Tuesday, November 19, 2024
More
    Home Blog Page 272

    Transition Marks Continuing Work for U.S. ‘Advise and Assist’ Brigades in Iraq

    As the last combat unit are leaving Iraq, over 50,000 troops are still in the country. 
    Capt. Charles Barrett of the 3rd HBCT, 3rd Inf. Div provides an insight of what his brigade is up to…

    Cos Kalsu, Iraq – There is no doubt everyone is excited about the last combat troops leaving Iraq, but what about the troops still in Iraq? This has been the burning question of many members of the media and family members of Soldiers still deployed.

    Sept. 1, 2010 marks the end of Operation Iraqi Freedom and the transition to Operation New Dawn. It is the symbolic date of a transition from combat operations to stability operations. I say “symbolic” because this change doesn’t happen overnight. I wish it were that easy, but rhetoric aside, you have to account for all the moving pieces of this very fluid environment.


    U.S. forces totaled 165,000 in 2008, when the drawdown began. Not long after, U.S. Forces started leaving major urban areas throughout Iraq. Having 50,000 troops in Iraq by Sept. 1 is just the next step in the process, with the concluding with all troops home by the end of 2011.

    Within that bigger picture, the 3rd Heavy Brigade Combat Team (HBCT), 3rd Infantry Division was designated as an Advise and Assist Brigade prior to our deployment. Our entire training plan, from Hammer Focus to the National Training Center, was geared toward the brigade’s new mission. We were augmented with transition teams and trained at every level of command and as sections to partner with our Iraqi counterparts.

    During our deployment, we have trained on medical operations, intelligence operations, public affairs operations, and the Rule of Law just to name a few. Others have partnered with the State Department’s Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRT) to assist in building civil capacity. Those projects include drip irrigation for farmers, bee keeping grants, libraries for schools, and progress toward the preservation of historical sites. So although the symbolic transition to stability operations will occur Sept. 1, the 3rd HBCT has been doing just that since they put boots on the ground Oct. 2009.

    It boils down to this: having no more combat troops in Iraq does not mean the troops left in Iraq are not combat capable. As outlined in the Security Agreement, U.S. Forces have the right to defend themselves if attacked. It is the mission and the training for that mission which have changed.

    Looking at the big picture, it should be easy to see this change is made possible by the successes of U.S. forces and Iraqi Security Forces (ISF). Despite attacks over the past year, we have witnessed the safe passage of millions of pilgrims traveling to the holy cities of Najaf and Karbala during religious holidays. For Arba’een, some reports estimated as many as 14 million pilgrims. This would not have been possible without the success of the ISF.

    I believe success – for the Iraqi people and for the U.S. forces who have served in Iraq – is a journey, not a destination, and we should not judge success or failure based on one event.

    As outlined by the Security Agreement, U.S. Forces remain in Iraq to train, advise and assist the ISF to continue to increase their capability. We will continue to support the PRTs in building civil capacity. Simply, we will honor the Security Agreement and continue to build on our strategic partnership with Iraq.

    Editor’s note:

    The first Advise and Assist Brigade — the 4th Brigade Combat Team of the 1st Armored Division from Fort Bliss, Texas — deployed last spring to Iraq, serving as a “proof of principle” for the advisory brigade concept.

    Of the seven Advise and Assist Brigades still in Iraq, four are from the 3rd Infantry Division, based at Fort Stewart, Ga. The 1st Heavy Brigade of the 1st Armored Division, based at Fort Bliss, and the 3rd Brigade Combat Team of the 4th Infantry Division, based at Fort Carson, Colo., are also serving as Advise and Assist Brigades.

    The 2nd Stryker Brigade Combat Team of the 25th Infantry Division is based at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii. A combat medic from that unit was killed Aug. 15 when his Stryker combat vehicle was hit with grenades, according to press reports.

    Two combat aviation brigades also remain in Iraq, according to Dan O’Boyle, Redstone Arsenal spokesman. Three more are deployed in Afghanistan, where there are currently no Advise and Assist Brigades. (see full article on Army Times)

    Army Aborts Ground Combat Vehicle Program, Set to Publish a Revised RFP in October

    A notional representation of the U.S. Army Ground Combat Vehicle. Photo: US Army

    The Army has cancelled the request for proposal process for the Ground Combat Vehicle, delaying the program by about six months. Details about revised rules for a more affordable program are expected within 60 days. Despite the setback, the Army is still hopeful the GCV could be deployed by the year 2017. However, in the near term the service could lose part of the $934 million funding, part of the fiscal 2011 budget request set aside for the development of the GCV prototypes.

    The decision followed a report by the Army and Office of Secretary of Defense, Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (OSD/ATL), that evaluated the new vehicle and determined that the service should better prioritize its requirements to better define achievable goals on schedule. Critics in industry have claimed the requirements for the vehicle were set to be too vague as the Army was not in agreement on exactly what the vehicle’s should do. “The refined RfP will result in a vehicle that provides soldiers with critical armored protection in the modern combat environment.” The Army statement said. One of the main concerns about the GCV was that to provide such protection the vehicle weight could increase up to 70 tons.

    The announcement comes as the Defense Department prepares for major budget cuts. The GCV program is considered vital for the Army, but since the definition and requirement were too vague from the beginning, the Army finds it difficult to justify committing to a long-term multi-billion dollar program only to replace the Bradley fighting vehicles. The proposed GCV meant much more than just a replacement, it is intended to be a bridge between current warfare and future, networked operations. While different from the cancelled Manned Ground Vehicle (MGV) mainly for political reasons, GCV should be much better protected and survivable, and well equipped to operate in distributed operations, where small units, sometime individual vehicles are empowered to conduct decisive military operations. Modifying current vehicles to perform such missions was found to be too complex.

