Thursday, February 5, 2026
More
    Home Blog Page 366

    Terror related Post-Traumatic Stress: The Israeli Experience

    Both Israel and Gaza are a “perfect laboratory” for studying Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and other anxiety related ailments. The level of chronic anxiety here is so great and so constant that it seems the ideal place for research on cognitive therapy. Unfortunately, only in Israel has there been a substantially organized effort to study these phenomena in an orderly fashion and several trauma researches have recently become available to the public.

    Trauma is no stranger to the Israeli psyche. It has been present here for nearly sixty years.

    Although the Second Lebanon War is now already a memory of the past, the emotional and psychological wounds of thousands of Israelis are quite vivid and have yet to heal. In addition to the traumas experienced by Israelis during the Second Lebanon War, the security crisis in Sderot and communities surrounding Gaza have had a tremendous impact on the mental health of thousands of Israelis residing in the southern regions of Israel. Often the symptoms of trauma and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder appear suddenly, severely hindering every aspect of the individuals’ life. Many of the children and families suffering from PTSD in Sderot are not receiving any treatment simply because they fear leaving their homes and being struck by a Qassam rocket.

    As part of a solution, NATAL the local trauma center, has initiated a “Mobile Unit”, composed of 5 mental health professionals who make home visitations to families in distress. For over seven years now the community of Sderot and those surrounding the Gaza Strip have been forced to contend with ongoing acts of violence and numerous traumas. From the ongoing barrage of Qassam rockets to economic instability, southern residents have faced their own unique crisis’s which has drastically impacted the mental health of thousands. Additionally, many of the residents in the south feel abandon by the state and the general public as terrorist attacks in the center of the country and the Second Lebanon War often times overshadowed the security crisis in the south. With no end of violence in sight, residents have had no choice but to live in a constant state of stress, isolation, uncertainty and fear.

    Dr. Adriana Katz, 59, is the director of Sderot’s mental health center, where she has worked for 12 years, and directs a newly established clinic called “Hosen Nafshi” (mental fortitude).The city’s mental health clinic is treating some 1,000 trauma victims – out of the city’s 24,000 residents – and figures are rising daily. Dr Katz believes there are more victims, but many are ashamed to seek help. A study conducted by Tel Hai College has found that at least one-third (!!) of the children in the Negev town of Sderot suffer from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

    Only handful kilometers to the West, a similar tragedy is unfolding in the Gaza Strip. Here children are suffering equally from traumatic symptoms. The street fighting in Gaza, where Hamas and Fatah gunmen are firing indiscriminately at each other, is keeping children cooped up in their squalid homes for days and weeks. It doesn’t take an air strike, or a telephoned warning that Israeli bombers are on the way, to terrify the war-weary children of Gaza. Heightened surveillance is enough to cause nightmares. Incessant shooting, Israeli jetfighter ultra-sound booms and just ordinary noise from firing Qassam and Israeli bombing, are sufficient sources of constant fear. In Gaza’s grim conditions, mothers find it hard to tell if their offspring are crying out of fright, pain or misery. But when normally bickering brats fall silent, it’s the first sign of mental scars from being scared, traumatized and frightened. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is common here. One survey found almost of a third of Gazan children suffering from a severe form of this condition. These figures make it clear that a typical childhood in Gaza included witnessing or experiencing the violent events associated with this particularly deadly conflict.
    .
    The problem is, that in Gaza there is little help, as no organized trauma centers are available to mitigate the suffering. Both Gaza and Sderot, only a stone throw apart, are two separate worlds, each engulfed in its own suffering and misery- but both are unfortunate victims of political bickering and cynical indifference by their respective leaders.

    Israel 2000-2007: Normal People Living in an Abnormal Situation

    The Israeli experience in PTSD occurring after suicide terror and massive rocket attacks, is second to none in the world, and academics name Israel as the ” world’s perfect laboratory” for PTSD studies, a rather dubious portrayal, which most Israelis would like to erase permanently from their agenda. According to Professor Arieh Shalev, chief of psychiatry at Hadassah-University Hospital Jerusalem, disasters can take many forms, all demanding rapid response by experienced emergency rescue teams.

    When such incidents are isolated, or infrequent, most people recover from the traumatic events quite rapidly. The same applies in principle, when an entire population is under a continuous war situation. For example could serve, the psychological stamina of the people of London during the 1940 Blitz, or the DESERT STORM Scud attacks on Israel in 1991, or even, to some extent, the horrendous carnage on 9/11 in 2001. While the stress was significant during the actual attack period, most of the psychological symptoms evaporated quite quickly and life resumed its normality.

    But in Israel, since the year 2000, and especially during the notoriously 2002-2005 incessant suicide terrorist attacks, the situation became highly critical.
    Palestinian suicide attacks during that period took an almost daily toll in civilian life. Israel’s towns became frontline to acts of brutal and indiscriminate terrorism- nearly a thousand Israelis lost their life during that terrifying time, thousand became severely mutilated, even more suffered mental disorders hitherto virtually unknown. Only the people of Baghdad must still share this kind of daily horror.

    While, under attack, most of the population, not directly affected by traumatic events, remains quite resilient and hardens to the daily threats and trying at best to continue their daily routine, the first response emergency workers are undergoing a growing emotional change, enhanced by protracted exposure to catastrophic events, some which are beyond human perception even to seasoned veterans in this grueling trade.

    Understanding the Symptoms of PTSD

    Most Israeli researchers distinguish between the acute symptoms that trauma victims experience immediately after the event ( Acute Stress Disorder), and chronic Post -Traumatic Disorder (PTSD), which is considered a disease that can only be diagnosed about four months after the actual incident. Professor Arieh Shalev ran MRI brain scans on people exposed to traumatic events one week after the incident and then six months later. At first, things appeared normal, but as time progressed he found there was more activity in the brain’s centers. As memories have more impact on the brain, people become socially regressive and lose interest in their surroundings.

    Israeli researchers thus appear to be reaching the understanding that the first period of time after a traumatic event is a window of opportunity, in which the human system is still open to professional intervention, and sufficiently sensitive to change and the damage is reversible.

    According to Professor Shmuel Shapira, Deputy Director General of the Jerusalem Hadassah University Hospitals, the medical term “lightly wounded” is not a scientific definition. It generally means that there is no immediate danger to life and limb in the patient’s body. But the damage to the soul, by severe shock, must be regarded far from “light”.

    To heal those may require weeks of treatment in hospitals, or specialist mental institutions, months of careful rehabilitation to restore some sort of normal lifestyle routine. Some of these effects may never heal completely. The psychological trauma may be even more devastating than wounds, says, Professor Shapira, and in worst cases can lead to chronic unemployment, divorce and sometimes even suicide, others may even be mentally handicapped for life.

