Friday, September 20, 2024
More
    Home Blog Page 359

    Possible joint Russian US anti-missile Defense in Azerbaijan?

    President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia put forth a counter-offer today to President Bush’s proposed missile defense plan, suggesting that instead of building radar defenses in the Czech Republic, the United States should use an existing system in the former Soviet republic of Azerbaijan. With the dispute flaring in recent days into Cold War-style rhetoric and threats from Moscow, Putin’s proposal to put the system in Azerbaijan came as a surprise.


    Putin said the existing radar station, built during Soviet times and leased to Russia for 10 years in 2002, is still held by Russia under a continuing agreement between Russia and Azerbaijan. He argued the benefits of his suggested substitute: An Azerbaijan-based system would cover all of Europe rather than just part of it, and destroyed missile debris would fall in the ocean rather than on land. Azerbaijani Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov said Azerbaijan is currently holding consultations both with Russia and the U.S. on the joint use of the Gabala radar in the north of the country.

    The Gabala radar station, (also called Gabelinskaya) is located at Lyaki, about 300 km to the west of Baku, which Russia leases from Azerbaijan, is the most powerful in the region. It has a range of about 6,000 kilometers (3,700 miles) and enables Russia’s Space Forces to monitor launches of intercontinental ballistic and other missiles in Asia and parts of Africa. Most important is that it covers the entire region of Iran and can become a crucial element in monitoring Tehran’s nuclear and missile activities.

    According to reports, a missile launched from a submarine anywhere in the Indian Ocean will instantly appear on a monitor in the command post of the Gabala station. The equipment of the radar station automatically processes data and gives technical details: speed, size of warheads, launch site, drop trajectory, and the target of the missile. Then this information goes in encoded form to Russian Ministry of Defense HQ. A joint sharing of information can become critical once Iran and other rogue states, reach WMD capability. But there is a price: The radar station covers large portions of valuable of land and the projected power of the station surpassing 350 MW has already created severe ecological problems in Azerbaijan. For example, just one hour of operations at the station already requires 300-400 cubic meters of cooling water. ON top of this twenty-five tones of Freon are used to cool the station’s equipment just once. This gas destroys the ozone layer 500-600 times more than others. a distinct issue, which the present G8 are trying to minimize, mostly in vain.

    A Google earth 3D terrain satellite image of the Gabala radar station.

    See related analysis: Is America Losing its Strategic Hold on Central Asia?

    Hermes 450 UAV

    Thales/Elbit Systems Watchkeeper Photo: Thales UK

    Hermes 450 was selected by the Israeli and British forces to provide Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance (ISTAR) services. In Israeli Hermes 450 is in operational use for about 10 years. Hermes 450 has already accumulated over 20,000 operational flight hours, mostly in combat service with the IDF, where it is used as the primary battlefield reconnaissance platform. The Israeli Air Force designation of the Hermes 450 UAV is “Ziq”. The version designed for the British Army is called WK450 Watchkeeper.

    Photo: Thales UK

    The WK450 Hermes derivative is expected to be fielded by the British Army as part of the Watchkeeper program around 2007. Both systems are using the same configuration of a high wing and V for optimal aerodynamic and mission performance. The aerial vehicle weighs 450 kg on takeoff, capable of carrying up to 150 kg of internal and external payloads. Sensors are comprised of EO/IR, synthetic aperture radar and electronic surveillance and communications equipment stored in the 300 liters payload bay and two outer gibmbals located in the lower fore and aft sections. Both vehicles use the UEL AR-801010 rotary engine with pusher propeller, delivering 52 hp at 8,000 rpm. The engine delivers 1.6 kw of electricity to power all avionics on board.

    The Hermes has an exceptionally high payload to weight ratio – up to 33% or the 450 kg are payload. Hermes 450 carries a typical EO payload such as the COMPAS IVweighing 32 – 35 kg and a SAR, at around 40kg weight. The remaining weight is fuel, and supporting systems. The Hermes 450 can carry two payloads simultaneously. On extended missions, Hermes 450 can carry two external fuel tanks or equivalent stores. The extra fuel extends mission endurance up to 28 – 30 hours.

    Hermes 450LE (Long Endurance) variant.

    The information collected on a mission is transmitted via line-of-sight datalink to the ground station for processing and interpretation by the ground element, and rapidly processed through existing intelligence and communications to the users. The aircraft was tested with an over-wing satellite communication pod, which enables the aircraft to establish wideband datalink beyond-line-of-sight. Watchkeeper will support UK and coalition forces, including Special Forces, battlegroup command posts, attack helicopter formations, attack aircraft or battleships throughout the battlespace. The system is designed to be integrated with existing and future ISTAR capabilities, future command and effects systems over NATO common protocols.

    UAV Tactical Systems Ltd. (U-TacS), a UK based joint venture between Elbit Systems Ltd. (NASDAQ:ESLT) and Thales UK, announced On June 7, 2007 it has been awarded a contract worth approximately $110 million by Thales UK deliver a Hermes 450 UAV unit to provide an urgent intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and reconnaissance (ISTAR) support for the UK Armed Forces. The program will commence immediately and will take place over the next few years. The contract includes training of the UK MoD staff in use and maintenance of the system, and the provision of contractor logistic support (CLS) and program management services. Hermes 450 will be used supplemented by the Watchkeeper UAV system, as it becomes operational around 2010. Another new customer for the Hermes 450 is the Singapore Air Force, which announced plans to field a Hermes 450 UAV unit with the newly-established 116 Squadron, one of three squadrons operating under the Singapore Armed Forces Air Force newly established UAV Command. The Hermes will augment the Searcher UAVs in service since the 1990s.

    Hermes 450 launched from a pneumatic lanucher developed by Robonic.

     

    DDG-1000 Zumwalt Class Destroyer

    DDG 1000 is the first in a class of the U.S. Navy’s multi-mission surface combatants tailored for land attack and littoral dominance. The ship’s mission is to provide affordable, credible, independent forward presence and deterrence and to operate as an integral part of naval, joint or combined maritime forces. DDG 1000 will provide advanced land attack capability in support of ground campaigns and will contribute naval, joint or combined battlespace dominance in littoral operations. DDG 1000 is in an advanced state of development and will influence ship design worldwide for the remainder of the century.


    Each DDG 1000 will carry 20 VLS missile launchers distributed along the periphery of the ship. These launchers could be loaded with Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles (TLAM), and Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles (ESSM) and Standard type air defense missiles. The MK57 features an open architecture, modular electronics design that provides a significant advantage for the integration of new missile systems without requiring modification of the launcher control software. This design will result in faster, more efficient system upgrades, as well as save significant costs and time for the Navy. raytheon and BAE Systems demonstrated the first test firing of MK57 system in February 2007.

    On January 2007 the U.S. Navy awarded over half billion US$ for continued detailes design of the Zumwalt class destroyer, DDG-1000. Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE: NOC) was awarded US$268 million and General Dynamics’ Bath Iron Works was awarded $257 million, bringing the total value spent on the new class’ design to $644 million. The contract funds further DDG 1000 detail design and procurement of vendor-furnished information and long-lead materials and runs through 2013.

    By February 2007 Raytheon was awarded about US$300 million contract to support the development of the vessel’s Mission System Equipment (MSE). In addition to the Mark 57 Vertical Launcher System, the MSE includes the ship’s computing environment infrastructure; acoustic sensor suite elements, such as the bow array sensor suite; dual band radar; electro-optic/infrared sensor; ship control system; identification of friend or foe; common array power and cooling systems and various electronic module enclosures.

    On April 24 2007 BAE Systems received an additional US$109 million award to complete the design, development and integration of the Advanced Gun System (AGS) weapon for the Zumwalt destroyer (DDG 1000). Two years ago (In May 2005) the company (then, United Defense) received $376 million to begin the development of the gun, a fully automated, single barrel, 155-mm, vertically loaded, stabilized gun mount that will be capable of firing programmable, guided Long Range Land Attack Projectiles. The gun will enable the vessel engaged in littoral warfare to attack land targets from safe stand-off distance over the horizon, and support ground and expeditionary forces beyond line-of-sight. The gun system will include fully automated gun, and automatic loading magazine containing the Long Range Land Attack Projectiles (LRLAP). According to the original schedule, development is expected to complete by 2010.

    Under the Navy’s DDG 1000 Design, Development and Integration contract awarded in 2005, Raytheon IDS serves as the prime mission systems equipment integrator for all electronic and combat systems for the DDG 1000 program. BAE Systems serves as the design agent for the MK57 and is responsible for building the launcher for the DDG 1000 destroyer.

    Is a War between Syria and Israel Inevitable?

    There is a consensus within the Israeli defense establishment and intelligence community that very soon the government will have to make a decision on Syria. Years of passive foot dragging seem to come to an end and a political decision cannot be postponed for long. There are only two major options: Will Israel enter into highly controversial talks with Bashar Assad’s regime, or will a military confrontation become almost inevitable?

