Friday, December 19, 2025
More
    Home Blog Page 346

    Kenya Ethnic Chaos Could Provoke Al Qaeda Comeback

    Kenya’s sudden spiral into chaos after years being regarded as a regional stability in the turbulent Black African continent, will no doubt strike a heavy blow on the economies of a wide swathe of neighboring nations. But while the present scale of internecine violence came as quite a surprise, it was not the first time that this African nation became engulfed in chaos.

    From October 1952 to December 1957 Kenya was under a state of emergency arising from the so-called “Mau Mau” rebellion against British colonial rule, over the deprivation of the Kikuyu majority. The official number of Kenyans killed was estimated at 11,503. Much fighting among the various tribes followed, until independence from Great Britain in December 1963, when Jomo Kenyatta, also a Kikuyu became first prime minister of the autonomous Kenyan government. Over the last decade or so, Kenya was regarded an African success story. Beginning to enjoy the fruits of its stability and openness, its economy has grown by more than 6 per cent annually in recent years. But now, in just a few bloody days, since a disputed election on December 27, Kenya has quickly slipped from democratic hopeful, escalating into uncontrollable chaos and brutal murder. From years of prosperity, it threatened to become the scene of just another regional, highly dangerous trouble spot, torn by ethnic bloodletting and prone to outside terrorist intervention.

    Back in 2002, Mwai Kibaki (age 76), a Kikuyu, was elected as president, promising to clean up Kenya after 40 years of corruption. His election was widely praised, after previous polls were marred by irregularities and ethnic violence between the Kikuyu and Luo communities. But now it seemed that Mr Kibaki was determined to hang on to power by those very corrupt means which he has declared fighting.

    Many of the voters actually favored Raila Odinga (62), who is a Luo, a tribe from western Kenya near Lake Victoria on the border with Uganda, comprising about 22 per cent of the population. The present turmoil has already caused dangerous repercussions throughout Africa. Kenya’s port of Mombasa and the single road snaking up to Uganda and beyond are vital for the economies of the entire region and the impact of the ongoing crisis is being felt with petrol pumps already running dry in Uganda and Burundi and with rationing being imposed in Rwanda. Any weakening of democracy in Kenya will have a domino effect across the continent, threatening infiltration of Islamic fundamentalist elements into any unstable state.

    The country, famous for its palm-fringed beaches and wildlife parks, visited by millions of tourists, shares borders with Tanzania, Uganda, Sudan, Ethiopia and Somalia. While its 36 million people are split into more than 40 ethnic groups, Kenya was nevertheless sofar widely regarded as a haven of relative peace and prosperity in a region plagued by conflict, poverty and disease. All this might now change rapidly, if a solution cannot be found immediately to prevent total disaster. By inviting dangerous elements like Al Qaeda or it’s affiliates into the void, these could make their comeback into this little ‘Garden of Eden’. In fact, Kenya’s attorney general Amos S. Wako has warned that his country is “fast degenerating into a catastrophe of unimaginable proportions”. About a third of Kenya’s population are Muslims, many more are refugees, driven by the unrest in neighboring Somalia, creating further problems of the already largely deprived Muslim population in the country.

    The fact is that many corrupt African governments, porous borders, widespread poverty and discontented Muslim populations have created a region ripe for Islamic fundamentalism, Kenya, and Tanzania just to its south, have already been victims of al-Qaeda terrorism. Kenya itself borders with the highly volatile and Al Qaeda infected Somalia. Moreover, as Al Qaeda is currently coming under pressure in Asia, any lawless African nation must now be considered their obvious target.

    Already in 2005 such warning came from Major General Douglas Lute, then director of operations at US Central Command “There will come a time when Zarqawi will face too much resistance in Iraq and will move on,” the general predicted, referring to the head of Al-Qaeda in Iraq. (Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Jordanian-born Islamist who was later killed in an American airstrike). Al-Qaeda has spent years operating in Kenya and is widely remembered by the 1998 twin bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi and in neighboring Tanzania, that killed 224 Kenyans, Tanzanians and Americans and injured over 4,000 more. This bloody attack was followed shortly by a 2002 suicide car bombing targeting a hotel popular with Israelis near Mombassa and the attempted destruction of an Israeli airliner by shoulder fired missiles, from near its airport. It had awakened U.S. security officials to the dangers posed by militant Islam in East Africa. In the years since, the Horn of Africa, and Kenya in particular, has come into new focus of U.S. counterterrorism.

