Wednesday, November 13, 2024
More
    Home Blog Page 338

    Joint Heavy Lift (JHL)

    Bell and Boeing are working on a new quad tilt-rotor design for the planned Joint Heavy Lift (JHL) transport aircraft. The design utilizes the ’tilt-rotor’ concept already proven on the CV-22 Osprey, The new aircraft will be capable of operating anywhere in the battlefield, lifting 25-32 ton cargo, representing a Stryker armored infantry carrier, an FCS ground maneuver vehicle or a Marine Corps Light Armored Vehicle (LAV). The aircraft will be able to operate straight from a ship’s deck or forward staging area, cruising at a speed of 275+ knots over 2100 nm unrefuelled, with 19 tons of cargo. Its operating ceiling will be around 25,000 ft, above most air defense and MANPAD threats (an artist concept is shown below).

    Another team pursuing JHL is led by Lockheed Martin [NYSE: LMT] which announced teaming with Karem Aircraft Incorporated. The new design will utilize Karem Aircraft’s Optimum Speed Tilt-Rotor (OSTR). This concept is considered one of the three approaches selected by the Department of Defense (DoD)’s Joint Heavy Lift program office to receive a Concept Design and Analysis extension contract. Lockheed Martin’s effort will be led by Lockheed Martin Aeronautics’ Advanced Development Programs organization (The Skunk Works). An artist concept of this design is shown at the top of this page.

    The third technology considered by the Army for JHL, is the X2 coaxial rotor system developed by Sikorsky Aircraft. An X2 powered aircraft will be capable of hovering, takeoff and land vertically, maneuver at low speeds, and transition seamlessly from hover to forward flight like a helicopter. In a high-speed configuration, one or more ‘pusher props’ is included in an integrated auxiliary propulsion system to enable high speed with no need to physically reconfigure the aircraft in flight. (A model of the High Speed Lifter is seen in the photo below)

    The High Speed Lifter will utilize both counter-rotating vertical lift system and propellers for forward  movement at speeds up to 245 knots

    Tactical Image and Intelligence Exploitation Systems

    Miniature Video Recorders and cameras

    PhotoTelesis from Symetrics Industries group developed lightweight video recce system (LVRS) which is currently in service with special forces. The image acquisition and transmission device integrates image processing, storage, display, annotation and management functions. The whole system can be packed in low weight, compact system called the Military MicroRIT (MMR) or operate in a ruggedized laptop. For applications requiring covert image acquisition by even smaller systems, Sekai Electronics introduced a smaller device called MTE-100 Ultra Compact Camera Recorder. This matchbox sized miniature device provides the same image quality of the TMC-100 but has an integrated battery for 30 days standby or 3 hours continuous recording. It also supports a local area network wireless (LAN).

    360 Degree panoramic camera from RemoteReality, on display at AUSA WInter 2008. Photo: Tamir Eshel

    Panoramic Vision

    RemoteReality introduced at AUSA Winter its latest version of 360 degree visual awareness sensor, a single camera covering all directions, all the time with continuous video coverage. RemoteReality is offering its system for security systems, as well as for manned and unmanned vehicles, offering enhanced situational awareness, integration with weapon targeting and improved navigation.

    Advanced Workstations for Intelligence Analysts

    Lockheed Martin is promising to revolutionize the way intelligence analysts and planners see the world and work with imagery data. For image processing and exploitation at a large scale, the company is promoting its version of analyst workstations, implementing the Global Visualization Services (Global ViSe) and Analyst Roundtable. Global Vise is creating an immersive visualization tool vastly improving the understanding situations and managing operations. The system is integrating layers upon layers of discrete data in an intuitive and dynamic interface, eliminating the need to access each database individually. Users can access images, targets or reports using ‘point-and-click on geographically represented map, aerial photo or design.


    Overwatch, now an established member of the Textron Systems group, is implementing its software applications with the workstations the Army is deploying for operating with the Distributed Common Ground System – Army (DCGS-A) segment of the joint DoD wide intelligence network. The U.S. Army is accelerating DCGS-A upgrades to improve the level of military intelligence support in theater. Upgrades planned within the next 24 months will streamline deployed systems with V3 configuration which will establish commonality and interoperability among analysts, focusing intelligence efforts on analytical thinking instead of repetitive data entry, and reduce training burdens by eliminating tools with similar capabilities. This version will also incorporate the AXIS Pro link analysis software from Overwatch, a new link building tool assisting analysts to discover and extract information more effectively and distribute it faster to the supported units.

    SAIC is also introducing the Champion, Counter-Intelligence, Human intelligence (CI/HUMINT) advanced modernization program. While information generated by automatic or manually controlled sensors is flooding the network, HUMINT information sources are less abundant. Separating valuable information from ‘chaff’ is difficult and work intensive and most often, the flow of HUMINT slows down to a mere trickle, in contrast to the information flood coming from networked sensors. The Champion program has addresses this shortfall. While the HUMINT collection process remains unchanged, Champion optimizes the reporting of critical intelligence, by tagging and referencing the relevant elements in the reports, applying XML-tagging routines, providing geo-referencing and enabling web services. This process improves the analyst’s link to intelligence collection across the tactical level and up to the national level. The program has already demonstrated improvement in reporting capabilities with the current portal-based service providing geo-referenced visualization of the collection operations management mission. This portal is being transitioned into an operational system and is expected to become a fully integrated system next year (FY09).

    Warfighters take a four-dimmensional Introductory tour of the battlespace

    A different image processing system is currently in development at SAIC. The 4DAR is a photorealistic application, accurate down to the graffiti on buildings walls simultaneously presenting three-dimensional photorealistic terrain, intelligence data and time (the fourth dimension of 4DAR). The system enables soldiers to see, experience and understand their future areas of operations – from the boots on the ground perspective – even before they leave home station.

    MWIR Compact Modular Imager from L3

    L3 Communications developed a Compact Modular Imager (CMI) utilizing a 20µm 640×512 Indium Antimonide (InSb) Medium Wave Infrared (MWIR) focal plane array (FPA) operating in the 3.6 – 4.95 µm spectral band . To take full advantage of the new FPA, a new linear dewar cooler design was incorporated offering over 10,000 hours of operation. The sensor is mounted in a rugged open frame module enabling simple integration into multisensor payloads and weapon platforms. The sensor provides 14bit real-time digital data output at up to 60Hz frame rate and uses standard RS422 serial interface for full remote operation. According to L3 Com, higher frame rates are achieved using an addressable window mode. The FLIR has a C)2 notch filter to minimize atmospheric interference to further enhance the MWIR performance in high humidity conditions.

    Laser Illuminated Cameras Extend the Soldier’s Vision

    As the demand for imagery is increasing, users require better vision, from longer range under the most difficult conditions, as sensors are challenged by sharp contrasts, low light levels, obstruction and interference. As specialist in high performance digital imaging systems, Intevac Inc. is offering a line of digital image intensifiers (DI2) and laser illuminated viewing andAn infrared camera based on the Digital Image Intensifier (right) from Intevac. Phto: Tamir Eshelranging systems, addressing the needs for compact, high performance vision at the tactical level. The E3010M DI2 is a self contained sensor module specifically designed for integration into imaging systems such as head or helmet mounted displays, rifle sights and small EO/IR surveillance systems. The sensor incorporates a compact, integrated element ensemble, including an SXGA (1280×1024 pixel) electron-bombarded CMOS sensor, high voltage power supply, low voltage power supply, FLASH memory (which also contains image correction parameters). The sensor operates in the 500-900 nm band (GEN II GaAs photocathode) and has a dynamic range supporting ‘twilight to starlight’ conditions. It can also work in daylight condition while the high voltage is switched off, operating in the Near IR (NIR) band.