    Intelligence reports, following last year’s controversial Lebanon war, indicate that Damascus has made its strategic decision to regain the Golan Heights; it lost forty years ago in the 1967 Six Day War.

    The recent UN Security Council’s decision to establish an international tribunal to try Basher Assad and his close entourage for its alleged murder of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri has already made the Damascus leadership frantic and analysts estimate that Syria will initiate some action before this tribunal will actually decide its ultimate fate. The present outbreak of fighting in Lebanon seems to be the first harbinger announcing what is in store. White House press secretary Tony Snow specifically named Syria acting behind the present fighting in Lebanon. Speaking to media reporters last Tuesday, Snow said: “We will not tolerate attempts by Syria, terrorist groups or any others to delay or derail Lebanon’s efforts to solidify its sovereignty or to seek justice in the Hariri case.”

    Although a full-scale war with Israel seems to be at best a rather hazardous adventure for Bashar Assad, it seems that the young leader has taken a leaf out of his long admired tutor Hassan Nasrallah’s book, becoming an avid student of his methods. On this trend, Assad could well be tempted to initiate a limited ground attack on strategic sites on the Golan, for example, a repeat performance of his father’s daring feat during the opening stages of the 1973 war, when a surprise helicopter-borne raid by the Syrian 82nd para-commando battalion successfully captured the Israeli observation site on Mount Hermon. The Israelis must be aware of the enormous propaganda value, that such a military bravado could achieve succeed and do everything possible to avert such a coup. In the latter phases of the Yom Kippur war, recapturing the Hermon redoubt by the Elite Golani infantry brigade, took heavy casualties in the heroic, but futile effort.

    The military establishment in Damascus will certainly realize that the Syrian army has no chance of beating Israel in a full-scale war, but it could nevertheless deal it a painful blow with a surprise attack, buying young Assad his much needed popularity among the masses of the Arab world.

    Israeli intelligence assessments notice that the Syrians may indeed be heading for a military option, convinced that Israel has lost its former “killer instinct” fearing another conflict so soon after the Lebanese debacle. This feeling relates to the Arab interpretation of the Winograd report and its public repercussions, as well as Israel’s reluctance towards an determined military response against the continued Hamas Qassam rocket bombardment from Gaza on Israel’s sovereign territory. Based on this concept, the Syrian military establishment perception is that there is no need for a large ground forces operation, but rather, a massive missile offensive targeting the dense Israeli population centers along the Mediterranean coastline. Thus, for the past two years Syrian has been engaged in massive acquisitions to bolster its missile arsenal.

    Israeli intelligence monitoring station located along the Israeli-Syrian border in the Golan Heights.According to the local press, IDF Northern Territorial Command intelligence estimates are based on the assumptions, that while Syria’s military threat has not changed substantially, a limited military act could become feasible if the situation will warrant such a move. As far as is known, the Israeli intelligence community does not have information pointing to clear intentions on the part of Syrian President Bashar Assad to launch a war. However, there are reports about ongoing preparations which the Syrian army is making for such a contingency in accelerated training, exercises and urgently given top priority to major arms acquisitions, mainly from Russia, Ukraine all funded by an emergency grant from Tehran. Intelligence researchers are finding it difficult to formulate a bottom line: whether Assad truly intends to go to war or if he is merely taking measures to be on the safe side, while seeking to exert pressure on Israel to renew peace negotiations at the lowest price tag.

    For the IDF Brass, Bashar Assad’s intentions are of secondary importance. Based on the rather mediocre performance of its land forces in the Second Lebanon war, the army is now preparing for every contingency along the Golan Heights and in order to retrain its first-line ground formations in high-intensive warfighting, the IDF has already engaged in massive large-scale ground maneuvers, simulating every possible combat scenario, which could become feasible in the event of a Golan War. Based on new weapons known to have equipped Syrian front line troops, such as AT-14 Kornet-E and AT-13 Metis-M, tank crews have been retrained to counter such weapons – Merkava tanks are being refitted with the new Rafael Trophy active defense system and new systems will be fielded soon into first line forces arsenals. Emergency depots have been restocked with the latest equipment for first line reserve units, earmarked for deployment on the Golan Heights.

    THis week June 5th, 2007 the IDF conducted a combined arms exercise  which simulated  battle scenario in the Syrian front. This exercise is  conducted every year and is not significant to the tension erupted this week. between Israel and SyriaSatellite and Electronic surveillance has been upgraded and placed on twenty-four hour high-alert status, to monitor any change in Syrian forward and rear deployment, in an effort to eliminate any chance of repeating the catastrophic intelligence failure in the first hours of the 1973 Yom Kippur war. Last week, a large-scale strategic command exercise, part of a series of high level exercises code-named “Firestone 10”, has examined the various scenarios of a two-to- three frontal conflict, involving Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas. The exercise included the full scale deployment of new information systems that integrates the strategic and territorial commands. The four day exercsie was the largest peace-time conceptual test of its kind held for a long time by the top military establishment- a distinctive outcome of the Winograd commission recommendations.

    But since last May, the Syrian army has also been engaged in a series of wide-scale military exercises. In 1973, as it may be recalled, these exercises turned out to be a de-facto attack. Even Israel’s ambassador to the US, Salai Meridor, has officially confirmed that Syria has significantly boosted its military presence on the border with Israel. “Since the Yom Kippur War Syria had not deployed such a significant number of forces along its border region,” he warned. Whether these military preparations on both sides are offensive or defensive nature cannot be verified, But is a history proven fact, that most Middle East Wars have started unintentionally, from miscalculations or foreign manipulated and falsified disinformation! To remind only of a few outstanding examples:

    • The 1967 Six Day War started on an intentional Soviet disinformation campaign, “seeding” false intelligence to Arab nations over an alleged Israeli troop concentration poised to attack Syria on the Golan, information which was totally baseless.
    • A thousand miles to the east, in 1980 Saddam Hussein started the eight year long Iraq-Iran war, in which over a million died- by miscalculating Iran’s fighting motivation-based on his assumption, that the Khomeini revolution and the following purges among the military establishment would render the army incapable against his overwhelming powerbase.
    • Hassan Nasrallah and his Tehran bosses miscalculated Israel’s determination to retaliate by overwhelming force over the kidnapping of its soldiers- destroying Iran’s strategic forward base along Israel’s border.

    Based on these examples, a war between Israel and Syria could break out over the same miscalculations, if necessary steps not be taken to avert such a tragedy in time. Unfortunately, the Israeli General Staff vividly remembers an incident, which is still haunting its intelligence community to these days. In summer 1996 Israel was on the brink of war with Syria. Syrian forces had redeployed its elite forces to the eastern slopes of the Hermon mountain region, poised for a commando strike on IDF positions on the Golan Heights.

    As tension escalated further, Syrian and IDF armored forces deployed within striking range of each other. The reason behind the tension was a certain Mossad agent, named Yehuda Gil, a man with highly respected reputation who had intentionally provided falsified intelligence reports to his superiors, allegedly indicating reliable sources providing information over a Syrian plan to re-occupy the Golan Heights by force. Luckily, suspicions surfaced within Mossad and Military Intelligence, contradicting Gil’s information. His dubious assessment was over-ruled, but not before the cabinet had debated whether or not to mobilize – fearing the country could face another Middle East war. Gil was charged with treason, tried and incarcerated for a long period. Since that serious incident, the intelligence community has been extremely overcautious in its assessments.

    Russian Scud-B tactical missile.Based on his perceptions, that last year’s Hezbollah rocket campaign on Israel’s rear was successful, the Syrian president could opt for an opening gambit, by launching a massive Scud attack on Israeli population centers and major strategic targets, (the latter would prove doubtful, as Scud missiles have only limited accuracy, insufficient for precision target strikes). Such a move, having perhaps considerable psychological, but only limited strategic value, would certainly provoke swift and deadly retaliation, with grave consequences on Syria. First of all, it must be remembered, that only a small portion of Hezbollah’s four thousand rockets and missiles caused casualties among Israeli civilians. Even Saddam Hussein’s four week Scud offensive in 1991 affected only a single fatality! Moreover, Israel’s vigilant spy satellites, ELINT and SIGINT monitors, would no doubt give sufficient early warning to place the majority of Israel’s public under well-prepared cover before the actual strike is launched.

    On the other hand, the situation in Syria’s five million packed capital would become catastrophic, as Israel strikes back. As long as it holds its present positions on the Golan heights, Israeli long-range artillery can submit devastating bombardments on Damascus, without moving a single tank or aircraft. The Syrian population has neither shelter, nor training to prevent a human catastrophe, which would certainly unleash tremendous outrage ultimately endangering Assad’s long-time Alawite minority regime.