    Dr Batya Ludman, an Israeli psychologist specializing in trauma explained that people associated with a one-time terror attack, can usually cope with the traumatic experience and return to normal routine after reasonable time, with or even without mental assistance. However, Dr Ludman warned, that the problem she observed in Israel during the height of the Intifada years, was that people did not have the time to recover from one terror attack, before the next one hit. In fact, this is currently the situation in Sderot, where Qassam alert is occurring day and night without respite.

    The Grueling Job of Israeli First Responder Services

    On a visit to the United States a few years ago, Israeli Emergency Medical Services (EMS) workers, provided first hand insight into the violence that they have witnessed as some first responder emergency units to arrive at the scene of the horrifying carnage. Being first on the scene, only minutes after an explosion, is a terrifying experience even to the staunchest veterans of wars. The MDA workers, many of which are volunteers are an indispensable part of the Israeli Emergency Rescue Services, which apart from the EMS include special security elements, Police Forensic Units, Bomb Disposal Experts, so-called “Body handlers” and, as of late highly trained mental assistance paramedics. Usually among the first on the scene, checking between bloody limbs and blown-up body parts for additional bombs, the men shut off their minds to the mortal scene they are facing up to. “You don’t have time to think about the danger of unexploded ordnance. As soon as you are faced with the real event, a switch goes off in your head and you shift into s different gear” says 28 year old Rami, a veteran BDS member who has seen it all and survived.
    But the most harrowing job of all is the task of the special Israeli volunteer organization Chesed Shel Emet (True Mercy) also known officially as Zaka (“Identification of Victims of Disaster”).

    These are ultra-orthodox Jews, wearing the black kippot (scull caps) and Tzitzit (a four cornered garment) and are identified on duty by their distinctive fluorescent orange emergency vests. Their task is to search and collect limbs and scrape down buildings splattered with blood and strips of flesh blown away by the blast of the explosion. While the other rescue teams work feverishly to recover the wounded and evacuate them as quickly as possible, police forensic experts try to identify the corpses- Zaka members, are carefully tending to the ancient Jewish ritual of giving the dead a proper burial.

    According to this law, the entire corps should be buried on the day of death, if possible. However, as the explosion usually blows body parts wide apart, such a task is not only a traumatic experience to the Zaka volunteers, but in many cases, when secondary explosions cause catastrophic fire, this becomes almost impossible, as bodies are burned to cinders. In the laconic professional designation, Zaka men are termed as ” Body Handlers”, which is rather a thin understatement of the highly sensitive and almost inhuman demand on their psychological stamina, which only their devout adherence to the Jewish Halacha law can support.

    But there are times, when Zaka men could even save limbs and rush them to hospitals in time for re-attachment, especially if the victims were children, this gives some brightness to a otherwise somber task, they say. How these men function at all, under those conditions, can best be explained in the words of Zaka founder, Rabbi Elazar Gelbstein: ” It’s something that you can never prepare yourself emotionally” he says, ” When we arrive at the scene, we reprogram ourselves and work in a trance. If we stopped to think about what we are doing, we’d become paralyzed”. The selection process for Zaka volunteers is difficult for many who enlist. Some cannot even take the training films projected, showing footage of bombings too shocking even to the most vivid horror movies, others drop out after the first encounter.

    But those who go on with this grisly work are certainly of a special breed, which have already gained public admiration, by the secular Israeli society, which traditionally regards the ultra-religious Haredim community as draft dodgers and national outcasts. In fact, Zaka has already gained international recognition in 2001, when the United Nations named it as Israeli volunteer organization of the year.

    But this work has its price. Among the most severe cases of Post- Traumatic Stress Disorders are the Zaka volunteers. The horror of the job tending for mutilated terror victims is taking its constant toll among those dedicated men. Rony Berger, a clinical psychologist with Israel’s largest trauma center, said, “with so much stress on such a regular basis, many of those who are first on the scene are suffering from ‘burn-out’.” Professor Shalev found that disaster workers with high blood pressure that does not decline over the first hours or days, are the highest risk samples for chronic PTSD, in other words, they suffer from complete burn-out and are no longer fit to work under stress.

    Rescue team leaders must be warned by physicians, of those cases, so that they can be replaced before they cause not only damage to their health, but can endanger their team mates during a critical life-saving operation.

    Under the professional term, emergency workers, suffering from traumatic symptoms are termed “Secondary Traumatic Stress Victims (STS)”.
    Second traumatic Stress differs from Post-Traumatic Stress by the mode of exposure to the traumatic event. Direct exposure may result in PTSD, whereas, indirect exposure to the event may result in STS.

    According to latest statistics, some 20% of these STS victims, will eventually develop PTSD symptoms. Another medical term for this phenomena is “Compassionate Fatigue”, in other words, mental exhaustion due to excessive stress.

    But not only the immediate rescue teams are prone to traumatic stress reactions. A similar process was detected in cleansing crews, repairmen and security guards, all called in to restore order to the chaos, but exposed to the gruesome debris and rests of the bloody carnage, which are left on the scene by the rescue squads, after the victims have been evacuated. ” The prevailing concept, that people who are exposed to repeated terror experiences, are hardened physically and mentally to the traumatic events, is baseless” ,says Dr Ze’ev Wiener, of the Ramat Chen Mental Institution,” the uniform ( of the rescue workers) may help, but only in short term. When they go home, the mental break-down becomes inevitable”.

    The Children Victims of Terrorism

    Currently, one of the most stressing aspects of PTSD is the fate of children exposed to the horrors of sustained terrorism and its related traumatic aftermath. Some 42 percent of Israeli children suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), of which 15 percent have a moderate to severe version of the syndrome, Dr. Avital Laufer of Tel Aviv University told the Knesset Committee on the Rights of Children. The committee was discussing the effects of the terror attacks of the past 32 months on children. Laufer’s findings were based on a study of some 3,000 children aged 13 to 15, from both sides of the “Green Line”. Some 70 percent of the children said that the terror attacks had had a direct impact on their lives, causing them to abandon or avoid certain activities.

    A similar study by the Gaza Community Health Programs found the rate of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) among Palestinian children showed that 54% suffered from severe PTSD, 33.5 % from moderate and 11 % from mild and doubtful levels of PTSD. Some symptoms of PTSD include restlessness, insomnia, aggressiveness, depression, dissociation, emotional detachment, and nightmares.