    Comparison of infrared camera and Laser Illuminated Viewing and Ranging (LIVAR) camera, both pictures are taken from a range of 600 meters. LIVAR uses Short Range Infrared enhanced with laser illumination, to deliver a detailed, sharp image  under dificult lighting conditions. Image: Intevac.
    Intevac is also introducing the Laser Illuminated Viewing And Ranging (LIVAR) – Short Wave IR (SWIR) based cameras, integrated with a laser illuminator to form a long-range viewing and ranging system, that can work in parallel t a FLIR device. SWIR sensors can effectively penetrate battlefield osbcurants, windshields and windows, in day and night, overcoming many of the limitations that earlier systems demonstrated when operating in asymmetric warfare scenarios. In an integrated FLIR/SWIR/LIVAR system, the FLIR is used as the primary sensor for threat detection, spotting a potential target at long range. As the target gets within the LIVAR range, the system sets the gate range for target location and then provides high-resolution digital stream of images for positive combat identification Using range-gated laser illumination, the system contributes to positive stand-off combat identification and high resolution imagery.

    The laser operates in ‘eyesafe’ wavelength band. LIVAR 500 is designed as a compact integrated sensor, for integration in mounted or dismounted applications. The LIVAR 500 uses a TE Photocathode (EBCMOS) focal plane array with 640×480 element matrix with spectral response range of 950-1650 nm.

    Medium Range EO Infrared sensor System (MREO) for FCS Vehicles

    The Medium Range EO Infrared sensor System (MREO) will be used on the manned combat system (MCS) and Infantry Carrier Vehicle (ICV), as well as the armed robotic vehicle – assault light (ARV-A-L) unmanned system. It will provide the ‘eyes’ of the ground-based platform. This stabilized, day/night networked multi-sensor includes a mid-wave thermal imager (MWIR), color/low-light TV and laser illuminated imager. The MWIR sensor is based on L3 communications’ 640×512 matrix, 20 micron dual-aperture IR camera. The system has a three-axis stabilization in pitch, roll and yaw, maintaining stable line of sight while on the move, or when elevated on a mast, remotely controlled by the crew or via the vehicle’s network communications, by external platforms or dismounted soldiers. The operator can control the system manually, as imagery from the sensor, with video from color daylight or low-light video monitored on the vehicle’s user screens. The image is presented in high resolution over a panoramic, medium/narrow and super narrow FOV.

    The multifunction laser can assists the crew in long range target identification (supported MWIR laser gated imaging). As a multi-function laser it also provides rangefinding and target designation; the system provides far target locations (FTL) of all targets tracked by the system. It provides target location and designation for on-board weapons as well as external effects. In an automatic mode the system feeds the thermal and visible imagery to the automatic aided target recognition (AiTR) processor, which classifies and prioritizes the imagery to highlight multiple air and ground targets, discriminated and tracked under all weather and visibility conditions. The MREO sensor can be mounted on the turret surface or elevated on a telescopic mast.

    Being part of the planned 2nd and 3rd ‘SpinOut’ phases, MREO is expected to become a standard sensor package to be fielded throughout the U.S. Army’s tactical mobile units in the next decade. The system uses the modular, miniaturized Common Electro-Optical Electronics Unit (CEEU) for image processing and control. This COTS based processor provides automatic tracking, interface the sensor, vehicle’s systems and on-board C4ISR systems, range, positioning and geo-location, as well as image recording, storage and distribution services. Another module, handling the systems power intensive functions is the power and servo controller.

    Additional articles in this review:

    Scalable Response Means More Choices for the Warfighters

    Escelating Response Systems

    Escelating Response Systems

    General Dynamics Ordnance and tactical Systems promoted both lethal and less than lethal means for force protection. The company is offering a 66mm grenade system with a range of less than lethal munitions firing smoke countermeasures and multi-spectral obscuration, and counter-personnel non-lethal effects. The grenades are used for detection avoidance, acquisition avoidance and hit avoidance against directed and guided weapons. Used as counter-personnel non-lethal effects, these grenades can be fired from increased standoff with placement accuracy for controlling or dispersing crowds and denies or secures certain risk areas.

    Taser's new Shockwave area denial non-lethal weapon. Photo: Tamir EshelTaser introduced the Shockwave – a command-activated area denial system. The baseline Shockwave unit is a command activated, 6-shot device that covers a 20-degree arc with 25ft XP TASER electronic control device (ECD) cartridges. When activated, Shockwave units saturate the defended area with the Taser devices which incapacitate personnel with reversible, non-lethal effects of the Taser Neuro Muscular Incapacitation (NMI). When deployed in a stacked configuration, each activation of the fire control button commands the array to sequentially fire rows of TASER cartridges via a smart addressing system . As a protective measure when waves of target sets are encountered, additional 5-second exposures are administered to already expended rows with each firing. Shockwave deployment keeps previously targeted personnel down and incapacitated while subsequent target sets are engaged – a truly scalable defense in depth capability. Multiple Shockwave units can be stacked or ‘daisy-chained ‘ to form longer or wider barriers, or allow for more than one salvo to be fired, as required by the mission. Taser Internaional is planning to release the Shockwave for pilot evaluations in the summer of 2008.

    M1001 High Velocity Canister Cartridge (HVCC) flechette grenade. Photo: General Dynamics OTS.Among the lethal types of ammunition GD-OTS developed for the 40mm weapon family is the M1001 High Velocity Canister Cartridge (HVCC). This grenade is loaded with 113 flechettes darts (2″ long), which are dispersed after the cartridge is fired, producing a close pattern densely covering an area 100 x133 cm, at a distance of 50 meters, or about 5×5 meter at a distance of 100 meters. The HVCC is designed for use with the MK19 Grenade Machine Gun. It is highly effective even against protected personnel (such as soldiers wearing body armor), the M1001 can be fired from stand-off range or from close range.

    Advanced warheads are one of the domains mastered by General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems (GDOTS). At AUSA Winter 2008 the company unveiled the K-Charge a patented multipurpose shaped charge warhead. The K-Charge design is scalable from shoulder fired weapons to fixed and portable land-based delivery systems, to air delivered systems from aircraft and helicopters. The compact design packs the same lethal effect of comparable diameter, heavier and larger warheads. The patented design uses multiple detonation points, either peripheral or central detonation point to shape the size and effect of the penetrator. K-Charge is currently used with the Javelin missile, and Enhanced Fiber-Optic-Guided missile and is being integrated with the Precision Attack Missile and Mid-Range Munition (MRM).

    A model of Boeing's A-160T Hummingbird unmanned UAV shown at AUSA WInter armed wit eight JAGM type missiles. Photo: Tamir EshelAnother missile looming on the horizon is the Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM), building on key technologies developed for the Joint Common Missile (JCM) program cancelled by the U.S. Army few years ago. JAGM will have a range exceeding 20 km, more than doubling the current Hellfire range. This missile will carry an integral internet protocol (IP) based data radio, providing access to ‘targeting during fly’, from multiple sources. The missile will utilize a the tri- mode seeker, matured with the JCM program. This seeker will provide precision targeting capability with fire-and-forget technology against moving or stationary targets in smoke, dust or poor weather. Its warhead will be designed as a common, multi-purpose warhead, effective against a wide target set including armored threats, maneuvering boats, bunkers and other targets including use in urban warfare scenarios.

    Lockheed Martin's P-44 precision guided missile. Photo: Tamir EshelAnother ‘Hellfire extender’ is the P44/P42 offered by Lockheed Martin. This missile was developed internally funded by its own resources. This missile will enable ground forces to extend the effect currently generated by the Hellfire II missile over a range of more than 70 km. These missile can be deployed and fire from an MLRS or HIMARS rocket carrier. With P44/42, an MLRS unit will be able to score a direct hit at a moving target traveling at a distance of 40 km within 2.9 minutes.