    A war with Syria will be different from what happened last year in Lebanon. There, due to political constraints, the Israeli air strikes were confined to Hezbollah related targets, leaving most of the Lebanese infrastructure intact. No such limitations will prevent the air force from devastating Syria’s economy. During the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Israeli air strikes virtually paralyzed the Syrian economic and administrative infrastructure, which took years to restore. For such a contingency, the Israeli “stand-off firepower” concept, which failed in Lebanon, could become an ideal military tool against Syria.

    Under such stringent circumstances, it would seem illogical for Syria’s president to enter into a highly dubious adventure against Israel. But in order to avert a dangerous miscalculation, both sides would do well to minimize their already highly superfluous rhetoric and seek a peaceful solution, which is still the preferred option over a costly confrontation.

    XM-307 – Advanced Crew-Served Weapon (ACSW)

    ACSW
    XM-307 Advanced Crew Served Weapon (ACSW)

    The XM307 Advanced Crew-Served Weapon (ACSW) 25mm system will replace current crew-served weapons such as the M-19 Mk3 40 mm grenade launcher, and heavy M2 0.5″ machine guns in US Army. ACWS is developed as the next-generation mounted and dismounted machine gun that will provide accurate long-range firepower, including air-bursting munitions, in a lightweight system package.

    The new weapon and family of 25mm ammunition will increase firepower effectiveness by extending stand-off range, enabling the defeat of defilade targets, providing day and night capability and reducing combat load. The lightweight, two-man portable, crew-served weapon system will fire new family of lightweight 25-mm high-explosive ammunition including HE, HEAT and thermobaric grenades.

    XM-307 ACSW

    Individual Airburst Weapon System is currently under development and intended to address the capability gap of defeating defilade targets. The weapon has the capability to hit point targets at a distance of 500 meters and area targets at 700 meters. 25mm munitions currently in development include High Explosive Air-Burst (HEAB), armor piercing, door breaching, anti-personnel, and two types of non-lethal munitions – blunt and agent dispersing airburst.

    The XM-307 Advanced Crew Served Weapon (ACSW) and a derivative XM-312 machine gun are designed to fire 25mm and 0.50 Caliber (12.7mm) ammunition. ACSW will fire the same 25mm ammunition developed for the XM25. The XM307 weighs about 92 lbs including the gun, two ammunition cans of 37 rounds each, fire control and tripod. Maximum rate of fire is 250 rounds per minute. However, the weapons accuracy enables gunners to achieve the desired effect with fewer rounds. The XM312 version will weigh about 43.7 lbs, (compared to the current 128 lbs of the M2HB). It will use gas recoil operation, and have soft recoil mechanism to minimize load on tripod or mount and least affect the gunner. Effective firing range for lethal and suppressive fire is about 2,000 meters. The weapon will be able to fire all types of 0.50 Caliber ammunition, including ball, API and SLAP.

    The development phase is funded through 2007, and managed by by GDATP under a cost-plus-award-fee contract with a total projected value of $94.8 million awarded by the U.S. Army Tank-Automotive and Armament Command. GDOTC is developing the new family of 25mm ammunition while Raytheon is responsible for the full solution fire control.

    General Dynamics is also working on a development of a Remotely Operated Variant (ROV) of the XM-307 which will be used in the US Army Future Combat Systems family of vehicles. The weapon will be integrated into a vehicle-mounted firing station that is remotely controlled by the operator. Cameras and range finders in the firing station will allow the operator to accurately identify and engage targets while remaining safely protected within the vehicle. The ROV program is also funded by the U.S. Army Tank-Automotive and Armaments Command (Picatinny).

    XM-307 ACSW
    XM-307 ACSW

    X-Hawk ‘Flying Assault Vehicle’

    A futuristic concept pursued by Bell and Urban Aeronautics from Israel, is the X-Hawk, a “flying car” concept utilizing two lift fans and two turbine powered pusher propellers providing the vehicle lift, stability, lateral thrust and maneuverability for vertical and horizontal flight.

    X-Hawk will be able to hover, utilizing unique vane control system for lateral control and stability, even in 50 kt. wind gust conditions. It will be designed for operation at speed of up to 140 kt. The X-Hawk will be able to carry a complete squad of troops and a pilot. X-Hawk is relatively quiet, compared to a helicopter. X Hawk will have much smaller footprint and offers safety and maneuverability suitable for operation in a the ‘urban canyons’ of the modern city. For example, vehicles will be able to assault a face of a building, enabling troops to assault inside through a window or evacuate the wounded for safety. This capability could revolutionizes the approach to urban warfare within buildings, and can be combined with other operational tactics to provide a truly force-multiplying effect.

    X-Hawk Preliminary performance data:
    Empty weight 3,700 lbs
    Typical mission fuel weight 1,300 lb.
    Payload 1,700 lb
    Maximum design gross weight 6,700 lbs
    Length 26.6 foot
    Width 13.8 Foot
    Height 11.5 foot
    Rotor diameter 8.2 foot
    Performance two CTS800 4N
    engines – 2,460 shp
    Max speed 140 kt
    Max altitude >12000 ft
    Endurance at typical mission fuel >2 hours Plus reserve
    Range at typical mission fue: 330 nm
    Operational radius 140 nm
    Capacity 11 combatants Plus pilot on crashworthy seats.

    Skylite B Mini VTUAV

    June 4, 2007: RAFAEL unveiled an enhanced version of the Skylite B UAV system, offering extended mission endurance of up to three hours, operating at ranges up to 35 km. The improved system also includes an encrypted digital communications and data link. The system was developed under cooperation between RAFAEL and BlueBird Aero Systems. The new Skylite weighs 8 kg (1.5 over the basic Skylite B)

    Skylite B followed the design of the canister-launched Skylite A vehicle, redesigneed with a V-tail desegn, larger wing span (240 cm compared to 170 cm in Skylite A). Th enhanced version has a wider wing span and more powerful batteries. Skylite B uses a stabilized payload and enhanced ground control system, to offer a robust “soldier proof” system. Despite the enhancements, the vehicle’s weight remained at 6 kg. Following a long series of developmental test flights, RAFAEL demonstrated the new mini-UAV to the Israeli Army Land Forces Command to be followed by more demonstrations overseas. SkyLite B is positioned to support field units at the battalion level and below, including Special Forces. The mini-UAV has an endurance of 90 minutes. It can be operated in various airspeeds, effectively handling and maintain flight path and position in rough weather conditions and high winds of up to 30 knots.

    Skylite B uses a lightweight catapult for launching. Weighing only four kilograms, the catapult is folded into the carrying bag when not used. Canister launching capability of Skylite A was retained with the B version. The UAV is retrieved by soft landing, with the assistance of a parachute and inflatable airbag. The UAV can be returned to flying condition immediately after landing, by replacing the battery and parachute and folding the airbag. The Mini UAV is equipped with rechargeable Lithium-Polymer batteries, which enable extended missions of up to 90 minutes (50% longer than the Skylite A). The SkyLite B system uses the D-STAMP miniature, gimbaled, stabilized EO payload delivering high definition images from an altitude of 300 – 2000 feet.

    The level of details provided by the system enables positive identification of targets including recognition of an armed, man-sized target and vehicle identification. The Skylite B is automatically piloted on planned course missions, continuous tracking of a static target, surveillance of a crowded urban area, scanning an axis, accompanying a combat force, tracking personnel and vehicles, as well as directing a combat force to its target. Tracking of mobile targets is facilitated by automatic EO target tracker.

    During the demonstration, the IDF was shown the new mini-UAV’s capabilities to provide real-time quality intelligence to a deployed infantry unit, and its potential to deal with various mission scenarios, such as on-going urban security, as well as scenarios occurring in traditional warfare situations. This was achieved within the required data flow, accuracy and picture quality ranges. The demonstration was carried out successfully in harsh weather conditions consisting of rain and strong winds.

    Skylite B is one of several mini UAV systems considered by the Israel Defense Forces for deployment as ‘battalion mini UAV’ system. Apart from potential sales of the system to the IDF, RAFAEL plans to market the Skylite B worldwide. To date, RAFAEL holds contracts for the SkyLite B system from several customers both in Israel and abroad. In the USA, the system is marketed by the joint venture RAFAEL formed in 2005 with Advanced Ceramics Research and Cubic Advanced Tactical Systems.

    U.K. Launch Project Taranis, UCAV Technology Demonstrator

    U.K. Defence Minister Lord Drayson has awarded a £124millon contract to BAE Systems to develop a new Unmanned Combat Aerial vehicle (UCAV) technology demonstrator known as ‘Project Taranis’ (named after the Celtic god of thunder). About the size of a BAE Systems Hawk, the 8 ton autonomous stealth plane will be built by an industry team led by BAE systems including Rolls-Royce, QinetiQ, and Smiths Aerospace. Taranis will be designed for autonomous recce and attack missions. Ground testing of Taranis are scheduled for in early 2009, at BAE Systems test facility at Woomera, Australia. The first flight trials taking place in 2010. According to Aviation Week’s London correspondent, Douglas Barrie, this TDP could lead to a decision to field a deep strike UCAV by 2018-20. Aviation Week also reported the TDPwill likely be powered by a Rolls-Royce Adour 951 engine.