    Three industry teams participated in the program; next month (September) the Army had planned to award contracts to at least two of the three teams, for the development of  demonstrator vehicles. These teams competing for these contracts were SAIC-led group with Boeing and Krauss-Maffei Wegmann; a BAE Systems – Northrop team, and a third group led by General Dynamics Land Systems partnered with MTU Detroit Diesel, Lockheed Martin and Raytheon. The development phase of the program is valued at $2.1 billion. The entire program could cost about $40 billion.

    More on GCV in the following Defense-Update articles:

    U.S. Army Defines Ground Combat Vehicles Priorities

    U.S. Army Requests Proposals for a New Ground Combat Vehicle

    Teaming for the Ground Combat Vehicle

    Army Begins GCV Contractor Selection Process

    Small Diameter Bomb II – GBU-53/B

    The clamshel cover protects that protects the seeker in potentially harsh ground and flight environments. The cover deploys after the weapon is released, just prior to the activation of the seeker. Photos on this page: Raytheon Company

    The U.S. Air Force has awarded the Raytheon Company (NYSE: RTN) US$450 million for the development and production of GBU-53/B for the Small Diameter Bomb increment II program. SDB II is the next generation of the lightweight, aerial precision-strike standoff weapon designed with the integral capability to accurately strike moving and fixed targets in adverse weather conditions.

    Raytheon has developed an all-new, streamlined bomb casing and folding swept-wing for the new weapon, departing from the MBDA designed ‘Diamond Back’ configuration used by the Boeing designed the first generation SDB. Raytheon will begin producing the new weapons in 2013 with initial deliveries completing the first production lot by late 2014.

    The GBU-53/B incorporates a three-modal seeker featuring millimeter-wave radar, a semi-active laser (SAL) and an uncooled imaging infrared. The use of an uncooled thermal imager is a unique implementation of such sensor in aerial weapons, demonstrating the maturity and high resolution achieved with bolometric technology.

    One of the key features of the GBU-53/B is that it is designed to maximize the loadout on fourth and fifth-generation fighter aircraft. BLU-61/A suspension equipment enables the F-15E fighter aircraft to carry seven groups of four GBU-53/Bs for a total of 28 weapons.
    Fit checks conducted at Langley AFB, on the F-22 Raptor, verified that the Raptor can carry eight weapons in its internal weapons bay, along with two AMRAAM missiles. All versions of the F-35 will also be able to carry eight GBU-53/Bs and two AMRAAMS in the internal weapons bay.

    “Our uncooled IIR seeker met all the warfighter’s requirements and reduced the weapon’s total life-cycle cost and logistics footprint,” said Dr. Taylor W. Lawrence, Raytheon Missile Systems president. The tri-modal terminal seeker is a derivative from the seeker systems used in the 120mm Medium Range Munition for the M-1A2 tank and the canceled XM-501 Precision Attack Missile. For the warhead, Raytheon opted for the newly developed ‘multi-effect warhead’. Originally, Raytheon adapted the warhead used in the SDB Increment I weapon, but in parralel, decided to develop another warhead optimized for the services’ requirements. “This new warhead used a plasma jet [created by the shaped charge] to penetrate armor, it could stop a tank and in many cases also destroy it. We also improved blast-fragmentation effects by scoring the case design.  It was so effective, Air Force engineers dubbed it ‘the shredder.'” said Harry Schulte, Vice President, Air Warfare Systems at Raytheon blogging on Aviation Week. “By changing the weapon’s length, our design team had the opportunity to repackage the seeker electronics in a way that improved affordability and producibility, while providing a clear path for the plasma jet,” Schulte added.

    The clamshell4 cover protects that protects the seeker in potentially harsh ground and flight environments. The cover deploys after the weapon is released, just prior to the activation of the seeker. Photos on this page: Raytheon Company

    The selection followed a successful technology demonstration program, during which the company tested and verified that its form factored tri-mode seeker could seamlessly transition between modes. The GBU/53-B seeker proved its reliability during flight testing when it flew 26 missions in 21 days without a single hardware failure. Test flights during the risk reduction phase included separation, subsystems deployment and operation, autopilot functions and navigation. Fit checks were also conducted at Langley AFB, on the F-22 Raptor, verifying that the Raptor can carry eight weapons in its internal weapons bay, along with two AMRAAM missiles. All versions of the F-35 will also be able to carry eight GBU-53/Bs and two AMRAAMS in the internal weapons bay. Fitting the weapon into these internal bays was not easy, said Schulte. “we needed to shorten the weapon’s length in order to meet the government requirements to carry eight weapons in the Marine Corp’s Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing F-35B Joint Strike Fighter. Without reducing the weapon’s length, the F-35B would be limited to six internal weapons, instead of the desired eight weapons.

    The multi-effect warhead went through more than 80 live tests demonstrating its capability to meet the warfighter’s requirements with minimal risk of collateral damage. The multi-effect warhead packs a shaped charge, blast, and fragmentation effects, defeating armored targets, structures as well as unarmored targets.

    Sand-X Motors Introduce the Sand-X T-ATV Desert Patrol

    From a Recreational Vehicle Developed for the Emirates’ Royalty,the Tracked All-Terrain Vehicle Turns into a Special Operations Desert Warrior

    Where conflicts are waged in remote inhibited and desert lands, mobility becomes a major concern for military planners. Movements are predictable and vulnerable, with convoy restricted to known transportation routes, where they are exposed to IED and ambushes. Elsewhere, security forces and border guards are tasked with exhaustive mission of sealing off long and porous borders in an attempt to block illegal immigration, stop drug smuggling, and monitor pipelines and mines, eliminating theft of oil and minerals. For these tasks and many more, all-terrain mobility becomes imperative.

    Defense-Update has reviewed several innovative manned and unmanned platforms, including tracked, wheeled all terrain vehicles, quad ATVs and motorcycles. But the new Sand-X Tracked-all-terrain vehicle (T-ATV), deserves a category in itself. Originally adopted by the emirate’s eliteas a powerful recreational vehicle, it was recently introduced as a desert patrols vehicle, tailored for security and military market, special operations and other military applications.

