based Armored Infantry Fighting Vehicle. The system is also considered to become part of the protection suite of future light armored vehicle (such as the Stryker) when these become operational with the Israeli Army.

    During the first months of 2009 the Trophy system went through comprehensive operational testing and was cleared for operational use after a successful operational firing test conducted early August 09. By the end of the year all new Merkava Mk4 tanks will be equipped with the system. Until then, Trophy is being retrofitted to operational tanks.

     

    The Trophy active protection system creates a hemispheric protected zone around the vehicle where incoming threats are intercepted and defeated. It has three elements providing – Threat Detection and Tracking, Launching and Intercept functions. The Threat Detection and Warning subsystem consists of several sensors, including flat-panel radars, placed at strategic locations around the protected vehicle, to provide full hemispherical coverage. Once an incoming threat is detected identified and verified, the Countermeasure Assembly is opened, the countermeasure device is positioned in the direction where it can effectively intercept the threat. Then, it is launched automatically into a ballistic trajectory to intercept the incoming threat at a relatively long distance.

    Specific details about the composition and mechanism of this explosive interceptor device are vague. From the briefing provided by US sources, Defense Update understands that Trophy is design to form a “beam” of fragments, which will intercept any incoming HEAT threat, including RPG rockets at a range of 10 – 30 meters from the protected platform. The Trophy development roadmap considers an enhanced countermeasure unit to be available in the future, and protect against kinetic energy (KE) threats. Trophy was designed to effectively operate in a dense urban environment, where armored vehicles operate closely with integrated infantry forces. Therefore, direction, formation and energy of the fragments are designed to ensure effective target kill with low collateral damage, and low risk to nearby troops. While not in use, the system is maintained in the stowed position, protected by an armor shield. The system has an automatic reload mechanism to handle multiple attacks.
    The system can simultaneously engage several threats, arriving from different directions, is effective on stationary or moving platforms, and is effective against short and long range threats (such as RPGs and ATGM). Trophy was designed to be effective in open or closed terrain, including urban area and can be operated under all weather conditions.

    On March 30, 2006 General Dynamics announced the successful completion of a firing test, conducted at the request of the Office of the Secretary of Defense’s Office of Force Transformation (OFT), to validate the Israeli Army’s tests that demonstrated Trophy’s ability to detect, track and destroy incoming rocket propelled grenades (RPG) at safe distances from the host vehicle. Trophy underwent this U.S. validation testing in support of OFT’s Project Sheriff, or the Full-Spectrum Effects Platform (FSEP). FSEP program officials seek to meet urgent operational requirements for a range of lethal and non-lethal technologies on a rapidly deployable platform. Trophy was selected in 2005 to be FSEP’s active protection solution. During the test, Trophy detected, tracked and defeated an inert incoming RPG while the Stryker combat vehicle was on the move. Similar tests were successfully conducted in Israel in late February.

    September 2006: The US Army opted to pursue a different system. Earlier in 2006, Raytheon received a development contract to demonstrate and develop the Quick Kill APS, to be integrated into the future FCS systems. The Army faced mounting criticism about not considering the Trophy system for the protection of its armored vehicles deployed in Iraq. Maj. Gen. Jeffrey A, Sorenson, the Army’s deputy for acquisition and systems management explained the decision (AFPS) saying the Israeli system is not a “produceable item.” The Israelis have been working on the Trophy system for 10 or 11 years, Sorenson said. “If this thing was ready to go, my question would be, why wasn’t it on the particular tanks that went into Lebanon?” he said. No Israeli Merkava tanks carried the Trophy system, he said.

    Other problems include the fact that the system right now has no reloading capability. Once it fires, that side of the vehicle is vulnerable. Which brings up another shortcoming: the Trophy can only be mounted to protect one axis. This means officials would have to mount multiple missile systems on every vehicle. The Quick Kill missile has 360-degree capability and a reload capability.

    Another worry is collateral damage, he said. “In a tight urban area, the Trophy system may take out the RPG, but we may kill 20 people in the process,” Sorenson said. “That is a concern we have that we haven’t fully evaluated.”

    However, an NBC report aired May 7, 2007 claims that in contrast to Sorenson’s observations, in a recent study made by the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA) requested by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, following a law passed by the US Congress, Trophy was found to be “in an advanced state of development” (with a TRL of 7-8). while Raytheon’s Quick Kill was judged a 3 for threshold capabilities (RPGs, ATGMs).

    April 2007: The development of the Trophy Active Protection System has been completed, including integration of the system into current AFVs as well as the introduction of reloading systems, positioning the Isaeli active protection system as the first available system in the West. Initial systems are expected to go into new production and currently deployed Merkava tanks as well as the new Merkava based armored Infantry Fighting Vehicles (Namer). While the system has been approved for production, which still awaits funding allocation. After the recent conflict in Lebanon (July-August 2006), Active Protection Systems were identified as a critical complement for the protection of main battle tanks such as the Merkava Mk4.