    The four-year Taranis project is part of the UK Government’s Strategic Unmanned Air Vehicle (Experimental) Programme [SUAV(E)]. Taranis is jointly funded by the UK MoD and UK industry, and will bring together a number of technologies, capabilities and systems to produce a technology demonstrator based around a fully autonomous intelligent system.

    The Technology Demonstration Vehicle (TDV) will utilize off the shelf technologies, including Signature Integration, Air Vehicle Performance, Vehicle Management, Command Control, Sensor Integration, Communications Integration and Payload Integration. While it is not intended to actually drop weapons, the TDV systems will emulate weapon release as part of the flight testing, representing a typical mission scenario. According to Aviation Week, the UCAV will have two internal weapons bays and an optional fit of electro-optical and radar sensors. Along with conventional weaponry the air force is also looking at the UCAV as a platform for directed-energy systems – laser or high-power microwave Mark Kane, managing director of Autonomous Systems & Future Capability (Air) for BAE Systems, said: “Taranis will make use of at least 10 years of research and development into low observables, systems integration, control infrastructure and full autonomy. It follows the completion of risk reduction activities to ensure the mix of technologies, materials and systems used are robust enough for the ‘next logical step’. These risk reduction activities include the Replica program, jointly funded with the MoD and the MoD funded ‘Nightjar’ program, building on and using the technologies and systems trialed in previous demonstrators such as Kestrel, Corax, Raven and HERTI. It is an important part of our future.” The Replica program had the objective of supporting the development of a UK capability to provide a survivable, affordable and supportable air platform to meet perceived Royal Air Force and Royal Navy requirements beyond current programs. Replica resulted in the production of a full scale Model of a radar signature controlled aircraft configuration, with key features representative of a flying integrated weapon system, which was then taken through a rigorous test program. A key aim of the Replica program was to demonstrate Low Observable (LO) technologies in a low cost design and production environment, using paperless aircraft processes. The Nightjar program is an example of the technology programs which are being exploited in this program. The program has played a crucial part in increasing the UK’s knowledge and understanding of how to design and manufacture future air vehicles. The aim of the Nightjar program was to explore the integration of new airframe features, which could be critical for the future of air vehicle design. The program provided stepped increases in valuable data on issues surrounding design, aerodynamics, manufacturing and in-service performance limits. The Raven program has already successfully demonstrated some of the key technologies required for the program. It was run in the BAE Systems Advanced Technology Demonstration Centre at Warton during 2003/4 and in ten months was taken from concept to first flight. The system was targeted at demonstrating flight control and autonomous system functionality along with ‘rapid prototyping’ techniques and capabilities.

    Portable Power Sources and Fuel cells for Soldier systems – at Soldiertech 2007

    Energy capacity of batteries means a great deal to ground forces. Heavy, expensive, non-rechargeable military batteries are slowing warfighting efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as weighing down soldiers in critical combat situations. For a typical 72 hour mission, requiring 20 Watts average power, each foot soldier now needs up to 27 lbs of rechargeable batteries (or 18 pounds of non-rechargeable batteries). Some platoons have designated individual soldiers to act as “battery mules” for the platoon. From ruggedized computers to communications systems to GPS to remote sensing and video, soldiers are carrying cumbersome loads of batteries to power these devices. And this power source problem is only growing, as the dismounted soldier continues to require more advanced and “power hungry” devices. Logistically, batteries have been a major problem during the Iraq war as the two domestic suppliers of key batteries could not keep up with the increasing demand. The operation of the war was delayed while battery supplies were being replenished by the long and arduous supply chain.


    To overcome these limitations, special operations, long range patrols and ambushes are planning their missions around available “battery energy capacity cycles”. Missions are set to these very limited battery lifetimes, requiring frequent resupply missions, with the potential risk involved, to deliver fresh power to forward-deployed forces. Any contribution toward reducing weight and increasing the power density of batteries becomes an important asset to the military, but even more relevant are the new possibilities to ‘harvest’ and generate power in the field.

    The growing need for electrical power, and high diversity of power sources used with standard equipment, leads to a considerable waste of power resources, as teams are required to carry extra batteries for each type of equipment. Lacking centralized power distribution capability, batteries available for one system cannot be used by another device. Although many systems are already operating on standard batteries, form factors and other requirements frequently dictate the use of non- standard batteries, consequently limiting the warfighter’s use of power reserves.

    A solution to this problem could be provided by new, portable field chargers producing power from methanol or hydrogen powered fuel cell. Fuel cells have also evolved in recent years to become lightweight and compact enough to be considered for future soldier systems. Yet, none have been integrated into an infantry combat suite as current technology is considered imature for field use. SInce most fuel cells are generating a considerable amount of heat and also have distinctive acoustic signature, they cannot be relied upon as a primary power source but are already considered for field recharging where their benefits outweigh their limitations.

    Power Sources forInfantry Combat Suites

    Felin system uses several power sources to support the core system, radios and various wearable sensors. The kit uses two batteries – a high capacity pack and a ‘standard pack’ providing minimal power required for mission critical systems.The high capacity pack is worn by the soldier in the combat vest. This flat, waterproof lithium ion rechargeable battery weighs about 600 grams and supplies 75 Wh supporting the core FELIN system. A smaller and compact Li-Ion battery weighing only 180 grams is the “Standard Pack’ delivers 18.5 Wh, powering the peripheral units and sensors (helmet and weapon). Both batteries are designed to sustain the FELIN system for up to 72 hours. The batteries use built in microprocessor and data-bus (SMBUS) to accurately monitor the remaining power level while the FELIN system is running and optimize charging cycles accordingly.

    When the teams are mounted aboard their vehicles, they use the vehicle’s power to recharge their systems. The charger is part of the FELIN vehicle integration kit, to be installed on infantry support vehicles. Team members are provided with individual power outlets to charge their systems without removing their FELIN combat vests. Spare batteries can also be charged with the vehicle’s collective battery charger. Most vehicles can be equipped with two collective battery chargers providing team members with 12 – 24 battery sets.

    A different power system was designed for the FIST system by ABSL. The companydeveloped its own version of modern soldier system’s power source. The core of these systems is the new 4.3 kg four channel ‘smart charger’, which can be connected to various DC power sources such as vehicle batteries, fuel cells or other batteries, to tap any power source available in the field. It provides a fast recharge cycle, delivering with 80% of charging in less than 60 minutes. The four channel DC charger supports the smaller soldier portable charger, which can charge any secondary smart battery. This lightweight charger (weight: 340 grams) is carried by the individual soldier enabling the warfighter to tap any power resource available in the field, including a solar array, field chargers and generators, car batteries or residual power remaining in other smart batteries. It supports charging rate of 7.4Ah enough to provide 80% of the charging in les than 60 minutes. It can perform the charging simultaneously with functioning as stand-alone supply functionality. The battery carried as part of the soldier system has an electronic processor to monitor the state-of charge and communicate with other batteries, the system’s computer and the soldier portable charger to manage available power resources.

    Batteries of Fuell Cells?

    Fuel cells can operate independently, but when used as hybrid systems with rechargeable Li-Ion batteries, they offer many advantages. The battery is used primarily as power storage device, delivering peak power over a limited, predictable period of time. The fuel cell is a power producer that continuously feeds power at a constant nominal output level. Batteries have a wider operating temperature level, especially at the sub-zero regime, they can operate while submerged and operate quietly while the fuel cell generally produce a low humming noise and is unable to operate underwater.

    A typical fuel cell is the XX25 from UltraCell. It provides an uninterrupted power to field computer and communications equipment supplying enough power to provide for a 72 hour mission at a total weight of only nine pounds (4.5 kg). This is about a third of the weight of batteries consumed ion such missions. The system uses the Reformed methanol Fuel Cell (RMFC) system, offering higher power density compared with the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC) system.The system consumes fuel cartridges containing 250cc a mixture of 76% methanol and 33% water. Each cartridge weighs only 12.4 ounces (351 grams) sustaining operation for nine hours. The fuel cell system delivers 25 watts continuous power, at 12V. The system weighs about 2.7 pounds (1.24 kg) and, when activated, runs through a start-up phase of about 20 minutes.