    Research into childhood trauma has clearly demonstrated that infants and children impacted by terrorism or with mothers who have suffered traumatic experiences are at very high risk for a multitude of long-term emotional disorders. Mothers suffering the effects of Post Traumatic Stress Disorders (PTSD) have difficulty providing the emotional holding environment and relational foundation necessary for healthy attachment and bonding. An anxious or traumatized mother will have difficulty soothing her child if she herself is in a state of emotional and physical hyper-arousal.

    These disturbing figures hardly need further elaboration, apart from placing this disturbing data on the top priority agenda before the political leadership on both sides of the fence to do their utmost, before it is too late, to stop this tragedy escalating into a human catastrophe.

    Squad Mission Support System

    Squad Mission Support System (SMSS) is a robotic platform based on a turbo-diesel powered, high mobility six wheel all-terrain vehicle (ATV) capable of carrying 1,000 pounds (453 kg) of payload. Current platforms are utilizing a commercial platform converted for a surrogate SMSS vehicle. Future versions will utilize specially designed platforms, optimized for the SMSS mission.

    SMSS is designed to carry enough loads to support a single squad, and utilizes a sophisticated management system to enable autonomous movement over rough terrain, as well as amphibious capability for crossing rivers and marshes. The SMSS’ supervised autonomy will provide the warfighter with a reliable squad-sized vehicle which will improve combat readiness, while assuring re-supply channels and casualty evacuations. The vehicle cost is expected to be around US$200,000 per unit. Lockheed Martin is expecting a market for 4,000 such vehicles. The company is planning to introduce an operational SMSS by 2009. While SMSS is expected to assume part of the roles planned for the Future Combat Systems’ (FCS) dismounted infantry support vehicle (MULE), Lockheed Martin does not expect this vehicle to become a competitor for their MULE.

    The vehicle was introduced by Lockheed Martin in August 2006, and was displayed at the AUSA 2006 exhibition. robotics program, funded by Lockheed Martin as an independent research and development project, will provide manned and unmanned transport and logistical support to the Light and Early Entry Forces.

    “Our long-term vision of this system can accommodate armed variants, while improving its reconnaissance, intelligence, surveillance and target acquisition (RISTA) capabilities within the concept of supervised autonomy,” says Gene Holleque, director – Combat Maneuver Systems at Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control. “A squad-size manned or unmanned support vehicle just makes sense in today’s asymmetrical and urban battlefields.”

    Tor M1 9M330 Air Defense System

    The TOR-M1 surface-to-air missile system is a mobile, integrated air defense system, designed for operation at medium-, low- and very low –altitudes, against fixed/rotary wing aircraft, UAVs, guided missiles and precision weapon. The system is capable of operating in an intensive aerial jamming environment. The system is comprised of a number of missile Transporter Launcher Vehicle (TLV). A Russian air defense Tor battalion consists of 3 – 5 companies, each equipped with four TLVs. Each TLV is equipped with 8 ready to launch missiles, associating radars, fire control systems and a battery command post. The combat vehicle can operate autonomously, firing from stationary positions or on the move. Set-up time is rated at 3 minutes and typical reaction time, from target detection to missile launch is 5-8 seconds. Reaction time could range from 3.4 seconds for stationary positions to 10 seconds while on the move. Each fire unit can engage and launch missiles against two separate targets. 

    Tor M1 can detect and track up to 48 targets (minimum radar cross section of 0.1 square meter) at a maximum range of 25 km, and engage two of them simultaneously, at a speed of up to 700 m/sec, and at a distance of 1 to 12 km. The system’s high lethality (aircraft kill probability of 0.92-0.95) is maintained at altitude of 10 – 6,000 m’. The vertically launched, single-stage solid rocket propelled missile is capable of maneuvering at loads up to 30gs. It is equipped with a 15kg high-explosive fragmentation warhead activated by a proximity fuse. The system is offered as fully integrated tracked combat vehicle, or as a modular combat unit (TOR-M1T) comprising a truck mounted mobile control module and launcher/antenna units, carried on a trailer. Other configuration include separated towed systems, as well as shelter-based systems, for the protection of fixed sites.

    The missile is also effective against precision guided weapons and cruise missiles. In tests the missile demonstrated kill probability of such targets ranging from 0.6 to 0.9.

    The first operator of the Tor system was the Russian Army Air-Defense, which operates 100 units of the SA-15 Gauntlet variant. The Russian navy also uses the naval version known as SA-N-9. China bought 50 systems and possibly 25 more, between 1997 and 2002. The Greek army fielded 21 Tor M-1 systems. Most recently (December 2005) Iran was reported to sign a deal worth US$ 1.0 billion covering the procurement of up to 29 TOR M-1 missile systems, modernization of air-force systems and the supply of patrol boats. The system was also proposed to several other countries. The TOR component of the deal was reported to be US$700 million. Deliveries of the TOR systems began in November 2006 and by the year’s end, over half of the order has been fulfilled. On January 16, 2007 Russia announced that deliveries were completed. Russian defense minister Sergei Ivanov confirmed the delivery and added that Moscow will continue to develop military and technical cooperation with Tehran. This could hint on further sales of S-300 air defense missiles, which were requested by Iran for several years, but so-far denied by Russia. The delivery was completed about 12 months ahead of time. According to the original schedule, completion of deliveries were expected to continue through 2008. (more from freerepublic). The Russian Press indicated on January 30, 2007 that Venezuela is also interesting in aquiring Tor M1 systems at an estimated cost of US$290 million. Venezuela plans to have the new systems interoperable with new radars and fighter jets recently bought from China and Russia.

    MicroFly

    The MicroFly can be configured with any military ram air parachute to accompany inserting HALO (High Altitude Low Opening) or HAHO (High Altitude High Opening) parachutists. Since the MicroFly and the jumpers are under the same canopy, the MicroFly will remain in close proximity with the jumpers through the flight.

    MicroFly can fly autonomously to the pre-planned impact point relying on internal GPS guidance or it could be remotely controlled by the jumper while in the air.

    The MicroFly will exit the aircraft first and can guide the inserting element under canopy to the impact point. The compact remote guidance unit can simultaneously control up to ten MicroFly systems.

    This feature allows unit on the ground to receive multiple resupply missions over an extended period of time. The MicroFly can also be remotely controlled should the element decide to deviate from the infiltration plan.

    When used in a blind drop where the drop zone is not secured, recovery of the system can be done more efficiently as the pallet can be located using the control unit.

    IED Blast related Brain Injuries: The silent killer

    Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) have now added a new dimension to battlefield injuries: Injuries and even deaths among troops who have no external signs of trauma but whose brains have been severely damaged. The insurgency war in Iraq and Afghanistan has reinstated one of the worst afflictions of World War I trench warfare: shell shock.