    Trophy Light

    a new version of RAFAEL’s active protection system, unveiled at RAFAEL’s display at DSEi 07 is based on the Trophy system, currently in production for Israel’s Merkava tanks. Trophy Light is designed for integration with light armored vehicles, such as RAFAEL’s Golan. The system will offer high probability of kill against advanced threats, including the most sophisticated shoulder-fired anti-tank rocket propelled grenades (RPG). The system utilizes the same operating principles of the Trophy, at scaled down proportions, facilitating installation on smaller, light armored vehicles, and operation at shorter ranges, therefore adapting to the typical operating environment of light armored vehicles. According to sources at RAFAEL, the development is a low-risk endeavor, as Trophy Lite will require only design and engineering work on the launcher/ loader and munitions. It is expected to weigh about half the weight of the standard Trophy, originally designed for main battle tanks. The system will use the same Elta radar used with the Trophy, and will employ electronic enhancements contributing to significant improvement in combat effectiveness. Trophy Lite is also expected to cost less, positioning it at a competitive advantage in the growing APS market.

    THAAD Scores Second Kill In An Endo-Atmospheric Intercept

    The Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system scored a second successful kill during a flight test conducted over the Pacific Ocean, last week (April 5th, 2007). The test demonstrated the successful ‘hit-to-kill’ intercept of a “mid-endoatmospheric” (inside Earth’s atmosphere) unitary (non-separating) target. Earlier this year, the first flight test conducted at PMRF demonstrated THAAD’s ability to intercept a threat representative target in the high endo-atmosphere.

    “The system is proving its precision and lethal effect throughout our skies, considering THAAD’s successes in both the high- and now mid-atmospheric proving grounds,” said Tom McGrath, program manager and vice president – THAAD at Lockheed Martin. “By linking with another element of the BMDS during this flight test, our nation’s vision of a layered missile defense becomes one step closer to reality.”


    The integrated THAAD system was operating during the test, including the radar, built by Raytheon, and launch system built by Lockheed Martin. Throughout the test, the THAAD Fire Control and Communications unit’s data link communicated with a simulated Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense ship via a satellite link with the Navy’s Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, located in San Diego. This successful link highlights the interoperability of the various elements of the United States’ Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS)

    The test also evaluated the capability of the interceptor’s seeker during the ‘end game’ (terminal phase) to identify the target and discriminate it prior to final intercept, and intercept of a non-separating liquid-fueled target.

    The THAAD program began flight testing in November 2005 at White Sands Missile Range (WSMR), NM. Three successful THAAD tests were conducted at WSMR, including the intercept of a unitary target in July 2006.

    THAAD is designed to defend U.S. troops, allied forces, population centers and critical infrastructure against short- to intermediate range ballistic missiles. THAAD comprises a fire control and communications system, interceptors, launchers and a radar. The THAAD interceptor uses hit-to-kill technology to destroy targets, and is the only weapon system that engages threat ballistic missiles at both endo- and exo-atmospheric altitudes.

    Diehl’s Sky Sphere set to Defeat UAS, OWA Drones Head-On

    0
    Diehl Defence has teamed up with Skysec to develop a drone interceptor. Diehl works with Skysec’s subsidiary, Skysec Defence, to modify the original civilian-oriented net-arresting interceptor into a hard-kill system suitable for military missions....

    Defense Update Weekly News Summary

    0
    Welcome to the latest episode of Defense-Update News Summary! In this episode, we dive into this week’s developments in defense technology, military acquisitions, and strategic partnerships worldwide. Some of this week's highlights include: Elbit Systems...

    Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle Program Launches as Part of Rafale F5 Standard

    0
    The French Ministry of Armed Forces has officially launched the Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle (UCAV) program as part of the Rafale F5 standard development. This event marks the beginning of a new era in...

    Air Defense & C-UAS Innovations at the AUSA 2024 Exhibition

    0
    Army Air Defense Undergoes Significant Modernization to Counter Drone Threats The U.S. Army's air defense branch has experienced its most substantial modernization and growth in over four decades, primarily driven by the need to counter...

    Elbit Systems Address US Army Artillery Modernization with Sigma 155×52 Wheeled Howitzer

    0
    Elbit Systems of America showcases the Sigma Next Generation Howitzer at AUSA 2024, where competing systems from Sweden, South Korea, France, and Germany are likely to be presented, some in models, others in full...

    Defense-Update Weekly News Summary

    0
    Welcome to the latest episode of Defense-Update News Summary! In this episode, we dive into this week’s developments in defense technology, military acquisitions, and strategic partnerships worldwide. Some of this week's highlights include: Elbit Systems...

    Israel Revamps Aerial Bomb Production

    0
    Elbit Systems has signed a 1.5-billion-shekel (approximately $400 million) contract with Israel's Ministry of Defense to establish an aerial bomb manufacturing bombs for the Israeli Air Force. In the past, the government-owned IMI operated...