Friday, December 19, 2025
More
    Home Blog Page 357

    ChemBio/Radiological Terror: A Threat Warning from Al Qaeda

    On Friday, August 10, US security Authorities were taking extra counterterrorism precautions in response to what they said was an unsubstantiated radiological threat to the New York City. NYPD deployed special sensors on street, water and air patrols, and were stopping vehicles at checkpoints in lower Manhattan and on bridges and tunnels entering the city. In an effort to prevent panic, New York Deputy Police Commissioner Paul J. Browne called the measures “strictly precautionary”, but the news nevertheless spread like wildfire.

    According to a report published by the Jerusalem Post, an Israeli web site reported that a video released last Sunday allegedly featured an al Qaeda spokesman, Californian-born Adam Gaddahn, also known as Azzan al-Amriki, who is wanted by the FBI, who warned of an attack, by means of trucks loaded with radioactive material, targeted against American financial nerve centers. The source, named DebkaFile, is usually reporting from seemingly well placed sources within the Israeli Military and Intelligence Communities, but cannot always be relied-on for accurate, non-speculative nature information.

    Alledged Al Qaeda spokesman Adam Gaddahn, aka Azzan al-Amriki is wanted by the FBI.In fact, Israeli counter-terror sources and even DebkaFile’s monitors have already said that there is no way of gauging for sure how serious these threats are, how real, or whether they are not part of a war of nerves to give the Gaddahn tape “extra mileage”. But, sources indicate, it should be important to note that the exchange of messages took place over al Qaeda’s internal Internet sites which contained the threat of radioactive terror, pointing to specific American cities for the first time, after a long silence on such subjects.

    “We are closely monitoring the situation,” said Homeland Security Department spokesman Russ Knocke. “There continues to be no credible information telling us that there’s a threat to the homeland at this time.” But New York has remained on an orange alert – the second highest such level, below red -since the September 11, 2001, attacks that destroyed the World Trade Center. A spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security in Washington said the threat to New York was “unsubstantiated” and there was “no credible information telling us there is an imminent threat to the homeland at this time.”

    Nevertheless, separate reports, by the US Department of Homeland Security and the Canadian Border Services Agency have each recently issued security notices alerting law enforcement officials to border-crossing issues, including illicit smuggling tunnels. Canadian official have also issued a warning that “several counterfeit visas have been intercepted at Toronto Pearson International Airport.” No further details were released.


    The Threat of Bio-chemical and radiological terrorism

    But whether the present threat is real or not, for the time being- the acute danger of bio-chemical and radiological terrorism is certainly building up, creating sleepless nights to international anti-terrorist agencies. And not enough attention is apparently given by national political decision-makers to this highly lethal threat.

    In a recent report, published in the Israeli Daily Haaretz, veteran reporter Yossi Melman, reveals the sad state of biological security in Israel, as evidenced by the absence of appropriate legislation and a supreme government authority keeping track of what is being done, to prepare the nation against this horrifying threat. According to Melman, Prof. Ethan Rubinstein conducted a study in which he tried to examine the resistance of anthrax microbes to antibiotics. They published the results of their study, of producing antibiotic-resistant anthrax microbes, in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

    “The study lit a warning light,” says Colonel (res.) Dr. David Friedman, the Defense Ministry expert on biological and chemical warfare. “It could be an example of a research study that is liable to be labeled sensitive.” The dream of every terror organization or enemy country is to get their hands on anthrax microbes against which there is no effective antibiotic or vaccine.

    But Anthrax research is only one example of the danger that bioterrorism threatens not only Israel, but th rest of the free world. If terrorists can get their hands on highly toxic material and turn these into lethal warfare elements, the danger to society can become catastrophic. Dr. Friedman, who is a biologist by training, was involved in R&D in the Israel Defense Forces and the Defense Ministry’s R&D. He also served as a representative of the counter-terrorism unit on a special counter-terrorism steering committee established jointly in late 2005, at the department in the National Security Council in the Prime Minister’s Office and the Israeli National Academy of Sciences. The Israel Biological Institute is one of the most clandestine research institutions in the country, where, according to foreign publications, Israel is developing chemical and biological weapons countermeasures.

    In a recent nationwide large-scale civil defense drill, anti-terrorist security forces featured a response to a mock chemical terror strike at a school in Ramat GanNevertheless, Israel may already be preparing at last to face the threat of this kind of unconventional warfare. In a recent nationwide large-scale civil defense drill, anti-terrorist security forces featured a response to a mock chemical terror strike at a school in Ramat Gan. The scenario envisioned a group of terrorists breaking into the school and attacking with a chemical that caused symptoms such as sweating and breathing difficulty. Officials mentioned this being the first of following drills by the Home Front Command.

    According to western intelligence sources, Al Qaeda has obtained access to anthrax since already in 1997. Dr. Ayman Zawahiri’s right-hand man confessed that the organization had succeeded in obtaining anthrax and intended to use it against US targets. In 2001, CNN reporter Mike Boettcher indicated the capture of an Al Qaeda bioterrorism manual with chemical formulas and “step-by-step instructions in the manufacture of deadly biological weapons. The Biological warfare sections of the manual, give exact formulas for the production of deadly toxins botulinum and ricin, although there’s no evidence of instructions on how to make or distribute anthrax.

    There is no doubt that Al Qaeda has shown an eagerness to use whatever weapons it can obtain against American targets in its terrorist operations, and that makes its efforts to acquire chemical and biological weapons particularly worrisome to United States intelligence officials. The official intelligence assessment is that Al Qaeda has a ”crude chemical and possibly biological capability,” a Pentagon official said recently. In fact, American intelligence officials reported after the 2001 Afghanistan war, that Al Qaeda had already experimented with cyanide gas at a crude chemical weapons research laboratory in Derunta, a small village near the eastern Afghan city of Jalalabad.

    There are intelligence reports showing the possible production of small quantities of cyanide gas providing the strongest indication received of Al Qaeda’s success in its efforts to develop chemical weapons. According to US military intelligence, another fertilizer plant was found in Mazar-i-Sharif, which the Northern Alliance captured during the war, which had allegedly been under the control of the Taliban and Al Qaeda, but had also used by Osama bin Laden and his organization, because its equipment could produce either biological or chemical weapons grade material.