    Smart Fuel Cell AG from Germany is another developer of portable power sources using the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC) process. The company promotes both stand-alone fuel cell power sources as well as hybrid systems using fuel-cell as efficient, field deployable. In 2006 the company introduced the JENNY system, developed for the German Army, offering a compact, covert, portable and continuous, high density power source. This fuel cell system will be used to power dismounted surveillance systems, unattended sensors and support dismounted infantry operations. The JENNY Fuel cell weighs about 1.3 kg and runs at an efficiency of 25% providing 25 watts consuming 350 ml cartridges. The total weight of a single JENNY and five cartridges required to sustain a three day mission (72 hours) is only 3.1 kg. replacing about 12 batteries (13 kg weight) previously needed to support such missions.

    SFC is developing a wearable fuel cell system called M-25 is currently under development. This system will weigh about 0.9 kg and will be designed to provide sustained 25watts with peaks of up to 80 watts, running at higher efficiency levels (up to 30%) from 300 ml Methanol cartridges. developed offer unique attributes for such missions, including low emissions of noise and heat, making them attractive for covert operations of special forces and deep, intelligence missions. DMFC used in hybrid battery configuration offers significant weight savings compared to batteries. For example, on a 72 hour mission, the DMFC hybrid system offers up to 80% weight comprising a minimal load of batteries and DMFC charger, compared with the full load of rechargeable batteries required for the mission duration.

    SFC also offers a power manager device, powering several devices including battery chargers, laptop computers, observation systems or radios from a single fuel cell. The device can also hook into a car battery to tap available power sources. The system can inputs 10 – 28 VDC and manages different voltage ranges (10 – 24 Volt) and currents up to 6,5 A to match different systems requirements. It can harvest power from all available sources, including batteries and vehicle’s power. The company also developed a special power manager for the FFW leader, supporting various types of batteries (BB-2590 and Li-145), and mission extenders, including fuel cells, zinc-air batteries and solar panels.

    At AUVSI 07 Protonex unveiled its new high capacity fuel cell offering unique advantages for military applications. The ProCore series of fuel cell is designed for optimized output power of 30 watts at 17 volt. The system is based on the fuel cell processor and replaceable cartridges, storing 720 W/h each. The cartridge contains Sodium Borohydride fuel in dry state and, upon being mixed with water it generates hydrogen consumed by the fuel cell to generate electricity. Protonex licensed the hydrogen generation technology from Millennium Cell Inc. This fuel cell is offered in various forms, powering unmanned ground vehicles and electrically powered unmanned aerial systems.

    Energy Harvesting

    A different form of energy supply is the harvesting of power from sources available in the field. One such application, the harvesting of power by Remote Aparatus Power System (RAPS) is one option considered by the US Air Force Special Operations Command for spec-ops units. This invention allows special forces to harvest power from any low voltage (<600 V) transmission line, for battery recharging. The simple device uses a metal clamp thrown up over the power line, feeding AC electrical power to the AC/DC power supply which converts it to the level consumed by the electronic systems or battery chargers.

    Topics covered in Soldiertech 2007 review:

    Personnel Radios for Soldier Modernization Programs – at Soldiertech 2007

    Several companies introduced advanced personel radios at At Soldier Technology 2007. Among the systems on display were the RF-7800S-TR UHF set from Harris, the latest version of Spearnet from ITT. Rockwell Collins introduced its Flexnet waveform. Selex demonstrated its H4855 PRR system, which also included several add-ons, such as the command and control module. Another system discussed on the briefings was the Microlight from Raytheon, which was used by the British Army during its field assessment tests of the FIST systems.

    For individual combat role, radio Harris is offering the RF-7800S-TR UHF set, a secure personal team radio. The radio operates over a distance of 1-2 km in open terrain, 500-800 meters in urban area and about half a kilometer in dense jungle. It runs on eight alkaline or rechargeable batteries supporting eight hours of continuous use. It carries full duplex digital voice and data communications, using an independent wireless network that does not require infrastructure or backbone support. The system supports 14 programmable preset networks, each supporting ‘talk groups’ – full duplex voice conferences allowing several speakers to talk simultaneously on the network while to an unlimited number of listeners. This results in a natural, dynamic communications exchange unrestricted by traditional limitations of half-duplex radio. The network uses priority based functions providing leaders the ability to break-in, ensuring critical orders are received even when the network is active. The data enabled radio has a built-in SPS GPS receiver, enabling automatic position tracking and messaging services. It connect to standard computing devices, such as digital cameras, PDAs and laptops via standard USB. Communication security is supported by built-in Harris Citadel II hardware or Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) encryption.

    ITT is offering the Spearnet team member radio operating in the 1.2 GHz, 2.4 GHz or 4.9 GHz frequency bands. The radio has an integrated AES COMSEC encryption module. Spearnet communicates uses Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum for optimal operation in an urban environment, supporting a maximum 6 Mbps burst rate or 1.5 Mbps in sustained transmissions. Rates are reduced through longer communications lasting over several frequency hops, for example, five hops will reduce he data rate to 500 kbps. The Spearnet uses a self-organizing, self-healing, ad-hoc network carrying secure voice, data and video communications. For data communications the radio supports a tactical LAN on the move that does not require a server to exchange messaging. Each radio has an embedded GPS, and Linux operating system for radio hosted applications.

    Rockwell Collins’ Flexnet waveform running on software defined radios developed by Rockwell Collins and Thales provide high data rate ad-hoc networking waveform, developed to support mobile networking requirements of the modern mobile force. The system is designed to establish secure, ad-hoc networking automatically connecting up to 150 nodes, carrying data rates up to 6 Mbps. The network runs optimized Quality of Service (QOS) managing network topology, link quality, allocate bandwidth and routing to optimize packet delivery between stationary and mobile nodes.

    Remote Radio Controllers & Headset

    Several companies displayed hearing protection devices, some integrated into the headset gear. Two competitors, the Norwegian company NACRE and US based Silynx introduced two parallel products which even have similar names – QuietPro andQuietOps, both offering a combination of headset, advanced hearing protection Voice Activation radio Transmission (VOX) and programmable control for tactical radio sets. QuietPro, introduced by NACRE is the more established system, that has already been integrated with the Marine Corps’ personnel radio communicators and Special Operations’ PRC-148 MBITR radio systems and the German Bundeswehr iDZ soldier modernization program. The QuietOps from Silynx was introduced later, and therefore was developed with more flexible programmability with radio systems. The system is used with the Israeli Integrated Advanced Soldier (IAS) program and is also offered worldwide. According to NACRE, over 24,000 units have already been ordered. The system uses a digital signal processor to facilitate automatic, adaptive digital hearing protection by passive and active noise reduction. Using both passive and active means, QuietPro’s can achieve 34-42 dB attenuation (depending in frequency). By attenuating ambient noises and canceling excessive acoustic peaks and impulses, resulting from nearby running engine, explosions and gun shots, QuietPro helps protecting the soldier’s hearing. An in-ear microphone and loudspeaker support simultaneous operation on two radio networks while an adaptive, digital talk-through and directional hearing facilitates a ‘bionic ear’, capable of localizing sounds and maximizing hearing sensitivity at specific directions.

    Besides using their radios, today’s soldiers are required to operate a number of electronic devices – each with its own functionality and controls all that, without taking hands off the weapon and eyes off the performing task. Thales Australia is developing a rifle input control (RIC) interface, that can be adaptable to various rifles and devices, enabling warfighters to easily control weapon or helmet mounted systems with intuitive commands. The system is based on a patented system invented by Kord Defence. The weapon mounted pushbutton controller provides fast, one-hand and ‘eyes free’ access control of a range of devices directly from the weapon. RIC’s three- or five-button controller can be used to generate ‘chordic’ combinations that could comfortably execute eight different commands such as activating a rangefinder, changing a sight or thermal imager’s field of view , sending a picture or ‘clicking’ a radio by momentarily pressing the ‘transmit’ push to talk button. The device is attaches to the front of the rifle and can be operated by left or right handed users.

    Topics covered in Soldiertech 2007 review:

    Imaging and C2 Systems for the Warfighter – at Soldiertech 2007

    The latest display systems introduced for modern soldier systems incorporate miniature ‘near-eye’ transparent viewers and hand-held displays, offering wide field of view, efficient visibility in daylight conditions and covert, NVG compatible display at night time. Among the latest transparent eyepieces are the mini displays produced by Rockwell CollinsLiteye and Vuzix. Among the new displays shown at the exhibition Defense Update spotted the ProView SO35-MTV from Rockwell Collins, a transparent micro-viewer which displays a near-eye, wide field of view picture with minimal vision obstruction.

    The ‘see-through’ viewer is clipped to standard Oakley M-Frame military approved eyewear with fully adjustable viewing angle allowing the display to be moved above or below the line of sight to increase situational awareness. The device weighs about 50 grams, and is compatible with the left or right eye. It can be operated in daylight or at night, delivering monochrome green SVGA display at a resolution of 800×600 or VGA at 640×480.