    The detonation of any powerful explosive generates deadly blast effect, propagated in a wavefront of high pressure that spreads out at 1,600 feet per second from the point of explosion, traveling rapidly over hundreds of yards. Normally, the detonation propels fragments of shrapnel at a high velocity. Where fragments penetrate the skull, such injuries (referred to as ballistic trauma) are considered “conventional” traumatic brain injuries; they are easy to diagnose, by clearly visible entry wounds, which are treated in a surgical procedure – foreign bodies are removed from the brain, and the patient is given a type of drug to prevent further damage to the brain neurons. Yet, blasts also causes invisible damage to the brain, as the blast wave tremors the soft tissue, smashing it against the hard surface of the inner skull.

    Actually, the lethal blast wave strikes twice. The initial shock wave of very high pressure is followed closely by the “secondary wind”: a huge volume of displaced air flooding back into the vacuum under high pressure. Neither a helmet nor the body armor protect the body from the risk of such wave fronts. These sudden and extreme differences in pressures – routinely 1,000 times as great as atmospheric pressure – lead to significant neurological injury including severe concussions, resulting in loss of consciousness and obvious neurological deficits such as blindness, deafness and mental retardation. Blast waves causing traumatic brain injuries can leave a 19-year-old soldier who could easily run a six-minute mile unable to stand or even think.

    It is little known, that thousands of troops have already experienced the blasts of IED. If they are knocked unconscious, they too are evacuated to a field hospital for evaluation. But if they survive the explosion and do not complain of a problem, they remain on duty. Yet, Specialists in brain injury know all too well that people can suffer brain problems without losing consciousness. One of the most frightening aspects of brain injury is that brain-injured people often lose the ability to know something is wrong.

    According to the Department of Veterans Affairs statistics, about 1,800 U.S. troops are already suffering from traumatic brain injuries caused by penetrating wounds. But neurologists worry that many more – at least 30 percent of the troops who have been engaged in active combat for four months or longer in Iraq and Afghanistan – are at risk of potentially disabling neurological disorders from the blast waves of IEDs. The US Department of Defense has acknowledged that Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) as a “significant health concern” and vowed to identify it among active duty troops. But many new cases are likely to emerge as troops transition to civilian life as veterans. Military records show that 60% of the 25,000 war injuries to date resulted from explosive blasts like IED’s or roadside bombs. And nearly 3,000 of the wounded are currently being treated for severe traumatic brain injury or TBI. Traumatic brain injury has rapidly become the signature wound of soldiers returning from Iraq.

    Due to the growing magnitude threat of the IEDs which are lately used by insurgents in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon, efforts are being made to develop effective counter-measures, mitigating the blast effect and enhance troops protection and survival. Among these are suspended seats, which soften the shockwave by slowing its propagation through energy absorbing and head restraining harness which forms the seat. This design, first introduced by the German companyAutoflug, protects soldiers from both belly charges which induce vertical shockwave, as well as road-side IEDs, which induce a lateral effect. Another patent pending design is currently in development at Plasan Sasa.

    Mobius PS offers another patent-pending blast protection technology, based on a simple approach, utilizing a single, factory tunable element, manufactured to meet preset EA characteristics. The fixed profile Energy Absorption element performs its mission with continuous self-adjusting dynamic attenuation, providing maximum protection to full range of occupants weights, from light 5th percentile female up to heavy 95th percentile male and beyond.

    This implementation provides a straightforward attachment of crew seats, passenger seats or benches, to the floor or to the walls, without the need for motion guides, rails or complex suspension and isolation techniques. Using light, strong seat frames and attachments, the protected seats are validated to face multi-directional impacts, from blast or accident and crash scenarios. To restrain the occupants to their seats, 4-5 point safety belts, all-belts-to-seat, adjustable head-rest (available with side supports) are also provided.

    Advanced blast mitigation materials used in modern protected vehicles also contribute to the reduction of blast effects. Usually, these materials are embedded in the vehicle’s floor to offset some of the explosion. Blast mitigating pads designed to reduce brain damage in case of blast are provided as a standard with most types of modern ballistic helmets. Such pads are also offered as add-on kits for standard helmets.

    With the war in Iraq already in its fifth year, one of its abnormal indications are, that this is not a conflict of death, although every soldier killed in action represents a human tragedy in itself, but more of a war of disabilities, Thus, the symbol of this protracted bloodletting is not the cemetery, as were former twenty century wars, but the orthopedic ward and as of lately, the neurosurgical unit. The men and women inside those units may have come home alive, but are missing arms and legs. Many are unable to see, hear or remember who they were before being hit by a roadside bomb. Coping with the growing number of such patients, leaves the military medical profession with a huge professional challenge, in order to find new methods in treating such a phenomena, which was sofar unexperienced in warfare.

    One of the reasons for such complexity is that frequently, traumatic brain injury relates to another medical Phenomena called Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The problem lies in the overlapping symptoms, such as increased anxiety, short attention span, limited concentration, problematic lapses in memory. Once these symptoms occur together, they can make a diagnosis extremely difficult, as they are mixing several disciplines, all concerning human behavior under acute stress situations. Detecting and recognizing the symptoms are difficult, treatment and healing are made even more complicated.

    PTSD, originally named “Shell Shock” during the First World War, when soldiers were subjected to long periods of continuous bombardment though high explosive shells. This became a physical/psychological phenomena, hitherto unknown to the mental treatment community. During the Second World War the term “Combat Fatigue” was known, but still regarded, in most cases, as curable through periods of rest and recuperation. In extreme incidents, such as the famous ill-treatment of a battle shocked youngster by General George S. Patton III, in Sicily, only highlighted the ignorance by commanders, of what was to become a seriously recognized factor in modern warfare.

    The Vietnam War saw thousands of young Americans, seemingly unscathed by combat but suffering from emotional and even physical disorders, which virtually crippled them from resuming their normal routine by becoming near permanent psychiatric cases. The American Psychiatric Association included the new diagnostic criteria for such cases in terms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in 1980.

    The Israeli psychiatry and psychological community had, at the same time researched the direct experiences of soldiers suffering from what was termed “Combat Stress Reactions” (CSR) in the aftermath of the 1973 Yom Kippur War and the even more serious effects of the 1982 Lebanon Invasion and the following long drawn-out anti-guerilla campaign. The Israeli researchers found that nearly 30% of the overall casualties were the result of CSR.

    One of the most significant factors in PTSD among veterans is their perception that the cause which they are fighting for is not publicly supported. For example, such a situation existed in the 1970’s among returning Vietnam veterans, in which the traditional horrors of war were magnified by public condemnation, or ignorance, in unprecedented manner. The mass incidence of psychiatric disorders among Vietnam veterans skyrocketed to nearly a third of the 3.5 million soldiers who fought in this war!