    Additional articles in this review:

    Defense Electronics at AUSA Winter 2008

    Since its first deployment in the early 2000s, the Army’s FBCB2 command and control system was proven as one of the most valuable command and control combat assets. Incorporating the latest developments in digital information processing and networking, DRS Technologies, the hardware subcontractor for Northrop Grumman, began shipments of the new generation of the fully militarized FBCB2 JV-5 computer system, which will run the FBCB2 applications on armored vehicles. The new computer uses multi-core processing units, increased memory and has expansion capability to allow future technology improvements. In the past years DRS supplied over 50,000 earlier versions of the computer systems for the FBCB2 program.

    Thales Offers Imagery on Demand

    Networking is becoming a critical component in modern battle and the ability to collect, distribute, share, and exploit intelligence, imagery and situational understanding is one of the fastest growing applications utilized over those networks. To support these capabilities Thales Land & Joint Systems is introducing a new family of services called Imagery on Demand (IoD) providing a range of products optimized for image dissemination. These scalable products are designed for deployment on manned and unmanned aircraft, armored vehicles, naval vessels and even operate as hand-held items by dismounted soldiers. Thales’ IoD products are designed to handle and transfer digital video over tactical radios, tactical data-links and any IP based communications channel. Systems are ranging from PMC IoD or 3U Compact PCI cards (weighing only 150 or 230 gram respectively) that can be integrated as modules in wearable, or airborne computers, to heavier modules weighing 15-20 kg, used on ships or armored vehicles. IoD functionality includes data integrity, forward error correction and delay-tolerant networking (DTN) supporting targeting applications. the system provides numerically lossless image compression and interactive compression adaptable to real time, non real time, narrow-band and interactive applications. Data relay support and remote sensor platform storage are also provided.

    WIN-T Progress

    Another hot topic at AUSA Winter 2008 was the U.S. Army’s new battlefield called WIN-T. This network will provide on-the- move, high speed, high capacity backbone communications network, linking the warfighters on the battlefield with the Global Information Grid (GIG). The Warfighter Information Network – Tactical (WIN-T) network introduces a mobile, ad-hoc, self-configuring, self healing network, using satellite communications (Satcom) for beyond-line-of-sight on-the-move (OTM) communications, robust network management and high bandwidth radio systems to keep mobile forces connected, communicating and synchronized. Recently restructured, the program will begin deployment soon with Increment 1, supporting fixed and stationary command elements with ‘Satcom on the halt’. The follow-on Increment 2 phase to be fielded next year will support two new waveforms – the NCW and Highband Networking Waveform (HNW) supporting high capacity line of sight communications. It will also introduce Satcom on-the-move (OTM) capability on command vehicles (HMMWV). The next phase will be ready for testing by 2011, and will be fully operational with FCS units.

    At AUSA WInter 2008 these JTRS Ground Mobile Radio demonstrated  transfer of video, data and voice using the new Wideband Networking Waveform. (WNW) Photo: Tamir Eshel

    JTRS Debuts the Wideband Networking Waveform (WNW)

    Another element of FCS connectivity demonstrated at AUSA Winter 2008 was the joint tactical radio network (JTRS) Ground Mobile Radio (GMR), which was demonstrated with the new wideband networking waveform (WNW) capability developed specifically for FCS. Seven applications were simultaneously run, sharing live streaming video, data and voice over the network operated among four locations, at the Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Rockwell Collins and BAE Systems’ display booths. WNW establishes secure, internet-like network capability with deployed units, operated while on the move or in stationary positions. GMR is a family of common, modular software programmable tactical radios designed to run multiple waveforms, simultaneously supporting different communications functions. The standard GMR set demonstrated here included two radio channels and two RF power amplifiers, attached to a system controller, all mounted on a common chassis and attached to a remote control console, designed for vehicular application. The current set was designed for demonstration and developmental purposes only and does not represent the future tactical radio configuration. Eventually, all modules will be packed into a single case which will offer modularity, configuration flexibility, high reliability and ease of use.

    Mark Wheeler from Windmill International  shows the KA10 terminal , capable of downloading 29 Mbps fdata torrent  from defense relay satellites in support of deployed special forces and intelligence  users worldwide. Photo: Tamir EshelOn-The-Move Satcom Terminals

    The new requirement for Satcom on the move represents a big opportunity for manufacturers of satellite communications terminals, particularly those offering low-profile antennae positioning designed for vehicular applications. At AUSA Winter, Cobham and EMS Technologies displayed such systems. A new Satcom product at the show was the Satlink KA10 developed by WindMill International and displayed at the EMS DS&S booth. This compact, lightweight and portable global broadcast service receive only unit. Weighing only 23.5 lbs (about 12kg) and operating from standard (BA5590), vehicle batteries of AC power, KA10 is set up in five minutes and can automatically acquire satellite signal in less than eight minutes. Once locked on the satellite beam it demonstrated full data rate transfer of up to 29.5 Mb/sec. The terminal can support Type 1 cryptographic processing (up to top secret level).

    Additional articles in this review:

    Is the Turkish Army facing a “Tora Bora” War in Kurdistan?

    As the US War in Iraq seems to diminish into acceptable proportions late 2007, a new crisis is arising in Iraq’s north, as Turkish Armed Forces started a massive land operation against PKK into Kurdistan before. Led by the Turkish Army’s 7th Corps, commanded by General Bekir Kalyoncu, a division sized force, supported by armor and airpower, is rapidly moving into a sofar limited area of some 35-40 kilometers, before entering into the mountain hideouts of the PKK. Alas, the latter will be quite a different ballgame.

    A sniper team blonging to the Turkish mountain of Northern Iraq troops operating in the mountains against Kurdish PKK , February 2008. Photo: Turkish MOD

    Ankara’s move, which has been anticipated for months, is about the last straw, that President Bush can swallow, in his already strained relations with the newly elected Turkish administration. A highly sensitive issue was barely forfended last October, over the controversial Armenian issue, which brought Ankara and Washington onto a dangerous brinkmanship situation.

    The Turkish incursion is quite embarrassing to Washington, which has tried hard to avert such action, as Kurdistan remained the only peaceful region in wartime Iraq. Moreover, the US military, in its effort to pacify Ankara, submitted precision intelligence on PKK locations, through aerial photography and satellite imagery, so that any Turkish action would be limited in sporadic point-target operations, but preventing large-scale offensive operations. Now, with the damage already done, the US and the Iraqi central government are most eager to play down the extent of the invasion or at least, keep it within its proportions. However Kurdish leaders, which are aware of Ankara’s hidden strategic agenda for years, are convinced that the aim of the present Turkish attack is to undermine the Kurdish region, which enjoys autonomous rights close to statehood. Ankara has always regarded the semi-independence of Iraqi Kurdistan and the Kurdish claim to the oil city of Kirkuk, as providing a dangerous example for Turkey’s own Kurds, who are equally yearning for some kind of autonomy.

    But for the US forces in Iraq, the logistical situation could become disastrous. About 70 percent of the air cargo that reaches the U.S. Army in Iraq originates in Turkey, as does about 30 percent of the fuel used by the army. If the border crossing is closed, or the Kurdish area becomes a war zone, the logistical supply line could be disrupted. Moreover, the Kurds are liable to decide to remove their thousands of top trained Peshmerga soldiers serving alongside US and government troops in the Baghdad region, to fight against the Turks, significantly undermining the ability of the American forces in Baghdad and its surroundings to confront the challenges still awaiting them. A destabilizing situation in Iraq’s north would also become a nightmare to US military planners, now that “post surge” conditions further south seem to be improving substantially.