    That a biological, chemical and radiological terrorist threat is real goes to show without doubt in a December 2004 jihadist website slogan “Dirty bombs for a dirty nation”. Its author, veteran Syrian jihadist named Mustafa Setmariam Nasar, complained that the brutal attack on the New York World Trade Center in 9/11 could have been much more “effective” if the planes were laden with weapons of mass destruction. He proposed that future attacks be carried out with deadly “dirty Bomb” material. His warning should be given serious attention if the West wishes to prevent a new catastrophe.

    Precision Aerial Delivery Mission Planning (PADS-MP)

    The Precision Aerial Delivery System’s Mission Planner enables aircrews to plan and initiate load release at a precise Computed Air Release Point (CARP), or within a Launch Acceptance Region (LAR), through application of accurate, Precision Aerial Delivery component modeling. The system was developed in the past six years under contract for the US Air Force, in coordination wit the US Army.

    Over 60 systems have been delivered to US Air Mobility Command and other DoD units. Additional systems are in production to assist in high-altitude airdrop operations and precision personnel insertions. The model parameters include aircraft position, altitude, airspeed, heading, ground speed, course, onboard load position, roll-out/exit time, decelerator opening time, trajectory to stabilization and descent rate. Descent trajectory is calculated to each of the planned points of impact, compensated with environmental effects such as atmospheric pressure, three-dimensional wind and density information measured by dropsonde deployed from the aircraft just before the cargo.

    The mission planner is used to program the drop and target altitudes, steering waypoints, wind magnitude and directions as a function of altitude, opening altitudes, and GPS “hot start” information. Mission planning is done before the flight. Information can be updated in-flight and just before the drop, from the aircraft avionics and from dropsondes and manually, using wireless link. This integrated technology allows rapid pre-flight programming and in-flight mission, threat, and terrain/environment changes for immediate reaction by the user. The mission planner uses a Panasonic CF-29 Tough Book laptop computer with specially ruggedized ‘high altitude’ hard drive.

    A New Weapons Bonanza Rocks the Middle East

    It will probably become the largest arms deal in the history of the volatile Middle East: Advanced US weapons systems worth a total of about $40 billion will be sold over the next 15 years to America’s allies in the region. Washington’s main objective seems to create a strategic military balance vis-à-vis the rise of Russia’s supported Iran, while curbing the erosion in the Bush administration’s regional standing – which may escalate further following a withdrawal from Iraq, in a down-scaling military presence process, inflaming an already highly tension-filled region.

    In a situation, which brings back memories of a long-gone superpower “Cold War” conflict era, Moscow is also ready to sign its largest arms deal in 30 years, promising to deliver billion dollars worth in warplanes, refueling tankers and sophisticated military hardware to its clients in Iran and Syria. The deal, offered to Tehran’s Islamic fundamentalist cleric regime includes no less than 250 Sukhoi Su-30 long-range strike fighters, having maximum range of 3,000 km, but Tehran also wishes to augment the purchase by adding refueling tankers that will increase the jet fighter’s range to 8,000 km. The Russians churned out the Sukhoi SU-30 to compete with the first class USAF Boeing F-15E long range, heavy payload/ multi-role fighter jet.


    Meanwhile, Moscow’s respected business daily Kommersant reported that Russia’s arms trading monopoly Rosoboronexport has begun to fulfill an arms deal which was secretly signed with Syria earlier this year to selling five MiG-31E (Foxhound) jet fighters, considered one of the best in the world, with an additionally unspecified number of the newest Russian MiG-29M/M2 fighters.

    These purchases should substantially enhance the Syrian and Iranian air force capabilities against Israel, the US and coalition air forces, in a future conflict situation. According to intelligence assessments, the arms deal could signify a Russian response to the US decision to sell thousands of Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) units to Saudi Arabia, a technology that upgrades free-fall bombs into guided smart bombs, which could be used in potentially deterrent air strikes against Iranian nuclear project targets.

    The crucial question asked by analysts is why both Moscow and Washington have chosen the present time for such earth-shaking, high-profile hand-outs to their respective clientele in this region. Is the bilateral tension, fueled recently by the Bush and Putin over the planned forward deployed missile defenses, actually getting out of control and emerging into a repeat performance of a mutual arms race- Cold War style? Are there even more sinister, political and strategic considerations at stake here? Or could it be, that Moscow has a strategic interest to support a Shi’ite axis, in order to enhance its presence in the oil rich region, to counter the currently forming Sunni pact, under Washington’s sponsorship? Only time will tell, as this strange turn of events is shaping into a new strategic reality. One thing is certain, neither of these answers are boding well for this highly explosive region, with its military hardware arsenals already filled to the brim with the latest destructive weapon systems, that petro-dollars can buy.

    But there might well be a much more simplistic reason behind this unfolding weapons Bonaza! The one to raise this in a tongue-in-cheek announcement last week was none other than Iran’s own Defense Minister Mostapha Mohammad Najjar who frankly said that the US is waging an arms race in the region to prevent its “big arms companies from going bankrupt”! Moreover, the minister openly admitted, that Iran is not worried by “Muslim, friendly and brother” countries’ efforts to strengthen their defensive capabilities,” adding that a boost in their defensive power is bolstering the defensive capabilities of the Islamic world. There can be no clearer statement to emphasize the sheer stupidity of such an irresponsible move by two shortsighted world leaders, recklessly inflaming this volatile powder keg with more destructive war machines.

