Saturday, December 20, 2025
More
    Home Blog Page 333

    Boeing Selects Elbit to Supply Virtual Radar for U.S. Navy’s T-45 Training System

    The U.S. Navy pilots training on the Boeing [NYSE: BA] T-45 will soon get a radar screen in their cockpits’ although these radars will not be able to actually detect enemy aircraft, they will be integrated into the training mission by simulating a realistic situational picture showing real and simulated targets. The realistic radar training is part of the Virtual Mission Training System (VMTS) for the T-45 this segment will be provided by Elbit Systems [NASDAQ: ESLT]. Boeing is currently under contract to develop the VMTS capability. Subsequent phases of work will provide for two test aircraft and then for retrofit of 18 existing aircraft with VMTS by 2012.


    VMTS simulates via data link an unclassified, mechanically scanned tactical radar that provides air-to-air and air-to-ground modes as well as simulated weapons and simulated electronic warfare. These functions can be networked between the participating aircraft and instructor ground stations that control the mission presentation. The current phase of VMTS work will provide flight officers with in-flight training in the use of radar and weapons against virtual enemy aircraft, including cooperative training with friendly real and virtual aircraft.

    The T-45 entered service with the U.S. Navy in 1992. Boeing recently rolled out the 210th Goshawk from its St. Louis assembly facility and remains under contract for 11 additional aircraft. Approximately 3,500 Navy, Marine Corps and international student aviators have earned their wings in the T-45. “VMTS will enrich the undergraduate military flight officer’s weapons-and-tactics curriculum, producing flight officers who are better prepared to transition to carrier strike-fighter and electronic-attack duty,” said Barbara Wilson, T-45 Training Systems director and program manager for Boeing.

    Lt. Cmdr. Matt Foster of Jacksonville, Fla., signals to the pilot of a T-45 Goshawk, attached to Training Air Wing (TW) 1, that he is ready to launch from nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CVN 65). Enterprise is underway conducting carrier qualifications. U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Jhi L. Scott

    Airbus military Celebrates A400M Roll-Out

    Airbus Military rolled out the first complete A400M military transport aircraft today. The event took place at the A400M Final Assembly Line facility in Seville, Spain. His Majesty Juan Carlos I, King of Spain attended the event. The A400M is the first new military transport aircraft of its category designed in over 30 years, with twice the capacity and twice the payload of the current aircraft types such as the C-130s.


    The aircraft can carry a payload of up to 37 tonnes over ranges of up to 4700 nm. Designed for mission versatility the A400M will be able to carry all loads and vehicles in the European Staff Requirement (ESR) inventory, serve as an aerial delivery platform and act as an in-flight refueller for both fast jets and helicopters.

    Launched under a single contract in 2003 with 180 orders for seven European launch customers, the A400M represents the most ambitious military procurement programme ever undertaken in Europe. The launch customer nations, Belgium, France, Luxembourg, Germany, Spain, Turkey and the United Kingdom were subsequently joined by Malaysia and South Africa, which recognised the potential of the new airlifter for their own requirements and brought the total number of commitments to 192. The initial contract, worth some 20 billion Euros was signed with a single interface between Airbus Military and the European defense procurement organization (Organisation Conjointe de Coordination en matière d’Armement – OCCAR), the contractual body representing all seven European customer nations.

    Airbus military Celebrates A400M Roll-Out. Photo: EADS

    L-3 Claim Performance Breakthrough with Uncooled Thermal Imagers

    L-3 Infrared Products is developing a new line of uncooled thermal imaging products called Thermal-Eye ‘Series 17’. According to Mike Studer, VP Marketing, L-3 Infrared Products, the new line is based on a new and promising technology called ‘Amorphous Silicon’ representing new and revolutionary sensing capabilities.

    Amorphous silicon is a non-crystalline allotropic form of silicon which does not have long range order at the atomic level, instead, the atoms form a random network. One of the main advantages of amorphous silicon when compared to other infrared detector materials is its common usage in a variety of high-volume products. Crystalline silicon – the same material in a different form – is the standard material used worldwide to make semiconductor chips. Amorphous silicon technology is well understood as it is used widely in large-area electronics such as liquid-crystal displays (LCDs) and photovoltaic solar cells. L-3’s Series 17 product family, is based on the 17µm (micron) amorphous silicon technology and offers 640 x 480 resolution, representing the smallest pixel array uncooled infrared sensor available for commercial production.

    “We use a unique architectural approach, deploy advances in material science, and have the technological bench strength to take our sensor products beyond the current industry norms”, said Steve Frank, CTO, L-3 Infrared Products. L-3 plans to introduce small-size, highest resolution arrays in the uncooled industry based on its new Series 17 products. Among the products planned are 17µm 640 x 480 detector and digital imaging module, a 320 x 240 detector array, as well as a 1024 x 768 detector array. Further, a dual-field-of-view long-range imaging module is underway and will feature a 1024 x 768 array that uses 640 x 480 electronics.

    Tahdiya Spurs Hamas’s Military Buildup in the Gaza Strip

    The Egyptian-brokered informal truce, or “Tahdiya” started Thursday, June 19, at 0600 hours and seems to be holding sofar. This not surprising, as Hamas has everything to gain and nothing to lose if it abides to it’s Tahdiya, until it can restart the war, on it’s own interest. Israel, on the other hand, has already tied the IDF to strict open-fire orders, which leave little scope for effective counter action, if so-called “irregulars” will open fire or plant exposives, on their own. It all happened before and it will again, when the time is right for Hamas.