    To place the situation in geo-demographic perspective: about 30 million Kurds live in the mountainous regions of Iran, Iraq, Syria and Turkey, making them the Middle East’s largest ethnic group without a state. Of these, some 15 million Kurds living in southeastern Turkey have warned that a prolonged Turkish incursion into Iraq would exacerbate tensions with the Ankara government.

    In fact, the Turks may be biting off more that they can chew in its new Kurdistan adventure. The Turkish army alone is unlikely to do much damage to the PKK, which has several thousand fighters hidden in a mountainous area that has few roads, currently covered with snow drifts, making tracks virtually impassable.

    Even further east, the mountainous region, where the PKK and an Iranian-Turkish guerrilla group known as PJAK operate, is super-tough terrain, with peaks of more than 11,000 feet. An Islamic terrorist group, allegedly affiliated to Al Qaeda, Ansar Al Islam, used it as a base to attack Iraqi Kurds before the 2003 U.S.-led invasion. When the Kurdish Peshmerga fought Saddam Hussein’s formidable army, even the Iraqi government never had firm control over this difficult region, says a veteran Kurdish guerilla leader. “Even Saddam Hussein with chemical weapons couldn’t get people out of that area”, General ‘Mam’ Rostum, a commander of the government loyal Iraqi-Kurdish militia, the Peshmerga, agrees. His own fabled fighters could not dislodge the PKK, he says, “because of the topography, and the PKK is fighting with guerrilla-warfare tactics.” Moreover, the main bases of the PKK are along Iraq’s border with Iran, notably in the rugged Qandil mountains to the south of where the Turkish troops are currently operating. This massive mountain range, between 120 and 150 km (75 and 90 miles) north of the regional capital Arbil, stretches from the tip of southeastern Turkey along the border with Iran.

    It is an area described by Iraqis as a natural fortress with its tall peaks, deep valleys and forests that make the perfect terrain for guerrilla warfare. It is here that the Turks could expect stubborn resistance from the Peshmerga, the army of Iraqi Kurdistan with decades of experience fighting a guerrilla war against Saddam.


    Turkish leaders in Ankara should remember another war, which was fought under similar conditions. On Christmas 1979, Russian elite paratroopers landed in Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan. The country was already in the grip of a civil war. The prime minister Hazifullah Amin, tried to sweep aside Muslim tradition within the nation and he wanted a more western slant to Afghanistan. This outraged the majority of those in Afghanistan as a strong tradition of Muslim belief was common in the country. Thousands of Afghanistan Muslims joined the Mujahideen – a guerilla force on a holy mission for Allah. The Mujahideen proved to be a formidable opponent. They were equipped with old rifles but had knowledge of the mountains around Kabul and the weather conditions that would be encountered there. The Russians resorted to using napalm, poison gas and helicopter gun ships against the Mujahedeen – but they experienced exactly the same military scenario the Americans had done in Vietnam. Nearly a decade later, the proud Soviet Army was forced to retreat shamefully, a move which put the end of seventy years of the grand Soviet empire. Is Ankara really so keen to enter into a similar high risk adventure?

    The answer may be in an equally risky fighting “entente” with Iran. Indeed, another front may open soon towards the east, as fighting could start by Iran against its own Kurdish rebels. The Kurds have manifested an independent spirit throughout modern Iranian history, rebelling against central government efforts to restrict their autonomy during the Safavid, Qajar, and Pahlavi periods. Another Kurdish uprising took place in 1979, following the Revolution at Mahabad, which became the center of Kurdish resistance. But Ayathollah Khomeini had already warned key Kurdish leaders that any attempts at dismantling Iran would be met with the harshest response, and he sent elite counter-insurgency units to the north. As result, fighting raged with the Iranian military battling Kurdish peshmerga forces from the Free Life Party in the Sardasht region of eastern Iran. Kurdish forces managed to defeat forces of the Tehran regime and even captured a military barracks of the Revolutionary Guards in the village of Mazra! Furious over its setbacks, the Guards used attack helicopters against crowds of demonstrators in the Iranian Kurdish town of Saqqez, killing 13 demonstrators and wounding more than 200. But the fighting did not stop. Last August, An Iraqi Kurdish group shot down a IRGC chopper killing eleven members of its crew. As result, Iranian forces were deployed near the Iraqi town of Haj Omran. Iranian and Turkish artillery shelled suspected guerilla outposts inside Kurdistan and further cross-border operations were conducted, coordinated between Turkish and Iranian military commanders.

    Veteran journalist and Iran expert, Ken Timmerman was at the front in Northern Iraq, in the Qandil Mountains, last October reporting on how Kurdish insurgents of the PJAK were bringing the fight inside Iran. Timmerman had uncovered a veritable alliance between Turkey, a NATO member and alleged U.S. ally and the Revolutionary Guards of Iran to try and destroy the Kurdish insurgency against the Islamic republic.

    The risk, Middle East analysts warn, is that Turkey might become drawn into a wider conflict with Iraqi Kurds even if it initially sought to conduct a small-scale operation, and that other countries, including Iran, which has a long anti-Kurdish tradition, might also feel emboldened by Turkey’s move, if initially successful. American intelligence experts warn, that a major Turkish military offensive, coordinated with Iran, could open a Pandora’s box for the Iraqi fiasco turning it into a regional quagmire, with other countries, such as for example Saudi Arabia, or even Syria, starting to fight inter-ethnic wars on Iraqi territory.

    Armored Vehicles at AUSA Winter 2008

    The 120mm lightweight (LW)  cannon being tested on a simulated MCS mount. Photo: US ArmyWhile the manned combat vehicle of the FCS family of weapons has yet to debut publicly, substantial progress has been made already, with FCS family of vehicles with the first platform – then Non-Line-Of-Sight-Cannon (NLOS-C) scheduled to roll off the production line this year. (see the recent GAO report about FCS in this issue). Another platform making progress is the XM-1202 Maneuver Combat System (MCS) – the light ‘tank’ of the FCS unit. MCS will have a crew of three – a commander, driver (common crew) and a gunner. The vehicle will carry a remotely controlled turret mounting a lightweight, low-recoil 120mm cannon, firing standard (line of sight) and beyond line of sight mid-range-munition (MRM) type ammunition. Based on situational awareness, utilizing on-board and networked sensors, the MCS will dramatically improve first round lethality. Similar to other FCS vehicles, both MCS and NLOS-C will base its survivability on a multi-level concept, based on the classical ‘onion’ protection, utilizing stealth by signature management and maneuverability. Hit avoidance is provided by passive and active protection, armor protection by modular armor and mine protection. Kill avoidance will be maintained by design for survivability and redundancy, retaining partial operational capability and mobility after being hit. For a full coverage on the FCS program see “FCS on the Move” and a summary of the recent GAO report about the program.

    The Utility Vehicle version of the JLTV proposed by Northrop Grumman and Oshkosh. Photo: Oshkosh.
    At least some of the contenders for the joint light tactical vehicle (JLTV) and other platforms are eliminating the “deep V hull” design, favoring more useful and less restrictive “shallow V” or oblique floor, applied with floating floor, blast mitigating carpet and other protection features contributing to crew safety and survivability, without substantially increasing the vehicle’s height. JLTV program, several contenders demonstrated systems, BAE Systems + Navistar displayed their solution. Floor & belly covered by panels to protect from “prowling” competitors; Oshkosh and Northrop Grumman was even more paranoid, and kept their JLTV contender segregated under wraps, unveiled only to special access VIPs. Textron unveiled their Hercules, also dubbed “ASV on Steroids”. It is designed to assume some of the roles and missions currently carried out by the Armored Security Vehicle (ASV), while offering much improved protection. The vehicle will use advanced protection, significantly increasing survivability while maintaining performance and mobility similar to the ASV, excluding air transport in the C-130. For a full coverage of the JLTV program see: “JLTV in Motion” in this month’s issue and “JLTV Pathfinders“, covering JLTV technology demonstrators.