    Fazul Abdullah MohammedWhat is little known was that a radical Palestinian group was already implicated in the bombing of the Jewish owned Norfolk Hotel in Nairobi on New year’s eve in1981. It was then, that Kenya had already been considered as a soft target by international terrorism experts, but little attention was given. A prime target of U.S. counterterrorism forces in the region for nearly a decade was one Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, who was indicted for planning the 1998 embassy bombings, the Paradise Hotel in Kikambala near Mombasa and the attempt on the Israeli Arkia airliner in 2002. Early 2004, the Kenya Anti-Terrorist Police, trained and financed by the United States, were raiding mosques on a tip-off, detaining suspected terrorists all along the Swahili coast. However Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, warned in time, escaped to Somalia, where radical Islam was establishing its strongest beachhead in the Horn of Africa.

    But Al-Qaeda operatives had already settled themselves into several communities along Kenya’s Indian Ocean coast. In 2004, US Marine Brigadier General Martin Robeson, then commander of the regional US-led anti-terror task force based in neigboring Djibouti warned that hundreds of new Al-Qaeda members had been recruited in Kenya, despite stepped-up anti-terrorism efforts. American intelligence officials mentioned repeatedly, that apprehended suspects included members of Al Qaeda and Al Itihaad al Islamiya, considered the most powerful radical band in the Horn of Africa, which has been funded by Al Qaeda. Counter terrorist intelligence reports have identified the Dabaab refugee camp on the Somalia-Kenya border as a training ground for Islamic extremists, through a Muslim charity, called al Haramain, that sponsored religious schools and social programs in that area.

    Kenya long maintained informal military alliances with the United States and the United Kingdom (UK). Since 1980 Kenya has supported U.S. military commitments in the Indian Ocean by permitting use of Mombasa port and air base facilities, in exchange for U.S. military assistance. Kenya is a valuable point of entry and staging platform, for U.S., British, and German aerial and naval search operations targeting Al-Qaeda–linked Somalia-based groups. Currently, Kenyan and U.S. officials are discussing a new U.S. military command, Africa Command (AFRICOM), destined to control U.S. military operations in Africa. Announced in 2007, AFRICOM will be carved out of the three combatant commands responsible for the continent: European Command, Central Command, and Pacific Command. AFRICOM will initially operate from Germany at the European Command headquarters and become fully established in late 2008 somewhere in Africa. Kenya is among the 10 countries being considered for AFRICOM’s main base. But this may well change under the present circumstances, as anti-US sentiments could increase with the ongoing instability. In fact, extending military relations with the US could be foreboding premonition for an escalating anti-American violence Al-Qaeda style, which would only increase regional instability and especially in an inter-ethnic fighting Kenya.

    As for Kenya’s own efforts to fight terrorism – these have been sporadic and sofar insufficiently effective to stem any serious influx of subversive elements, as the present chaos clearly demonstrated. In 2004 The Kenyan government had established the African continent’s first counter-terrorism center to help develop and coordinate strategies in east Africa. The new National Counter-Terrorism Center was headquartered in Nairobi, but it seemed sofar totally incapable to overcome the bureaucratic hurdles, obstructing any successful operational function.

    US Sells TOW-RF Missiles, Guided Weapons for Persian Gulf States

    Missiles Arms sales rally continues in the Persian Gulf, this week, sales of advanced versions of the TOW missiles to Kuwait and various aerial weapons to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) were reported by the Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

    The aerial weapons to be ordered by the UAE will equip their F-16 Block 60 aircraft, and include 224 AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM air/air missiles, 450 GBU-24 Paveway III laser guidance kits and 200 GBU-31 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) tail kits for Mk-84 bombs (2,000 pounds), and 488 GBU-12 Paveway II guidance kits for Mk-82 (500 pound) bombs. The order, $326 million will also include 224 MK-84 2,000 pound bombs.

    Kuwait will be upgrading its TOW missile systems, as their missiles are nearing the end of their shelf life. Kuwait is buying 3,510 TOWs of the latest Tow-2A/B Radio Frequency (RF) models, a wireless version of the TOW. The $328 million order will include 2,106 TOW-2A RF missiles and 1,404 TOW-2B Radio Frequency missiles. The Kuwaiti Army operates 118 vehicle mounted TOW systems. The country’s National Guards has additional systems, mounted on armored cars.

    Counter MANPADS system to be Evaluated Under Regular Airline Operations and Maintenance

    The jeteye Counter-MANPADS system, developed by BAE Systems was installed on a cargo aircraft ioperated by American Airlines. Three more passenger aircraft will be equipped with the Jeteye and be used for evaluation of the missile defense system. Photo: BAE Systems


    BAE Systems has received a $29 million award from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to test an infrared aircraft missile defense system on passenger aircraft. The tests will evaluate the system’s compatibility with daily passenger airline operations and maintenance.