    A similar condition was perceived in Israel in the aftermath of the 1982 Lebanon War, when the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) became involved in the 18 year stagnating war in South Lebanon, which was regarded by the Israeli public as superfluous and lacking national consensus. While not so severe, the protracted counter-terror combat in the densely populated Palestinian urban environment in the West Bank and Gaza, has already increased the number of psychiatric cases among the young Israeli soldiers, exposed to hazards which they were totally unfamiliar with before they joined national service. Sofar, there is only insufficient evidence over PTSD in the aftermath of last summer’s Lebanon war.

    An Israeli professor who is studying the long term effects of war on the soldiers, who fight it, is now sharing her knowledge with US counterparts in an attempt to provide better therapy for American servicemen and women returning home from the battlefields of Iraq. Over the last 20 years, Tel Aviv University Professor Zahava Solomon has conducted research into the psychological consequences of war and terror. According to Professor Solomon’s research, which has revolutionized the way Israeli soldiers are treated in battle, the best way to combat stress is to give immediate treatment while soldiers are still on the front lines. The IDF has already established a wide range of “Forward Psychiatry”, even to combat units, through trained medical personnel, which render on-the-spot treatment, ordering the more severe cases for immediate evacuation. Special mental health care centers were also established to cure PTSD patients and return them as early as possible to combat duty. Statistical figures from official sources indicate that during the 1982 Lebanon War, with proximal treatment 90% of CSR casualties returned to their unit, usually within 72 hours. However, with rearward treatment only 40% returned to their unit indefinitely.

    With her experience, Professor Solomon is recognized as one of the world’s leading experts in combat trauma. In fact, with the lessons Israel’s ‘natural laboratory’ in PTSD provides, offers valuable material for researchers, helping them discover new solutions to help treat those who suffer from PTSD and a range of other psychological illnesses.

    Raytheon Delivers Two Radar Systems for Quick-Kill APS

    Two prototypes of the Multi-Function Radio Frequency System (MFRFS) radar were delivered by Raytheon Company’s (NYSE:RTN) Network Centric Systems for integration into the Quick Kill Active Protection System the company is developing for the U.S. Army.

    The electronically-scanned, solid-state phased array radar can detect and track multiple threats, ranging from rocket propelled grenades (RPG) fired at close proximity to more distant threats such as kinetic energy projectiles. MFRFS will also provide the common radar for Future Combat Systems (FCS) manned ground vehicles, supporting a number of radio frequency functions including surveillance, high- band secure communications and combat identification.

    Raytheon’s Quick Kill APS is capable of providing a “bubble” of coverage to protect current force Stryker, Abrams and Bradley vehicles, as well as FCS platforms, from a broad range of threats from any direction. With the MFRFS delivery and progress anticipated over the next few months, Raytheon’s Quick Kill APS will be integrated on a Stryker for end-to-end system demonstrations and design verification testing beginning late this summer.

    U.S. Army: Interceptor is the Best Available Body Armor

    Brig. Gen. R. Mark Brown, Program Executive Officer Soldier agreed to release a June 2006 test results rebuffing claims that commercially available body armor is supperior to the Interceptor Body Armor the Army issues to warfighters. Gen. Brown said the Army had been reluctant to release test results that could inform the enemy of U.S. capabilities. “Right now, we believe it’s critical that our Soldiers have confidence in their equipment and that their families know force protection is the Army’s number one priority,” Brown said. Dragon-skin flex armor

    Driving the decision to release May 2006 test data is an assertion by Pinnacle Armor Inc. of unfair treatment. The issue surfaced again in this week’s investigative report aired by NBC. Pinnacle, based in Fresno, Calif., is the manufacturer of Dragon Skin SOV3000 body armor, which Brown said failed “catastrophically” when it was tested by HB White Labs in Street, Md., one of two labs in the nation certified by the National Institute of Justice. “It failed to stop 13 of 48 [first- or second-round] test shots,” Brown said of the testing at H.P. White. “The CEO and vice president of Pinnacle witnessed it. One bullet penetration is cause for failure to meet the Army’s standard.”

    According to Gen. Brown, Pinnacle’s Dragon Skin SOV3000 body armor was subject to the same fair and independent testing, in a variety of environmental conditions, as products from the six producers of the Army’s current body armor. All six of the current producers passed every test with zero failures, which is the standard. In addition to failing ballistic testing, Dragon Skin is also operationally unsuitable because of its greater weight and bulk and compared with the Army’s body armor. Depending on size, Pinnacle is 46% to 70% heavier than the current IBA. “We are trying to make the armor lighter, not heavier,” Brown said. It should be noted, however, that DragonSkin provides full side protection with the baseline system, while IBA requires two additional ESBI modules which add more weight to the system.

    Excalibur Retains High Precision at Maximum Range

    The Excalibur team reports another successful test firing of the Block Ia-2 precision-guided artillery projectile. Five rounds were fired at a target over a range of 40.8 km (25.4 miles) by an M-109 series self propelled 155mm howitzer, using Modular Artillery Charge zone 5 with base-bleed. Extended range Excalibur Block Ia-2 is scheduled for initial operational capability in fiscal year 2009.

    Two rounds fired at the maximum range impacted at within 2.2 meters (7.2 feet) from the target’s center. Three additional rounds fired 5 degrees off-axis, over a range of 35 km, impacted between 2.8 (9.2 feet) and 6.1 (20 feet) from the target center. The companies leading the Excalibur team are US based Raytheon and Swedish based BAE Systems Bofors.

    The Swedish Archer 52-caliber howitzer is predicted to achieve an Excalibur range of approximately 50 kilometers (33 miles). Upcoming Block Ia-2 tests include full system performance testing, to include maximum range shots from the Archer, and safety testing to validate projectile design margins under gun pressures exceeding normal operating conditions.

    Quantum, Alion to Develop Hybrid-Electric Aggressor

    The US Army is launching a diesel-electric hybrid powered version the Aggressor – an off-road Alternative Mobility Vehicle (AMV). “Aggressor” was developed by Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ:QTWW) under a U.S. Army’s Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center (TARDEC) and the U.S. National Automotive Center (NAC) program. The Aggressor was designed as high performance light-duty off-road hybrid vehicle powered by hydrogen based fuel cell. TRADEC contracted Alion Science and technology Corporation to manage the program. Quantum was awarded the $4.88 million development contract for the propulsion system.