    An outgrowth of the Armored security Vehicle was displayed at AUSA WInter 2008 by Textron Defense Systems. Photo: Defense Update

    Having delivered five vehicles in response to an Army Operational Needs Statement, DRS Sustainment Systems is gearing up to begin production of the M1200 Armored Knight. The system uses an electro-optical multi-sensor target acquisition payload mounted and integrated on an M1117 Armored Security Vehicle to form the Reconnaissance, Surveillance and Target Acquisition (RSTA) platform. The original manufacturer of the ASV, Textron Marine & Land Systems, is also offering their version for the RSTA mission. The vehicle is fitted with a turret, mounting two automatic weapons (50 Cal and M19 grenade launcher) and mast-mounted Star SAFIRE IV EO payload made by FLIR Systems, comprising a 640×480 InSb focal plan array flir, a color CCD-TV, low-light level CCD camera and laser rangefinder, illuminator, designator and pointer. The system also comprises a digital IMU/GPS to facilitate quick geo-pointing and geo-location of targets.

    A recovery version of the RG-33 MRAP was unveiled at AUSA WInter 2008 by BAE Systems. Photo: Tamir EshelUnsolicited development by BAE Systems (RG33) and Oshkosh (HEMTT PLSR) were addressing the urgent need for heavy recovery vehicles in Iraq and Afghanistan, in support of heavy armored vehicles which are operating intensively and subjected to frequent attacks. Current recovery assets are sometime helpless when called to recover a disabled forty-ton MRAP, leaving the job for the M-88 Hercules, originally designed to support the heavy armor. Hercules has provided unmatched capabilities during Operation Iraqi Freedom. To date 210 Hercules vehicles have been fielded against a total U.S. Army requirement of 595 vehicles. A total of 68 have been fielded to the U.S. Marine Corps, which has decided on the single M88A2 configuration.The new heavy recovery vehicle is based on the RG-33 MRAP platform, equipped with a crane, winch and lifting bars. The hydraulic, telescopic crane can lift up to 40 ton, the towing drum is capable of horizontally towing the same weight while the telescopic lifting arms are capable of lifting up to 25 tons. This arm is designed for insertion under a disabled vehicle, lifting it by supporting the front or rear axle. A full coverage of MRAP and other heavy armored vehicles is available in our recent title “Beyond MRAP“.

    The ten-wheeler PLS/R heavy recovery vehicle  proposed by Oshkosh to augment the current PLS family of vehicles.  Photo: Oshkosh.
    The Palletized Load System (PLS) is the backbone of the U.S. Army’s distribution and resupply missions. The newest member in this family, PLS Recovery vehicle will be able to rapidly and safely support disabled or damaged armored vehicles in a tactical environment. Some of the PLS/R assets are standard with the PLS (like the lifting crane) while others, such as the Tru-Hitch system, are already in the U.S. Army’s inventory. The 10×10 (five axles) PLS/R will be powered by a Detroit Diesel Model 8V92TA engine and have full-time all wheel drive. It will be equipped for and have the payload and power capacity to recover heavy armored vehicles such as MRAP or Stryker vehicles and, as such, will be instrumental in providing rapid recovery services where self-recovery and like-vehicle recovery is not feasible. The PLS/R will make it possible to overturn vehicles for recovery, perform slope recovery and recover vehicles mired in water, mud, sand and snow. Lift and tow operations are performed by a fifth wheel towing recovery device coupled to a Rotzler TR-80 winch. This device can also be engaged into a high mobility recovery trailer for evacuation of completely immobilized vehicles. The PLS/R also includes winching spade caps to provide a stable platform for heavy-duty winch recovery. Damage is reduced on vehicles’ axles and chassis due to the ability to perform flat towing.

    Recovery vehicle based n the Stryker is under development at  General Dynamics Land Systems. Photo: Tamir EshelAnother recovery vehicle unveiled here was the maintenance and recovery vehicle (MRV) version of the Stryker, fitted with a winch, pulling more than 40,000 lbf, crane capable of lifting 16.5 tons and an hydraulically operated earth anchor made of ballistic steel, which also adds to frontal protection. The vehicle is designed to support Stryker combat brigade teams, performing recovery operations, lifting, and Stryker vehicle fleet support wherever the brigade deploy.

    For more reading on combat vehilce recovery, see our previous item on new recovery systems for the USMC.

    Additional articles in this review:

    AUSA Winter Exhibition Review 2008

    AUSA Winter 2008 convention held at Ft. Lauderdale in February 2008 provided the venue for the second largest land forces exhibition held in the USA in recent months. (Defense Update reported from AUSA 2007 Convention in October 2007). Although the winter event addressed many of the aspects already covered last October, the rapid pace of development and upcoming changes in the Army’s and department of Defense priorities, funding and plans brought many exhibitors to focus on new topics.

    One of the most visible changes was the high priority that all defense integrators and vehicle manufacturers are placing on the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle program – a ‘winner takes all’ multi-billion dollar opportunity to be grabbed by a single team in the next decade. While the final decision on the winner design and team is expected only by 2013, industry teams are already in battling to win the technology demonstration and system development phases. (Click here for our JLTV updated report).

    While JLTV is making progress, the military continues to spend huge amounts on the procurement of MRAP, despite their limitations (regarding tactical maneuverability and strategic mobility). Another issue realized with current MRAP deployments was the gap in the ability to recovery disabled MRAPs in theater. While the Army has yet to publish a specific requirement for heavy recovery assets to be able to support these beasts, both Oshkosh and BAE Systems are preparing to submit their offers for such vehicles, two of which were on display at AUSA Winter. (Read Defense-Update review of the new recovery vehicles at AUSA Winter 2008)

    Another hot issue is the warfighter – new wearable systems are being introduced in growing numbers, following the trend of miniaturization, and empowerment of the ‘combat edge’, as reflected by Special Forces units and the latest ‘Land warrior’ trend. At AUSA Winter we discovered several new systems such as the Watchdog physiological monitoring system, CID, acoustic gunshot locator, multiple radio communications controller and more. (see our dismounted warfighter, land warrior and soldier systems articles)

    ICV (XM-1206) will be the infantry combat vehicle of the FCS family. Image: US ArmyMuch progress is being made with the Army’s Future Combat Systems; Two of the four unmanned systems included in the FCS family of systems are being released as part of ‘Spiral 1’, to support the current force. More systems, including the ground unattended sensors will follow soon and the Non Line of Sight – Cannon (NLOS-C) – the first of eight manned vehicle platforms will roll out of BAE production line this year. (link to FCS family of vehicles article) Progress was made with the lightweight 120 gun associated with another vehicle, as well as with the mortar system, missile etc. At the network level, AUSA Winter provided the opportunity to demonstrate the operability of the Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) Network Centric waveform, a critical element in the formation of the overarching future FCS network and the Army’s future Warfighter Information Network – Tactical (WIN-T) networking infrastructure. One of the most critical elements of this network will be Satcom on the Move, an area which attracted much interest from visitors and exhibitors alike. (FCS networking update)