    This award funds the third phase of the DHS counter-MANPADS program’s research development activity. The current phase will not test the system’s missile-defeating capability, a task already demonstrated in an earlier phase of the program. The JETEYE missile defense systems will be installed on up to three American Airlines aircraft. The DHS counter-MANPADS program is designed to commercialize proven military technology and gauge its suitability for protecting U.S. commercial aircraft by evaluating its performance, impact on aerodynamic drag, weight, reliability, maintainability, and system cost.

    The JETEYE system is based on BAE Systems’ existing directable infrared countermeasures technology, used to protect military aircraft. With this award, JETEYE will be the only system installed on both cargo and passenger aircraft.

    Israeli Infantry Battalions to Improve Fire Support

    Keshet 120mm self-propelled mortar utilizes the M-106 (M-113) chassis configured with the Cardom mortar system from Elbit Systems (formerly Soltam).

    The Israeli Army is planning to complete the fielding of CARDOM mortar systems and remotely controlled weapon stations, equipping the regular infantry brigades and some reserve infantry units this year (2008).


    According to Lt. Col. Eran Granit, IDF Land Forces’ Head of Weapon Systems, the CARDOM version selected by the IDF is a more advanced version of the vehicle mounted 120mm mortar system developed by Soltam, and fielded with the US Army Stryker brigade combat teams. The Israeli version designated “Keshet” is fully integrated with brigade’s command and control system, enabling automatic mortar aiming, (traversing and elevation) to rapidly target targets with high precision. The manually loaded system will enable battalion commanders to employ autonomous fire support which was previously available at brigade level and above.

    In 2008 Infantry battalions are also expected to receive the Samson armored, remotely controlled weapon stations (RCWS). Some of the vehicles, such as the Achzarit AIFV are equipped with mechanical ‘Overhead Weapon Stations’ (OWS), also developed by Rafael. The externally mounted Samson will free some space inside the fighting compartment and improve situational awareness and target acquisition and engagement capability with the introduction of electro optical day/night sensors and stabilized weapon mount. Similar systems are already installed on elevated sites along the Israeli border with the palestinian gaza strip, providing persistent coverage, by visual observation and firepower, along this sensitive borderline.

    Harris Unveils a New Wearable Tactical Radio

    A new member of the Falcon III family, the RF-300S, is positioned by Harris as a lightweight, wearable tactical radio supporting the dismounted soldier. This UHF radio (225 MHz to 470 MHz) provides wideband data transfer for situational awareness applications, in addition to narrowband voice capabilities. It is designed to establish squad-level networking based on software-defined radios with built-in GPS.


    “The Falcon III RF-300S will deliver new levels of voice and high-bandwidth data connectivity to the entire squad,” said George Helm, vice president and general manager, U.S. Government Products, Harris RF Communications. “By combining P25 and the Soldier Radio Waveform, the radio offers great operational flexibility, ease of migration as standards change, and interoperability.” The new radio is designed to address the emerging requirements of the U.S. Department of Defense, such as the Rifleman Radio program. The radio also supports APCO Project 25 (P25) waveform, allowing secure interoperability with currently deployed squad radios as well as with first responders in non-military operations. Interoperability with currently deployed narrowband radios is critical to allow a smooth transition to a networked force until adequate spectrum is available to support a large number of users.

    It also operates the Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW) and the Harris Advanced Wideband Networking Waveform (ANW2) for networked tactical communications. The new radio is secured using the Suite-B algorithms, including AES for encryption, allowing interoperability with other Suite-B enabled communication products. Properly implemented Suite-B algorithms can provide protection of information up through the classified SECRET level in a non-cryptographic controlled item (CCI) environment, eliminating the need for every soldier to have a security clearance. Harris plans to submit the RF-300S to the U.S. Government for evaluation for use in non-CCI, Secret and below applications.

    At the LandWarNet exhibition Harris also demonstrated how another member of its Falcon III family of radios, the AN/PRC-117G can operate with JTRS-developed Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW), transferring wideband tactical networking. SRW will serve as the principal Department of Defense waveform for creating battlefield communication networks for individual soldiers.
    At the exhibition, the radios transmitted combat net radio voice, streaming video and situational awareness data over a network using the SRW waveform. “This demonstration validates the ability of the Falcon III radios to host wideband networking waveforms developed under the JTRS program, thus providing warfighters with secure access to the network and high-bandwidth applications, such as streaming video,” said George Helm, vice president and general manager, U.S. Government Products, Harris RF Communications.

    The Falcon III AN/PRC-117G, now in production and fielded by the Department of Defense, is the first radio to provide both secure wideband data and narrowband voice capability. The radio allows the mobile warfighter access to secure IP data at on-air rates up to 5 Megabits per second, dramatically improving situational awareness by supporting networked data-intensive applications. It features mobile ad-hoc networking, automated network establishment and maintenance, and integrated Type 1 security. It is based on SCA-compliant software-defined architecture, offering legacy interoperability with currently fielded radios, incorporating SINCGARS, Havequick, the High Performance Waveform (HPW), as well as Tactical Satellite (TACSAT).