    The second-generation AMV will be based on feedback from the U.S. Army’s testing and evaluation of the Aggressor. Its propulsion system will comprise a battery dominant, series hybrid electric system, charged by JP-8 fuel-compatible diesel internal combustion engine. This system is considered to be a cost-effective near-term solution as fuel cell technology matures. “We believe that the AMV program offers an innovative solution as a long-range reconnaissance vehicle that fills a technology gap for the U.S. Army in its national defense efforts while reducing its fuel logistic burden,” said Alan Niedzwiecki, President and CEO of Quantum. The vehicle’s silent watch capability, high performance acceleration, extended range, and exportable power provide significant advantages for the U.S. Army in communications, surveillance, targeting, and reconnaissance missions.

    Global Safety Labs Improves Armored Vehicle Fire Protection

    Fire protection has always been a major consideration in the design of combat vehicles. Uncontrolled fires can spread quickly to flammable materials and explosives, causing catastrophic results. In Iraq, insurgents have begun using fires as a tactic to attempt to penetrate armored vehicles – targeting vulnerable fuel tanks and tires.


    According to Michael H. Freeman, CEO/COO of fire-proofing expert Global Safety Labs, Inc. (GSL) fire proofing can help avoiding instances where troops must abandon the safety of an armored vehicle because the tires, hydraulic or fuel tanks caught fire. Mr. Freeman announced that GSL is working on TACOM Engineering approvals in order to fulfill request for installations of GSL’s Automatic Vehicle Fire Extinguishment & Survivability System (AVFESS). The system uses patented vehicle spray system to extinguish both external and internal vehicle fires, protecting occupants and coating tires to prevent re-ignition. The system uses GSL’s Arctic Fire-Freeze (AFF) Agent on both the interior and exterior of the HMMWV stopping the fire and providing a fire-proof coating. The AFF has a unique ability to shield human skin, equipment and clothing from direct exposure to fire, heat and flame. Each “Fire-Proofed” HMMWV includes five different Vehicle/Warfighter fire protection and extinguishment systems. “With the AVFESS, not only is the fire extinguished, but a Warfighters’ clothing and skin are protected from blazing fires for up to several minutes, giving them critical time to assess the situation and react.” GSL Executive VP and Military Liaison, Brig. Gen. Richard C. Freeman, (USAF Ret.)

    Al Qaeda spurs Gaza carnage to create Hamastan

    The present events in the Gaza Strip have to be viewed within a wider context of the Middle East strategic framework, in order to search for a solution of this rapidly escalating crisis situation.

    The real force behind the Gaza mayhem seems to be, a combined al Qaeda and Iran strategy, strange bedfellows perhaps, but for the time being, closely-linked partners in a common strategic goal to establish “Hamastan” as a forward base for Global terrorism. Al Qaeda’s ultimate objective is to destabilize and destroy the moderate Arab nations, first in line post- Mubaraq’s Egypt, then the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and finally, the Sunni cradle of Saudi Arabia. A similar aim is Tehran’s Shiite Crescent strategy – thus both partners are united, even if their spiritual heritance differs widely and even conflicts sharply, in their religious deism.

    According to Dr. Boaz Ganor of the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center, “Global Jihad’s main aim is to topple moderate Arab and Muslim regimes, like that in Egypt, and bring like-minded Islamic radicals to power.” Shin Beit chief Yuval Diskin, addressing the Knesset (Israeli Parliament) Foreign Affairs and Security Committee, voiced deep concern that al Qaeda was creeping ever closer to Israel from its Sinai terror base.

    The fact that Al Qaeda terror network has already infiltrated the West Bank and Gaza Strip, was made public last year, when in March 2006, Palestine Chairman Mahmoud Abbas claimed that the Islamic organization had infiltrated the West Bank and Gaza Strip, in which “its operations could have appalling consequences”.

    Only last week, the credibility of these warnings was vindicated when a group believed to be affiliated with Al-Qaeda, or at least espousing its ideology, attacked a UNWRA-run school celebration in Rafah, in the southern edge of the Gaza Strip, killing one person and injuring five others. The attack in Rafah, along with other recent sporadic incidents including the yet-to-be-resolved kidnapping of BBC Gaza correspondent Alan Johnston, are being seen as ominous signs for the future.

    Hamas militant leaders had followed with concern recent preparations by Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) and his adviser Mohammed Dahlan in preparing Palestine Liberation Organization’s (PLO) military arm, Fatah for a final confrontation in the Gaza Strip. They watched in awe, as the Fatah leadership had won extensive financial grants from the United States and European countries, including American military equipment and weapons from the moderate Arab countries. A full brigade of Fatah elite forces was under training in Egyptian military camps in Sinai, ready to deploy into the Strip.

    Masked gunman seen on a Gaza streetThus the Hamas militant leadership has decided it was time to win full control of the Gaza Strip, before it was too late. Indeed, Hamas is now fighting its ultimate battle against Fatah for control of the Gaza Strip. No quarter is asked nor given in this all-out carnage, in which brother fights brother ruthlessly in the lawless streets of squalor.

    Meanwhile, the million and half numbering population is on the verge of a human disaster. People are scooped up in their houses, water and electric supply is failing, hospitals are breaking under the stress, as more and more wounded arrive, casualties from the brutal internecine war which is raging in the streets. There seems to be no way to prevent the infighting among Palestinian factions by a plethora of armed clans fighting this civil war, as the “official” Hamas leadership has lost control of the situation and is hiding, being itself targeted by the clan leaders.

    Mohammed DahlanFatah’s own leadership vacuum is the main reason for the group’s defeat in the current round. Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas is still not showing signs of determination to intervene forcefully. On paper, Abu Mazen’s loyalist forces should number nearly 60,000 armed troops, but intelligence estimates assess that most of these will not fight, when deployed against Hamas in Gaza. This leadership vacuum is becoming even more blatant by strongman Mohammed Dahlan’s absence from the turbulent region. Dahlan is temporarily being hospitalized in Cairo following back surgery.

    Latest Israeli intelligence assessment have therefore concluded, that Hamas, or better phrased, the fighting clans, have already won the battle for Gaza, which is ready to become an Islamic fundamentalist stronghold – ideal to al Qaeda or Iran establishing its long seeked forward base on the Mediterranean.

    Under such impossible circumstances, the so-called “benchmarks” for Israel and the Palestinian Authority – recently laid out by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to promote peace – seem like a joke: No Israeli leader, in his right mind, can agree to the opening of a “safe passage” between Gaza and the West Bank.

    Two major blunders have created this catastrophic situation: The US conduct of the post OIF war in Iraq, which has brought Iran itself terrified by the US conquest at first and still badly damaged by the Iraq-Iran war) into world focus and Israel’s irresponsible unilateral withdrawal from the Gaza strip, which virtually “invited” Hamas to power (this would never have happened as long as Yassir Arafat was in charge) and finally, Israel’s poor conduct of the Lebanon crisis, which has severely damaged Israel’s military deterrence in the region.