    However there are other issues, no less crucial and equally dangerous to this region, which must be considered under the present trend. There has been a surprising diplomatic flurry from Saudi Arabia since early this year, when the aftermath of Israel’s war against the Tehran-backed Hezbollah, served as a wake-up call. The so-called “Shi’ite Crescent”, is currently challenging Muslim-Sunni domination of the Middle East, traditionally led by Saudi Arabia. The result was that Rhiyad emerged as high-profile sponsor of an inter-Palestinian dispute, between Hamas (supported by Iran) and Fatah, which desperately seek recognition by the “moderate” Arab world, sofar without avail. The other issue which worried the Saudi Kingdom was the fate of Lebanon, which seemed, earlier this year on the verge of falling into the trap set by the shrewd President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s Shi’ite expansionist ambitions. Saudi King Abdulla bluntly told the Iranian president, on his visit yo Rhiyad, to “stop meddling in Lebanon’s political affairs” this being Saudi Arabia’s domain. Rhiyad also sponsored the, alas, shortlived unification between Abu Mazen and Ismail Haniyeh’s rival factions, which unfortunately escalated into Hamastan in the chaotic Gaza Strip enclave.

    Washington’s latest, perhaps last attempt to solve the insoluble Israel-Palestinian conflict started this week, with US Foreign Secretary Condoleezza Rice’s visit to the region, preparing the Bush initiated Arab-Israeli summit, upon which the already hard-pressed US President is placing high, but quite unrealistic hopes.

    In fact, any attempts by Washington to present Saudi Arabia as a moderate Arab nation backing the moderate Abbas regime in Ramallah and placing this highly complex issue into an inter-Arab context, are misleading. Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal said clearly that a precondition of its attendance was that the conference tackles the four big “final status” issues that had bedeviled peace negotiators since 1979. However, he stressed, “We are interested in the peace conference, one that deals with the heart of the peace process, the issues of peace, the core issues, not one that is just a podium for meetings and talk that do not enrich peace.” Without guarantees that the conference will address these issues, therefore, Saudi delegates are most unlikely to attend. In fact, as the United States looks to regional actors for support on Iraq, Iran and Israeli-Palestinian issues, it will find that Riyadh is not going to play its assigned role. While President George W. Bush’s administration faces long odds on these issues already, the Saudi position makes the prospect for success even less likely. Perhaps Mr Bush’s hopes gaining Riyadh’s goodwill by his “friendly” arms package?

    Israel’s foreign minister, Tzipi Livni said on Wednesday during meetings with the US Secretary, who flew to Jerusalem after talks with the Saudis in Jedda, that while Israel welcomed the latest Saudi comments, their precondition may not be so easy to meet. A clear understatement, perhaps diplomatically set so, to meet the circumstances prevailing in Jerusalem on the visit.

    Under the intricate circumstances that have existed in past attempts to try and break the deadlock in the political impasse between Israel and its Palestinian neighbors, all efforts failed, when preconditions were set by any of the Arab parties, which Israel could not accept without committing political, if not sheer strategic suicide. A major stumbling block to any possible constructive dialogue would be the continued exclusion of Damascus, into any negotiation process. Without Syria, or even Hamas being involved, there will be no substance to any decisions reached in the forthcoming summit, nor can neither Olmert nor Abbas by themselves implement any decisive moves. Olmert has neither public, nor political backing for a major dramatic step, while Abbas merely represents a minor part of the Palestinian people, even in the West bank, not to mention the Gaza Strip’s one and half million people of his Palestine. Even thinking about a Palestinian state under such conditions is only wishful thinking, if not a waste of time. Syria is the key to any future peace agreement with Israel and as long as it remains isolated there will be no relaxing of the tension in the north, with either Hezbollah or Syria and Iran’s dangerous meddling in Lebanese affairs.

    President Bush’s present aspirations will backfire, just as his vision for a democratic Middle East has already taught Washington the stark realities of the Orient. The only way that any substantial effort might eventually pay off, is through a new situation in which dominant leaders, calibers like Ariel Sharon, Yizhak Rabin in Israel, and charismatic statesmen in Palestine, will negotiate directly face-to-face, without outsiders trying to mediate, by involving their own interests. Sofar any such leaders are unfortunately not in sight on either side.

    But what is most worrying to the regional leaders is the real reason behind George Bush’s latest gesture and, more important, what strings are attached on Washington’s magnanimous gift package?

    In yesterday’s news a minor report was filed by the U.S. 5th Fleet’s headquarters in Bahrain confirming that the USS John C. Stennis and the USS Nimitz carrier groups were returning to their home ports of Bremerton, Washington, and San Diego, California while the USS Eisenhower entered the area. This indicates that the Navy is scaling down its Gulf presence, for at least three months, until USS Harry S. Truman is deployed in the fall. Is this a first indication that Washington intends to leave the region to fend for itself against a future Nuclear Iran, by filling the local arsenals with high profile weapons and then get out from this self-made quagmire, as Bush’s predecessors did decades ago from Vietnam?

    But such a massive arms deal with even “moderate” Arab nations has its inherent danger, which cannot be overlooked. A radical Islam is already threatening to undermine the stability of secular Arab regimes and the real danger of radicals taking over sophisticated weapons systems is more than realistic. It happened already in Iran and Hamastan and could also happen in Saudi Arabia or even Egypt.
    Former Israeli ambassador to the UN Dore Gold and an expert on Mid Eastern affairs mentioned that al Qaeda has already penetrated different branches of Saudi Armed forces. Attempts by Saudi security forces to quell al-Qaeda in the Kingdom, have only been partial and the threat exists. In Fact, large parts of Saudi Arabia have become a hot house for radical Sunni Islam.

    According to Dr Gold:. “The current radical Islamic wave that Western alliance is facing has two sources. First, the Islamic revolution in Iran led by Ayatollah Khamenei. And the second is the rise of al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, much of which is backed by Saudi Arabia. Therefore an effective counter-strategy has to take into account both sources of the problem,” Dr Gold said, “when it comes to Saudi Arabia, the Israeli government suffers from a certain myopia, forgetting that in the 9/11 attacks, 15 of the 19 terrorists were Saudis, and that up until recently, Saudi Arabia was the primary founder of Hamas during the high point of the suicide bombing attacks against Israel ” Dr. Gold added.

    No doubt the present arms race will continue in this most volatile region in the world, with Moscow’s Putin providing highly lethal weapons to the reckless leader who supports al Qaeda, Hezbollah, and Hamas, and who has made his plans for holy war, not only public knowledge, but a messianic ambition.