    T-ATV is an ATV category defined by a hybrid traction system combining low-pressure tires supported by a continuous track in the back, providing the traction, adding stability and safety at all speeds, sloped angles and terrain. Like a motorcycle or snowmobile the T-ATV is steered by handlebars. As the name implies, it is designed to handle a wider variety of terrain than most other vehicles.

    The SAND-X T-ATV is build to cross the desert as fast and safe as possible and supporting the troops. SAND-X T-ATV pilots can cross the dunes in every directions and can follow the given navigation route or choose theirs own path without large detours. Hard reached locations in the desert, so called 'black spots', are now easy, fast and safely accessible for land forces with this new generation of desert vehicles. Photos: Sand-X Motors.

    The tires used on the vehicle can be matched for every terrain while the track, made of tough Kevlar composite, is designed for operation over different types of terrain including deep and dry sand, rocks, gravel and loose dirt, shallow water, mud, snow or ice. The vehicle is said to be much safer for riding off-road or when travelling over pavement and roads. The new militarized model of the Sand-X T-ATV introduced recently is powered by a Rotax 4 stroke fuel-injecting 1,200cc petrol engine, with automatic transmission, operating over ough terrain without refueling at distances exceeding 350 km. Sofar the recreational version of the Sand-X was offered with a two-stroke 800cc engine. The four stroke 1200cc is quieter, and has better fuel efficiency, travelling a range of 350 km with a 42 liter tank. The developer, Sand-X Motors of Switzerland has recently introduced two militarized versions of this recreational vehicle, designed for special-operations, military and security applications. According to the manufacturer, Sand X T-ATV is faster and safer than any other sand vehicle and can carry more gear combined with bigger fuel range for longer range operations.

    According to Sand-X Motors, the Sand-X is already in use by several special operations and reconnaissance units of several military forces in the Middle East vehicles and North Africa. While the company has not disclosed the countries using the vehicles, its logistical supply and support centers located in and Algeria, Egypt, Kuwait, Morocco, Qatar and Saudi-Arabia, in addition to the UAE central operations facility.

    the military version is posed alongsite a UAE Leclerc tank. Photo: Sand-X Motors

    The motorbike-style Control-handle acts on the two tires on the front-axle. This allows precise tracking and directional control. Furthermore the stability in the roll axis is dramatically increased. The point of gravity is exceptionally low and the Kevlar made track provides optimum grip for precise power and speed control. The risk of roll-over or directional instability is reduced to a minimum with the low center of gravity, and wide stance roll over protection. Furthermore, with a single track providing traction, the Sand-X T-ATV does not need any ground clearance to overcome obstacles. On desert missions teams riding the Sand-X can cross the terrain to the target in a straight line, through dunes, rocks or other obstacles impeding mobility with other vehicles.

    Traveling cross country at high speed enables security teams or special forces to save time, effectively chase fleeting targets and control larger areas with fewer forces. The vehicle accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in less than three seconds, and can reach a top speed of 185 km/h cross country. It can carry a payload up to 300 kg weight, is equipped with extra strong cooling system supporting operations in tropical/desert conditions.

    Update: Raytheon Selected to Deliver the U.S. Air Force with SDB-II Weapons

    The U.S. Air Force has awarded the Raytheon Company (NYSE: RTN) US$450 million for the development and production of GBU-53/B for the Small Diameter Bomb increment II program. SDB II is the next generation of the lightweight, aerial precision-strike standoff weapon designed with integral capability to accurately strike moving and fixed targets in adverse weather conditions. Raytheon has developed an all-new, streamlined bomb casing and folding swept-wing for the new weapon (shown in the photo above), departing from the MBDA designed ‘Diamond Back’ configuration used by the Boeing designed SDB (photo on left). The SDB family of weapons developed by Boeing quadruples the number of weapons an aircraft can carry, enabling aircrews to attack more targets on each sortie.

    Raytheon has developed an all new airframe and wings for the new SDB-53/B Small Diameter Bomb. The weapon was selected for the next generation SDB-2, to enter service in 2014. Photo: Raytheon

    Raytheon’s proposal was selected over a competing offer from Boeing and Lockheed Martin. Raytheon will begin producing the new weapons in 2013 with initial deliveries completing the first production lot by late 2014. The GBU-53/B incorporates an three-modal seeker featuring millimeter-wave radar, a semi-active laser (SAL) and an uncooled imaging infrared. The use of an uncooled thermal imager is a unique implementation of such sensor in aerial weapons, demonstrating the maturity and high resolution achieved with bolometric technology. “Our uncooled IIR seeker met all the warfighter’s requirements and reduced the weapon’s total life-cycle cost and logistics footprint” said Dr. Taylor W. Lawrence, Raytheon Missile Systems president. The tri-modal terminal seeker is a derivative from the seeker systems used in the 120mm Medium Range Munition for the M-1A2 tank and the cancelled XM-501 Precision Attack Missile. Raytheon also integrated a new ‘multi effect warhead’ designed to defeat armored targets, structures and soft target in the open with minimal collateral damage.

    Raytheon conducted a successful technical demonstration program, during which the company tested and verified that its form factored tri-mode seeker could seamlessly transition between modes. The GBU/53-B seeker proved its reliability during flight testing when it flew 26 missions in 21 days without a single hardware failure.

    The SDB II multi-effect warhead defeats armored targets by penetration with shaped charge generated plasma jet. The effect is augmented by blast and fragmentation. Photo: Raytheon

    Update: QinetiQ’s Zephyr solar powered unmanned aircraft soars to new world records

    Above: Ground in Arizona, as part demonstrating the solar powered drone’s capability to fly a two week mission. Photo: QinetiQ

    Zephyr, the solar-powered, high altitude long endurance (HALE) unmanned vehicle developed by QinetiQ has been flying for the past week, smashing a number of long-standing world records.

