Thursday, January 15, 2026
More
    Home Blog Page 343

    Armored Vehicles at AUSA Winter 2008

    The 120mm lightweight (LW)  cannon being tested on a simulated MCS mount. Photo: US ArmyWhile the manned combat vehicle of the FCS family of weapons has yet to debut publicly, substantial progress has been made already, with FCS family of vehicles with the first platform – then Non-Line-Of-Sight-Cannon (NLOS-C) scheduled to roll off the production line this year. (see the recent GAO report about FCS in this issue). Another platform making progress is the XM-1202 Maneuver Combat System (MCS) – the light ‘tank’ of the FCS unit. MCS will have a crew of three – a commander, driver (common crew) and a gunner. The vehicle will carry a remotely controlled turret mounting a lightweight, low-recoil 120mm cannon, firing standard (line of sight) and beyond line of sight mid-range-munition (MRM) type ammunition. Based on situational awareness, utilizing on-board and networked sensors, the MCS will dramatically improve first round lethality. Similar to other FCS vehicles, both MCS and NLOS-C will base its survivability on a multi-level concept, based on the classical ‘onion’ protection, utilizing stealth by signature management and maneuverability. Hit avoidance is provided by passive and active protection, armor protection by modular armor and mine protection. Kill avoidance will be maintained by design for survivability and redundancy, retaining partial operational capability and mobility after being hit. For a full coverage on the FCS program see “FCS on the Move” and a summary of the recent GAO report about the program.

    The Utility Vehicle version of the JLTV proposed by Northrop Grumman and Oshkosh. Photo: Oshkosh.
    At least some of the contenders for the joint light tactical vehicle (JLTV) and other platforms are eliminating the “deep V hull” design, favoring more useful and less restrictive “shallow V” or oblique floor, applied with floating floor, blast mitigating carpet and other protection features contributing to crew safety and survivability, without substantially increasing the vehicle’s height. JLTV program, several contenders demonstrated systems, BAE Systems + Navistar displayed their solution. Floor & belly covered by panels to protect from “prowling” competitors; Oshkosh and Northrop Grumman was even more paranoid, and kept their JLTV contender segregated under wraps, unveiled only to special access VIPs. Textron unveiled their Hercules, also dubbed “ASV on Steroids”. It is designed to assume some of the roles and missions currently carried out by the Armored Security Vehicle (ASV), while offering much improved protection. The vehicle will use advanced protection, significantly increasing survivability while maintaining performance and mobility similar to the ASV, excluding air transport in the C-130. For a full coverage of the JLTV program see: “JLTV in Motion” in this month’s issue and “JLTV Pathfinders“, covering JLTV technology demonstrators.

    An outgrowth of the Armored security Vehicle was displayed at AUSA WInter 2008 by Textron Defense Systems. Photo: Defense Update

    Having delivered five vehicles in response to an Army Operational Needs Statement, DRS Sustainment Systems is gearing up to begin production of the M1200 Armored Knight. The system uses an electro-optical multi-sensor target acquisition payload mounted and integrated on an M1117 Armored Security Vehicle to form the Reconnaissance, Surveillance and Target Acquisition (RSTA) platform. The original manufacturer of the ASV, Textron Marine & Land Systems, is also offering their version for the RSTA mission. The vehicle is fitted with a turret, mounting two automatic weapons (50 Cal and M19 grenade launcher) and mast-mounted Star SAFIRE IV EO payload made by FLIR Systems, comprising a 640×480 InSb focal plan array flir, a color CCD-TV, low-light level CCD camera and laser rangefinder, illuminator, designator and pointer. The system also comprises a digital IMU/GPS to facilitate quick geo-pointing and geo-location of targets.

    A recovery version of the RG-33 MRAP was unveiled at AUSA WInter 2008 by BAE Systems. Photo: Tamir EshelUnsolicited development by BAE Systems (RG33) and Oshkosh (HEMTT PLSR) were addressing the urgent need for heavy recovery vehicles in Iraq and Afghanistan, in support of heavy armored vehicles which are operating intensively and subjected to frequent attacks. Current recovery assets are sometime helpless when called to recover a disabled forty-ton MRAP, leaving the job for the M-88 Hercules, originally designed to support the heavy armor. Hercules has provided unmatched capabilities during Operation Iraqi Freedom. To date 210 Hercules vehicles have been fielded against a total U.S. Army requirement of 595 vehicles. A total of 68 have been fielded to the U.S. Marine Corps, which has decided on the single M88A2 configuration.The new heavy recovery vehicle is based on the RG-33 MRAP platform, equipped with a crane, winch and lifting bars. The hydraulic, telescopic crane can lift up to 40 ton, the towing drum is capable of horizontally towing the same weight while the telescopic lifting arms are capable of lifting up to 25 tons. This arm is designed for insertion under a disabled vehicle, lifting it by supporting the front or rear axle. A full coverage of MRAP and other heavy armored vehicles is available in our recent title “Beyond MRAP“.

    The ten-wheeler PLS/R heavy recovery vehicle  proposed by Oshkosh to augment the current PLS family of vehicles.  Photo: Oshkosh.
    The Palletized Load System (PLS) is the backbone of the U.S. Army’s distribution and resupply missions. The newest member in this family, PLS Recovery vehicle will be able to rapidly and safely support disabled or damaged armored vehicles in a tactical environment. Some of the PLS/R assets are standard with the PLS (like the lifting crane) while others, such as the Tru-Hitch system, are already in the U.S. Army’s inventory. The 10×10 (five axles) PLS/R will be powered by a Detroit Diesel Model 8V92TA engine and have full-time all wheel drive. It will be equipped for and have the payload and power capacity to recover heavy armored vehicles such as MRAP or Stryker vehicles and, as such, will be instrumental in providing rapid recovery services where self-recovery and like-vehicle recovery is not feasible. The PLS/R will make it possible to overturn vehicles for recovery, perform slope recovery and recover vehicles mired in water, mud, sand and snow. Lift and tow operations are performed by a fifth wheel towing recovery device coupled to a Rotzler TR-80 winch. This device can also be engaged into a high mobility recovery trailer for evacuation of completely immobilized vehicles. The PLS/R also includes winching spade caps to provide a stable platform for heavy-duty winch recovery. Damage is reduced on vehicles’ axles and chassis due to the ability to perform flat towing.