    Marine Corps Systems Command Launches MRAP II Solicitation

    As enemy threats to warfighters evolve, the technology used to protect the troops in the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) is evolving as well. Last week the US Marine Corps released a solicitation to the industry, asking for proposals for even more capable MRAPs. Currently, more than 5,690 MRAPs have been ordered. About 210 vehicles are already operational in theater. The new vehicle is required to offer higher protection than the current models, particularly from advanced threats. Furthermore, the new solicitation is designed to provide the Joint Program Management Office with flexibility increasing production capability and providing vehicles with enhance protection and performance to meet future near-term requirements.


    Earlier in 2007 the US Marine Corps awarded production contracts to eight manufacturers, each producing four Mine Resistant Armor Protected (MRAP) vehicles for trials. Currently, more than 5,690 of the vehicles have been ordered under the initial MRAP vehicle program solicitation. About 210 vehicles are already operational in theater. Up to 8,000 vehicles are slated to be ordered through current and requested fiscal 2008 funding. The MRAP vehicle’s V-shaped hull and raised chassis have proven to protect troops from improvised explosive devices, small-arms fire and mines.

    However, as enemy threats to warfighters evolve, the technology used to protect the troops must evolve as well. In a request for proposal released on July 31, 2007, the Marine Corps is asking industry again to propose even more capable MRAPs.

    Vehicles procured through this second solicitation must meet enhanced requirements determined by commanders in the field. MRAP IIs will de designed for the same categories and roles defined for MRAP I program. “MRAP II continues our need to exploit every opportunity to deliver force protection,” said Paul Mann, Joint MRAP program manager. “It builds on the acquisition velocity in process now and enables industry to help us deliver improved solutions in support of battlefield commanders.” The MRAP II solicitation is designed to provide the Joint Program Management Office with flexibility increasing production capability and providing vehicles with enhance protection and performance to meet future near-term requirements.

    Orders for vehicles will continue to be placed under the MRAP I program until production verification of MRAP II vehicles is determined. Manufacturers have until Sept. 17 to respond to the MRAP II solicitation.

    Four manufacturers, International Military and Governance LLC, Armor Holdings, BAE Land Systems and Force Protection Industries, Inc., are primarily tasked with production of those vehicles and it is expected that more producers will join the program in its next phase. Some like Oshkosh and Ceradyne have already teamed for the new program. PVI is also expected to become a more substantial player in the next program, with its new production lines gearing up and new armoring materials are matured.

    Guided Naval Gun Projectiles

    Finmeccanica is developing two types of precision guided projectiles for naval guns, the DAVIDE, designed as a high velocity anti-aircraft munition for the Oto-Melara 76mm naval gun while Vulcano is designed for precision land attack missions, for the 127mm gun.

    The system utilizes the Driven Ammunition Reduced Time of Flight (DART) concept, with muzzle velocity of 1200 m/sec, the system enables effective interception of aerial and missile targets at ranges beyond 5 km, and up to 35 km, in shore bombardments. Davide is equipped canard control section, enabling the projectile to maneuver at loads of up to 40 gs, It is fitted with a high explosive warhead, encased inside a pre-engraved fragmentation case and is activated by a proximity microwave fuze. The system can be used as add-on to existing 76/62 mm naval guns.

    76mm High Velocity, Anti-Air Munition DAVIDE
    Vulcano Long Range 127mm Projectile

    Vulcano represents a new family of Long Range Ammunition for the 127mm naval guns. Its primary role will be in naval fire support for shore bombardments. Vulcano provides range enhancement by increasing muzzle velocity without using rocket assist, thus preserving barrel life. Vulcano will be compatible with 127/54, 127/64and 5″/54 naval guns and 155mm land based artillery. The Vulcano family will include unguided, extended range ammunition (70 km range), with multifunctional programmable proximity fuze, a precision attack, terminally guided version, with an infrared seeker for the engagement of surface naval targets at ranges beyond 70 kilometers, and an autonomous GPS/IMU guided ammunition capable of engaging land based surface targets at a range beyond 100 km, with a precision better than 20meters CEP. for long range, precision land attack missions.

    Broad Area Persistent Surveillance System

    The Broad Area Persistent Surveillance System, an advanced ISR application covering a wide area with imaging sensors is being developed by ITT for area surveillance and force protection applications. According to the manufacturer, the unmanned paraglider is providing an ideal platform for this application. The system collects individual, high resolution still images at a rate of two frames per second, creating a mosaic of 14 pictures depicting a ‘region’, defined by one 66 Megapixel image.

    Enhanced with time stamps and location metadata the images are compressed ‘on the fly’ using multiple JPEG 2000 compression boards, where they are also merged into wide area ‘mosaic’ and are stored on board. Within seven seconds users can download an entire region from the airborne image server, using standard communication link. Users can pull whole regions directly from the airborne image server, with full resolution.

    The airborne image server offers users the ability to view the scene in real-time, and also compare it to historical views of the targets, as well as the ability to conduct activity pattern and ‘forensic backtracking’ analysis (for example, tracking back a suicide bomber from the location where he exploded himself to the places and people he associated with prior to the attack). Replay, rewind and ‘fast forward’ can be processed on videos presented immediately after a video is taken, providing analysts valuable tools for situational awareness and investigation.

    The platform uses scalable multi-camera arrays offering continuous coverage of large areas offering broad area situational awareness, forensic backtracking of specific events and ‘drill down’ into specific areas of interest.

    6.3 billions in Multiyear Awards Complete Funding for 183 Raptors

    The US Air Force awarded Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) an additional $5 billion from the U.S. Air Force for the production of three lots of F-22 Raptor air dominance fighters from the year 2008 through 2011. The current award brings the total multi-year F-22 contract value to $7.3 billion and extends the production of the aircraft through the year 2011.

    The U.S. government previously awarded $2.3 billion of the contract to buy long lead- time parts and maintain continuous manufacturing flow. The air force also awarded a $1.3 billion multiyear contract to Pratt & Whitney to produce the Raptor’s F119 engines. Two F119 engines enable the F-22 to supercruise or achieve supersonic speeds without the use of the afterburner.