    A different input device developed by Vuzix Tactical Display Group is a TacEye miniature eyepiece that can be attached to standard goggles to form a 800×600 SVGA head mounted display. The TacEye runs for five hours on a single rechargeable lithium battery, supporting operating modes from full daylight to total darkness, where special filters are used to interface with the goggles and minimize leaks that can indicate the warfighter’s position to the enemy.

    ITL Optronics from Israel displayed an integrated hand-held controller and display system, designed for day or night operations. The device weighs only 300 grams and uses high resolution OLED mini display from eMagin; an integrated line-of-sight sensor enables automatic image or map orientation. Built-in mouse buttons provide an interface with the computer.


    Jeffrey Paul, program manager at DARPA responsible for the Multispectral Adaptive Networked Tactical Imaging System (MANTIS) program introduced this breakthrough program, which aims to improve the soldier’s night vision capability through integration of advanced sensing and processing technologies. MANTIS studies the benefits multi-spectral fusion performed on the helmet or hand held viewer, using an advanced ‘system on a chip’ processor. The system will improve the soldier’s ability to see at night, under difficult visibility conditions including typical urban ambient lights (light bulbs, fires, car lights etc.), under moonless or cloudy skies, penetrating through smoke, fog, dust and flares. The system will also support video sharing trough ‘picture in picture’ functionality.

    Command and Control Systems

    New versions of Cobham’s Integrated Digital Soldier System (IDSS) were displayed at Soldier Technology 07. The company demonstrated the latest version of its Battlehawk situational awareness and communications software and a new wrist worn display called MDT. In addition to standard time display (watch), it can also display a plan position indicator with two range scales, showing relative locations of team members and targets. The device can also show incoming text messages, or heading indication (compass rose).

    Thales UK unveiled at Soldier Technology 07 its new MILTRAK, a command and control unit designed for infantry teams. MILTRAK comprises a navigation module, and a separate display system used primarily by leaders. It uses a simple interface, similar to the older designs used mobile phones, to provide navigation, situational awareness (SA) picture and short text messages.

    The Eurotech Group launched at Soldier Technology 07, the Zypad, a rugged wearable computer built with hardened mechanical design optimized for field uses. The device can be adapted to run at different application levels, such as ‘basic’, mission and ’emergency’. The Zypad supports an integral 640×480 pixel VGA display with 256 colors and an overlaid touch screen. It supports bluetooth Class 2 communications of ZigBee as well as 802.11 wireless LAN. It also integrates a 16 channel GPS receiver and DGPS device, accelerometers, electronic compass and biometric ID.

    Elbit Systems unveiled its latest, and most compact wearable computer system designated ‘Terminal’. This is a modular computer system powered by an RMI dual processor running Windows CE operating system. The Terminal computer provides high quality graphics, supporting two simultaneous 1920×1200 pixel displays, including a direct interface to the OLED (VESA). The system has a modest power consumption of only 6.5 watts, supplied by two hot swappable external Lithium Polymer batteries sustaining continuous 4-5 hours of operation. This modular computer weighs 0.7 kg (excluding batteries) and provides the heart of the new IDF command and control system for dismounted operations (also known as Dominator or Integrated Advanced Soldier – IAS). In this configuration, Terminal is used as a wearable computer coupled with a hand held display, a radio (PRC710), eyepiece display and headsets, mobile Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) and navigation system. All elements are embedded into a wearable system and armor vest weighing less than five kilograms.

    GPSless Navigation

    GPS independent navigation has posed a significant challenge for modern soldier systems, particularly when engaged with urban operations, where GPS coverage is not available. Several systems already offer solutions to this problem. Draper developed the Personal Positioning System (PPS) in response to the US Army requirement for Personal Navigation System, required to provide autonomous, uninterrupted position, location and attitude reference in GPS-challenged signal environment. This robust suite is currently in prototype phase. A similar system is also under development in Israel, by Elbit Systems, for the Israeli Integrated Advanced Soldier (IAS) program. This navigation system will enabling effective navigation in areas where GPS cannot be relied upon. The system uses a combination sensors, such as gyro, compass, accelerometers and barometric pressure sensor, to determine the location of the unit (distance travelled and direction) relative to the last confident GPS reference point. The system is attached to the soldier’s gear and will continue to determine accurate location for several hours after GPS contact is lost. Its accuracy is determined as a function of the distance traveled without GPS reference. It is effective throughout the soldier’s combat activities, including running, walking, crawling or sprinting. The system weighs about 100 grams and is calibrated to reflect the individual soldier’s activities using his personal identification identification tag.

    Topics covered in Soldiertech 2007 review:

    Review of soldier modernization programs – at Soldiertech 2007

    Soldier Technology 2007 conference and exhibition, organized by the Worldwide Business Research (WBR) group porovided an excellent view into some of the leading soldier modernization programs worldwide. Through the briefings, the common denominators and key differences between programs became evident. Two speakers from the US – Col. Richard Hanson, EO Soldier Land Warrior PM, briefing via video from the US and Mark Richter, program manager, USMC Expeditionary Rifle Squad (MERS)lectured about their respective programs. Lack of commonality between systems was clearly apparent. No common standards are available or even suggested among NATO members, resulting in excessive development and procurement cost for all armies. Disagreement about the goal of such systems exists even among various US service branches. While the Army’s program is leaning toward technologies, empowering each and every warfighter and combat leader, the USMC is aiming at improving the capabilities and performance of the squad as a whole.

    Land Warrior Programs

    Col. Hensen suggested establishing interoperability between the various warrior programs, under development among all allied forces. “If we don’t buy together and fund together – some countries will not be able to afford it” said Hensen. He expects Land Warrior (LW) to restart next year with the renewed funding directed by the Senate. “Affordability will be the key [to the system success]” said Hensen.

    Hansen’s briefing covered the progress with the various warrior programs, as well as the rapid fielding initiative. Land Warrior kits were modified significantly after the 4/9 test & evaluation. Since the suite is modular, it was redesigned to better match troop’s preference, moving the radio and batteries onto the soldier’s back, while the computer, navigator and controller unit (known as ‘fusion’) is mounted on the side, clearing more space for ammunition and grenades. Such repositioning became possible with the mounted warrior kit, since these warfighters usually operate close to their Stryker armored vehicles. Currently, over 200 land warrior suites are operational in Iraq with the 42nd Brigade Combat Team (BCT). Operational lessons gathered during the current employment are expected to be instrumental for further progress of future programs. The focus is on empowering the small unit call for fire; collect and relay target data to command post and fire units and accelerate medical support calls and treatment under combat conditions. Further development of the system was suspended this year due funding cuts brought to the program’s cancellation by the Army. However, the Senate Armed Services Committee added $80 million to the FY 09 program to resurrect the program, as it migrates into the Army’s Future Combat Systems (FCS).

    Marine Expeditionary Rifle Squad (MERS)

    Mark Richter, PM Marine Expeditionary Rifle Squad (MERS) outlined the USMC view of the enhanced rifle infantry squad, a combat formation reduced from a complex 13-man unit to a more maneuverable, streamlined eight men formation. Richter also discussed the rapid fielding of new equipment, including the fielding of night vision devices, personal role radio for all squad members, equipping commanders at various levels with additional computing devices. The concept of “platoon in a box” was also discussed, outlining some innovative logistical solutions enabling the support and deployment of such flexible concepts. “The squad as a system” is the USMC approach to future warrior systems. Richter regards power to be the most critical issue. The future concept is the Enhanced / Distributed Operations. Enabling the marine unit to control and dominate a larger area – placing more experienced Non Commissioned Officers (NCO) in key positions in the squad and platoon, embedding intelligence cells at Forward Operating Bases (FOB) and company or platoon formations, issuing four digital cameras to each squad, enabling troops to collect intelligence while on routine missions and process it on image enhancement gear while at the FOB. The cameras are quiet and effective even in darkness, as images can be enhanced to show details invisible on regular mode. 200 digital cameras in the battalion become a powerful visual intelligence asset that must be managed effectively.

    FIST Assessment Phase (AP)

    The FIST program, currently in the assessment phase, has gone through several phases of trials, which highlighted some technical issues with equipment subsystems. These tests demonstrated how the FIST will integrate within the British Army’s Bowman network and work with other systems currently under planning stage. Recent tests validated the improvements made with weapons and firepower of the fire team. John Foley, FIST program Technical Director at Thales briefed on the recent achievements, detailing the composition of FIST SA equipment, the test’s outline ad some of the lessons learned. Col. A.G. Bain, British Army Force Development Headquarters Infantry added some insights on development and fielding of new infantry gear and weapons, among them a new 60 mm portable mortar, replacing the aging 52mm hand held mortar, and an all-terrain load carrier, that will offload some of the cargo currently carried by British warfighters.