    Recovery vehicle based n the Stryker is under development at  General Dynamics Land Systems. Photo: Tamir EshelAnother recovery vehicle unveiled here was the maintenance and recovery vehicle (MRV) version of the Stryker, fitted with a winch, pulling more than 40,000 lbf, crane capable of lifting 16.5 tons and an hydraulically operated earth anchor made of ballistic steel, which also adds to frontal protection. The vehicle is designed to support Stryker combat brigade teams, performing recovery operations, lifting, and Stryker vehicle fleet support wherever the brigade deploy.

    For more reading on combat vehilce recovery, see our previous item on new recovery systems for the USMC.

    Additional articles in this review:

    AUSA Winter Exhibition Review 2008

    AUSA Winter 2008 convention held at Ft. Lauderdale in February 2008 provided the venue for the second largest land forces exhibition held in the USA in recent months. (Defense Update reported from AUSA 2007 Convention in October 2007). Although the winter event addressed many of the aspects already covered last October, the rapid pace of development and upcoming changes in the Army’s and department of Defense priorities, funding and plans brought many exhibitors to focus on new topics.

    One of the most visible changes was the high priority that all defense integrators and vehicle manufacturers are placing on the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle program – a ‘winner takes all’ multi-billion dollar opportunity to be grabbed by a single team in the next decade. While the final decision on the winner design and team is expected only by 2013, industry teams are already in battling to win the technology demonstration and system development phases. (Click here for our JLTV updated report).

    While JLTV is making progress, the military continues to spend huge amounts on the procurement of MRAP, despite their limitations (regarding tactical maneuverability and strategic mobility). Another issue realized with current MRAP deployments was the gap in the ability to recovery disabled MRAPs in theater. While the Army has yet to publish a specific requirement for heavy recovery assets to be able to support these beasts, both Oshkosh and BAE Systems are preparing to submit their offers for such vehicles, two of which were on display at AUSA Winter. (Read Defense-Update review of the new recovery vehicles at AUSA Winter 2008)

    Another hot issue is the warfighter – new wearable systems are being introduced in growing numbers, following the trend of miniaturization, and empowerment of the ‘combat edge’, as reflected by Special Forces units and the latest ‘Land warrior’ trend. At AUSA Winter we discovered several new systems such as the Watchdog physiological monitoring system, CID, acoustic gunshot locator, multiple radio communications controller and more. (see our dismounted warfighter, land warrior and soldier systems articles)

    ICV (XM-1206) will be the infantry combat vehicle of the FCS family. Image: US ArmyMuch progress is being made with the Army’s Future Combat Systems; Two of the four unmanned systems included in the FCS family of systems are being released as part of ‘Spiral 1’, to support the current force. More systems, including the ground unattended sensors will follow soon and the Non Line of Sight – Cannon (NLOS-C) – the first of eight manned vehicle platforms will roll out of BAE production line this year. (link to FCS family of vehicles article) Progress was made with the lightweight 120 gun associated with another vehicle, as well as with the mortar system, missile etc. At the network level, AUSA Winter provided the opportunity to demonstrate the operability of the Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) Network Centric waveform, a critical element in the formation of the overarching future FCS network and the Army’s future Warfighter Information Network – Tactical (WIN-T) networking infrastructure. One of the most critical elements of this network will be Satcom on the Move, an area which attracted much interest from visitors and exhibitors alike. (FCS networking update)

    Some of the weapons displayed at AUSA Winter highlighted the continued trend toward measured effects enabling precision attack at extended range. New weapons such as the P44/42 and DAGR, both developed by Lockheed Martin are examples of the two extremes – carrying the effect currently provided by the Hellfire missile to much longer range (P-44/42) or to shorter range, and controlled collateral damage, by the new DGAR guided rocket. New warheads are also offered for the modern missiles, optimizing the weapon to achieve the desired effects against a wide range of threats. New sensors capable of better identifying targets from longer ranges and in difficult conditions, are supporting the weapons providing real-time forensic support needed for rapid targeting and engagement through an ever short sensor-to-shooter process. (Click here for our ‘Weapons for Scalable Response’ article)

    Sensors and Electro-Optical (EO) equipment received extensive coverage at AUSA Winter. Advanced vision systems including image intensifiers and thermal vision systems (FLIRS) are providing the warfighter ever better performance. With the market evolving at record pace to realize enhanced and more capable systems, many exhibitors of EO systems underlined their generic technological capabilities, promoting new thermal imaging modules, digital I2 devices and laser augmented imaging which could be integrated into new systems meeting specific customer requirements. Other solutions focused on the uses of imaging resources – recording, storage and retrieval at the lower level, distribution, processing and workflow that creating actionable intelligence by correlating images based on geographic relevance or through time to discover changes or hidden links or meanings. Intelligence is automatically and manually processed from millions of images received continuously from scores of combat cameras and video sensors distributed in the field, as well as from human sources. Means of creating reports, tagging information and processing it to discover hidden meaning and links are the focus of several intelligence application developers that unveiled part of their work at the convention. (see the feature on: Electro-optics, Intelligence and IMINT)

    Defense Update continues the coverage of the Army’s Joint Heavy Lift program. This year at AUSA Winter. The Army decided to support three different technologies which are currently pursued by Lockheed Martin, the Boeing-Bell team and Sikorsky. Another program currently in progress is the A-160 Hummingbird, developed by Boeing. The program suffered a setback with the loss of one of the A-160T unmanned vehicles last December, but Boeing assured that the problem did not casue significant delay for the program. (JHL article)

    Additional articles in this review:

     

    Centralized Controller for Multiple UAV/UGV Operation

    Lockheed Martin recently tested the capability of a single operator to simultaneously control four different unmanned systems through a new centralized controller. The prototype controller enabled users to control multiple systems via a hand controller and a touch screen, while the system automatically translates the commands and guides the execution of autonomous functions as required by each system.