    “The multi-year contract allows us to generate savings for the taxpayer and continue to deliver the most capable aircraft in the world to the men and women defending our nation,” said Larry Lawson, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics executive vice president and F-22 program general manager. A recent RAND Corporation study, the multi-year contract is estimated to save approximately $400 million over Lots 7, 8 and 9 (60 aircraft), compared to a corresponding annual procurement program. This equates to a savings of $6.85 million per aircraft.

    The F-22 is produced in partnership with Boeing and Pratt & Whitney with parts and subsystems provided by nearly 1,000 suppliers in 44 U.S. states. F-22 production takes place at Lockheed Martin Aeronautics facilities in Marietta, Ga.; Fort Worth, Tex.; Palmdale, Calif.; and Meridian, Miss., as well as at Boeing’s plant in Seattle, Wash. Final assembly and initial flight testing of the Raptor occur in Marietta. Currently, Raptors are being built at a rate of approximately two per month. The multiyear procurement will sustain a production rate of 20 per year, with deliveries starting in late 2008. That plan will bring the total F-22 buy to 183 aircraft, the most allowed under the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review findings. To date, 105 Raptors have completed final assembly at the Lockheed Martin facility in Marietta, Ga. So far, 99 Raptors have been delivered to the Air Force.

    British Army Evaluates Boxer, VBCI and Pirhana FRES Utility Variant

    The British Ministry of Defense (MoD) Future Rapid Effect System (FRES) program office is conducting evaluation trials of three wheeled armored vehicles considered for the FRES Utility Vehicle role. The Boxer, Piranha and VBCI are put through their paces at the Bovington training area as part of trials for a FRES Utility Vehicle Variant (UVV).

    Based on these trials the Army will decide on the winning design to be used with the future program. The FRES program will equip the UK Armed Forces with over 3,000 new medium weight armored, air-transportable vehicles configured for reconnaissance, direct fire, and maneuver support roles.

    The candidate vehicles are the Boxer, produced by the Dutch-German ARTEC consortium; Piranha, a Mowag design presented by General Dynamics UK; and the VBCI (Véhicule Blindé de Combat d’Infanterie, or “Armoured vehicle for infantry combat”) produced by the French company Nexter. The trials have involved the candidate vehicles being evaluated by technical experts and soldiers.

    Northrop Grumman to Build an Unmanned Combat Aircraft for the US Navy

    Northrop Grumman (NYSE: NOC) won a $635 million US Navy contract to build a Carrier-based (CV) Unmanned Combat Air System Demonstration vehicle (UCAS-D). The program will mature critical carrier suitability technologies for future low observable unmanned combat platforms. Once proving these capabilities, the Navy is expected to launch a full scale development of a future UCAV, which could be fielded by 2018.


    As a stealth aircraft, UCAS-D will complement the carrier-based version of the Joint Strike Fighter (F-35C), it will be operated by the US Navy, UCAS will become the carrier task force’s “first day of the war” asset, similar to way B-2 and F-117 are used by the US Air Force. As a refuellable unmanned platform it will provide the Navy with persistent capability over selected, high value targets in the future battlespace, providing real-time targeting data for weapons launched from other platforms, or direct attack by weapons carried on board. The unmanned combat aircraft will have the capability to acquire targets at high precision, designate fixed or moving targets, strike them with precision guided weapons and collect and disseminate post strike information.

    X-47B - artist impression. Photo: Northrop GrummanThe US Navy UCAS program was born from the former Joint Unmanned Combat Air Systems (J-UCAS) program sponsored by DARPA. For this program Boeing developed the X-45 while Northrop Grumman developed the X-47 UCAV demonstrators. The Navy’s UCAS is focusing on a strike-fighter sized unmanned air vehicle which will demonstrate carrier flight operations. Testing is scheduled to begin by mid 2010 and culminate with carrier flight operations in 2013. The tests will involve shipboard operation, including catapult takeoffs, arrested landings and flight in the immediate vicinity of an aircraft carrier. The air vehicle will not carry weapons.

    “This specific contract is for technology development and demonstration and will not be an operational system” explained Navy Capt. Rich Brasel, program manager for NAVAIR’s technology demonstration effort here. “But through it, we will develop knowledge, skills and technologies specific to operating an autonomous low-observable unmanned air vehicle in an aircraft carrier environment. This is a critical step in efforts to develop future Naval Aviation combat capabilities.”

    Subsequently, following the successful conclusion of these trials, a full-scale development program will be launched, with a targeted service entry date in 2018.

    The X-47B will be capable of operating at altitudes from sea level up to over 40,000 ft, at a combat radius of 1,500 nm (on ISR missions) flying at high subsonic cruise speed. It will be able to carry up to 4,500 lbs of payload (2,045 internally). The UCAS-D will be equipped with various sensors including electro-optical infrared (EO/IR), Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) with ground moving target indication (GMI) capability, electronic support measures (ESM), and others. Unmanned combat aircraft are expected to be used for intelligence, surveillance, targeting and reconnaissance (ISTAR) missions, long range precision strikes, suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD), close air support, electronic attack, and information operations.
    X-47B - artist impression. Photo: Northrop Grumman

    Italian Air Force Receives First Enhanced Typhoons

    The first of the five block 5 Eurofighter Typhoons ordered for the Italian Air Force has entered into service. All five aircraft will be delivered this year, as part of 29 aircraft tranche 1 production series, envisaged for the Italian Air Force. Block 5 Typhoon represents the final standard of the tranche 1, as well as additional features of the initial configuration of the second production batch, whose deliveries are planned starting from 2008. Later on, this standard will be implemented in all Italian Air Force Typhoons. Currently two aircraft are undergoing retrofit at Alenia Aeronautica’s Caselle plant, the first aircraft is slated for delivery by the first quarter of 2008.


    It is the first Typhoon to be equipped with the “Pirate”, passive, infrared search and track system made by a consortium of companies led by Galileo Avionica, a Finmeccanica company. The Pirate (Passive Infra-Red Airborne Tracking Equipment) combines the functions of the FLIR infra-red system (Forward Looking Infra-Red) and of the IRST system (Infra Red Search and Track), able to search, detect and track potential targets. The system operates in a passive mode, without emitting signals which might reveal the aircraft’s presence.