    Some of the weapons displayed at AUSA Winter highlighted the continued trend toward measured effects enabling precision attack at extended range. New weapons such as the P44/42 and DAGR, both developed by Lockheed Martin are examples of the two extremes – carrying the effect currently provided by the Hellfire missile to much longer range (P-44/42) or to shorter range, and controlled collateral damage, by the new DGAR guided rocket. New warheads are also offered for the modern missiles, optimizing the weapon to achieve the desired effects against a wide range of threats. New sensors capable of better identifying targets from longer ranges and in difficult conditions, are supporting the weapons providing real-time forensic support needed for rapid targeting and engagement through an ever short sensor-to-shooter process. (Click here for our ‘Weapons for Scalable Response’ article)

    Sensors and Electro-Optical (EO) equipment received extensive coverage at AUSA Winter. Advanced vision systems including image intensifiers and thermal vision systems (FLIRS) are providing the warfighter ever better performance. With the market evolving at record pace to realize enhanced and more capable systems, many exhibitors of EO systems underlined their generic technological capabilities, promoting new thermal imaging modules, digital I2 devices and laser augmented imaging which could be integrated into new systems meeting specific customer requirements. Other solutions focused on the uses of imaging resources – recording, storage and retrieval at the lower level, distribution, processing and workflow that creating actionable intelligence by correlating images based on geographic relevance or through time to discover changes or hidden links or meanings. Intelligence is automatically and manually processed from millions of images received continuously from scores of combat cameras and video sensors distributed in the field, as well as from human sources. Means of creating reports, tagging information and processing it to discover hidden meaning and links are the focus of several intelligence application developers that unveiled part of their work at the convention. (see the feature on: Electro-optics, Intelligence and IMINT)

    Defense Update continues the coverage of the Army’s Joint Heavy Lift program. This year at AUSA Winter. The Army decided to support three different technologies which are currently pursued by Lockheed Martin, the Boeing-Bell team and Sikorsky. Another program currently in progress is the A-160 Hummingbird, developed by Boeing. The program suffered a setback with the loss of one of the A-160T unmanned vehicles last December, but Boeing assured that the problem did not casue significant delay for the program. (JHL article)

    Additional articles in this review:

     

    Centralized Controller for Multiple UAV/UGV Operation

    Lockheed Martin recently tested the capability of a single operator to simultaneously control four different unmanned systems through a new centralized controller. The prototype controller enabled users to control multiple systems via a hand controller and a touch screen, while the system automatically translates the commands and guides the execution of autonomous functions as required by each system.

    The test involved several unmanned systems simulated operations in an urban environment. The systems included Honeywell’s Micro Air Vehicle
    Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV); the Silver Fox UAV (produced by Lockheed Martin), the Roll Based Operations Architecture (RBOA) robot and an Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) demonstrator developed by Lockheed Martin. Controlling of the PackBot (from iRobot) by the centralized controller is currently underway.

    Several different radio links were demonstrated in conjunction with the centralized controller, including UHF, L-band and wireless broadband. The demonstration also utilized the Joint Architecture for Unmanned Systems message protocol to communicate with the Lockheed Martin UGV.

    Another aspect demonstrated during the test was automated route planning, provided by the Combat Maneuver Mission Route Planner (CMMRP) software. This application is part of the Human Robotic Interface, utilized for UGV control. This capability enabled the centralized controller to execute both pre-planned autonomous operation and manual tele-operation of the unmanned platforms.

    Integrated Sensor Is Structure (ISIS) Unmanned HALE Airship

    The Integrated Sensor Is Structure (ISIS) developed by Lockheed Martin Aeronautics. ISIS will provide a new model for persistent, autonomous ISR platform. Utilizing a stationary stratospheric airship, ISIS will establish a position on the ‘high ground’ at an altitude of 70,000 ft. This airship will be deployed for long missions, staying in position for one, five or even ten years.

    The airship structure will be integrated with lightweight, phased-array radar antennas, providing highly accurate and sensitive sensor capable of detecting ground-bound and airborne moving targets under all weather conditions. ISIS will provide a persistent early warning sensor able to detect cruise missiles at distances of 600 kilometers or dismounted enemy combatants at a range of 300 km. Exploiting its huge size, ISIS will utilize its large aperture instead of high power to meet the radar performance requirements.

    To generate power for the systems on board, the outer skin of the airship will be coated with solar cells, absorbing the sun light as well as light reflected from the earth surface, thus minimizing power drainage at night. The airship program is currently funded by DARPA and could be matured for deployment toward the end of the next decade (around 2018).

    Arch Terror Mastermind Mughniyah Joins The “Shahid” Clan

    The Middle East, from Beirut, Damascus and to Tehran is in severe shock. Hezbollah’s top military commander and one of the world’s most notorious terror masterminds, died in a mysterious car bomb explosion in the Damascus district of Tanzim Kafr Susa on Tuesday night. For almost three decades, this man has been a fugitive from the world’s leading intelligence services.


    Imad Mughniyah, was more than just a senior Hezbollah official. Western intelligence experts and foremost the Israeli defense establishment, consider him to be the actual founder of the “new” Hezbollah, reshaping it from a small terrorist organization, into a second-to-none well equipped and highly trained, guerilla army, operating along totally new warfare tactics, which culminated in last summer’s Second Lebanon War against the IDF. Even Winograd report, although hardly mentioning his name, gave Hezbollah under Mughniyah’s leadership high marks.

    Imad Fayez Mughniyah, 45, orchestrated the suicide bombings of US Marine and French Beirut headquarters, in 1982 which killed 241 Marines and 58 French soldiers, in the aftermath of Israel’s invasion into Lebanon. One year later, Mughniyah planned the US embassy bombing, killing 63 people and wiping out the entire top CIA Middle East staff. In 1985, he shocked the world’s headlines, in the widely publicized hijacking TWA Flight 847 and the cold blooded murder of U.S. Navy diver Robert Stethem, a passenger on the plane. The United States placed Imad Mughniyah on the top of the “Most Wanted Terrorists”, but was unable to capture him, in spite of ceaseless efforts. Mughniyah became infamous for numerous brutal kidnappings of Westerners in Beirut during the 1980s, most notably, that of, former Vietnam veteran and journalist, Terry Anderson and U.S. Army Col William Francis Buckley, who was later murdered.

    Iran in particular, regarded Mughniyah as a crucial, even strategic asset. He enjoyed the rare and complete personal confidence of both Iranian supreme ruler Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and al Qaeda’s Osama bin Laden. But the dead terrorist’s association with Tehran and its violent overseas exploits went back twenty years. In 1988, in collusion with Tehran, he organized the kidnapping of US Marine Corps Lt. Colonel William R. Rich Higgins, the most senior American intelligence officer in Lebanon, who was tortured to death by Iranian Revolutionary Guardsmen and Hezbollah operatives.

    Senior enough to take orders from no-one ranking lower than Iran’s supreme ruler, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Mughniyah operated directly through the top Revolutionary Guards commander General Rahim Safavi. Intelligence sources in the West and in particular the Israeli military had a high opinion of Mughniyeh’s military, intelligence and tactical skills. His hand was seen in the transformation of al Qaeda’s 2001 defeat in Afghanistan into a launch pad for its anti-US campaign in Iraq and many other ventures in the terror war against America. After the death of Abu Musab al Zarqawi, Mughniyah was rated the world Islamic terror movement’s most outstanding field commander. His part in causing the Israeli Army so much problems during last years summer war, was decisive. In fact, Mughniyah was high on Israel’s target list during the war. Israeli military intelligence had assessed that he could have been killed in a massive air strike on the movement’s headquarters in the Beirut Dahya neighborhood on July 19, but he escaped, miraculously, as he did during his “nine lives” survival.