    The steel wal erected by Israel in an effort to protect its soldiers patrolling the separation line between Gaza and Egypt was toppled by Hamas engineers, in an attempt to ease the Israeli blockade on the Gaza strip. The Egyptian government succeeded in securing a temporary cease-fire agreement [tahdiya] between Israel and Hamas. Hamas regards the temporary cease-fire as a tahdiya and not a hudna. A hudna implies recognition of the other party’s actual existence, without acknowledging its legitimacy. As Hamas’ leader Khaled Mashaal explained, a tahdiya is “a tactic in conflict management.”

    Senior columnist Sever Plocker severely criticized Ehud Olmert’s decision to accept the Hamas “Tahdiya”. Plocker in an article in Ynet: “When we talk about a Tahdiyah (Calm) agreement with Hamas,” the word calm isn’t the problem. Rather, the agreement with Hamas is the problem”.

    According to Plocker, en route to the so-called “truce” agreement, Olmert’s government shattered Israel’s most important strategic advantage it possessed ever since Hamas came to power last June: The advantage of refusal. The refusal to engage in dialogue with Hamas, the refusal to recognize the legitimacy of its rule, the refusal to compromise with it, and the implied refusal to give Hamas international legitimacy. The Israeli public was mistakenly presented with only two options – a massive military operation, or appeasement. There was a third way too: Ongoing blows delivered at terror centers and leaders.

    Had Israel persisted in its refusal to recognize Hamas, the regime in Gaza would have collapsed or fundamentally changed. Yet surprisingly, Israel deserted the path of refusal a short time after it managed, through great efforts, to convince Europe, the United States, Russia, and the United Nations to establish a united refusal front. Yet Jerusalem was the first to cut out a window in the boycott wall. Without making any diplomatic-ideological-strategic concession, Hamas was recognized by Israel as the legitimate master of the Gaza Strip, the authentic representative of the Palestinian people, and a partner for agreements of one kind or another. This is a priceless gift for Hamas. Without it, placed under continued pressure, both militarily and economically, Hamas would soon or later succumb. Yet surprisingly, it was not the weakened Hamas leadership that capitulated but the stronger Israel and its weak leadership.

    Not only could the Hamas leadership congratulate themselves on their extraordinary coup, the second in only two years, after their brilliant take-over from Fatah. Iranian sources reported that Iran’s top leaders held a special meeting in Tehran Thursday, June 19, 2008, just hours after the Gaza ceasefire went into force. They too congratulated themselves for achieving their second base on a Mediterranean shore after winning control of Lebanon through Hezbollah’s takeover of Beirut and its government. In fact, it seems that Iran has already tightened its noose around Israel as well as Egypt, a move which should, under circumstances cause considerable alarm.

    But the “peace-at-any-price brigade” in Israel, are already chuckling happily, as expected, over the Hamas / Israel six-month ‘ceasefire’. Little do they ponder over the consequences, should this “treaty”, as happened so often in the past fail, with even more sinister repercussions. History has more than enough examples to show:

    Mr. Neville Chamberlain on 30 September 1938 declared the accord with the Germans signaled “peace for our time”, after he had read it to a jubilant crowd gathered at Heston airport in west London. A year later Great Britain was fighting for its very life against Hitler’s Nazi hordes.

    But only two years later, in June 1940, during the Blitz, Adolf Hitler’s Germany sought to embark on secret indirect talks with Britain. Winston Churchill rejected these feelers out of hand. If we embark on any kind of contacts, he warned, we shall quickly find ourselves on a slippery slope that would ultimately lead to acceptance of the evil Nazi regime, based on the argument that this is reality and that it “represents the Germans.” Churchill was not tempted, and saved civilization. Unfortunately, the lesson of 1938 and 1940 and those which followed them, are sometimes forgotten and the consequences, as usual, are paid by the people.

    Indeed, many Israelis across the political board have expressed deep frustration as an Egyptian-brokered ceasefire with the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip went into effect early Thursday morning. A ‘victorious’ Hamas already warned of severe responses from its side, if Israel was the first to disturb the fragile “peace”. To show that it meant business, just hours before the ceasefire went into effect, Hamas rocket crews pounded southern Israel with a barrage of rockets and mortar shells to drive home the point, who the Boss in Gaza was. Israeli opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu said on Israel Radio that he found it mind-boggling, that Olmert’s government would re-enter into yet another ill-advised ceasefire that everyone knew would be used by the terrorists to regroup and rearm for future aggression. It is a well known fact, that all previous informal ceasefires between Israel and Hamas had lasted, at best only for a few months, but in reality were punctuated by sporadic attacks, by so-called “irregulars”, while strict limitations on Israel’s military response allowed the terrorists to simultaneously keep pressure, without the “Hudna” being officially compromised.

    Israelis who have been living around the Gaza Strip are under no illusion, as to what the future forebodes. For no less than eight years they have been subjected to a daily barrage of rockets, mortars and sniping, while trying to live a “normal” life under impossible conditions. Not that a few kilometers to their west, inside the Hamas ruled Gaza Strip, ordinary people were better off. Both suffered the same hardship, placed upon their shoulders by irresponsible, corrupt and ignorant leaders- who were looking entirely after their own political survival.

    Even the hard core of Israel’s military leadership has repeatedly warned decision-makers, in vain, that the truce will only strengthen Hamas rule in Gaza, further decreasing the likelihood that the territory will revert to the control of moderate Palestinian elements more palatable to Israel and Western peace brokers. Some of the more outspoken officers, have indicated that they failed to understand why Israel is granting Hamas a respite that will almost surely be exploited to bolster the terror group’s defensive and offensive capabilities, in addition to its grip on the local population. Mentioning that the Egyptian-brokered ceasefire actually placed no limitations on Hamas activities inside Gaza, and even if it did, there is no monitoring mechanism available in place. Hamas will be at full liberty to continue smuggling arms into Gaza, as their leader, Ismail Haniyeh openly told the press on Saturday. The Hamas military will continue to plant explosive charges in buildings, built bunkers within sight of the border line and dig tunnels. Once the Tahdiya will end, the Gaza Hamastan will be ready to confront the IDF in July 2006, just as Hezbollah was, six years after it’s forced withdrawal in May 2000.