    The test involved several unmanned systems simulated operations in an urban environment. The systems included Honeywell’s Micro Air Vehicle
    Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV); the Silver Fox UAV (produced by Lockheed Martin), the Roll Based Operations Architecture (RBOA) robot and an Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) demonstrator developed by Lockheed Martin. Controlling of the PackBot (from iRobot) by the centralized controller is currently underway.

    Several different radio links were demonstrated in conjunction with the centralized controller, including UHF, L-band and wireless broadband. The demonstration also utilized the Joint Architecture for Unmanned Systems message protocol to communicate with the Lockheed Martin UGV.

    Another aspect demonstrated during the test was automated route planning, provided by the Combat Maneuver Mission Route Planner (CMMRP) software. This application is part of the Human Robotic Interface, utilized for UGV control. This capability enabled the centralized controller to execute both pre-planned autonomous operation and manual tele-operation of the unmanned platforms.

    Integrated Sensor Is Structure (ISIS) Unmanned HALE Airship

    The Integrated Sensor Is Structure (ISIS) developed by Lockheed Martin Aeronautics. ISIS will provide a new model for persistent, autonomous ISR platform. Utilizing a stationary stratospheric airship, ISIS will establish a position on the ‘high ground’ at an altitude of 70,000 ft. This airship will be deployed for long missions, staying in position for one, five or even ten years.

    The airship structure will be integrated with lightweight, phased-array radar antennas, providing highly accurate and sensitive sensor capable of detecting ground-bound and airborne moving targets under all weather conditions. ISIS will provide a persistent early warning sensor able to detect cruise missiles at distances of 600 kilometers or dismounted enemy combatants at a range of 300 km. Exploiting its huge size, ISIS will utilize its large aperture instead of high power to meet the radar performance requirements.

    To generate power for the systems on board, the outer skin of the airship will be coated with solar cells, absorbing the sun light as well as light reflected from the earth surface, thus minimizing power drainage at night. The airship program is currently funded by DARPA and could be matured for deployment toward the end of the next decade (around 2018).

    Arch Terror Mastermind Mughniyah Joins The “Shahid” Clan

    The Middle East, from Beirut, Damascus and to Tehran is in severe shock. Hezbollah’s top military commander and one of the world’s most notorious terror masterminds, died in a mysterious car bomb explosion in the Damascus district of Tanzim Kafr Susa on Tuesday night. For almost three decades, this man has been a fugitive from the world’s leading intelligence services.


    Imad Mughniyah, was more than just a senior Hezbollah official. Western intelligence experts and foremost the Israeli defense establishment, consider him to be the actual founder of the “new” Hezbollah, reshaping it from a small terrorist organization, into a second-to-none well equipped and highly trained, guerilla army, operating along totally new warfare tactics, which culminated in last summer’s Second Lebanon War against the IDF. Even Winograd report, although hardly mentioning his name, gave Hezbollah under Mughniyah’s leadership high marks.

    Imad Fayez Mughniyah, 45, orchestrated the suicide bombings of US Marine and French Beirut headquarters, in 1982 which killed 241 Marines and 58 French soldiers, in the aftermath of Israel’s invasion into Lebanon. One year later, Mughniyah planned the US embassy bombing, killing 63 people and wiping out the entire top CIA Middle East staff. In 1985, he shocked the world’s headlines, in the widely publicized hijacking TWA Flight 847 and the cold blooded murder of U.S. Navy diver Robert Stethem, a passenger on the plane. The United States placed Imad Mughniyah on the top of the “Most Wanted Terrorists”, but was unable to capture him, in spite of ceaseless efforts. Mughniyah became infamous for numerous brutal kidnappings of Westerners in Beirut during the 1980s, most notably, that of, former Vietnam veteran and journalist, Terry Anderson and U.S. Army Col William Francis Buckley, who was later murdered.

    Iran in particular, regarded Mughniyah as a crucial, even strategic asset. He enjoyed the rare and complete personal confidence of both Iranian supreme ruler Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and al Qaeda’s Osama bin Laden. But the dead terrorist’s association with Tehran and its violent overseas exploits went back twenty years. In 1988, in collusion with Tehran, he organized the kidnapping of US Marine Corps Lt. Colonel William R. Rich Higgins, the most senior American intelligence officer in Lebanon, who was tortured to death by Iranian Revolutionary Guardsmen and Hezbollah operatives.

    Senior enough to take orders from no-one ranking lower than Iran’s supreme ruler, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Mughniyah operated directly through the top Revolutionary Guards commander General Rahim Safavi. Intelligence sources in the West and in particular the Israeli military had a high opinion of Mughniyeh’s military, intelligence and tactical skills. His hand was seen in the transformation of al Qaeda’s 2001 defeat in Afghanistan into a launch pad for its anti-US campaign in Iraq and many other ventures in the terror war against America. After the death of Abu Musab al Zarqawi, Mughniyah was rated the world Islamic terror movement’s most outstanding field commander. His part in causing the Israeli Army so much problems during last years summer war, was decisive. In fact, Mughniyah was high on Israel’s target list during the war. Israeli military intelligence had assessed that he could have been killed in a massive air strike on the movement’s headquarters in the Beirut Dahya neighborhood on July 19, but he escaped, miraculously, as he did during his “nine lives” survival.