    First and foremost to face this looming threat is the Jewish State of Israel. Through building a strategic alliance between Iran and the radical Palestinian forces in the territories, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is seeking to surround Israel from three sides – from the north, by rebuilding Hezbollah’s strategic rocket arsenal; from the West Bank, a threat to Israel’s heartland and from a strong military base in Gaza.
    There is no doubt that Israel is currently facing a very serious dilemma.

    On the one hand, it is inclined to refrain from a widespread response to the Qassam rocket offensive so as not to be lured into premature re-invading the Gaza Strip, a move that would effectively end the Fatah-Hamas bloodbath and unite the two fighting movements against their common enemy. Inevitably, at Israel’s Prime Minister’s Ehud Olmert’s governmental level, there is little enthusiasm for such a major move.

    Palestinian militants demonstrate positioning a Qassam rockets  launch site in a Gaza strip orchard.On the other hand, Israel is no longer an innocent bystander to the internal Palestinian fighting. The first civilian casualties from the massive rocket attacks on Sderot made Israel a party to the internal conflict in Gaza and now urgently needs to take drastic measures in defending its civilians. It must be remembered, that Sderot and other targets along the Gaza Strip are located entirely within Israel’s sovereign territory, defined by international law in 1949. It may have been a strategic mistake to withdraw the IDF from the Gaza Strip in 2005, but once this was implemented any incursion by fire into this territory is strictly against international law, calling for full measures in self defense.

    Israel’s options are all critical: It can prepare an all-out military offensive to capture part, or all of the Gaza Strip, or call for an international force to administrate the Gaza Strip for an interim period until a viable Palestinian government can be formed to take over full responsibility (See our January, 2005 post: Two Palestinian Entities). The first option needs little elaboration to define the difficulties involved. The second option is even more complex and has sofar received little public attention (See our April 29, 2007 post: Military Confrontation with Hamas in Gaza Unavoidable).

    If the United States are counting on General Keith Dayton’s plan to reform Abu Mazen’s “Presidential Guard” and maintain law and order in Gaza, it must be hallucinating, as Gaza was never easy to govern, even in better times. Perhaps the biggest tragedy is the “usual” conduct of the United Nations. All that the new UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon could say last week, as the fighting raged in the streets of Gaza and rockets bombarded Sderot, was that “the fighting between Palestinian factions Hamas and Fatah and rocket attacks into Israel “unacceptable!” It would certainly need much more than that to clear up the mess which is enfolding in this sizzling powder keg.

    But not all is yet lost. There are some solutions, which, if conducted under wise statesmanship, could still prevent at least, part of the looming danger.

    A key player should be Egypt. President Hosni Mubarak has expressed great concern over the increasing strength of Hamas Egypt did not accept Hamas in power, as it became elected last year, especially in light of its growing ties with the Muslim Brotherhood, which leads the opposition in Egypt. A politically radicalized “Hamastan” which would give a boost to its own Islamic radicals, against which the government has long fought, is haunting the secular Cairo establishment. But only by enhancing its sofar minor efforts to close the Sinai-Rafah smuggling lifeline into the Gaza Strip, Egypt could virtually “starve” the fighting. All this needs, is to order to the troops already deployed and supervise that these order be implemented in full.

    King Abdallah II has recently proposed a new framework for the Palestinian issue. Amman is acting out of concern for the shaky Palestinian Authority, which might threaten its security. Under this plan, Jordan proposed reconsidering a previously shelved Palestinian-Jordanian confederation, which calls for ending the occupation of Palestinian lands and their transfer under Amman’s control. Jordan's King Abdullah IIUnder the plan, the confederation would be headed by the Jordanian monarch, but both parts of the state will have considerable independence, as well as their own governments. During the Arab-Israeli wars of 1948-49 and 1967, the Western Bank of the Jordan River and East Jerusalem were part of Jordan. The late King Hussein waived Jordan’s claims to Palestinian lands in the late 1980s.

    Jordan’s security services are searching a new strategy to fortify the kingdom against the shocks of the US troop withdrawal from Iraq, which would leave the kingdom exposed on two fronts: Iraq, where Amman expects the US military to start pulling out in late summer, and the West Bank, where the Palestinian Authority is on its last legs. Its breakdown would engulf the territory in the sort of chaos and violence which has already swept the Gaza Strip.

    Unfortunately, there is sofar little enthusiasm for the King’s incentive. Egypt and Saudi Arabia are not in favor of these links. Cairo suspects that if the arrangement works on the West Bank, the Jordanians will want to scoop up the Gaza Strip too. Riyadh is historically opposed to any enhancement of the Hashemite throne, a former rival. But this could now change as all concerned apprehend the new threat to their own safety. Tehran is extremely troubled by Jordan’s proposal, which could in time form a strong counter-axis to its Shiite Crescent ambitions, if Syria and more Sunni states be drawn into this strategic initiative. With US approval, a strong Sunni axis, led by Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan, could still redress the looming abyss, which is creating on Israel’s doorstep.

    Humvee Gunner Protection Kit (GPK)

    The GPK improves the protection of the gunner, with taller armoring and transparent shields offering enhanced visibility of the surrounding area. The new GPK adds 40 cm (16 in.) of armor to existing GPK to cover the gunner in a stand-up position. The transparent armor is compatible with modern optronic sights and night vision devices. The kit uses existing interface points to accommodate a variable range of weapons, including M2, M240, M249 and Mk-19 weapons.

    The Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center at Picatinny has designed a new armor shield that improves the protection for HMMWV gunners in combat situations. The system includes a combination of steel, transparent armor windows and rear-view mirrors configured to provide protection against rifle fire and IED blasts, allowing the gunner to maintain a protected posture while performing mission objective with full visibility through the windows. The system was transformed from conceptual design models to full-scale production in just six months. With over 2,500 of the systems fielded, O-GPK is currently in mass production at the Rock Island Arsenal in Illinois. The plant is expected to ship 7,500 kits by July 2007 and 20,000 by 2008.

    The GPK improves the protection of the gunner, with taller armoring and transparent shields offering enhanced visibility of the surrounding area. The new GPK adds 40 cm (16 in.) of armor to existing GPK to cover the gunner in a stand-up position. The transparent armor is compatible with modern optronic sights and night vision devices. The kit uses existing interface points to accommodate a variable range of weapons, including M2, M240, M249 and Mk-19 weapons.