    To guess what lies in store, after the Tahdiya ends, one should consult a recent in-depth study by the Israeli intelligence community. Entitled “Hamas’s Military Buildup in the Gaza Strip,” the report – compiled by the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center – detailed the structure of the Hamas military force in Gaza, naming commanders of its various brigades and the types of weapons it had succeeded in smuggling in from Egypt via tunnels underneath the Gaza-Egypt borderline ‘Philadelphi’ Corridor.

    This study, which received updated information from the ISA and Military Intelligence, says that Hamas, the militant group that now controls Gaza, is engaged in the broadest and most significant military buildup in its history with help from Syria and Iran, restructuring itself more hierarchically and using more and more powerful weapons, especially longer-range rockets against Israel’s southern communities.

    “This is the first comprehensive analysis of the Hamas buildup,” said Reuven Erlich, a retired Israeli colonel in military intelligence who heads The Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, the institute that produced the study. “It is based on a wide range of sources. And what is very clear is that Hamas, like Hezbollah in Lebanon, is aiming to use rocket fire to draw the Israeli military in.” According to the report, Hamas has smuggled at least 80 tons of explosives into Gaza since last summer. It says this accounts for more than half the amount smuggled into Gaza since Israel’s 2005 withdrawal, evidence of intensification the study alleges. The study also says that Hamas has obtained advanced anti-tank devices like those used by Hezbollah against Israel in its 2006 war, as well as powerful roadside bombs for use in border areas where Israeli vehicles might be expected to pass in pursuit of rocket launchers. It added that hundreds of fighters have been trained in Iran, Lebanon and Syria.

    According to the study, Hamas gets it arms from three sources – Iran and Syria (sometimes directly and sometimes via Hizbullah), arms dealers and independent production, according to the researchers.

    It has several dozen long-range 122 mm. Grad-model Katyusha rockets – the type fired into Ashkelon in February; dozens of anti-tank missiles – including advanced Sagger missiles and thousands of rocket-propelled grenades; several anti-aircraft missiles; and a few dozen anti-aircraft machine guns. Hamas also has various types of listening equipment for intelligence gathering, and an unknown quantity of night-vision equipment.

    Hamas’s rocket arsenal is based on several hundred independently produced Kassam rockets, with diameters ranging from 90 mm. to 115 mm. and ranges of nine-13 kilometers. Hamas has also received an unknown number of Iranian-made long-range mortar shells.

    The Hamas military wing has several independently produced longer-range rockets which can reach 19 km., and dozens of standard long-range Grad rockets (122 mm.), with a range of up to 20.4 km. that were smuggled into Gaza or confiscated from the Palestinian Authority security services following the Hamas takeover of the Gaza Strip in June 2007. The breach of Rafah crossing to Sinai in January allowed Hamas to acquire additional standard rockets, and perhaps even a number of rockets with ranges longer than 20.4 km. that can reach targets north of Ashkelon.

    Download the Full Report Hamas’s military buildup in the Gaza Strip (April 2008)

    FELIN Enters Company Level Field Trials

    The FELIN project began 15 years ago, in 1993. By 2004 Sagem was selected as prime contractor and development began. By 2009 the initial shipments of the first 1,000 systems are expected. In July 2008 the program will pass a major milestone, as decision on the production of the first thousand systems will be taken (the total FELIN acquisition, is expected to be 31,588 units). Sofar, prototype systems were delivered and tested, the most recent trials ended in April 2008 involving 40 systems. According to Jacques Dechoux, Programme Manager, FELIN, MoD France), 358 systems are being delivered, and will enter extensive and long field testing, beginning July this year (2008). Three infantry companies are being equipped with FELIN and will evaluate them during operational training during nine months.

    A French soldier wearing the FELIN combat suite demonstrates how an observation and firing  around a corner can be performed. Photo: Tamir Eshel, Defense-Update
    A futuristic headgear for the FELIN is being evaluated by the French MOD and program manager FELIN. Photo: Tamir Eshel, Defense-UpdateFELIN and VBCI will enter service at the same time. Eventually, FELIN will work with 20 different systems, including different vehicles such as improved VAB, VBCI, AMX10P, the FAMAS assault weapon, SITEL battle management system, parachutes, helicopters, sensors, communications systems etc. The systems being used weigh about 25 kg, including essential combat supplies. They include the weapon’s day and night sights and weapon mounted controls, thermal binocular for commanders, helmet mounted night vision systems, data, audio and video capable secured radio, and power and data distribution system embedded into wearable webbing. Other elements to be evaluated include vehicle-mounted battery chargers, networking ‘sockets’ for mounted operations, unit networking support, laser eye protection gear and CBR protection suite.

    Part of the recent studies included done as part of FELIN provided a detailed review of the human factors involved with extended mounted operations. Sofar most studies focused on the dismounted aspects of the soldier system, while little attention was given to the comfort, usability and ergonomics of soldier wearing combat suites inside the vehicle’s space for extended time. The FELIN study evaluated the seating configurations (facing columns) with weapons and communications gear connected to ‘hot shoes’ providing intercom and recharging.