    Israel has a long list of accusations on Mughniyah. According to Yossi Melman, senior analyst in Haaretz daily, “If there is a definition for the term “the snake’s head,” it is Imad Mughniyah, who started his terrorist activities as a militant with Fatah, and joined Hezbollah afterwards with the establishment of the Shi’ite organization. If Israel is behind this act, it can be seen as the most significant intelligence accomplishment in the war on terror, coming before the assassination of Fathi Shikaki, leader of the Islamic Jihad in 1995″.

    In the past, in the 1990’s, according to foreign reports, the Mossad tried to assassinate him in a complex operation in southern Beirut. However, the operation killed his brother, a car shop owner in Beirut. Mughniyah was expected to be present at the funeral, giving an additional chance to assassinate him, but he never showed. The United States also tried to detain Mughniyah several times, including a 1995 attempt to arrest him when the plane he was traveling was due to stop in Saudi Arabia. Diplomats said Saudi officials refused to allow the plane to land. Several more attempts also failed.

    Former Mossad head retired Major General Danny Yatom said on Israel Radio. “He was one of the terrorists with the most amounts of intelligence agencies and states chasing him. Mughniyah had been a very tough target to track”, he said, describing his death as a severe blow to Hezbollah. “He behaved with extreme caution for many years. It was impossible even to obtain his picture. He never appeared or spoke before the media. “His identity was hidden. His steps were hidden. He behaved with extreme caution, and that was the reason it was difficult to get to him for so many years.”

    Whoever tracked Mughniyah down in Syria had excellent operational and intelligence capabilities, something that was lacking in the Second Lebanon War. Although naturally Hezbolla, Damascus and Tehran immediately blamedIsrael behind the assassination, Mughniyah had enough enemies in his own camp to wish him “join his forefathers!” For some of the second level leadership, Mughniyah was growing too strong even to challenge Hassan Nasrallah’s sofar unique prestige, which waned somewhat after the Tehran Ayahtollah’s blamed him for destroying their forward base last Summer, in his reckless abduction. (A recent photo of Mughniyah, released by Hezbollah after his death is shown on the left.)

    In fact, only a few days earlier, the leader of Lebanon’s Druze community, Walid Jumblatt, used a televised address, to hundreds of cheering supporters on Mount Lebanon, to make a speech which was not only a virtual declaration of war on the Shia militia Hezbollah but also at times contradictory. Only a few days before a mass rally is to be held Thursday on the third anniversary of the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafiq al-Hariri, such speeches are generally used to attack the governments in Tehran-Damascus which carried out the assassination. Jumbalat’s head-on attack on Hezbollah could inflame tempers, which are already simmering into dangerous proportions between Shi’ites and Sunnis in Lebanon. Lebanese security forces are expecting some high tension in Beirut, during Mughniyah’s funeral in Hezbollah’s stronghold Dahya quarter and on the streets of the capital itself. Things could easily get out of control and even escalate into a renewed civil war.

    The immediate question, however, is whether or not Hezbollah or Iran will respond to the assassination with terror attacks in Israel’s north or overseas. For example, following then Hezbollah leader Sheikh Abbas Musawi’s assassination in 1992, Mughniyah responded with the notorious attack on the Israeli embassy and in 1994 against the Jewish community center in the Buenos Aires. In these terror attacks, more than 100 people were killed.

    While Israel officially denied any part of its involvement, which is quite rare in itself, the Defense community has elevated the alert on its Lebanese and Syrian borders, at airlines, embassies and Jewish institutions world wide. Security has been stepped up for prominent Israeli and Jewish figures, including defense minister Ehud Barak, who were already targeted by Hezbollah.

    COMBATSS-21

    COMBATSS-21, developed by Lockheed Martin is a new core combat management system developed for the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS-1). The system integrates the sensors, weapon systems, communications, processing and display systems including the radar, gun weapon system, missile launchers, decoy launchers, and electronic warfare systems. The system were integrated for the first time on board USS Freedom in June 2008, validating the open architecture with both COMBATSS-21 and Freedom itself. During the integration testing, targets of opportunity were engaged and tracked to demonstrate operability. The system’s core functions are employed as baseline, with additional user-defined specific mission packages. The initial package developed by the U.S. Navy is the Surface Warfare Mission Package (SUP). The second is the anti-submarine warfare was tested in August 2007. SUW MP was recently tested in integration with the ship’s stabilized 30mm Mk46 gun and sensors, demonstrating rapid detect, track and prosecution of small-boat threats. The system is also designed to protect local assets and move a force quickly through a strategic waterway. On coastal attack missions, the vessel could employ the Non Line of Sight – Launch System (NLOS-LS) to fire precision attack missiles. It also interfaces with two Vertical Takeoff and Landing Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (VTUAVs) and a MH-60R helicopter carried on board. COMBATSS-21 was built through a high degree of reuse from the Aegis Weapon System, enabling cost effective updating throughout the US Navy surface fleet. The system is part of a common product library that delivers to Aegis, LCS, the U.S. Coast Guard’s Deepwater program and international navies. The system is designed to be exportable to international navies considering operating the LCS, among them Israel and Saudi-Arabia.

    Lockheed Martin Unveils the Stalker Mini-UAV for Special-Forces Operations

    Lockheed Martin unveiled the latest mini UAV model called Stalker, developed at the Advanced Development Programs (also known as the famous Skunk Works). Stalker was developed in 2006 to address specific requirements raised by US Special Operations forces and made its first flight in mid 2006. Designed to be carried and operated by an individual soldier, the hand- launched mini UAV weighs 6 kg and has a wing span of 3 meters. The system includes hand held mission control system and communications module that can control up to four vehicles simultaneously.