    MiG-35 Multi-Role Combat Aircraft

    Based on the MiG-29M OTV, MiG-35 (Nato reporting name Fulcrum F), is equipped with advanced avionic suite comprising of a modern glass cockpit designed with three 6×8 inch flat-panel LCDs and full HOTAS controls, digital map, helmet-mounted sight. The latest Zhuk-AE active electronically scanning array (AESA) radar is mounted on this aircraft. This radar was developed with modular approach, enabling upgrading existing Zhuk ME/MSE radars, into the phased array equipped MFE/MSFE standard, deployed in MiG-29/Su-27 platforms.

    The MiG-35 is fitted with western standard Mil-1553 bus and advanced Russian made weaponry. Reliability and serviceability have been improved, reducing operating cost and improving serviceability by 2.5 times (compared to older MiG-29s). MiG-35 is equipped with an optronic target tracker, identical to the system used on the Su-30MKI. For precision air-to-ground attack missions, the aircraft can be equipped with a conformal electro-optical targeting module, installed under the right air intake. The aircraft is equipped with radar warning, electro-optical missile launch warning and laser warning sensors, and integral active self protection (jamming, chaff and flare) as part of the integral self-defense system. The aircraft has four additional hardpoints and can haul an external payload in excess of six tons.

    Most of the systems introduced in the MiG-35 can be applied to older MiG-29s through upgrading programs.

    The aircraft is powered by two RD-33 MK engines digitally controlled smokeless engines, producing 9000kgf of thrust each. This type is an improved and uprated version of the standard RD33 engine. The engine was developed to power the carrier based MiG-29K and modernized version MiG-29M/M2. The prototype demonstrated in Bangalore did not have thrust vector exhausts, but, according to the manufacturer, these can be installed in production aircraft.

    Proposed Cuts Could Eliminate FCS’ All Manned Ground Vehicles

    The proposed cuts to the program would effectively prevent the development of Future Combat Systems Manned Ground Vehicle (MGS). This means Soldiers would operate Abrams tanks and Bradley fighting vehicles “indefinitely,” and cancel the development of the infantry load carrier, or ‘Mule‘ and one of the two remaining unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) said Lt. Gen. Stephen the U.S. Army director of force development and deputy chief of staff.Four unmanned systema have already been eliminated from the program in a previous cost control effort. Commenting on the possible cut of $876 million in the 2008 budget for the Future Combat Systems, proposes by the Congress. Gen. Speakes said the proposed cuts endanger a program that would improve military capabilities today and in the future. The total Future Combat System request for fiscal 2008 is $3.7 billion.

    Manned Ground Vehicle - Infantry Fighting Vehicle variant


    Part of the motivation for the modernization of the ground forces, through the FCS program, is economical. The Abrams tank gets about three gallons to the mile. “Just think of the inefficiency of that on top of $3 to the gallon gas,” Lt. Gen. Speakes said. “We can’t afford to operate these legacy systems into the future without the promise that American Soldiers will operate something better. It’s like you are going to operate your 1970s-era car for the next couple of decades.”… “We will be doomed to spend the next 20 to 30 years with the existing combat platforms we have today,”… “Soldiers would be very negatively affected by these cuts, Speakses concluded.

    The FCS Combat vehicles are designed to share common hull and 80% common parts. “Savings from this would manifest themselves in fewer spare parts and training one set of mechanics for all vehicles rather than specialists for a mix.” Said General Speakes.

    General Speakes said that the program is on track and have met performance standards. “we are on the eve of some really great developments that are going to start hitting the Army literally overnight.” FCS represents a significant change in weapon systems acquisition strategy. “In the past, the Army designed and bought systems in isolation – one set of designers built a tank, another, a fighting vehicle, still another a medical evacuation capability, he said. Yet another group would work on making them all communicate with each other. The Future Combat Systems is working to eliminate this”, Lt. Gen. Speakes said.

    Threat Simulation Turns into Battlefield Deception

    0
    Visiting the UMEX & SimTEX 2026 exhibition taking place at the ADNEC Centre in Abu Dhabi this week, a new system caught our attention. Slovenian company Carboteh has introduced an unconventional approach to protecting...

    From Venezuela, to India, and the Rise of the Laser Era – a Weekly...

    0
    The opening week of 2026 has been defined by a singular, paradigmatic shift in modern warfare: the "catastrophic failure" of Venezuela's integrated air defense network during a U.S. special operation. The operation succeeded not through brute force, but by rendering Venezuela's Russian S-300VM and Chinese "anti-stealth" radars effectively blind, validating the supremacy of advanced electronic warfare over legacy kinetic defenses. This failure has sent shockwaves through the global defense market, underscoring why nations like Spain and Germany are rushing to modernize their air defense architectures with Western alternatives, while massive procurement programs exceeding $301 billion signal an accelerated transformation toward unmanned systems, directed energy weapons, and indigenous production capabilities.

    Beyond Drones: Key Facts Defining Turkey’s Rise as a Global Arms Giant

    0
    Turkey's defense industry transformation extends far beyond its celebrated drones. Now ranking 11th globally in defense exports, Turkey is executing a comprehensive strategy to become a top-tier arms supplier. With 75% of exports flowing to Western markets and five firms in Defense News' Top 100, Turkey is methodically building a complete defense ecosystem through combat-proven systems, integrated defense diplomacy, strategic self-reliance, and real-world R&D in active conflict zones.

    Skunk Works and XTEND Simplify Multi-Drone Command

    0
    Lockheed Martin Skunk Works® and XTEND have achieved a major milestone in JADC2 by integrating the XOS operating system with the MDCX™ autonomy platform. This technical breakthrough enables a single operator to simultaneously command multiple drone classes, eliminating the friction of mission handoffs. From "marsupial" drone deployments to operating in GPS-denied environments, explore how this collaboration is abbreviating the data-to-decision timeline and redefining autonomous mission execution.

    From Ukraine to Taiwan: The Global Race to Dominate the New Defense Tech Frontier

    0
    As traditional defense primes face mounting competition from agile “neoprimes” such as Anduril, Palantir and Helsing, the balance of innovation is shifting toward software-defined warfare and scalable, dual-use technologies, while global industry consolidation—marked by Boeing’s integration of Spirit AeroSystems and other strategic mergers—signals an intensified race to secure control over the defense technology value chain. Our Defense-Tech weekly report highlights these trends.

    Europe’s “Drone Wall”

    0
    In early October 2025, a coordinated wave of unmanned aerial system (UAS) incursions—widely attributed to Russia—targeted critical infrastructure across at least ten European nations. The unprecedented campaign exposed the fragility of Europe’s air defenses...

    Weekly Defense Update & Global Security Assessment

    0
    Executive Summary The past week (September 18-25, 2025) represents an inflection point where strategic defense concepts have transitioned from doctrine to tangible reality. An analysis of global events reveals four primary, interconnected trends shaping an...