    Defense Update report from Soldier Technology 2008 is focusing on these topics:

    Canada’s Integrated Soldier System Program

    Backed by C$310 budget, Canada’s will equip Canada’s Integrated Soldier System Program (ISSP) is expected to become operational in 2011-2012, as part of a 10 year program launched this year (2008). According to Lieutenant Colonel Jacques Levesque, Program Manager, ISSP, the Canadian program is designed with evolutionary, incremental implementation rather than ‘big bang’ systems, fielded all at once. Similar to the British FIST, the Canadian program uses three primary versions designed as – ‘assault’ and ‘command’ kits, highlighting weapon’s sights and C4I and communications gear, and a minimal ‘support’ configuration.

    One possible version of the Canadian future infantry combat suite, developed by Rheinmetall Defense.  This system utilizes a  computer system developed in Canada,  a hand-held viewer, helmet mounted camera and sight and the QuietPro, communications controller. The body armor system is modular, meeting Canadian aproach for such systems. Photo: Defense UpdateThe program has three phases, each focusing on different aspects of the system; the initial increment currently in development including the vest, head borne systems and helmet, weapon sensors and ballistic protection. It also addresses the physical, electrical and electronic distribution, known as the ‘human infrastructure’ – including load carriage, as well as the cabling and connectors, power and data distribution, linking between all the system’s elements. Phase 2 will begin in 2011 and last through 2016 to be followed by phase 3, beginning development in 2013 aiming at replacing much of the equipment introduced in phase 1 by the year 2016 (implementing the eight year equipment modernization cycle). The Canadians believe that an efficient design of the human infrastructure could prevent errors later in the program, eliminating the development of a ‘Christmas Tree’ effect so common with existing systems.

    Most of the Canadian combat suite’s elements are expected to be maintained in service for maximum eight years, thus ensuring continuous evolution of the entire system. The goal of the program is the fielding of systems as widely as possible down to the section level, creating force multiplier through the implementation of ‘system of systems integration (SOSI) approach. The system envisages the deployment of elements of the systems to non combatant elements, such as combat support personnel, creating a common level of communications and situational awareness to encompass the entire force.

    Defense Update report from Soldier Technology 2008 is focusing on these topics:

    More Firepower for the Marine Rifle Squad

    The weapons allocated to the infantry squad have not been changed since the mid 1960s, when the M-16 replaced the Carbine as the rifleman’s principal weapon. Few improvements are considered to match this rifle for modern soldier systems, for example, the use of a sliding stock to better match current body armor designs. But things are changing and new weapons are coming in, to improve and empower the marine rifle squad. According to Lt. Colonel Tracy Tafolla, USMC Program Manager, Infantry Weapons, among the new weapons are several sniper rifles, shotguns, grenade launchers and improved mortars.

    A new weapon currently introduced at battalion level, is the M32 multi-shot grenade launcher and M1014 (Bennelly) shotgun, used at the rifle squad level, providing effective short-range firepower with limited breeching capability, which is especially useful in urban terrain combat. The M12 sharpshooter weapon is also being delivered. This modified M4 has a silencer, optical sight and bipod. A single weapon is allocated to the squad. A larger caliber sniper weapon is the M-14, firing 7.62 mm ammunition. The improved M14 uses more accurate optical sight and improved design. The rifle is not yet in service, but its capability gap is to be fulfilled by an urgent operational requirement. Targets at longer ranges could be handled only by high- power sniper rifle, such as the 0.5 Cal (Baret) sniper rifles, hitting man-sized targets at ranges of 1500 – 1800 meters.

    60mm and 81mm mortars are providing integral fire support to the rifle company and infantry battalion. They are optimized for effective short-range and rapid response firepower. When dismounted, these mortars are carried in backpacks, following anywhere where the warfighter goes. The U.S. Marine Corps funded an improvement program for its mortars, shedding 30% off the weight of the 81mm mortar, by replacing the existing base-plate with a new model made from advanced super-alloys. Cold-forming manufacturing of the tube yield stronger, thinner mortar tubes, firing bombs with more energetic propellants, while reducing the tube’s wear, resulting in more accurate and extended range (the 81mm mortar will reach 5,600 meters). When the mortar will employ a ballistic computer, and rangefinder, muzzle velocity meter and fuze setter, the 81mm mortar will offer the fire-accuracy of precision-guided munitions, while firing standard high-explosive ammunition. The 60mm mortar was also reduced 20% of its weight due to similar economies. The new mortars are expected to enter service by 2010.

    Defense Update report from Soldier Technology 2008 is focusing on these topics:

    PECOC Program Develops Better Battle Dress, Combat Gear for British Troops

    Personal Equipment and Common Operational Clothing (PECOC) is designed to replace the current Combat 95 clothing, load carriage and legacy items. PECOC wil develop and field a kit of combat gear, designed for the warfighters employing the FIST integrated soldier systems and FRES family of combat vehicles. The kit will consist of ballistic and sensory protection (hearing, eyes, gloves etc), load carriage, clothing, footwear, gloves and sleeping bags, all designed to match different operational environments and support extended deployment. PECOC is being designed with modular, upgradable and field customized design, enabling soldiers to optimize their equipment for the specific mission.

    MOD 'fashion show' style display at Soldier technology showing the new gear designed by the PECOC  team for British infantry, the gear will be modular, and could be designed for specific roles such as commander (left) and grenadier (right). Photo: Tamir Eshel, defense-Update


    PECOC is scheduled to be ready for operational deployment by 2011. Suppliers and systems are currently down-selected for the initial prototype. The program will be broken into three developmental phases. The most critical element being the load carrying battle suite and protection gear. This system will consist of personally adjustable combat gear, appealing to be better accepted by the warfighter.
    Modularity and weight distribution is a significant asset. For example, four elements weighing five kg each, are better than one item weighing 20 kg which has a more significant loading effect on the soldier.