    Stalker can carry payloads of up to 3 pounds on a two hour mission at ranges of up to 20 km. The mini UAV is equipped with a specially designed EO payload comprising of a retractable stabilized pan and tilt mount, which can be fitted with different modules containing specific payload, such as daylight (TV) camera, low-light TV, an uncooled thermal sensor or a combined sensor and laser target market. The dual-axis stabilizes payload is mounted under the belly and is retrieved before landing. It is also protected by special shock absorber pad. Stalker typically operates at altitude of 400 above ground and can be used up to 15,000 ft above sea level.

    With a lightweight, stealthy design and very low acoustic signature derived from the extended assembly designed for the electrical motor, Stalker is claimed to be uniquely quiet, making it highly suitable for spec-ops role. The autonomous vehicle is designed to operate under difficult weather conditions, at winds up to 30 knots (although it was demonstrated to be usable in winds up to 50 kt). Launched by hand, Stalker is designed for automatic retrieval over any terrain, without a parachute, by using deep stall and specially designed shock absorbing belly. The mini UAV will autonomously return and land in area up to 50 feet from its designated landing point.

    Space Program Raises Concern About Iran’s Ballistic Missile Thrust

    Tehran successfully launched an experimental research rocket called Explorer-1 last week. According to Iranian information, the new launcher will be able to carry a small satellite into orbit. According to the Iranians, the Explorer-1 was launched to determine the exact orbital position for the satellite. Tehran unveiled the first indigenous satellite called Omid (Hope). According to Iranian plans, Omid will be launched by March 2009 and operate in low-earth orbit, hinting on the potential use of the satellite for strategic, earth observation mission (reconnaissance).


    Last week Iran unveiled its new space center designed and built to support future satellites. The center has a launch pad from which the Omid will be launched, and an underground control center supporting the operation. Iran’s space programs were pioneered by the Sinah-1 satellite, launched by a Russian Kosmos-3 booster rocket in 2005. By 2010 Tehran plans to have four satellites in orbit, some of them placed in space by its indeginous satellite launchers.

    Both Moscow and Washington are concerned over Iran’s continuous development of long-range missiles. The recent launch emphasizes Tehran’s thrust to extend the range and payload capacity of their long range ballistic missiles, under the shroud of scientific and research program. “It’s unfortunate Iran continues to test ballistic missiles. This regime continues to take steps that only further isolate it and the Iranian people from the international community,” White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said. However, Iran denied that it’s space technology and research threat to peace and stability in the region.

    Iranian media gave no details about the rocket, but based on visual inspection it is similar to the advanced version of the Shahab-3 ballistic missile (Shehab-3B), which has a smaller warhead and larger fuel capacity, resulting in maximum range of up to 2,000 km (about 1,200 mi). Furthermore, Iran is reportedly developing a larger Shahab 4 missile, with a range of 4,000 km (about 2,500 mi). Long-range ballistic missiles are considered an inherent element for a nuclear weapons program development believed to be undertaken by Iran through the past decade.

    Video Below: A launch of a Shehab-3B missile. Note similarity to the Explorer-1 shown above (NTV)

    U.S., Israel Pursue Counter Rocket, Artillery & Mortar (C-RAM) Weapons

    The Extended Area Protection and Survivability (EAPS) program is part of an advanced technology objective (ATO) pursued by the U.S. Army’s Aviation and Missile Research, Development, and Engineering Center (AMRDEC), seeking to protect U.S. forces against attack by rockets, artillery, and mortars (RAM). The program anticipates the use of guided munition technologies to intercept RAM threats. The system, comprising interceptors, sensors and fire control systems will provide stationary and mobile forces with 360-degree hemispherical ‘umbrella’ extending area protection from direct and indirect fires.

    In February 2008 Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems were awarded $8.6 and $5.9 million contracts (respectively) to design prototype hardware for EAPS Battle Element. Both companies are expected to present their competing systems to the Army by the end of 2012.


    Lockheed Martin’s concept features a compact, vertically launched missile designed for ‘hit-to-kill’ intercept of RAM threats. The system encompasses the interceptor, fire control sensor, launcher and battle manager, and will ultimately interface with the latest battlefield surveillance systems. The Lockheed Martin team includes Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control, Lockheed Martin Maritime Systems & Sensors and Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company.

    The contract calls for the design, fabrication, integration and test of the prototype hardware, and is structured as a base award to be followed by four options aligning to the five phases of the program. Phase 1 culminates in a Preliminary Design Review. Phase 2 includes Hardware-in-the-Loop and a Critical Design Review, paving the way to demonstrating intercepts of individual RAM targets in Phase 3 and multiple simultaneous intercepts of RAM targets in Phase 4. Phase 5 is a risk-reduction phase in anticipation of the System Development and Demonstration program, ultimately leading to a production program providing a significant improvement in C-ram capabilities.

    Israel’s Iron Dome C-RAM Program

    A parallel Israeli program is in more advanced stages, with RAFAEL expecting to conduct initial test demonstrations of the Iron-Dome Wide Area Counter-RAM system later this year. The system, promoted by the Israeli Ministry of Defense as an urgent requirement to defeat short range rockets, both Palestinian fired Qasam improvised rocket and 107mm and 122mm Katyusha and Grad rockets, deployed by Hezbollah. The Israeli system will use a low-cost, autonomous guided missile designated Tamir, to defeat only those rockets projected to cause damage or risk to designated targets.