    Galileo Avionica is the prime contractor of the EuroFirst Consortium which also includes Thales in the UK and Tecnobit in Spain. In 2006, the consortium was awarded with a contract valued around 200 million euros to supply 200 PIRATE systems for the some Tranch 1 and Tranche 2 Eurofighter Typhoons.

    Other improvements associated with Block 5 includes the installation of an Instrumental Landing System (ILS) for all visibility conditions landings and the Enhanced Weapon Training Facility, offering an integrated training system built into the aircraft cockpit, providing the pilot with the simulated presence and operation of external loads such as weapons and stores, such as air-to-air missiles, or guided weapons, without actually carrying or dropping the hardware.

    The new version fully utilizes the Typhoon’s digital flight controls system, hence improving maximum load flight envelope to 9g at subsonic speed and up to 7 g for the supersonic speed.

    In the air-to-air mode, the new Block introduces evolved integration of the new-generation air-to-air ASRAAM missile. The aircraft radar now offers air-to-ground functionality and the aircraft is cleared to carry and drop laser guided weapons, including GBU-10 and 16 Paveway II. However, this capability has not been fielded yet with the new Italian Air Force Typhoons.

    SkyForce – Multi-UAV Control System

    SkyForce DMS consists of Proxy’s mission-oriented software system, a primary mission-management ground control station and mobile ground control user terminals. Together, these elements are designed to control up to 12 fully autonomous air vehicles engaging in concurrent, cooperative flight. With SkyForce DMS, each UAV has the ability to make fully independent decisions during flight, contributing to the group tactical goal, without any human intervention. This fact makes it completely different from any UAV system on the market today.

    The United States Air Force UAV Battlelab is using the SkyForce to evaluate cooperative flight of several unmanned aircraft flying in constellation formation, while simultaneously distributing sensor control and viewing capability among multiple end users.

    The cooperative constellation demonstrated adaptive autonomy using SkyForce DMS and the Virtual Pilot capability that are key software components of the SkyForce system.

    Was Damascus meeting preparation for Shrewd anti-Siniora coup?

    Hezbollah is attempting in vain, at least sofar, to bring down the Government of Lebanon, at the behest of its allies, Syria and Iran. The assassination of Industry Minister, Pierre Gemayel, a Maronite Christian, on 21 November 2006, added boost to the story, the general assumption being that this act was prelude of an ongoing “coup” action plan. For months, Hezbollah and its compatriots have been seeking a more broadly based Lebanese government – a government of national unity in which Shi’ites would have more say. Failing that, they seek a general election for their objective. Hezbollah and Aoun’s Christian Free Patriotic Movement and their allies have already 56 out of the 128 seats in the Chamber of Deputies, that is, over 40%.

    So a government of national unity representative of the Chamber would give the two groups over a third of the Ministers.

    But things may change soon When Nasrallah asking his audience in a recent rally: “Are you willing to fight the wars of others inside Lebanon?“, accusing the Lebanese army and government of fighting the anti-terror war on behalf of the Americans, and the Lebanese army being “incapable in defending Lebanon” he might well cause General Aoun to break with him. Indeed, while the Lebanese army has not yet succeeded in routing the Syrian-backed Fatah-al Islam uprising in Nahr al Bared camp, its efforts have nevertheless managed to prevent the uprising spreading further south, challenging Fouad Siniora’s Government, which was the prime objective in Damascus. In fact, for the first time in decades, the Lebanese military have clearly demonstrated considerable fortitude in carrying out their task, even in the face of heavy casualties.

    Lebanese PM Fouad Siniora (left) and General Michel Aoun (right)Thus, if this trend by Hezbollah’s leader remains, it would seem logic that General Aoun’s popularity is likely to vanish if he continues to stand behind Nasrallah, giving his Christian followers second thoughts over their strange alliance with Nasrallah’s Shi’ites. In fact, Aoun’s popularity within the Maronite Christian population is still high. This community will no doubt become the main target in any future confrontations with either Sunni extremist factions, or Hezbollah Thus, General Michel Aoun could well opt again for a new volte face to take the helm, saving the community from yet another tragedy. Analysts claim that without a consensus candidate in sight for the presidential election which is to be carried out in parliament, the sole declared runner could be the controversial Michel Aoun, who was exiled in Paris after the war with Syrian troops but returned when they finally withdrew in 2005.

    An Iranian source told the London-based al-Sharq al-Awsat newspaper that during their meeting in Damascus earlier this month, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Syrian President Bashar Assad agreed to boost military and political relations between the two countries. In return for Iran’s military assistance and its promise to back Syria on the Lebanon issue, Assad pledged not to enter into peace talks with Israel. According to the agreement, Ahmadinejad will exert his influence to prevent the Lebanese parliament from convening to elect a new president to replace Emile Lahoud, who will be stepping down in the coming weeks.

    Close Friends: Nasrallah and Ahmedinejad  get together in Damascus after a year of absence.Ahmadinejad also asked Tehran’s protégé Hassan Nasrallah to try and understand that his government was financially squeezed by its preparations for a future conflict and was therefore unable, at the moment, to remit the one million dollars promised to repair the war damage suffered by South Lebanon last year. This was apparently part of the Iranian leader’s discontent with Hezbollah failing him miserably, in disregarding Tehran’s specific instructions over the use of its medium-and long range missile arsenal – which was totally lost during the first days of the so-called “Tamuz” war last summer. According to reports, Nasrallah was visibly taken aback by his sofar loyal sponsor’s rigid stance. Nasrallah claimed that he too was weighed down by the heavy cost of his pledges to the inhabitants of southern Lebanon, from which he might lose support if their situation was not solved within foreseeable time but it seems that Ahmadinejad remained adamant.

    President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who swept to power in 2005, promising to bring oil revenues to every family, is already facing increasing criticism over newly imposed fuel rationing and skyrocketing prices. Domestic discontent is an unwelcome challenge for a president who has his hands full fending off international criticism over Iran’s nuclear program and now also growing discontent over his reckless spending to outsiders, like Syria and Hezbollah, defying hisPresidents Bashar Assad (Syria) and Mhmoud Ahmedinejad (Iran) meet in Damascus last week.instructions. First signs in Iran are evident already, as shortly after raising gasoline prices by 25 percent, the government began fuel rationing, sparking violence in Tehran as angry Iranians smashed shop windows and set fire to a dozen gas stations.