    Previous systems were not designed as modular, resulting in painful fielding and poor acceptance by the troops. For example, the Kestrel bullet proof vest developed to replace the older ECBA protection vest was designed for troops operating from vehicular platforms and armored vehicles. However, since troops took these superior protective vests on foot patrols, soldiers complained they were too heavy and uncomfortable and cumbersome, as the excessive armor coverage restricted movement in combat.

    PECOC team is considering to retain the currently fielded Osprey advanced bulletproof vest, but introducing a thinner, curved- shaped strike panel, designed for close-fitting, to improve comfort without compromising on protection level. PECOC will have basic lightweight protection for all levels, with add-on heavy (AP plate) and blast protection upgrade.

    The AFV crewman’s vest combines water carriage, body armor, load carriage and harness, all in one piece of equipment. In an attempt to overcome the weight problem, the suite is designed to allow soldiers, to flexibly configure the system to the load they carry and to the mission-type performed. For example, on dismounted operations, PECOC will comprise a load carriage system integrated with the assault vest and close-fitting fragmentation and bullet-proof plate. Soldiers will carry an operational day sack optimized for 48 hour mission, with body armor. Alternatively, on extended deployment, soldiers will remove the body armor, trading its weight for a 75-100 litre Bergen, optimized for heavy load carriage.

    Defense Update report from Soldier Technology 2008 is focusing on these topics:

    Norway to Test NORMANS Integrated Soldier System in 09

    The Norwegian NORMANS system passed a significant milestone after the evaluation of prototype system during platoon level trials in 2006. Following positive responses received from the field, the Norwegian MOD decided to proceed with procurement of 416 systems for testing at a company level in 2009. According to Rune Lausund, NORMANS Programme Manager, the program will be integrating the MP7 assault rifle from Hekler Koch, fitted with an Aimpoint Compact M4 optical sight, a new protective vest, integrated wiring and load bearing system, and the QuietPro integrated remote control for the Harris RF7800-TR personal role radio, audio management system and hearing protection. NORMANS suites will utilize specific computing segments tailored for specific roles, riflemen and grenadiers will use location reporting devices, utilizing microcontroller, navigation system and miniature display providing basic communications and navigation. Commanders will receive a more advanced palmtop size (PDA) computer for better situational awareness, planning and reporting.

     

    Defense Update report from Soldier Technology 2008 is focusing on these topics:

    ELTA Unveils Unattended Ground Sensor Network

    Elta’s new UGSN is a modular network of autonomous distributed sensors including seismic, acoustic, electro-optical sensors and miniature ground surveillance radars. Each sensor includes a sensitive microphone, for acoustic detection, a geophone picking up seismic vibration from nearby movement, a GPS receiver, communications transceiver a low-power controller and signal processor. The sensor can pick up moving heavy vehicles (such as tanks) from a distance of 500 meters and walking humans from 50 meters.

    The UGS can be configured with high capacity power module for extended use (four weeks), or in a miniature casing, for short missions (7 days). Surveillance data is transmitted wirelessly, through self-forming network to the ground command and control center. The UGS can be located in any area for monitoring the area of interest for an extended period of time. The sensors can operate autonomously or in combination, optimizing area coverage, and facilitating target detection, classification. Add-on electro-optical sensors such as TED based passive, uncooled thermal sensors, can be added. While TEDs are maintained in power saving ‘sleep mode’, they automatically designated by the UGS to perform target recognition and identification.

     

    Defense Update report from Soldier Technology 2008 is focusing on these topics:

    Improving Urban Assault Capability

    The MATADOR unguided man-portable multi-purpose rocket system

    While the first version of the IAS is focusing on the dismounted commander, as planned originally, forthcoming spirals are already implementing lessons learned during Lebanon (2006) and the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Among the systems currently evaluated, are a number of lethality enhancement systems, primarily those designed for urban assault. Other systems are addressing threat detection and warning, including thermal sniper spotters, wearable sensors detecting gunfire, automatically locating such threats, and a new class of ‘through the wall sensing radars”.

    MATADOR MP - multi-purpose urban assault weapon developed by Rafael. Photo: RafaelThe second spiral development of the IAS will incorporate lessons from recent combat operations, in Lebanon and the Gaza strip. Urban assault weapons considered for IAS include the Simon, a door breaching rifle grenade developed by RAFAEL. The Simon is fired from standard assault rifles, using live ammunition. A stand-alone follow-through ‘tandem’ assault munition is also produced by RAFAEL.

    This weapon uses a precursor charge to open a path for a grenade-size warhead, that ‘follows through’ and detonates behind the wall. The warhead size is designed to maximize lethal effect within the room, while minimizing effect beyond the target. RAFAEL offers the follow-through charge as part of the Urban Star 6kg weapon, designed to neutralize room-sized targets, with minimal collateral damage beyond the room’s walls. Another shoulder-launched weapon, also designed by RAFAEL is the Matador WB which can operate as a follow-through charge, or wall-breaching weapon, opening a man-sized hole creating an assault path for the attacking troops.

    TED infrared sensor designed for a man-portable application of electro-optical sniper detection. Photo: Defense UpdateThis weapon can be used effectively from standoff range of up to 400 meters, fired from e,nclosed (FFE) or open terrain placements. An even larger weapon, dubbed ‘urban cannon’ is under development at IMI. It has a more powerful warhead, using dynamic follow-through charge, penetrating thicker walls and destroying a complete apartment in a building, without risking collateral damage beyond the target area. Several sensors are under development, optimized for operation in urban setting.
    The Xaver 400 Through Wall Imaging radar is a hand-held, compact sensor providing real-time information behind a wall, indicating the number and location of people inside the room, at a distance of up to eight meters away. The 3kg unit uses ultra-wide-band signal processing to simultaneously track moving and static targets. The current system provides 2D imaging capability. Another new sensor, is a Short Wave Infra-Red (SWIR) based gunshot detection imaging sensor, utilizing patented Transient Event Detection (TED) to rapidly spot and locate gunfire signature in wide-field of view video taken by the SWIR camera. The resulting threat warning provides very high probability of detection with low false alarm rate, even under a complex operating environment encountered in urban warfare. The sensor can be worn by a soldier, and provide threat warning for the entire team.