    The Iron Dome C-RAM system is designed as a mobile defensive solution countering short range rockets and 155 mm artillery shell threats with ranges of up to 70 km in all- weather conditions, including low clouds, rain, dust storms or fog. The system uses a unique interceptor missile equipped with a special warhead that detonates any target in the air within seconds. The Iron Dome radar, based on Elta’s Advanced Artillery Radar (AAR) will detect and identify the target and monitor multiple trajectories of incoming salvo in real time.

    Target data will be transmitted to the Battle Management & Weapon Control (BMC) for processing, where each trajectory is extrapolated to analyze the expected impact point. If the estimated rocket trajectory poses a critical threat, a command is dispatched directly to the best placed launcher for immedate launch and intercept of the threat. The interceptor receives trajectory updates from the BMC via uplink communication. As it approaches the target, the missile employs its radar seeker to acquire the target, guiding the interceptor to pass at close proximity to the target. The location of the intended kill is calculated to be employed over a neutral area, therefore reducing collateral damage to the protected area.

    Land-based Phalanx Weapon Systems (LPWS) called Centurion. is a C-RAM weapon developed by Raytheon. Photo: RaytheonOther companies engaged with the CRAM challenge is Raytheon, offering the Land-based Phalanx Weapon Systems (LPWS) called Centurion. This rapid firing guided gatling gun represent a revolutionary approach to point defense, as they are designed to intercept rockets, artillery and mortar rounds in the air before impact, thereby reducing or eliminating any damage they might cause. The system comprises the sensors, fire control and weapon in a single integrated unit, providing situational awareness, precision fires, real-time targeting and kill assessment. In Novebmer 2007 Raytheon was contracted by the Pentagon to build 12 Centurion units to protect coalition operating bases in Iraq. In this role, the LPWS is integrated with counter-battery radar systems such as TPQ-36/37 which will be augmented in the future multi-mission radar known as EPQ-36. Raytheon is also proposing an enhancement to the system, utilizing parallel solid-state high power laser as an effector, replacing the gun.

    More news – April 21, 2009:

    Israel interested in the Centurion LPWS

    While their Iron-Dome missile interceptor capability is maturing, following recent successful tests Israel is considering enhancing the system introducing short-range counter-mortar capability. Despite the Israel MOD previous rejection of the Centurion system, Israel’s Minister of Defense Ehud Barak reportedly authorized the MOD to request the system from the USA with priority. Israel is also fielding a new mortar locating radar to better cope with short range mortar attacks, that are harder to detect and could cause considerabe damage to border towns and military facilities.

    U.S. Army Orders Ravens for SOCOM & Other Services

    The U.S. Army exercised an option for additional procurement of RQ-11B Raven Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (SUAS) from AeroVironment, Inc. (NASDAQ: AVAV). The total award value is $45.8 million. Each Raven system typically consists of three aircraft, a ground control station, system spares, and related services. and is fully funded.

    Hand launched Raven RQ-11AThe SUAS program of record provides the Raven hand-launched aerial sensor systems for the Army and Marine Corps. The additional contract will provide for additional supplies supporting Special Operations Command and other U.S. military services.

    Raven is a 4.2-pound, backpackable, hand-launched sensor platform that provides day and night, real-time video imagery for “over the hill” and “around the corner” reconnaissance, surveillance and target acquisition in support of tactical units. U.S. armed forces use Ravens extensively for missions such as base security, route reconnaissance, mission planning and force protection. Raven can be operated manually or programmed for autonomous operation, utililizing the system’s advanced avionics and precise GPS navigation. With a wingspan of 4.5 feet and a weight of 4.2 pounds, the hand-launched Raven provides aerial observation, day or night, at line-of-sight ranges up to 10 kilometers. The Raven delivers real-time color or infrared imagery to the ground control and remote viewing stations. According to the U.S. Army, Ravens were flown for approximately 150,000 combat hours in 2007. To date Sofar AeroVironment has delivered more than 8,000 small unmanned aircraft, most of them Ravens.

    A US Air Force team prepares to launch a Raven SUAS. Photo: US Air Force

    EPX – Studying a Future SIGINT Platform for the US Navy

    The U.S. Navy awarded three industry teams $1.25 million five month contracts (each), to help develop the system concept for the Navy’s EPX – the future manned SIGINT platform expected to replace the current EP-3. Planned as a replacement for the EP-3 Aries aircraft, the EPX will be a manned multi-mission, multi-intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and targeting (ISR&T) platform. EPX will support carrier strike groups at sea and theater, combatant and national commanders, operating from shore based forward operating locations. The EPX would assume the role of the Navy’s EP-3E aircraft and provide greatly expanded capabilities. The EPX will operate in concert with other maritime patrol and reconnaissance platforms, such as Broad Area Maritime Surveillance and the P-8A Poseidon.

    “These contracts will allow industry to work with the Navy to analyze the current requirements for the EPX system and will further develop the concepts, cost and schedule for the program,” said Capt. Joe Rixey, Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance Aircraft program manager. “These contractors will help us determine the technical criteria necessary to build a strong foundation for the EPX program.”

    One team receiving the contracts is led by the Boeing Company, partnering with Argon ST. Boeing is also the prime contractor for the P-8 Posedon Multi-Mission Maritime Aircrraft (MMA), the successor or the P-3C Orion maritime patrol and anti-submarine aircraft. “as the prime contractor for that program we can leverage logistics, maintenance, support, training and other relevant data.” said Paul Summers, Boeing director of airborne SIGINT campaigns.

    Another team led by Northrop Grumman joined by L3 Communications. Northrop Grumman is a major supplier of special-mission aircraft for the US Navy, particularly the E-2 Hawkeye and EA-6B Prowler electronic warfare aircraft. L3 Com was the prime contractor for the EP-3E. “This competition is about more than replacing an aircraft,” said Patricia McMahon, vice president of Information Operations and Electronic Attack for Northrop Grumman’s Integrated Systems sector. “It’s about transforming Navy warfighters’ ability to perform the ISR&T mission and share that information with joint and allied forces.