    Israel has a long list of accusations on Mughniyah. According to Yossi Melman, senior analyst in Haaretz daily, “If there is a definition for the term “the snake’s head,” it is Imad Mughniyah, who started his terrorist activities as a militant with Fatah, and joined Hezbollah afterwards with the establishment of the Shi’ite organization. If Israel is behind this act, it can be seen as the most significant intelligence accomplishment in the war on terror, coming before the assassination of Fathi Shikaki, leader of the Islamic Jihad in 1995″.

    In the past, in the 1990’s, according to foreign reports, the Mossad tried to assassinate him in a complex operation in southern Beirut. However, the operation killed his brother, a car shop owner in Beirut. Mughniyah was expected to be present at the funeral, giving an additional chance to assassinate him, but he never showed. The United States also tried to detain Mughniyah several times, including a 1995 attempt to arrest him when the plane he was traveling was due to stop in Saudi Arabia. Diplomats said Saudi officials refused to allow the plane to land. Several more attempts also failed.

    Former Mossad head retired Major General Danny Yatom said on Israel Radio. “He was one of the terrorists with the most amounts of intelligence agencies and states chasing him. Mughniyah had been a very tough target to track”, he said, describing his death as a severe blow to Hezbollah. “He behaved with extreme caution for many years. It was impossible even to obtain his picture. He never appeared or spoke before the media. “His identity was hidden. His steps were hidden. He behaved with extreme caution, and that was the reason it was difficult to get to him for so many years.”

    Whoever tracked Mughniyah down in Syria had excellent operational and intelligence capabilities, something that was lacking in the Second Lebanon War. Although naturally Hezbolla, Damascus and Tehran immediately blamedIsrael behind the assassination, Mughniyah had enough enemies in his own camp to wish him “join his forefathers!” For some of the second level leadership, Mughniyah was growing too strong even to challenge Hassan Nasrallah’s sofar unique prestige, which waned somewhat after the Tehran Ayahtollah’s blamed him for destroying their forward base last Summer, in his reckless abduction. (A recent photo of Mughniyah, released by Hezbollah after his death is shown on the left.)

    In fact, only a few days earlier, the leader of Lebanon’s Druze community, Walid Jumblatt, used a televised address, to hundreds of cheering supporters on Mount Lebanon, to make a speech which was not only a virtual declaration of war on the Shia militia Hezbollah but also at times contradictory. Only a few days before a mass rally is to be held Thursday on the third anniversary of the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafiq al-Hariri, such speeches are generally used to attack the governments in Tehran-Damascus which carried out the assassination. Jumbalat’s head-on attack on Hezbollah could inflame tempers, which are already simmering into dangerous proportions between Shi’ites and Sunnis in Lebanon. Lebanese security forces are expecting some high tension in Beirut, during Mughniyah’s funeral in Hezbollah’s stronghold Dahya quarter and on the streets of the capital itself. Things could easily get out of control and even escalate into a renewed civil war.

    The immediate question, however, is whether or not Hezbollah or Iran will respond to the assassination with terror attacks in Israel’s north or overseas. For example, following then Hezbollah leader Sheikh Abbas Musawi’s assassination in 1992, Mughniyah responded with the notorious attack on the Israeli embassy and in 1994 against the Jewish community center in the Buenos Aires. In these terror attacks, more than 100 people were killed.

    While Israel officially denied any part of its involvement, which is quite rare in itself, the Defense community has elevated the alert on its Lebanese and Syrian borders, at airlines, embassies and Jewish institutions world wide. Security has been stepped up for prominent Israeli and Jewish figures, including defense minister Ehud Barak, who were already targeted by Hezbollah.

    COMBATSS-21

    COMBATSS-21, developed by Lockheed Martin is a new core combat management system developed for the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS-1). The system integrates the sensors, weapon systems, communications, processing and display systems including the radar, gun weapon system, missile launchers, decoy launchers, and electronic warfare systems. The system were integrated for the first time on board USS Freedom in June 2008, validating the open architecture with both COMBATSS-21 and Freedom itself. During the integration testing, targets of opportunity were engaged and tracked to demonstrate operability. The system’s core functions are employed as baseline, with additional user-defined specific mission packages. The initial package developed by the U.S. Navy is the Surface Warfare Mission Package (SUP). The second is the anti-submarine warfare was tested in August 2007. SUW MP was recently tested in integration with the ship’s stabilized 30mm Mk46 gun and sensors, demonstrating rapid detect, track and prosecution of small-boat threats. The system is also designed to protect local assets and move a force quickly through a strategic waterway. On coastal attack missions, the vessel could employ the Non Line of Sight – Launch System (NLOS-LS) to fire precision attack missiles. It also interfaces with two Vertical Takeoff and Landing Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (VTUAVs) and a MH-60R helicopter carried on board. COMBATSS-21 was built through a high degree of reuse from the Aegis Weapon System, enabling cost effective updating throughout the US Navy surface fleet. The system is part of a common product library that delivers to Aegis, LCS, the U.S. Coast Guard’s Deepwater program and international navies. The system is designed to be exportable to international navies considering operating the LCS, among them Israel and Saudi-Arabia.

    Lockheed Martin Unveils the Stalker Mini-UAV for Special-Forces Operations

    Lockheed Martin unveiled the latest mini UAV model called Stalker, developed at the Advanced Development Programs (also known as the famous Skunk Works). Stalker was developed in 2006 to address specific requirements raised by US Special Operations forces and made its first flight in mid 2006. Designed to be carried and operated by an individual soldier, the hand- launched mini UAV weighs 6 kg and has a wing span of 3 meters. The system includes hand held mission control system and communications module that can control up to four vehicles simultaneously.

    Stalker can carry payloads of up to 3 pounds on a two hour mission at ranges of up to 20 km. The mini UAV is equipped with a specially designed EO payload comprising of a retractable stabilized pan and tilt mount, which can be fitted with different modules containing specific payload, such as daylight (TV) camera, low-light TV, an uncooled thermal sensor or a combined sensor and laser target market. The dual-axis stabilizes payload is mounted under the belly and is retrieved before landing. It is also protected by special shock absorber pad. Stalker typically operates at altitude of 400 above ground and can be used up to 15,000 ft above sea level.

    With a lightweight, stealthy design and very low acoustic signature derived from the extended assembly designed for the electrical motor, Stalker is claimed to be uniquely quiet, making it highly suitable for spec-ops role. The autonomous vehicle is designed to operate under difficult weather conditions, at winds up to 30 knots (although it was demonstrated to be usable in winds up to 50 kt). Launched by hand, Stalker is designed for automatic retrieval over any terrain, without a parachute, by using deep stall and specially designed shock absorbing belly. The mini UAV will autonomously return and land in area up to 50 feet from its designated landing point.

    Space Program Raises Concern About Iran’s Ballistic Missile Thrust

    Tehran successfully launched an experimental research rocket called Explorer-1 last week. According to Iranian information, the new launcher will be able to carry a small satellite into orbit. According to the Iranians, the Explorer-1 was launched to determine the exact orbital position for the satellite. Tehran unveiled the first indigenous satellite called Omid (Hope). According to Iranian plans, Omid will be launched by March 2009 and operate in low-earth orbit, hinting on the potential use of the satellite for strategic, earth observation mission (reconnaissance).


    Last week Iran unveiled its new space center designed and built to support future satellites. The center has a launch pad from which the Omid will be launched, and an underground control center supporting the operation. Iran’s space programs were pioneered by the Sinah-1 satellite, launched by a Russian Kosmos-3 booster rocket in 2005. By 2010 Tehran plans to have four satellites in orbit, some of them placed in space by its indeginous satellite launchers.