    The solar powered drone mission continues above the US Army’s Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona, as part demonstrating the solar powered drone’s capability to fly a two week mission. “By being able to remain over a location for weeks or months at a time, it can usefully deliver a host of practical and more affordable solutions to both civil and military customers” said Jon Saltmarsh, Zephyr Program Director at QinetiQ.


    A Larger Zephyr

    The current goal is to fly for a further week and prove Zephyr is the world’s first truly eternal plane, capable of providing a low-cost, persistent surveillance capability over months rather than days. Potential applications include earth observation and communications relay in support of a range of defense, security and commercial requirements.

    Unlike conventional manned or unmanned aircraft now being operated, Zephyr does not need to return to base at regular intervals for re-fuelling or servicing which also helps minimize the logistical supply chain and extend its operational capability.

    Around 50% larger than the previous Zephyr, technical changes now mean it has a 22.5m wingspan to accommodate more batteries that are combined with a totally new integrated power management system. The entirely new aerodynamic shape and high “T” tail also contribute to reduce drag and improve performance. The payload capacity will meet a number of key surveillance and communication requirements already demonstrated by Zephyr over the past three years. Zephyr’s ultra-lightweight carbon-fibre design also means it weighs in at just over 50Kg.

    “The current Zephyr aircraft is a genuine breakthrough design, drawing on the latest technology and represents a massive leap forward in engineering excellence incorporating an entirely new wing design.” Saltmarsh explained. Launched by hand, the aircraft flies by day on solar power delivered by amorphous silicon solar arrays no thicker than sheets of paper that cover the aircraft’s wings. These are also used to recharge the lithium-sulphur batteries, supplied by Sion Power Inc, which are used to power the aircraft by night. Together they provide an extremely high power to weight ratio on a continuous day/night cycle, thereby delivering persistent on-station capabilities.

    Claiming the World Endurance Record for UAVs

    On July 23, 2010 Zephyr successfully landed after 14 days (336 hours) and 21 minutes flying over Arizona.  and is now awaiting official confirmation of its world record status. Following the flight, QinetiQ is claiming three world records for the Zephyr:

    • the absolute duration record for an Unmanned Air Vehicle – being filed at 336 hrs / 22 minutes
    • the duration record for a UAV (in the U/1.c / 50-500Kg category) – time as above
    • the absolute altitude record for a UAV (in the above category) – being filed at 70,740ft (21,561m)

    This record far exceeds the unofficial world record for longest duration unmanned flight of 82 hours, 37 minutes set in 2008 and already held by Zephyr, and is well in excess of the current official world record of 30 hours 24 minutes set by Northrop Grumman’s RQ-4A Global Hawk on 22 March 2001. Upon landing, plans to claim the world record for HALE UAV flight endurance. The company invited the Federation Aeronautique Internationale (FAI), the world air sports federation, to oversee the flight and an FAI Official has been monitoring progress at the Yuma Proving Ground.

    QinetiQ was awarded $45 million by the U.S. Navy for the delivery of seven Zephyrs, QinetiQ will produce the Zephyrs at Farnborough, in the United Kingdom. The seven aircraft are expected to be delivered win 2014.

    Zephyr 2010 pre-launch

    Karrar – Iran’s New Jet-Powered Recce and Attack Drone

    The Iranian jet powered drone Karrar launched by Rocket Assist Take-Off (RATO) booster, acceleratingh the vehicle from a stationary ground launcher. Karrar can also be launched from an aerial platform. Photos: FARS News by Vahid Reza Alael.

    Iran has this week unveiled a new type of turbojet-powered drone designated ‘Karrar’ (striker – in Farsi), described by Iranian officials as capable to perform long-range reconnaissance and attack missions. Iranian Defense Minister, Brigadier General Ahmad Vahidi announced on Sunday that the country’s first home-made long-range Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) named ‘Karrar’ has a flight-range of 1,000km. Karrar is described as capable of operating at long range, and in ‘great operational depth’, at high or low altitudes.

    Another Karrar drone undergoing finishing before applying the Target-typical red paint. Derived from an aerial target platform, the Karrar offers quite a few advantages as a recce or attack platform. Photo: FARS News agency

    According to Iranian reports, on reconnaissance missions the Karrar can record images flying over targets of interest and transmit them back to the ground control as it re-establishes communications. The drone can also carry weapons, two configurations were displayed – carrying a unitary bomb (what seemed to be a 500 lb weapon) on the centerline, or carrying two smaller weapons (assessed by their shape and size, these weapons could be the Kowsar (C-701) anti-ship missiles).

    The origin? BQM-126A

    The design of the Karrar traces back to the BQM-126A target drone, developed by the U.S. company Beechcraft in the 1970s. Like the Iranian unmanned plane, the BQM-126 was powered by an expendable turbojet engine, developing thrust around 4 kN. (Iran’s Tolloue 5 turbojet engine, rated at 4.4kN is in production powering some of the country’s long range anti-ship missile program.) The fully loaded BQM-126 weighed about 0.6 tons and offered mission endurance over two hours. Its top speed was 950 kph, with service ceiling at 40,000 ft. It had a wingspan of 3 meters and length of 5.51 meters. This target plane also influenced the South African Skua target drone, developed by Denel. Skua Karrar is believed to be shorter (around 4.meter long), and, carrying less fuel, its useful payload can be increased to around 700 kg. Its cruising speed is 900 kph.

    While the origins of new drone could bear upon the U.S. original, the Iranian designers invested significant effort in modifying and shaping it to their demands. The podded turbojet was moved inside the fuselage, with the air intake emplaced in a dorsal fairing, feeding the turbojet through a curved duct, assisting in absorbing some of the radar reflections from the turbine surface. The dorsal intake position cleared the belly for the carriage of stores or weapons on the centerline. To enable aerial carriage, the dorsal fairing behind the air duct has been strengthened, providing attachments for aerial pylons, with ample space for avionics and support systems,while also accommodating the recovery parachute. The center fuselage and forward section provides space for payloads, flight control sensors and, possibly, an internally carried warhead. The swept wings are designed for high speed flight, at relatively high altitude, but videos released by the Iranians also indicate the Karrar is also capable of flying low-level flights.