    Defense Update report from Soldier Technology 2008 is focusing on these topics:

    Israel’s Advanced Infantry System

    As C4I Segment Matures, Research FocusShifts to Address Urban Recon & Lethality

    With the first phase of IAS, which focused on C4I is nearing completion, the program office is focusing on the warfighter, says Ram Rotbart, (Maj.) deputy IAS PM at Mafat. Among the many types of hardware considering for the program, IAS project team is assessing several lethality systems addressing anti-material weapons, based on dynamic follow-through charges. Several systems are designed by Rafael, including the Urban STAR and Urban Cannon weapons, the later capable in destroying a whole apartment from a range of 300 meters, without risking collateral damage, or nearby operating friendly troops. For the sniper team, the IAS is considering integration of the Sniper Fire Control System (SFCS) designed to improve hit accuracy by 60%. The Second Lebanon War (2006) clearly proved the importance of firepower & support, made available to the infantry.

    The updated kit for the Israeli advanced infantry system  comprises a miniature 'wearable' computer (right), an 8" display (top),  hand-held controller and viewer (bottom) and two radios, an intra-squad (left) and combat net hand-held radio (center). Photo: Tamir Eshel, Defense UpdateMajor Rotbart explained that, at its current phase the program is designed to improve command, control and communications at the infantry battalion, primarily improving the dismounted commander’s situational awareness and command and control, at all tactical levels. However, implementing lessons learned during the 2nd Lebanon war with Hezbollah in 2006 and the ongoing combat engagements in Gaza, the IDF is accelerating the second ‘spiral’, which focuses on increasing the efficiency and lethality of infantry tactical units, by empowering the individual soldier as well as the combat team.
    This initial phase of the IAS program is scheduled to enter a full-scale field evaluation this year. A preliminary system was tested in 2005 at battalion-level exercise, which led to a decision to enter a 24 month, full-scale development of an integrated soldier system, designed specifically for the tactical infantry leaderhip. The system is developed by Elbit Systems, integrating various subsystems from several (mostly domestic) manufacturers. Different IAS system variants are developed for specific applications, including team leaders (NCOs) and junior officers (platoon commanders), forward observers, special operations operators, snipers, grenadiers and riflemen. The program is scheduled to enter testing, at company level in October 2008 and is expected to undergo field evaluation at battalion level, by March 2009, followed by production decision, by summer 2009. Following more testing the system is expected to become mature for operational deployment, by 2010.

    This 8" touch screen display  is used by Israeli Advanced Infantry System for planning and debriefing, it is replaced by the hand held display when operating combat missions. Photo: Elbit SystemsDuring the past year (since Defense Update last reported on the system), few changes have emerged, primarily with the refinement and evolution of the system’s computer (Personal Digital Unit – PDU) which evolved into a smaller, more energy-efficient unit. The new PDU will run on rechargable Li-Ion batteries betweenfour to 14 hours, depending on the usage and mission profile. The PDU is uniquely designed with a power graphic processor to support extensive 2D/3D graphic rendering and video handling capabilities. In its current form, the PDU weighs 0.7 kg and is powered by a 500 MIPS RISC Au 1550 processor running Windows CE or Linux operating systems. It supports two local area networks (LAN), five USB ports, a serial (RS232) port, analog video and audio with integral Voice over IP (VOI) codec, and Fiber LAN docking interface. The PDU supports a tactical hand-held tactical display or helmet mounted eyepiece or an 8″ flat-panel LCD display used for planning and debriefing.

    An innovative element in the Israeli Advanced Infantry Soldier assembly is the Soldier Navigation System, also under development by Elbit. This device augments standard satellite based GPS navigation systems, providing the dismounted soldier with an uninterrupted location and navigation solution. This device is designed for operation indoor and outdoor, and is particularly effective when operated in multi-level urban, wooded area and subterranean environment, operating effectively under different conditions, including walking, running, crawling, jumping or firing. The system’s hardware design has been completed and the project team is now developing sophisticated algorithms to refine and improve the system’s accuracy and predictability. Weighing only 150 grams this cigarette pack sized system uses different sensors, including MEMS based accelerometers, MEMS gyros, magnetometer triad and altimeter to augment a GPS system. The sensors are programmed to detect and classify steps, estimate direction, and stride by movement type and platform, and calculate a position at an accuracy of 1-2% of the distance traveled offering one degree directional accuracy when walking, it will be able to effectively operate for up to three hours without position update.

    Read more about the next phase of IAS, addressing enhancement in 
    urban operations and assault
    .

    Read more about the program in our comprehensive coverage of IAS.

    Defense Update report from Soldier Technology 2008 is focusing on these topics:

    FIST Derivatives Rush to Afghanistan to Support British Army Troops

    Britain’s FIST program encountered some delays last year, as the Ministry of Defence (MOD) addressed urgent operational requirement (UOR) from deployed Army units, to improve communications and situational awareness at infantry squad and platoon level, engaged in combat operations in Afghanistan. Colonel Peter Rafferty MBE, Individual Capability Group Leader FIST, briefed on some of the UORs currently underway. As FIST systems are still immature for operational use, the program office utilizes some elements used in the evaluation process, although they were not considered for the program itself. Therefore, Rafferty cautions, the devices currently being operated in Afghanistan are not representative of full FIST quality and cannot therefore be regarded as ‘spin-off’ from the future program, but only as stop-gap applications, improving existing equipment.