    While the reports from the Damascus summit received little headlines in the Arab world, the al-Sharq al-Awsat item, which was virtually hidden in backpages, quite surprisingly became top news in Israel. Tehran’s immediate denial of the “new arms deal with Damascus”, which was no more than a exaggerated version of an earlier Russian- Syrian rumor spread before the Lebanon war in June 2006, remained ignored. In the meantime, Israeli intelligence seems to have gotten behind the real topic for Ahmadinejad’s surprise visit to Damascus. Although sofar no official version has become available, sources close to intelligence assessments consider the Damascus talks and especially the follow-on meeting in Tehran, to be the real topic discussed between the military leaders. Several reasons seem to back this thesis:

    • The current preparations for a new Middle East summit, sponsored by US President Bush is aimed not only to try and support a Israel-Palestinian peace initiative, but primarily to bolster the creating anti-Iranian (Shi’ite) axis, headed by Saudi Arabia, with other moderate Sunni nations. This new development, which seems to gain momentum these days, must be Ahmadinejad’s top priority issue.
    • The fear over Bashar Assad trying to renew a peace initiative with Israel and withdraw from the Iranian “bear hug” is Ahmadinejad’s second worry. The looming threat over the new UN Tribunal over the assassination of Rafik Hariri must already cause young Bashar sleepless nights.
    • Failure of Hassan Nasrallah’s postwar internal revolution to topple Siniora’s government and thus eliminate Iran’s strategic forward base in South Lebanon, is Tehran’s serious concern and lastly, the Gaza fiasco, of the brutal Hamas takeover, Tehran’s Palestinian protégé, has sofar misfired badly, with Hamas virtually “bottled-up” in Gaza- unable to support its millions of hapless people.

    All this signaling not a very pleasant outlook for Ahmadinejad’s Shi’te Crescent ambitions in the still Sunni Moslem dominated region.

    Returning to the situation in Lebanon – the White House has recently taken the unprecedented step declaring that Syria and Iran, acting through Hezbollah, are on the verge of staging a coup d’etat against the democratically elected government of Fouad Siniora and the assassination of Pierre Gemayel could have been the first shot in that coup.

    A series of recent opinions published in the Lebanese daily Al-Mustaqbal, openly warned of a planned Syrian-Iranian coup in Lebanon. The question asked was: “Were the latest reports over the Damascus talks between Ahmadinejad, Assad and Nasrallah only a disguise for the real thing that the “rogue axis” leaders were planning in Lebanon?


    According to these articles, Hezbollah was planning to launch, in the near future, a new stage in the coup being sponsored secretly by Syria and Iran in Lebanon, during which it would use its weapons on the domestic Lebanese front. The threats by the Lebanese opposition to establish a second government in Lebanon were part of this planned coup, and the coup was to be carried out under the banner of establishing a second government. Unconfirmed reports, close to Israeli military sources, claimed that Hezbollah has moved its short-range Katyusha rockets into built-up areas in southern Lebanon, mostly in Shi’ite villages, or even in Beirut, which experts believe could be fired in an emergency against Siniora’s strongholds.
    Further articles in the free Lebanese press mentioned that Hezbollah’s military preparations fell under several categories:

    • a) Military activity both south and north of the Litani River, in defiance of U.N. Resolution 1701
    • b) Transformation of the Beqa’ region into a military zone, so that it could be used as a war zone in Hezbollah’s next confrontation with Israel and as a frontline in the next war.

    In this context, the articles mentioned several events: a recent military parade in the Beqa’ valley, in which hundreds of Hezbollah activists participated; days-long truck traffic from the northern villages in the Beqa’ towards a village where permanent military positions had been reinstated in several buildings; groups of young people who had gone to train in Iran; and earthworks in Balbeq for installing Hezbollah’s private telephone communications network.

    One of the articles in Al-Mustaqbal asked whether Iran’s involvement in the Lebanon coup was evidence of a change in Iranian policy, which had previously been that everything possible must be done to prevent Sunni-Shi’ite civil war in Lebanon. It read: “The dossier of Iranian-Syrian relations, and Iran’s relations with influential Arab countries, has passed entirely into the hands of Iranian Foreign Minister Manuchehr Mottaki, and Iranian National Security Council Secretary Ali Larijani no longer has anything to do with this issue…

    Shiite Persian Iran is not content with being just an inconsequential pariah. Ahmadinejad’s Iran has grand ambitions. Tehran wants to be the predominant state in the Middle East, replacing the US as the region’s power broker and lording over its Sunni Arab neighbors. With the fall of its most fearsome competitors for regional pre-eminence – Iraq’s Saddam Hussein and Afghanistan’s Taliban – Iran is blatantly purporting itself on the international stage.

    While Hezbollah is threatening to topple Lebanon’s democratically elected government unless it is given additional cabinet seats – potentially rendering it veto power over Beirut’s decisions, Iran would love to add Lebanon to Syria as a client state in its effort to form an arc of Iranian influence across the region.

    One look at a map suffices, to see that the current movements by Iran make lots of sense. Control Syria and Lebanon in the north and gain control of Gaza in the south a classic strategic pincer move. Once they establish control of Iraq they have a choice: Take on Israel, or consolidate the Caliphate first by taking Jordan and then moving southward. If given a free game playground, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad views this as his messianic long term plan. He is not doing this just to cause a present distraction, by spreading rumors and disinformation over his nuclear ambitions, this is his so-called “Caliphate War” and the struggle is already on. It remains to be seen if it will be a Sunni or Shia Caliphate.

    Mk 38 Mod 2 Remotely Controlled Naval Gun

    Photo: BAE Systems

    The Mk 38 Mod 2 main weapon is the M242 25mm Chain Gun, a proven NATO standard cannon with selectable rates of fire. The Mk 38 Mod 2 MGS fires all USN-approved 25mm ammunition at up to 180 rounds per minute, with 168 rounds on-mount. Additionally, the systems’ 4-axis stabilized electro-optical sensor provides round the clock surveillance capability, enhancing the ship’s overall mission effectiveness.