    The Iranian jet powered drone Karrar launched by Rocket Assist Take-Off (RATO) booster, acceleratingh the vehicle from a stationary ground launcher. Karrar can also be launched from an aerial platform. Photos: FARS News by Vahid Reza Alael.
    Target drones like the Karrar can be launched from the ground or from an airborne transport plane such as this U.S. Navy DC-130, carrying 1970 vintage Firebee aerial targets, supporting U.S. Navy exercises. Photo: U.S. Navy
    Karrar drone prepared for launch from a ground launcher. The drone is shown here in attack configuration, carrying a single bomb (500lb) under the centerline. Another weapon configuration uses two or four guided missiles carried under the wings.

    For what missions is the Karrar designed for? The first question to be asked would be – whether it is an unmanned aerial vehicle (operated as a reusable asset) or is it a ‘one way only’ cruise missile? As it is based on a target drone, Karrar could perform both missions successfully and affordably. Unlike conventional UAVs, it is not designed to operate with real-time, man-in-the-loop, but most likely to fly a pre-programmed mission, however – with more advanced flight controls already available to the Iranians with their UAVs and anti-ship missiles, it could ‘improvise’ with evasive maneuvering to evade potential threats, typically being the characteristics of a cruise missile. The Iranians already gained access to cruise missile knowhow, with the acquisition of Kh55 missiles from the Ukraine. Karrar could be the first manifestation of what they have learned from the Russian Kh55 technology.

    Unlike other cruise missiles, Karrar seems to have the unique capability for carrying relatively heavy weapons slung under the wings, or on the centerline. However, it must be assumed that carrying such weapons should dramatically reduce its operational radius. Beyond deep recce missions, two offensive missions, that the drone might be used for, could be extended range anti-ship or missile-defense-suppression. The drone’s range could be further extended by aerial delivery,using transport aircraft, such as the C-130 or P-3 or Il-76 launching Karrars from strengthened underwing pylons. Typically, a C-130 carries two aerial targets.

    A rear view of the Karrar prepared for launch. Photos: FARS News by Vahid Reza Alael.

    In a naval attack role, the Karrar equipped with two or four Kowsar missiles could extend the Iranian reach well beyond their coast, without being detected by maritime patrols. Similarly, the drone could be used as an anti-radar ‘missile bus’, or employ ‘suicide attack’ mode, in an attempt to blind the ‘eyes’ of ballistic-missile defense systems – systems such as the THAAD, Patriot PAC-3 that rely on early warning and fire control radars for their operation, being deployed in several Gulf states which are well within Karrar’s combat radius. As the counter ABM mission employs radar homing missiles, the Karrar can be flown without active sensors, engaging fixed targets at known positions. To mask its approach the drone could employ some radar deception techniques to close-in for a quick shot – including mimicking and magnifying the radar signature of the drone to look like a commercial aircraft – such techniques are widely used with aerial targets, enabling a small target to simulate larger aircraft. According to Iranian sources the drone can carry up to four weapons on external stores. Another advantage of the autonomous operation is the communications silence maintained by the drone throughout its operation, minimizing early warning and detection by the defender’s electronic surveillance.

    Another question is – could such a platform be used for carrying a nuclear warhead? The commonly agreed threshold for nuclear capable missile delivery is the ability to carry at least 1,000 kg warhead. At its current configuration, Karrar does not seem to be able to lift this kind of payload – yet.

    ITT Introduces a New Wide Area Airborne Surveillance (WAAS) Capabilities

    AAS-W generates multiple high resolution views of specific regions , simultaneously, across the payload's widest footprint, enabling users to track multiple targets in different parts of the field of view. Photo: ITT

    ITT is introducing new Wide Area Airborne Surveillance (WAAS) sensor architecture and a special WAAS payload at the AUVSI 2010 exhibition opened today in Denver, CO. The new architecture enables the warfighter to access collection of data from multiple sources. The new stabilized multi-megapixel-class day/night payload designated WAAS-W comprises a turret sensor designed to operate with the new architecture.

    WAAS-W generates multiple high resolution views of specific regions, simultaneously, across the payload’s widest footprint, enabling users to track multiple targets in different parts of the field of view. The system enables the user to instantly obtain high resolution, detailed images sufficient to track dismounts. The payload uses two separate imagers, 160 day/night imager and 64 megapixel mid-wave infrared imagers covering a wide field of view with fixed optics, producing two simultaneous feeds updated at a rate of several frames per second.

    In August 2010 ITT has delivered several WAAS type payloads to the U.S. Air Force, to be fitted on MQ-9 Reaper drones, as part of project ‘Gorgon Stare’, providing aerial persistent surveillance over wide area, in support of U.S. Forces in Afghanistan.

    For more information on WAAS see also Defense Update article “Night Eyes for the Constant Hawk” published 19 September, 2009.

    We also suggest the coverage of ITT’s “Broad Area Persistent Surveillance System” on Defense-Update.

    BirdEye 650LE Mini-UAV Uses Fuel Cell to Fly Six Hour Missions

    Above: Using a New Fuel Cell Technology, IAI Malat Extends mini-UAV mission Endurance to six hours. Photo: IAI

    Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) has successfully integrated hydrogen proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell system extending the flight endurance of the Birdeye 650 mini UAV to 6 hours – more than doubling its endurance with lithium batteries. The fuel-cell equipped mini-UAV has been given the designation Birdeye 650 LE. The Aeropak PEM fuel cell developed by Singapore based Horizon Energy Systems (HES) weighs about the same as the rechargeable batteries currently powering the mini UAV, therefore maintaining the take off weight of the BirdEye unchanged at 11 kg. This weight includes the payload carried by the Mini-UAV – a miniature Micro-POP or STAMP mini-payload weighing up to 1.2 kg. The BirdEye’s mission range remains 20 km – dictated by the line-of sight datalink and typical flight altitude. The following video shows clips taken by the BirdEye’s stabilized payload in day and night.