    For situational awareness and force tracking, the ELSA gear provides leaders with the Miltrak system produced by Thales. Photo: Tamir Eshel, Defense UpdateThe systems being delivered as part of the program, include an improved version of the Selex personal role radio (PRR). As part of the Enhanced Low-Latency Situational Awareness (ELSA) UOR program, the new radios provide encrypted voice and data transfer capability. For situational awareness and force tracking, leaders are equipped with the Miltrak system produced by Thales. This cellphone-size unit indicates the relative location of each team member, presented on a digital map. Automatic warning can be issued for team members that have not reported their last location. In addition, enhancements are provided to squads and platoons, as part of the Integrated Sights and Target Acquisition system (SISTA). This upgrade includes the delivery of optical (ACOG) weapon sights, thermal binoculars, and laser rangefinder. With the delivery of SISTA, combat units received more thermal imaging systems, since these devices are performing better under the starless dark nights in the Afghan mountains and desert, where light ‘pollution’ is almost non existent. British forces have reported, that most nights in Afghanistan, particularly those in the isolated mountain ranges of Helmand, are too dark for I2 to operate effectively, therefore requiring the operation of thermal imaging equipment.

    FIST is being integrated into Britain’s future weapon systems programs under the Integrated Soldier System Strategy (IS3). Over the past two years, the program went through the FIST assessment phase, under which, different systems were tested and evaluated, matching expectations for performance and services with currently available technology. Some of the lessons learned from these tests were already implemented. As FIST enters it’s next phase, procurement will continue in three increments, each to include an assessment, development, testing and deployment phase.

    FIST systems will not be limited to the warfighters alone, but extend (in a basic configuration) to combat support and service- support elements, which must be networked and connected into the system, to be included in the overall situational picture, effectively link to combat formations and eliminate the risk of fratricide (in an all-connected combat environment, a non-networked element becomes a critical liability and the weakest point, most susceptible to fratricide).

    Defense Update report from Soldier Technology 2008 is focusing on these topics:

    GAO Sustains Boeing Claims on Unfair US Air Force Tanker Selection

    The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) recommended the Pentagon re-run the competition offering aerial refueling tankers to the U.S. Air Force. Northrop Grumman won the bid to sell the Air Force 179 European designed (domestic U.S. built) EADS Airbus A330 transport jets for $35 billion. The losing bidder, Boeing Co (NYSE:BA) protested the decision. GAO sustained Boeing’s protest adding the Air Force made “a number of significant errors that could have affected the outcome of what was a close competition”. The Air Force “conducted misleading and unequal discussions with Boeing” by telling the company it had fully satisfied a key performance criteria, then later determining that Boeing had only partially met the objective, the GAO said.


    US Air Force Selects KC-45A as KC-135 Replacement

    Feb 29, 2008: The U.S. Air Force announced the selection of Northrop Grumman (NYSE:NOC) to build its next-generation air-refueling tanker aircraft. The estimated $35 billion program calls for the production up to 179 new KC-45A tankers, to be built over the next decade. The KC-45A is based on the A330 Multi-Role Tanker Transport (MRTT) system, built by Airbus, a division of the European aerospace giant EADS. Northrop Grumman teamed with EADS to introduce the MRTT as a competitor to the US built KC767 proposed by Boeing. Northrop Grumman stressed that although the A330 is a European aircraft, the KC-45A will essentially be a US built aircraft – as it is supported by 230 domestic suppliers contributing about 60% of the platform’s content. Furthermore, the program will support more than 25,000 jobs in the USA. According to Northrop Grumman the manufacturing and support infrastructure for the KC-45A will create a new ‘aerospace manufacturing corridor’ in the Southeastern USA, creating 2,500 new jobs in and around Mobile Alabama, where the new aircraft will be assembled.

    More than a KC-135 Replacement

    According to the US Air Force the KC-45A will introduce a significant increase in performance, compared to the current KC-135. Furthermore, as a secondary role, it will be able to fly passengers, cargo, casualties and fuel over long distances. The aircraft will therefore expand the U.S. air force’s flexibility to support operations in distant theaters. Its mission endurance and range could be further extended by aerial refueling from other tanker (current KC-135s partially support such capability today). The KC-45A will have the capability to carry an air refueling pod on each wing. It will be equipped to support US Air Force aircraft, as well as US Navy, Marines and aircraft operated by allied air forces. Since different refueling systems (boom and probe) are employed by the Air Force and Navy aircraft, the current KC-135s must be set up for each specific task before takeoff (only 20 of the KC-135s are geared for this capability today). The KC-45A will be equipped for both systems on every flight and also will have connections for wing pods. When wing pods are installed, it will be able to refuel two probe-equipped aircraft, such as those flown by Navy and many allied aircrews, at the same time. In this configuration it will cut almost in half the amount of time it takes a four-ship formation to cycle across the tanker. The new tanker will also be able to download fuel to storage bladders on the ground, supporting ground vehicles, reducing some of the burden and vulnerability from ground bound supply convoys. To improve its survivability to guided surface-to-air missiles, the aircraft will be equipped with defensive therefore expanding its capability to operating from or within dangerous environments that current tanker aircrews usually avoid.

    The new Air Refuelling Boom System (ARBS) developed for the A330 shown during a test flight on an A310. The boom was recently  tested for the first time offloading fuel to an F-16. Photo: EADS.According to Air Force Gen. Arthur J. Lichte, commander of Air Mobility Command based at Scott Air Force Base, Ill., if the program will progress on track the first test aircraft should be flying by 2010. Air Mobility Command provides the U.S. military with passenger, cargo, tanker and other aircraft support.