    The Israeli progress

    The Israeli Integrated Advanced Soldier (IAS) program is building a ‘dismounted combat team’ to be operated within the infantry battalion level. These battalions will be able to operate in mounted or dismounted operations, while commanders able to receive and make decisions based on an updated ‘live’ situational picture presenting both hostile and friendly forces. The equipment used by the troops will be modular, and designed to operate in urban and open terrain. Currently underway the program is led by the Ministry of Defense’s Defense Directorate for Research and Development (DDRD) and Elbit Systems.

    The program began with a feasibility study launched in 2003 and followed a year later with a combat lab experiment. In 2005, the IDF tested individual combatant gear and conducted the first battalion-size field test highlighting an urban warfare scenario. Following the test, which proved highly successful, the system entered full scale development. The first kits are being delivered and will be used for company and battalion-size exercises, beginning fall 2007 through winter 2008. Following the conclusion of these tests, the system will become operational with the first combat platoon for an operational pilot.

    Topics covered in Soldiertech 2007 review:

    Terror related Post-Traumatic Stress: The Israeli Experience

    Both Israel and Gaza are a “perfect laboratory” for studying Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and other anxiety related ailments. The level of chronic anxiety here is so great and so constant that it seems the ideal place for research on cognitive therapy. Unfortunately, only in Israel has there been a substantially organized effort to study these phenomena in an orderly fashion and several trauma researches have recently become available to the public.

    Trauma is no stranger to the Israeli psyche. It has been present here for nearly sixty years.

    Although the Second Lebanon War is now already a memory of the past, the emotional and psychological wounds of thousands of Israelis are quite vivid and have yet to heal. In addition to the traumas experienced by Israelis during the Second Lebanon War, the security crisis in Sderot and communities surrounding Gaza have had a tremendous impact on the mental health of thousands of Israelis residing in the southern regions of Israel. Often the symptoms of trauma and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder appear suddenly, severely hindering every aspect of the individuals’ life. Many of the children and families suffering from PTSD in Sderot are not receiving any treatment simply because they fear leaving their homes and being struck by a Qassam rocket.

    As part of a solution, NATAL the local trauma center, has initiated a “Mobile Unit”, composed of 5 mental health professionals who make home visitations to families in distress. For over seven years now the community of Sderot and those surrounding the Gaza Strip have been forced to contend with ongoing acts of violence and numerous traumas. From the ongoing barrage of Qassam rockets to economic instability, southern residents have faced their own unique crisis’s which has drastically impacted the mental health of thousands. Additionally, many of the residents in the south feel abandon by the state and the general public as terrorist attacks in the center of the country and the Second Lebanon War often times overshadowed the security crisis in the south. With no end of violence in sight, residents have had no choice but to live in a constant state of stress, isolation, uncertainty and fear.

    Dr. Adriana Katz, 59, is the director of Sderot’s mental health center, where she has worked for 12 years, and directs a newly established clinic called “Hosen Nafshi” (mental fortitude).The city’s mental health clinic is treating some 1,000 trauma victims – out of the city’s 24,000 residents – and figures are rising daily. Dr Katz believes there are more victims, but many are ashamed to seek help. A study conducted by Tel Hai College has found that at least one-third (!!) of the children in the Negev town of Sderot suffer from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

    Only handful kilometers to the West, a similar tragedy is unfolding in the Gaza Strip. Here children are suffering equally from traumatic symptoms. The street fighting in Gaza, where Hamas and Fatah gunmen are firing indiscriminately at each other, is keeping children cooped up in their squalid homes for days and weeks. It doesn’t take an air strike, or a telephoned warning that Israeli bombers are on the way, to terrify the war-weary children of Gaza. Heightened surveillance is enough to cause nightmares. Incessant shooting, Israeli jetfighter ultra-sound booms and just ordinary noise from firing Qassam and Israeli bombing, are sufficient sources of constant fear. In Gaza’s grim conditions, mothers find it hard to tell if their offspring are crying out of fright, pain or misery. But when normally bickering brats fall silent, it’s the first sign of mental scars from being scared, traumatized and frightened. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is common here. One survey found almost of a third of Gazan children suffering from a severe form of this condition. These figures make it clear that a typical childhood in Gaza included witnessing or experiencing the violent events associated with this particularly deadly conflict.
    .
    The problem is, that in Gaza there is little help, as no organized trauma centers are available to mitigate the suffering. Both Gaza and Sderot, only a stone throw apart, are two separate worlds, each engulfed in its own suffering and misery- but both are unfortunate victims of political bickering and cynical indifference by their respective leaders.

    Israel 2000-2007: Normal People Living in an Abnormal Situation

    The Israeli experience in PTSD occurring after suicide terror and massive rocket attacks, is second to none in the world, and academics name Israel as the ” world’s perfect laboratory” for PTSD studies, a rather dubious portrayal, which most Israelis would like to erase permanently from their agenda. According to Professor Arieh Shalev, chief of psychiatry at Hadassah-University Hospital Jerusalem, disasters can take many forms, all demanding rapid response by experienced emergency rescue teams.

    When such incidents are isolated, or infrequent, most people recover from the traumatic events quite rapidly. The same applies in principle, when an entire population is under a continuous war situation. For example could serve, the psychological stamina of the people of London during the 1940 Blitz, or the DESERT STORM Scud attacks on Israel in 1991, or even, to some extent, the horrendous carnage on 9/11 in 2001. While the stress was significant during the actual attack period, most of the psychological symptoms evaporated quite quickly and life resumed its normality.

    But in Israel, since the year 2000, and especially during the notoriously 2002-2005 incessant suicide terrorist attacks, the situation became highly critical.
    Palestinian suicide attacks during that period took an almost daily toll in civilian life. Israel’s towns became frontline to acts of brutal and indiscriminate terrorism- nearly a thousand Israelis lost their life during that terrifying time, thousand became severely mutilated, even more suffered mental disorders hitherto virtually unknown. Only the people of Baghdad must still share this kind of daily horror.

    While, under attack, most of the population, not directly affected by traumatic events, remains quite resilient and hardens to the daily threats and trying at best to continue their daily routine, the first response emergency workers are undergoing a growing emotional change, enhanced by protracted exposure to catastrophic events, some which are beyond human perception even to seasoned veterans in this grueling trade.

    Understanding the Symptoms of PTSD

    Most Israeli researchers distinguish between the acute symptoms that trauma victims experience immediately after the event ( Acute Stress Disorder), and chronic Post -Traumatic Disorder (PTSD), which is considered a disease that can only be diagnosed about four months after the actual incident. Professor Arieh Shalev ran MRI brain scans on people exposed to traumatic events one week after the incident and then six months later. At first, things appeared normal, but as time progressed he found there was more activity in the brain’s centers. As memories have more impact on the brain, people become socially regressive and lose interest in their surroundings.

    Israeli researchers thus appear to be reaching the understanding that the first period of time after a traumatic event is a window of opportunity, in which the human system is still open to professional intervention, and sufficiently sensitive to change and the damage is reversible.

    According to Professor Shmuel Shapira, Deputy Director General of the Jerusalem Hadassah University Hospitals, the medical term “lightly wounded” is not a scientific definition. It generally means that there is no immediate danger to life and limb in the patient’s body. But the damage to the soul, by severe shock, must be regarded far from “light”.

    To heal those may require weeks of treatment in hospitals, or specialist mental institutions, months of careful rehabilitation to restore some sort of normal lifestyle routine. Some of these effects may never heal completely. The psychological trauma may be even more devastating than wounds, says, Professor Shapira, and in worst cases can lead to chronic unemployment, divorce and sometimes even suicide, others may even be mentally handicapped for life.

    Dr Batya Ludman, an Israeli psychologist specializing in trauma explained that people associated with a one-time terror attack, can usually cope with the traumatic experience and return to normal routine after reasonable time, with or even without mental assistance. However, Dr Ludman warned, that the problem she observed in Israel during the height of the Intifada years, was that people did not have the time to recover from one terror attack, before the next one hit. In fact, this is currently the situation in Sderot, where Qassam alert is occurring day and night without respite.

    The Grueling Job of Israeli First Responder Services

    On a visit to the United States a few years ago, Israeli Emergency Medical Services (EMS) workers, provided first hand insight into the violence that they have witnessed as some first responder emergency units to arrive at the scene of the horrifying carnage. Being first on the scene, only minutes after an explosion, is a terrifying experience even to the staunchest veterans of wars. The MDA workers, many of which are volunteers are an indispensable part of the Israeli Emergency Rescue Services, which apart from the EMS include special security elements, Police Forensic Units, Bomb Disposal Experts, so-called “Body handlers” and, as of late highly trained mental assistance paramedics. Usually among the first on the scene, checking between bloody limbs and blown-up body parts for additional bombs, the men shut off their minds to the mortal scene they are facing up to. “You don’t have time to think about the danger of unexploded ordnance. As soon as you are faced with the real event, a switch goes off in your head and you shift into s different gear” says 28 year old Rami, a veteran BDS member who has seen it all and survived.
    But the most harrowing job of all is the task of the special Israeli volunteer organization Chesed Shel Emet (True Mercy) also known officially as Zaka (“Identification of Victims of Disaster”).