    HES provides quiet and reliable electric propulsion, extending the flight durations of mini UAS by several orders of magnitude. Its energy source comes in the form of portable and hot-swappable chemical fuel cartridges.

    “The Aeropak is a game-changing propulsion power system.” Says Gareth Tang, Managing Director of HES, “The advantages it brings are beyond power, weight and energy, since it impacts on mission operation modes. Our new fuel cell system reduces the number of take-offs while simultaneously expanding mission radius and operation coverage, reducing casualty, and easing logistical burden and cost”. Prior to the launch of the Aeropak, extended flight endurance capabilities were restricted to larger, more costly UAS platforms, mainly due to limitations of their battery power source. Now with a smaller, more flexible and cost-effective fuel cell power solution, mini-UAS can undertake sophisticated missions such as persistent surveillance, reconnaissance (ISTAR), patrol and convoys escort, and other special tasks.

    BirdEye 650 in flight. Photo: IAI

    Will Fueling Bushehr Also Push the Shi’ite Nuke Bomb?

    Russian nuclear rods arriving at Bushehr this week, launching the reactor's fueling process, expected to complete by September 5, 2010. Photo: FARS News Agency.

    With the fueling of the Bushehr nuclear reactor initiated this weekend, the Shi’ite Mullahs mark the culmination of their nation’s long ambition to acquire access to atomic energy. Whether this should remain a peaceful overture to similar reactors to follow suit, or the mark the omen for a more sinister nuclear weapons construction effort- will remain to be seen.

    Although the 1,000 Mw plant will be the first operational nuclear power station in the Middle East, its very composition does not pose serious proliferation risks. Being constructed from a light water reactor, fueled with low enriched uranium, at first sight it seems, that it should not fit into the known weapons grade plutonium production process. However, nuclear experts warn, that closer examination reveals that the nuclear facility could present considerable fall-out risk to neighboring countries, across the Persian Gulf, such as Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Oman etc.

    Moreover, these experts mention another avenue, which could become extremely dangerous. Due to the isotopic composition, weapons designers do not consider the present plutonium bred in the spent fuel of the Bushehr Plant – provided it is recharged on average, every eighteen months – suitable material for nuclear weapon grade material. However, were fuel unloaded eight months, or so into its cycle, the plutonium could become weapons grade.

    Russian nuclear rods arriving at Bushehr this week, launching the reactor's fueling process, expected to complete by September 5, 2010. Photo: FARS News Agency.

    Presumably, IAEA safeguards would detect such an Iranian effort and Russia has also demanded additional guarantees requiring spent fuel repatriation as a quid pro quo for new fuel elements. But were the Mullahs to balk, they could bank on fuel supplies from their own enrichment and fuel assembly facilities to keep Bushehr in operation while extracting the plutonium for weapons from the spent fuel. It might be a tricky affair, but the Iranians are known to use very clever ways to achieve their will and their country is large enough to hide important matters from preying eyes, like the IAEA watchdogs.

    All these facts only serve to complicate the region’s already complex nuclear situation.
    Indeed, the Gulf states are already extremely worried about Iran going nuclear but at the same time also fretting about a dangerous confrontation, that could arise from more sanctions and military threats to Tehran, which would involve them, now that radiological fall-out is becoming a high risk situation.

    What concerns America and the Israelis, more than fueling Bushehr, is Iran’s refusal to halt uranium enrichment, a process that can be used to make fuel for nuclear arms. Tehran already has one potential weapons stream through its enrichment program and another pending, being the heavy water Arak reactor that is ideal for weapons-grade plutonium production.

    President Barack Obama’s top adviser on nuclear issues, Gary Samore, told The New York Times that he thinks it would take Iran “roughly a year” to turn low-enriched uranium into weapons-grade material. “We think that they have roughly a year “dash time,” Gary Samore was quoted as saying. By “dash time,” the official referred to the shortest time Iran would take to build a nuclear weapon, judging from its existing facilities and capacity to convert stocks of low-enriched uranium into weapons-grade material, a process known as “breakout”.

    American and Israeli officials believe that Iran has only enough nuclear materials for two weapons. And to build those two would require the country to kick out international inspectors, which would make it clear what its intentions were. It would also take some time for Iran to convert its nuclear facilities to produce weapons-grade uranium. So far, Iran has added relatively few centrifuges this year, and only about half of those are fully working, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. But Israeli officials remain suspicious that Iran has a secret enrichment site stashed away somewhere, not yet detected by satellite observation.

    Moreover, Iran’s Bushehr Reactor poses another deadly risk. Once the plant commences full operations in months to come, it will accumulate large inventories of highly radioactive waste as the fuel rods expend their energy. Although presenting a different design, the Ukrainian Chernobyl disaster demonstrated what would happen were a large reactor to release its contents. A successful military strike or terrorist attack on Bushehr could replicate the disastrous Ukraine accident-the immediate hostages to such a pending disaster threat, will obviously be the Gulf States.

    But the Gulf states nevertheless are not burying their heads in the sand. The Saudis, the UAE and others are hastily building up their naval capacity and missile defense systems – with Washington’s willing help – to steel themselves against Iran’s new military buildup. Once Iran goes nuclear so will, soner than later be, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Jordan, Egypt and a host of other countries. In fact, the UAE has already embarked with the South Koreans, building four electricity producing nuclear reactors. This will lead to an even more unstable Middle East, one that goes from a sizzling conventional arms-filled powder keg to an A-bomb, defense analysts warn. Everyone fears such an arms race in an area that is not known to practice détente, but might also use a “doomsday” weapon when ready.