    Photo: BAE Systems

    Nine U.S. Naval ships currently have Mk 38 Mod 2 systems in service and have demonstrated excellent overall performance. The combined Mk 38 Mod 2 Government/contractor team recently completed a major upgrade to bring all mounts up to the current production configuration. Similar systems have been acquired for the Australian Armidale class patrol boats (photo below).

    BAE Systems teamed with RAFAEL Armament Development Authority, Ltd., for the development and production of the Mk 38 Mod 2. The system is assembled and tested at BAE Systems’ Louisville, Kentucky facility.

    EL/M-2248 MF-STAR Naval Multi-Mission Radar

    The MF-STAR is a multi-function S-band solid-state active conformal phased array radar system for the new generation of military ships. As the ship’s primary sensor the radar provides 3D long-range air surveillance. At medium range it will automatically track and classify threat and simultaneously, search the horizon for potential missile threats. In parallel, it supports multiple engagements by offensive and defensive weapons. Designated EL/M-2248 the radar system delivers high quality arena situation picture and weapons support, under the toughest target/environment conditions in the existing and future naval arena.

    Incorporating advanced technology and robust system architecture; the MF-STAR employs multi-beam and pulse Doppler techniques as-well-as robust ECCM techniques to extract fast, low RCS targets from complex clutter and jamming environments.

    Photo: IAI

    EL/M-2248 – MF-STAR is a multi-function solid-state active conformal phased array radar system designed for the new generation of naval vessels designed for both Blue water and Littoral warfare. The system can operate in multiple functions simultaneously, delivering high-quality situation picture, supporting offensive weapons, while performing self-defense and battlegroup protection roles. MF-STAR employs multi-beam and pulse doppler techniques using advanced beam forming techniques embedded with robust ECCM techniques to extract fast, low RCS targets from complex clutter and jamming environments. The agile radar operates in multiple simultaneous modes, offering short search frames and Track While Scan (TWS) revisit time. The system also offers rapid tracking update rate and high accuracy for priority targets. The radar will automatically establish tracks of high flying targets at ranges beyond 250km and at low flying targets, at ranges above of 25 km.

    Weighing about seven tons, the radar uses four flat lightweight antennae operating in the S-band that can be tailored to fit even relatively small ships, from corvettes and above. Hardware architecture and technology ensure high system availability, low maintenance and low life cycle cost.
    For weapons guidance, MF-STAR Supports different operating modes of missile systems including mid-course guidance of active/semi-active anti-air missiles and Illumination enslavement for semi-active missiles, thus making dedicated guidance radar systems redundant. Also incorporates is an automatic splash detection and measurement, to support naval gunnery in maritime security and close-in defense role.

    This radar is currently under development, in anticipation for fielding with the Israel Navy next generation Saar 5+ corvette as well as with other modern vessels, planned for procurement or upgrading by foreign navies. The system is integrated as part of the advanced version of the Barak missile known as Barak-NG and Indian MR-SAM (also designated as Barak 8).

    Elta has already implemented its static phased array radar technology in several programs, including the Phalcon airborne early warning (AEW) system, as well as the early warning radar for the Arrow missile interceptor system, and the new artiller/air defense Multi-Mission Radar.

    Skunk Works and XTEND Simplify Multi-Drone Command

    0
    Lockheed Martin Skunk Works® and XTEND have achieved a major milestone in JADC2 by integrating the XOS operating system with the MDCX™ autonomy platform. This technical breakthrough enables a single operator to simultaneously command multiple drone classes, eliminating the friction of mission handoffs. From "marsupial" drone deployments to operating in GPS-denied environments, explore how this collaboration is abbreviating the data-to-decision timeline and redefining autonomous mission execution.

    From Ukraine to Taiwan: The Global Race to Dominate the New Defense Tech Frontier

    0
    As traditional defense primes face mounting competition from agile “neoprimes” such as Anduril, Palantir and Helsing, the balance of innovation is shifting toward software-defined warfare and scalable, dual-use technologies, while global industry consolidation—marked by Boeing’s integration of Spirit AeroSystems and other strategic mergers—signals an intensified race to secure control over the defense technology value chain. Our Defense-Tech weekly report highlights these trends.

    Europe’s “Drone Wall”

    0
    In early October 2025, a coordinated wave of unmanned aerial system (UAS) incursions—widely attributed to Russia—targeted critical infrastructure across at least ten European nations. The unprecedented campaign exposed the fragility of Europe’s air defenses...

    Weekly Defense Update & Global Security Assessment

    0
    Executive Summary The past week (September 18-25, 2025) represents an inflection point where strategic defense concepts have transitioned from doctrine to tangible reality. An analysis of global events reveals four primary, interconnected trends shaping an...

    U.S. Air and Space Forces Push Next-Gen Programs at the AS&C 2025 Conference and...

    0
    At the 2025 Air, Space & Cyber Conference, U.S. Air Force and Space Force leaders unveiled major updates on next-generation fighters, bombers, unmanned systems, and space initiatives, highlighting both rapid innovation and critical readiness challenges as the services race to outpace global competitors. A short version is available here, with a more detailed version for subscribers.

    TADTE 2025: Reflecting Taiwan’s Strategic Themes

    0
    The Taipei Aerospace & Defense Technology Exhibition (TADTE) 2025 crystallized around four dominant strategic themes that collectively illustrate Taiwan's comprehensive approach to defense modernization amid escalating regional tensions. Based on a detailed report by Pleronix (available upon request). Includes a Podcast discussion on TADTE 2025's highlighting Taiwan's four strategic themes beyond the post's coverage.

    Iron Beam 450 Completes Testing, Soon to Join With Operational Air Defense Units

    0
    Israel’s Iron Beam 450 high-power laser system has completed final testing, marking a major leap in air defense. Developed by Rafael, it offers precise, cost-effective interception of rockets, UAVs, and mortars, and is set for IDF deployment by 2025.