    The Air Force should receive the first group of operational KC-45A aircraft around 2013. The Air Force is awarding Northrop Grumman an initial $1.5 billion contract for the design and development of the KC-45 system, and the delivery of four KC-45 test aircraft. This contract also includes five production options targeted for 64 aircraft at $10.6 billion. 128 Future orders are expected to bring the total program value up to $35 billion.

    Boeing Files a Protest Calling for GAO Review of the Air Force’s Decision

    As part of the selection process, the air force compared two proposals, provided by Boeing and Northrop Grumman. The evaluation compared the two platforms along nine key performance parameters and five evaluation factors: mission capability, proposal risk, past performance, cost/price and an integrated fleet air refueling assessment performance in a simulated war scenario. Next week the Air Force is planning to debrief both bidders about the process and how each proposal fared in the evaluation.

    The Boeing Company (NYSE: BA) complained about the delay and filed a request to receive an immediate debriefing. According to Mark McGraw, vice president – 767 tanker programs, their proposal should have been lower than the competitor, “Based on values disclosed in the Air Force press conference and press release, the Boeing bid, comprising development and all production airplane costs, would appear to be less than the competitor” he said. Boeing viewed the tanker competition as ‘must win’ top priority program. “We bid aggressively with specific focus on providing operational tanker capability at low risk and the lowest total life cycle cost,” said McGraw. Boeing hints that there may have been factors beyond those stated in the RFP, or weighted differently than originally planned, during the evaluation and decision process. “It’s important for us to understand how the Air Force reached their conclusion” said McGraw.

    Following a debriefing on the decision by the Air Force on March 7, 2008 Boeing officials spent three days reviewing the Air Force case for its tanker award. A rigorous analysis of the Air Force evaluation that resulted in the Northrop/EADS contract led Boeing to the conclusion that a protest was necessary. Based on the review Boeing announced it plans to file a protest asking the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to review the Air Forces’ decision. “Based upon what we have seen, we continue to believe we submitted the most capable, lowest risk, lowest Most Probable Life Cycle Cost airplane as measured against the Air Force’s Request for Proposal,” Jim McNerney, Boeing chairman, president and chief executive officer. “We look forward to the GAO’s review of the decision.”

    Following the certification of the Japanese KC-767 tanker, Boeing delivered two KC-767 aerial refuelling aircraft to the Itochu Corp. for Japan’s Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF). Japan has ordered four convertible freighter 767s, providing flexibility in carrying cargo or passengers while maintaining its primary role as an aerial refueling tanker. It features Boeing’s advanced aerial refueling boom and Remote Aerial Refueling Operator (RARO II) system. Boeing is scheduled to deliver the remaining two refueling aircraft in 2009 and 2010. Italy has also fur KC-767 on order. The first is scheduled for delivery this year.

    Boeing recently delivered the first two KC-767 tankers to Japan. Photo: Boeing

    Skunk Works and XTEND Simplify Multi-Drone Command

    0
    Lockheed Martin Skunk Works® and XTEND have achieved a major milestone in JADC2 by integrating the XOS operating system with the MDCX™ autonomy platform. This technical breakthrough enables a single operator to simultaneously command multiple drone classes, eliminating the friction of mission handoffs. From "marsupial" drone deployments to operating in GPS-denied environments, explore how this collaboration is abbreviating the data-to-decision timeline and redefining autonomous mission execution.

    From Ukraine to Taiwan: The Global Race to Dominate the New Defense Tech Frontier

    0
    As traditional defense primes face mounting competition from agile “neoprimes” such as Anduril, Palantir and Helsing, the balance of innovation is shifting toward software-defined warfare and scalable, dual-use technologies, while global industry consolidation—marked by Boeing’s integration of Spirit AeroSystems and other strategic mergers—signals an intensified race to secure control over the defense technology value chain. Our Defense-Tech weekly report highlights these trends.

    Europe’s “Drone Wall”

    0
    In early October 2025, a coordinated wave of unmanned aerial system (UAS) incursions—widely attributed to Russia—targeted critical infrastructure across at least ten European nations. The unprecedented campaign exposed the fragility of Europe’s air defenses...

    Weekly Defense Update & Global Security Assessment

    0
    Executive Summary The past week (September 18-25, 2025) represents an inflection point where strategic defense concepts have transitioned from doctrine to tangible reality. An analysis of global events reveals four primary, interconnected trends shaping an...

    U.S. Air and Space Forces Push Next-Gen Programs at the AS&C 2025 Conference and...

    0
    At the 2025 Air, Space & Cyber Conference, U.S. Air Force and Space Force leaders unveiled major updates on next-generation fighters, bombers, unmanned systems, and space initiatives, highlighting both rapid innovation and critical readiness challenges as the services race to outpace global competitors. A short version is available here, with a more detailed version for subscribers.

    TADTE 2025: Reflecting Taiwan’s Strategic Themes

    0
    The Taipei Aerospace & Defense Technology Exhibition (TADTE) 2025 crystallized around four dominant strategic themes that collectively illustrate Taiwan's comprehensive approach to defense modernization amid escalating regional tensions. Based on a detailed report by Pleronix (available upon request). Includes a Podcast discussion on TADTE 2025's highlighting Taiwan's four strategic themes beyond the post's coverage.

    Iron Beam 450 Completes Testing, Soon to Join With Operational Air Defense Units

    0
    Israel’s Iron Beam 450 high-power laser system has completed final testing, marking a major leap in air defense. Developed by Rafael, it offers precise, cost-effective interception of rockets, UAVs, and mortars, and is set for IDF deployment by 2025.