    Moreover, Iran being a cultural threat with far-reaching strategic ambitions in the region, constantly threatens the Saudi royal’s century-long religious domination. Sunni Muslims have controlled most Islamic areas of the world for centuries. They control most of the wealth and the governments in Islam today. Shiite Muslims have been the underclass in Islam, but the revolution, is rising with the support of the Shia clerics, ruling Iran and Shiite teachings about a mystical end time savior figure, called the “Mahdi”. Iran and this rising revolutionary movement is now the great fear of the ruling Sunni families in the gulf and it is why these nations are now arming to the teeth. As the Tehran Mullah’s are rapidly gaining ground and the United States, under the controversial leadership of President Barak Hussein Obama, is losing is as fast, the conditions among Islamic nations might now ripen for a great cultural conflict (with nuclear weapons?), between Sunni and Shiite Muslims.

    The focus of the West today is on Iran and Israel, but Iran is just using Israel as a forefront excuse to develop the weapons that will be necessary to achieve regional domination. The Suni-led Arab oil rich nations spend huge amounts of money acquiring the latest weapons and unlike the past, it is not Israel that these weapons are pointed at. Tehran Mullas do not fear Israel. They fear their own Arab brothers and neighbors.

    Enriched Uranium rods are inspected and entered into the reactor at Bushehr. Photos: FARS NEws Agency.

    Update: Last U.S. Combat Brigade Pulls Out of Iraq

    Seven years and five months after the U.S.-led invasion, the last American combat brigade was crossed the Kuwait-Iraq border on before dawn today. (check AP report by Rebecca Santana).

    It was the 4th Stryker Brigade Combat Team (BCT), 2nd Infantry Division that pulled back from Iraq, two weeks ahead of President Barack Obama’s Aug. 31, 2010 deadline for ending U.S. combat operations there. Yet, the U.S. presence in the country is far from over as some 56,000 U.S. troops are staying for at least another year, in what is designated as a ‘advise and assist‘ non-combat role. Special Forces will continue to help Iraqis hunt for terrorists while other troops will be training and assisting Iraqi troops on their security missions. In fact, as the 4th Stryker BCT left Iraq, soldiers of the 2nd Stryker BCT of the 25th Infantry Division are deployed in Iraq as members of an ‘Advise and Assist Brigade’, the Army’s designation for brigades selected to conduct security force assistance. The 2nd Stryker BCT is one of seven ‘Advice and Assist Brigades’ currently positioned in the country, along with National Guard brigades.

    A column of Stryker armored vehicles of the U.S. Army 4th Stryker Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division arrive in Kuwait, after travelling along the 500 km highway from Baghdad. The 4th Stryker Brigade Combat Team was mentioned as the last U.S. Army combat brigade to leave Iraq. Photo: AP

    The military was preparing for the withdrawal for several months, restricting media reports on the brigade’s movements until they were almost to the border. The brigade decided to fly half of the troops by air and send 4,000 soldiers overland, maintaining the 360 Strykers vehicles force in combat ready posture for an extra three weeks. The Strykers left the Baghdad area in separate convoys over a four-day period, traveling through potentially hostile territory over the 500 km road to Kuwait at night, minimizing U.S. military movements by day. Highway overpasses and other sensitive points were covered by U.S. military overwatches and attack helicopters, with the banks of the highway constantly swept for suspected IEDs. The biggest threat was roadside bombs planted by Shiite extremist groups who have a strong foothold in the south.

    The AP story, which was followed by other reports in the U.S. media, seems aimed at looking for a ‘happy end’ for the U.S. role in the Iraqi conflict. However, the international press is not impressed. Here are few the skeptical commentators:

    No security and stability in Iraq

    U.S. withdrawal from Iraq: Ending or outsourcing the war?

    Pentagon denies pullout of combat troops out of Iraq accomplished

    Deadly bombing comes hours after talks break down

    Bloodbath in Iraq amid political impasse

    Will Obama keep US troops in Iraq beyond 2011?

    Defense Update News Analysis: The Beginning Or the End of The Iraq War?

    Defense Update News Analysis: Are Iraqi Security Forces Up to the Challenge?

    Update: U.S. Army Awards Enhanced NVG Contracts to ITT, DRS and L-3

    The U.S. Army Research Development and Engineering Command (REDCOM) have ordered 660 Enhanced Night Vision Goggles (ENVG) from three manufacturers for testing, toward massive fielding of new ENVGs in upcoming years. The awarded companies are ITT, L-3 Insight Technology and DRS Systems. The three contracts, each valued around US$250 million, cover the delivery of the 220 systems in the base year, (2010) and options for the delivery of production quantities in the years 2011-2013. The Army is expecting to field new and improved digital fused imaging goggles by 2014.

    Sofar ITT has been producing the Army’s first generation AN/PSQ-20 ENVG under a sole source indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract worth about $560 million. This contract expires by the end of 2010. ITT has already provided over 2,400 ENVG systems with another 6,500 to be delivered on the current contract.

    The development of the ENVG began in the year 2000. First models were fielded in 2008 with special operations units. By early 2009 the 10th Mountain Division was the first regular Army unit to receive few hundred items. The recent follow-on contracts address an ENVG follow-on program, with ITT has addressed with an updated version of the current ENVG system, called ‘Spiral Enhanced Night Vision Goggle’ (SENVG). This new device is designed to meet high volume production rates and the critical performance requirements of the ground-based soldier.

    ENVG (Enhanced Night Vision Goggle) Training

    The SENVG incorporates the 18 mm image intensifier tube and a display beam combiner assembly (DBCA) utilizing an OLED-XL microdisplay produced by eMagin. The SENVG utilizes several qualified ENVG subassemblies and is powered by three AA batteries, which reduces the logistics burden and gives the customer an estimated $130 million savings over the product’s life cycle. Through various system enhancements the SENVG has a digital upgrade capability that will allow the goggle to export fused imagery for transmission via battlefield networks.