    A third contract was awarded to Lockheed Martin, the original manufacturer of the P-3 platform and supplier of the Navy’s S-3B Viking, carrier-based aerial refueller and anti-submarine aircraft.

    Following completion of concept refinement, the Navy will solicit proposals and select contractors for the technology development phase of the program. The Navy is expected to down-select to one contractor for the EPX system development and demonstration phase in late 2011 or early 2012.

    The first completed P-3C to EP-3E conversion aircraft departs from the L-3 Communications modification facility in Waco, and heads to Naval Air Station Patuxent River for testing and fleet training. EP-3E JMOD Common Configuration spiral one ForceNet equipment suite. Photo: US Navy

    World’s Most Powerful Electromagnetic Railgun Tested by the U.S. Navy

    The U.S. Navy’s Office of Naval Research successfully conducted a record-setting firing of an electromagnetic rail-gun at Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren, VA. The new technology demonstrated in the recent test uses high power electromagnetic energy instead of chemical energetic (explosive) propellants to accelerate a projectile farther and faster than any preceding gun. At full capability, a future rail gun will be able to fire a projectile more than 200 nautical miles (ten times farther than current Mk 45 five inch guns) at a muzzle velocity of mach seven and impacting its target at mach five. These high velocity projectiles will be able to destroy targets by kinetic energy, rather than with conventional explosives. According to Dr. Elizabeth D’Andrea, ONR’s Electromagnetic Rail-gun Program Manager, the elimination of explosives from both propellant and warheads will have significant contribution to the safety on board future combatants.

    Science and technology challenges met by ONR in the development of the rail gun include development of the launcher, pulse power generation and the guided projectile design. The program’s goal is to demonstrate a full capability, integrated railgun prototype by 2016-2018.

    The program is conducted as a U.S. Navy Science and Technology investment, in partnership with industry (Boeing, Charles Stark Draper Lab, Inc., and General Atomics and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, the U.S. Army and the UK MOD. Among the industry participants are Several Navy establishments are contributing to the program, including the U.S. Naval Academy, Naval Postgraduate School, Sea Systems Command (PMS 500), Naval Surface Warfare Center and Dahlgren Divisions.

    A projectile fired by the electromagnetic railrun races toward the target  at Mach 5 speed, during a record setting test conducted by the Office of naval Research. Photo: US Navy

    Tetherless Rifle Improves Training Realism

    The Cubic Corporation (AMEX: CUB) is introducing a tetherless version of the M-4 training rifle, fitted with a gas-operated recoil and wireless link, allowing for greater freedom of movement and more realism during tactical simulations. The new simulator battery operated weapons are linked to the EST via 2.4GHz wireless connection. The recoil is gas activated by an integral compressed CO2 cartridge housed in either the ammunition magazine or in attachments to the simulated weapon.

    Cubic Introduces Tetherless M-4 Training Rifle

    The tetherless training weapons can be used either with Cubic’s EST 2000 Engagement Skills Trainer or its Warrior Skills Trainer, an enhancement to EST 2000 that enables soldiers to move around either on foot or in a moving vehicle in a simulation environment that replicates the weather conditions, convoy attacks and judgment issues that arise in certain combat situations. These trainers are used by thousands of military personnel throughout the world to develop marksmanship, judgmental and collective training skills.

    “There has been a growing demand for the soldier to train as they fight, and a tethered weapon can prevent movement, restricting motion in a collective mode,” said Terry Fiest, director of Business Development for U.S. Army Programs for Cubic’s Orlando division. “A tetherless weapon is more suited to tactical engagements and gives the soldier more latitude. We are finding that our customers like tethered weapons for marksmanship and they prefer tetherless for dismounted and offensive training scenarios.”

    The first tetherless system was delivered in 2007 to the Mississippi Air National Guard at the Combat Readiness Training Center in Gulfport. Additional systems are on contract for the Wisconsin Air National Guard’s Combat Readiness Training Center at Volk Field later this year. More than 1,000 EST 2000 systems are operational at Army and Air Force installations worldwide, including the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Korea, Germany, Afghanistan, Kuwait and Iraq. Cubic’s Orlando division is now working on converting other weapons used in EST 2000 and the Warrior Skills Training to operate in a tetherless environment. Cubic could potentially create tetherless technology for law enforcement users in the future. The company’s Orlando site is used as a training venue for Central Florida law enforcement teams who want to train with Cubic’s laser-based ground combat training instrumentation.

    Non Line of Sight Cannon (NLOS-C)

    The primary purpose of NLOS-C is to provide responsive fires in support of the Future Combat Systems (FCS) Combined Arms Battalions (CABs) and their subordinate units in concert with other fire effects, including line-of-sight, Beyond-Line-of-Sight (BLOS), Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS), external and joint capabilities. The system provides flexible support through its ability to change effects round-by-round and mission-by-mission. These capabilities, combined with rapid response to calls for fire and rate of fire, provide a variety of effects on demand.

    The cannon will be able to move rapidly, stop quickly and almost instantly deliver lethal first round effects on target. The cannon will have a Multiple Round Simultaneous Impact (MRSI) capability, to maximize the effect on a target, from a single gun or a small number of firing units. The NLOS-C system mounts an ultra-lightweight 38-caliber, fully automated 155-mm howitzer. A fully automated ammunition handling system is installed, holding 155-mm projectiles and Modular Artillery Charge System (MACS) propelling charges in ready to load racks. The automation eliminates the physical handling of ammunition and provides the system to fire rounds at sustained rates with minimal physical effort. The system will enable rapid rearming and refueling.