    These are ultra-orthodox Jews, wearing the black kippot (scull caps) and Tzitzit (a four cornered garment) and are identified on duty by their distinctive fluorescent orange emergency vests. Their task is to search and collect limbs and scrape down buildings splattered with blood and strips of flesh blown away by the blast of the explosion. While the other rescue teams work feverishly to recover the wounded and evacuate them as quickly as possible, police forensic experts try to identify the corpses- Zaka members, are carefully tending to the ancient Jewish ritual of giving the dead a proper burial.

    According to this law, the entire corps should be buried on the day of death, if possible. However, as the explosion usually blows body parts wide apart, such a task is not only a traumatic experience to the Zaka volunteers, but in many cases, when secondary explosions cause catastrophic fire, this becomes almost impossible, as bodies are burned to cinders. In the laconic professional designation, Zaka men are termed as ” Body Handlers”, which is rather a thin understatement of the highly sensitive and almost inhuman demand on their psychological stamina, which only their devout adherence to the Jewish Halacha law can support.

    But there are times, when Zaka men could even save limbs and rush them to hospitals in time for re-attachment, especially if the victims were children, this gives some brightness to a otherwise somber task, they say. How these men function at all, under those conditions, can best be explained in the words of Zaka founder, Rabbi Elazar Gelbstein: ” It’s something that you can never prepare yourself emotionally” he says, ” When we arrive at the scene, we reprogram ourselves and work in a trance. If we stopped to think about what we are doing, we’d become paralyzed”. The selection process for Zaka volunteers is difficult for many who enlist. Some cannot even take the training films projected, showing footage of bombings too shocking even to the most vivid horror movies, others drop out after the first encounter.

    But those who go on with this grisly work are certainly of a special breed, which have already gained public admiration, by the secular Israeli society, which traditionally regards the ultra-religious Haredim community as draft dodgers and national outcasts. In fact, Zaka has already gained international recognition in 2001, when the United Nations named it as Israeli volunteer organization of the year.

    But this work has its price. Among the most severe cases of Post- Traumatic Stress Disorders are the Zaka volunteers. The horror of the job tending for mutilated terror victims is taking its constant toll among those dedicated men. Rony Berger, a clinical psychologist with Israel’s largest trauma center, said, “with so much stress on such a regular basis, many of those who are first on the scene are suffering from ‘burn-out’.” Professor Shalev found that disaster workers with high blood pressure that does not decline over the first hours or days, are the highest risk samples for chronic PTSD, in other words, they suffer from complete burn-out and are no longer fit to work under stress.

    Rescue team leaders must be warned by physicians, of those cases, so that they can be replaced before they cause not only damage to their health, but can endanger their team mates during a critical life-saving operation.

    Under the professional term, emergency workers, suffering from traumatic symptoms are termed “Secondary Traumatic Stress Victims (STS)”.
    Second traumatic Stress differs from Post-Traumatic Stress by the mode of exposure to the traumatic event. Direct exposure may result in PTSD, whereas, indirect exposure to the event may result in STS.

    According to latest statistics, some 20% of these STS victims, will eventually develop PTSD symptoms. Another medical term for this phenomena is “Compassionate Fatigue”, in other words, mental exhaustion due to excessive stress.

    But not only the immediate rescue teams are prone to traumatic stress reactions. A similar process was detected in cleansing crews, repairmen and security guards, all called in to restore order to the chaos, but exposed to the gruesome debris and rests of the bloody carnage, which are left on the scene by the rescue squads, after the victims have been evacuated. ” The prevailing concept, that people who are exposed to repeated terror experiences, are hardened physically and mentally to the traumatic events, is baseless” ,says Dr Ze’ev Wiener, of the Ramat Chen Mental Institution,” the uniform ( of the rescue workers) may help, but only in short term. When they go home, the mental break-down becomes inevitable”.

    The Children Victims of Terrorism

    Currently, one of the most stressing aspects of PTSD is the fate of children exposed to the horrors of sustained terrorism and its related traumatic aftermath. Some 42 percent of Israeli children suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), of which 15 percent have a moderate to severe version of the syndrome, Dr. Avital Laufer of Tel Aviv University told the Knesset Committee on the Rights of Children. The committee was discussing the effects of the terror attacks of the past 32 months on children. Laufer’s findings were based on a study of some 3,000 children aged 13 to 15, from both sides of the “Green Line”. Some 70 percent of the children said that the terror attacks had had a direct impact on their lives, causing them to abandon or avoid certain activities.

    A similar study by the Gaza Community Health Programs found the rate of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) among Palestinian children showed that 54% suffered from severe PTSD, 33.5 % from moderate and 11 % from mild and doubtful levels of PTSD. Some symptoms of PTSD include restlessness, insomnia, aggressiveness, depression, dissociation, emotional detachment, and nightmares.

    Research into childhood trauma has clearly demonstrated that infants and children impacted by terrorism or with mothers who have suffered traumatic experiences are at very high risk for a multitude of long-term emotional disorders. Mothers suffering the effects of Post Traumatic Stress Disorders (PTSD) have difficulty providing the emotional holding environment and relational foundation necessary for healthy attachment and bonding. An anxious or traumatized mother will have difficulty soothing her child if she herself is in a state of emotional and physical hyper-arousal.

    These disturbing figures hardly need further elaboration, apart from placing this disturbing data on the top priority agenda before the political leadership on both sides of the fence to do their utmost, before it is too late, to stop this tragedy escalating into a human catastrophe.

    Squad Mission Support System

    Squad Mission Support System (SMSS) is a robotic platform based on a turbo-diesel powered, high mobility six wheel all-terrain vehicle (ATV) capable of carrying 1,000 pounds (453 kg) of payload. Current platforms are utilizing a commercial platform converted for a surrogate SMSS vehicle. Future versions will utilize specially designed platforms, optimized for the SMSS mission.

    SMSS is designed to carry enough loads to support a single squad, and utilizes a sophisticated management system to enable autonomous movement over rough terrain, as well as amphibious capability for crossing rivers and marshes. The SMSS’ supervised autonomy will provide the warfighter with a reliable squad-sized vehicle which will improve combat readiness, while assuring re-supply channels and casualty evacuations. The vehicle cost is expected to be around US$200,000 per unit. Lockheed Martin is expecting a market for 4,000 such vehicles. The company is planning to introduce an operational SMSS by 2009. While SMSS is expected to assume part of the roles planned for the Future Combat Systems’ (FCS) dismounted infantry support vehicle (MULE), Lockheed Martin does not expect this vehicle to become a competitor for their MULE.

    The vehicle was introduced by Lockheed Martin in August 2006, and was displayed at the AUSA 2006 exhibition. robotics program, funded by Lockheed Martin as an independent research and development project, will provide manned and unmanned transport and logistical support to the Light and Early Entry Forces.

    “Our long-term vision of this system can accommodate armed variants, while improving its reconnaissance, intelligence, surveillance and target acquisition (RISTA) capabilities within the concept of supervised autonomy,” says Gene Holleque, director – Combat Maneuver Systems at Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control. “A squad-size manned or unmanned support vehicle just makes sense in today’s asymmetrical and urban battlefields.”

    Australian Redback AFV to Get PASEO Joint Fires Payload

    0
    Safran is integrating the PASEO Joint Fires advanced day and night panoramic sight system onto Hanwha’s Redback Infantry Fighting Vehicle (IFV). The company announced this development at Australia's recent Land Forces 2024 event. The...

    India’s Light Tank Zorawar LT Completes Trial by Fire

    0
    India's new light tank has completed its first live-fire trials and is expected to undergo limited user testing in the coming months. The Zorawar light tank has completed its first live-fire trials, marking a...

    Rafael Breaks Cover of Iron Dome Mission Modules

    0
    Rafael Advanced Defense Systems showcased its new Iron Dome Mission Module at last week's Land Forces 2024 exhibition in Australia and the Air Force Association Air, Space, and Cyber (ASC) event in Washington, D.C.,...

    JASSM-XR Further Extends Cruise Missile Strike Capability

    0
    Lockheed Martin has unveiled the AGM-158 JASSM-XR, the latest extended-range version of its Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM). As a variant of a proven and air-qualified family of weapons, the XR variant offers a...

    Combined Hardware-Cyber Attack Annihilate Hezbollah Command Network

    0
    Over 3,000 pagers and hundreds of two-way radios exploded this week, causing about 40 fatalities and wounding thousands of Hezbollah operatives in Lebanon and Syria. The pagers exploded after receiving a coded message in...