    Since the fielding of the ENVG PEO Soldier has been delivering ENVGs and in parallel, developing a lighter, more rugged digital system (ENVG-D), that will also support image transfer and display of images from other sensors and sights, Digital Video Recorders (DVR) and remote computing devices. The current systems are significantly more expensive and heavier, compared to the systems they are intended to replace – PVS-7 and PVS-14. The new ENVG (D) is expected to overcome these weaknesses and meet the Army’s objective weight and cost requirements.

    Read more on the Enhanced Night Vision Goggles (ENVG) on Defense-Update.

    U.S. Marines Receive New Command Vehicles

    Lockheed Martin [NYSE: LMT] has delivered the first two of 52 upgraded Command and Control variants of the Light Armored Vehicle (LAV) to the U.S. Marine Corps. The remaining 50 vehicles are to be delivered over the next two years. The vehicle provides a mobile command center providing advanced communication capabilities to Marines in the field.

    Fully equipped LAV C2. Photo: Lockheed Martin

    The LAV-C2 upgrades include integration of communications equipment such as the Multi-Band Multi Mission Radio System and the Enhanced Position Radio System, as well as improved automated workstations and command systems. The new equipment offers the Marines universally interchangeable workstations, an expanded workspace, improved transportability, upgraded radio systems and consolidated antennas. The platforms are provided to by the U.S. Marine Corps with Lockheed Martin installing and integrating the communications suite, automated workstations and command systems.

    Lockheed Martin was awarded the system integration part of the program in 2006. The follow-on production contract was awarded in December 2009. The total cost of the program is around $30 million.

    Updated: Russia to pay €1.37 Billion for Two French Helicopter Carriers

    Updated December 30, 2010: Following a tender held earlier in October 2010, the bid submitted by the consortium of France’s DCNS and STX teamed with the Russian naval yard OSK was selected as the winning proposal. As a result, France will construct two Mistral class helicopter carrying command vessels for the Russian Navy, with options to build two additional ships in Russia. The U.S. and the former Soviet Baltic States have expressed their concern of the Franco-Russian deal arming Moscow with modern Western weaponry. According to Russia’s news agency Novosti, Russia will pay €720 million for the construction of the first vessel. The second will cost €650 millions. Both ship will be constructed at STX shipyard in Saint-Nazaire, France. Another two will be constructed later at the Admiralty Shipyards in St. Petersburg.

    Mistral Helicopter Carrier
    The Russians wanted to buy up to four French Mistral ships. Photo: Novosti news agency

    Originally published 19 August, 2010: The Russian Defense Ministry will hold a tender on the purchase of helicopter carriers, having backed out of negotiations to buy the Mistral-class helicopter carrier from France without a tender. Russia has been negotiating with the French shipbuilder DCNS about the procurement of two vessels, with options for two additional ships to be built by local shipyards. The estimated cost of the program could exceed US$2 billion – making this program one of the largest Russian shipbuilding programs in recent decades.

    The decision to open the tender followed a complaint by the Russian United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) to the Federal Antitrust Service, about the exclusion of local shipbuilders from competing for this program, a claim that gained the Russian Navy support. As a result, USC was officially invited to take part in the tender, to be announced next month. The tender is likely to involve other foreign shipbuilders in addition to the French.

    While Russian and foreign bidders will seriously attempt to compete, it is likely that the tender will be ‘tailored’ to clear the ground for selecting the French offer. According to the Russian Daily Kommersant, USC has offered to build the ship for $500-700 million, while DCNS priced their vessels around $430-540 million. USC is realistic about its chance to win the program, and is setting the ground to join the French as a partner. Two of the USC subsidiaries are candidates for such JVs – the Admiralteyskiye Verfi  from St.Petersburg’s and the Yantar shipyard in Kaliningrad. A French delegation is expected to visit the Yantar shipyard this month to study the possibility of building Mistral class ships there. Another subsidiary of USC is the Zvezda Shipbuilding Company, based in the Far East, has already established a joint venture with South Korean Daewoo Marine Shipbuilding & Engineering, and will offer the Dokdo helicopter carrier.

    USC is promissing it could complete the vessel construction within 30 months.

    Diehl’s Sky Sphere set to Defeat UAS, OWA Drones Head-On

    0
    Diehl Defence has teamed up with Skysec to develop a drone interceptor. Diehl works with Skysec’s subsidiary, Skysec Defence, to modify the original civilian-oriented net-arresting interceptor into a hard-kill system suitable for military missions....

    Defense Update Weekly News Summary

    0
    Welcome to the latest episode of Defense-Update News Summary! In this episode, we dive into this week’s developments in defense technology, military acquisitions, and strategic partnerships worldwide. Some of this week's highlights include: Elbit Systems...

    Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle Program Launches as Part of Rafale F5 Standard

    0
    The French Ministry of Armed Forces has officially launched the Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle (UCAV) program as part of the Rafale F5 standard development. This event marks the beginning of a new era in...

    Air Defense & C-UAS Innovations at the AUSA 2024 Exhibition

    0
    Army Air Defense Undergoes Significant Modernization to Counter Drone Threats The U.S. Army's air defense branch has experienced its most substantial modernization and growth in over four decades, primarily driven by the need to counter...

    Elbit Systems Address US Army Artillery Modernization with Sigma 155×52 Wheeled Howitzer

    0
    Elbit Systems of America showcases the Sigma Next Generation Howitzer at AUSA 2024, where competing systems from Sweden, South Korea, France, and Germany are likely to be presented, some in models, others in full...

    Defense-Update Weekly News Summary

    0
    Welcome to the latest episode of Defense-Update News Summary! In this episode, we dive into this week’s developments in defense technology, military acquisitions, and strategic partnerships worldwide. Some of this week's highlights include: Elbit Systems...

    Israel Revamps Aerial Bomb Production

    0
    Elbit Systems has signed a 1.5-billion-shekel (approximately $400 million) contract with Israel's Ministry of Defense to establish an aerial bomb manufacturing bombs for the Israeli Air Force. In the past, the government-owned IMI operated...