    As a fully automated system, NLOS-Cannon integrates all crew operations – firing, moving, training and maintenance – into a digitized two-man cockpit, providing automated handling of all gun systems, real-time situational awareness, and effective protection from battlefield conventional and unconventional threats, including nuclear, biological and chemical environments. The NLOS Cannon, as with all FCS Manned Ground Vehicles (MGV), incorporates active and passive protection systems to enhance crew and platform survivability against all types of battlefield threats.

    The NLOS Cannon chassis will feature highly durable, lightweight band track that provides a smoother ride over conventional steel track. The track is propelled by a diesel engine and hybrid-electric propulsion system designed to improve system mobility and reduce fuel consumption.

    In September 2006, BAE Systems completed the integration of the NLOS-C first Firing Platform, to be used for firing tests through 2008, when the NLOS-Cannon prototype was delivered on May 30, 2008.

    This prototype was the first of nine vehicles to be delivered to the Army for engineering, mobility, safety and reliability testing as well as gun firing, to be conducted at the Army Yuma Proving Grounds, Arizona, by 2009. The five early configuration platforms including the first prototype currently delivered will be supplied this year and the remaining three will be configured in a full system development and demonstration (SDD) design, will be delivered by early 2009.

    The firing platform uses a 38-caliber length, fully automated 155-mm howitzer, developed at BAE Systems’ Minneapolis System Integration Facility. The Firing Platform’s howitzer is integrated with a fully automated ammunition handling system. The platform, made of a combination of high-strength steel and aluminum, incorporates a cannon assembly that is 1,200 pounds lighter than the M777 cannon previously tested on the NLOS Cannon Concept Technology Demonstrator.

    The prototype of the NLOS Cannon is the first vehicle destined for the FCS program to utilize the new hybrid-electrical proplusion. All eight of the FCS manned combat vehicles are mounted on nearly the same chassis — they share more than 80 percent compatibility across the family of vehicles. They are unique in that they are electrically powered. A diesel engine on board turns a generator, which in turn charges batteries, which in turn powers electric motors that drive the tracks. In fact, the entire vehicle is electrically powered.

    Much of the advanced technology being developed for the NLOS Cannon is being incorporated into the design and development of other vehicles in the MGV family, such as the NLOS Mortar. The NLOS Mortar is being designed by BAE Systems to have an estimated 80 percent commonality with the NLOS Cannon chassis and mission equipment to reduce maintenance and logistics. A NLOS Mortar Firing Platform is expected to be delivered for testing and qualification in spring 2007.

    From Venezuela, to India, and the Rise of the Laser Era – a Weekly...

    0
    The opening week of 2026 has been defined by a singular, paradigmatic shift in modern warfare: the "catastrophic failure" of Venezuela's integrated air defense network during a U.S. special operation. The operation succeeded not through brute force, but by rendering Venezuela's Russian S-300VM and Chinese "anti-stealth" radars effectively blind, validating the supremacy of advanced electronic warfare over legacy kinetic defenses. This failure has sent shockwaves through the global defense market, underscoring why nations like Spain and Germany are rushing to modernize their air defense architectures with Western alternatives, while massive procurement programs exceeding $301 billion signal an accelerated transformation toward unmanned systems, directed energy weapons, and indigenous production capabilities.

    Beyond Drones: Key Facts Defining Turkey’s Rise as a Global Arms Giant

    0
    Turkey's defense industry transformation extends far beyond its celebrated drones. Now ranking 11th globally in defense exports, Turkey is executing a comprehensive strategy to become a top-tier arms supplier. With 75% of exports flowing to Western markets and five firms in Defense News' Top 100, Turkey is methodically building a complete defense ecosystem through combat-proven systems, integrated defense diplomacy, strategic self-reliance, and real-world R&D in active conflict zones.

    Skunk Works and XTEND Simplify Multi-Drone Command

    0
    Lockheed Martin Skunk Works® and XTEND have achieved a major milestone in JADC2 by integrating the XOS operating system with the MDCX™ autonomy platform. This technical breakthrough enables a single operator to simultaneously command multiple drone classes, eliminating the friction of mission handoffs. From "marsupial" drone deployments to operating in GPS-denied environments, explore how this collaboration is abbreviating the data-to-decision timeline and redefining autonomous mission execution.

    From Ukraine to Taiwan: The Global Race to Dominate the New Defense Tech Frontier

    0
    As traditional defense primes face mounting competition from agile “neoprimes” such as Anduril, Palantir and Helsing, the balance of innovation is shifting toward software-defined warfare and scalable, dual-use technologies, while global industry consolidation—marked by Boeing’s integration of Spirit AeroSystems and other strategic mergers—signals an intensified race to secure control over the defense technology value chain. Our Defense-Tech weekly report highlights these trends.

    Europe’s “Drone Wall”

    0
    In early October 2025, a coordinated wave of unmanned aerial system (UAS) incursions—widely attributed to Russia—targeted critical infrastructure across at least ten European nations. The unprecedented campaign exposed the fragility of Europe’s air defenses...

    Weekly Defense Update & Global Security Assessment

    0
    Executive Summary The past week (September 18-25, 2025) represents an inflection point where strategic defense concepts have transitioned from doctrine to tangible reality. An analysis of global events reveals four primary, interconnected trends shaping an...

    U.S. Air and Space Forces Push Next-Gen Programs at the AS&C 2025 Conference and...

    0
    At the 2025 Air, Space & Cyber Conference, U.S. Air Force and Space Force leaders unveiled major updates on next-generation fighters, bombers, unmanned systems, and space initiatives, highlighting both rapid innovation and critical readiness challenges as the services race to outpace global competitors. A short version is available here, with a more detailed version for subscribers.