    Both Moscow and Washington are concerned over Iran’s continuous development of long-range missiles. The recent launch emphasizes Tehran’s thrust to extend the range and payload capacity of their long range ballistic missiles, under the shroud of scientific and research program. “It’s unfortunate Iran continues to test ballistic missiles. This regime continues to take steps that only further isolate it and the Iranian people from the international community,” White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said. However, Iran denied that it’s space technology and research threat to peace and stability in the region.

    Iranian media gave no details about the rocket, but based on visual inspection it is similar to the advanced version of the Shahab-3 ballistic missile (Shehab-3B), which has a smaller warhead and larger fuel capacity, resulting in maximum range of up to 2,000 km (about 1,200 mi). Furthermore, Iran is reportedly developing a larger Shahab 4 missile, with a range of 4,000 km (about 2,500 mi). Long-range ballistic missiles are considered an inherent element for a nuclear weapons program development believed to be undertaken by Iran through the past decade.

    Video Below: A launch of a Shehab-3B missile. Note similarity to the Explorer-1 shown above (NTV)

    U.S., Israel Pursue Counter Rocket, Artillery & Mortar (C-RAM) Weapons

    The Extended Area Protection and Survivability (EAPS) program is part of an advanced technology objective (ATO) pursued by the U.S. Army’s Aviation and Missile Research, Development, and Engineering Center (AMRDEC), seeking to protect U.S. forces against attack by rockets, artillery, and mortars (RAM). The program anticipates the use of guided munition technologies to intercept RAM threats. The system, comprising interceptors, sensors and fire control systems will provide stationary and mobile forces with 360-degree hemispherical ‘umbrella’ extending area protection from direct and indirect fires.

    In February 2008 Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems were awarded $8.6 and $5.9 million contracts (respectively) to design prototype hardware for EAPS Battle Element. Both companies are expected to present their competing systems to the Army by the end of 2012.


    Lockheed Martin’s concept features a compact, vertically launched missile designed for ‘hit-to-kill’ intercept of RAM threats. The system encompasses the interceptor, fire control sensor, launcher and battle manager, and will ultimately interface with the latest battlefield surveillance systems. The Lockheed Martin team includes Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control, Lockheed Martin Maritime Systems & Sensors and Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company.

    The contract calls for the design, fabrication, integration and test of the prototype hardware, and is structured as a base award to be followed by four options aligning to the five phases of the program. Phase 1 culminates in a Preliminary Design Review. Phase 2 includes Hardware-in-the-Loop and a Critical Design Review, paving the way to demonstrating intercepts of individual RAM targets in Phase 3 and multiple simultaneous intercepts of RAM targets in Phase 4. Phase 5 is a risk-reduction phase in anticipation of the System Development and Demonstration program, ultimately leading to a production program providing a significant improvement in C-ram capabilities.

    Israel’s Iron Dome C-RAM Program

    A parallel Israeli program is in more advanced stages, with RAFAEL expecting to conduct initial test demonstrations of the Iron-Dome Wide Area Counter-RAM system later this year. The system, promoted by the Israeli Ministry of Defense as an urgent requirement to defeat short range rockets, both Palestinian fired Qasam improvised rocket and 107mm and 122mm Katyusha and Grad rockets, deployed by Hezbollah. The Israeli system will use a low-cost, autonomous guided missile designated Tamir, to defeat only those rockets projected to cause damage or risk to designated targets.

    The Iron Dome C-RAM system is designed as a mobile defensive solution countering short range rockets and 155 mm artillery shell threats with ranges of up to 70 km in all- weather conditions, including low clouds, rain, dust storms or fog. The system uses a unique interceptor missile equipped with a special warhead that detonates any target in the air within seconds. The Iron Dome radar, based on Elta’s Advanced Artillery Radar (AAR) will detect and identify the target and monitor multiple trajectories of incoming salvo in real time.

    Target data will be transmitted to the Battle Management & Weapon Control (BMC) for processing, where each trajectory is extrapolated to analyze the expected impact point. If the estimated rocket trajectory poses a critical threat, a command is dispatched directly to the best placed launcher for immedate launch and intercept of the threat. The interceptor receives trajectory updates from the BMC via uplink communication. As it approaches the target, the missile employs its radar seeker to acquire the target, guiding the interceptor to pass at close proximity to the target. The location of the intended kill is calculated to be employed over a neutral area, therefore reducing collateral damage to the protected area.

    Land-based Phalanx Weapon Systems (LPWS) called Centurion. is a C-RAM weapon developed by Raytheon. Photo: RaytheonOther companies engaged with the CRAM challenge is Raytheon, offering the Land-based Phalanx Weapon Systems (LPWS) called Centurion. This rapid firing guided gatling gun represent a revolutionary approach to point defense, as they are designed to intercept rockets, artillery and mortar rounds in the air before impact, thereby reducing or eliminating any damage they might cause. The system comprises the sensors, fire control and weapon in a single integrated unit, providing situational awareness, precision fires, real-time targeting and kill assessment. In Novebmer 2007 Raytheon was contracted by the Pentagon to build 12 Centurion units to protect coalition operating bases in Iraq. In this role, the LPWS is integrated with counter-battery radar systems such as TPQ-36/37 which will be augmented in the future multi-mission radar known as EPQ-36. Raytheon is also proposing an enhancement to the system, utilizing parallel solid-state high power laser as an effector, replacing the gun.

    More news – April 21, 2009:

    Israel interested in the Centurion LPWS

    While their Iron-Dome missile interceptor capability is maturing, following recent successful tests Israel is considering enhancing the system introducing short-range counter-mortar capability. Despite the Israel MOD previous rejection of the Centurion system, Israel’s Minister of Defense Ehud Barak reportedly authorized the MOD to request the system from the USA with priority. Israel is also fielding a new mortar locating radar to better cope with short range mortar attacks, that are harder to detect and could cause considerabe damage to border towns and military facilities.

    Diehl’s Sky Sphere set to Defeat UAS, OWA Drones Head-On

    0
    Diehl Defence has teamed up with Skysec to develop a drone interceptor. Diehl works with Skysec’s subsidiary, Skysec Defence, to modify the original civilian-oriented net-arresting interceptor into a hard-kill system suitable for military missions....

    Defense Update Weekly News Summary

    0
    Welcome to the latest episode of Defense-Update News Summary! In this episode, we dive into this week’s developments in defense technology, military acquisitions, and strategic partnerships worldwide. Some of this week's highlights include: Elbit Systems...

    Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle Program Launches as Part of Rafale F5 Standard

    0
    The French Ministry of Armed Forces has officially launched the Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle (UCAV) program as part of the Rafale F5 standard development. This event marks the beginning of a new era in...

    Air Defense & C-UAS Innovations at the AUSA 2024 Exhibition

    0
    Army Air Defense Undergoes Significant Modernization to Counter Drone Threats The U.S. Army's air defense branch has experienced its most substantial modernization and growth in over four decades, primarily driven by the need to counter...

    Elbit Systems Address US Army Artillery Modernization with Sigma 155×52 Wheeled Howitzer

    0
    Elbit Systems of America showcases the Sigma Next Generation Howitzer at AUSA 2024, where competing systems from Sweden, South Korea, France, and Germany are likely to be presented, some in models, others in full...

    Defense-Update Weekly News Summary

    0
    Welcome to the latest episode of Defense-Update News Summary! In this episode, we dive into this week’s developments in defense technology, military acquisitions, and strategic partnerships worldwide. Some of this week's highlights include: Elbit Systems...

    Israel Revamps Aerial Bomb Production

    0
    Elbit Systems has signed a 1.5-billion-shekel (approximately $400 million) contract with Israel's Ministry of Defense to establish an aerial bomb manufacturing bombs for the Israeli Air Force. In the past, the government-owned IMI operated...