    F-15E Strike Eagle

    The Boeing F-15E Strike Eagle is a dual-role fighter designed to perform air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. An array of avionics and electronics systems gives the F-15E the capability to fight at low altitude, day or night, and in all weather. The aircraft has a crew of two – pilot and weapon systems operator. Its avionics suite include an advanced multi-mode air/air/ air/ground radar (APG-70), navigation system based on laser gyro, and an electro-optical targeting system (Originally equipped with LANTIRN, the Strike eagle recently received the Sniper Advanced Targeting Pod). The aircraft retained the LANTIRN’s radar navigation pod, to provide low-altitude terrain following flight at night and under difficult visibility conditions.

    The F-15E is the US Air Forces’ combat command’s ‘platform of choice’ for new capabilities is the F-15E. This aircraft is currently suited to carry Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM), Joint Air to Surface Strike Missile (JASSM) and Small Diameter Bomb (SDB). The Strike Eagle can carry 20 SDBs which can be targeted individually to attack different targets.

    McDonnell Douglas F-15E First production F-15E (SN 86-0183) in flight

    A near-term capability enhancement planned for the SDB is the use of ‘Focused Lethality Warheads’, which will further reduce the risk of collateral damage and enable shorter safety margins for attack. In the longer term, a new radar (most probably a variant of the APG-63V3 AESA radar will replace current APG-70 radar as part of the Eagle’s Radar Modernization Program (RMP).

    Other improvements included in the Suite 6 avionics upgrade include a new digital video recorder and mission planning to offer much faster and more efficient mission planning using smart weapons. The aircraft will be fitted with modern IFF Mode 5, AIM-120D medium-range BVR AMRAAM missiles, satellite communications link and VHF/UHF ARC-210.

    In the following pages, Defense Update reports how the USAF plans to maintain its ‘Shooters’ effective for years to come.

    MQ-8B Fire Scout – Vertical takeoff UAV (VTUAV)

    An enhanced version of the FireScout Vertical Takeoff UAV (VTUAV) completed an initial series of flight testing conducted by the U.S. Navy and Northrop Grumman.


    The new model offers a significant capability increase over the first generation RQ-8A Fire Scout. It has a four blade rotor, and other enhancements giving the aircraft longer endurance (over eight hours) greater payload carrying capacity of up to 600 pounds (272 kg).

    With vehicle endurance greater than six hours, Fire Scout will be capable of continuous operations providing coverage 110 nautical miles from the launch site. A baseline payload that includes electro-optical/infrared sensors and a laser designator enables Fire Scout to find tactical targets, track and designate targets, accurately provide targeting data to strike platforms and perform battle damage assessment. FireScout was also selected for the US Army FCS Class IV UAV, offering future units of action a flexible, weaponized ISR and attack platform.

    With additional fuel capacity, the MQ-8B can stay on station for six hours at 110 miles (176 km) from launch site. The Navy plans to use Fire Scout on board the Littoral Combat Ship, where sailors will operate both manned and unmanned helicopters to support operational requirements.

    FireScout conducted a series of flight tests that culminated in two successful launches of a 2.75-inch Hydra-class rocket from the Fire Scout Vertical Takeoff Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (VTUAV). Fire Scout is programmed to become operational in fiscal year ’09 and deploy aboard the littoral combat ship. The Fire Scout was re-designated MQ-8B, which reflects the aerial vehicle’s multi-mission functionality. The Navy is acquiring the MQ-8B Fire Scout UAV to fulfill the service’s requirement for a tactical UAV capable of operating in the shipboard environment.

    On May 30, 2007 The U.S. Department of Defense awarded Northrop Grumman Corporation’s (NYSE:NOC) $13.6 million for the procurement of long lead items, in support of the low-rate initial production of MQ-8B Fire Scout Vertical Takeoff and Landing Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (VTUAV). “The Fire Scout program is on track to conduct payload flights this fall and enter initial operational evaluation and then achieve initial operational capability in 2008 as planned,” said CDR Rob Murphy, Navy VTUAV program manager. The Fire Scout’s operational requirements include real-time video imagery collection, intelligence gathering, communications-relay capability, precision targeting and battle damage assessment from the Littoral Combat Ship. The Navy has nine Fire Scouts currently on contract with Northrop Grumman. The first was delivered in November to Naval Air Station Patuxent River. The successful series of first flights was completed just weeks later. All nine are expected to be delivered by the end of 2008.

    FireScout Industry Team

    System design work on the Fire Scout is performed at the Integrated Systems Unmanned Systems Development Center in San Diego, Calif. The Fire Scout is assembled at the Unmanned Systems Center in Moss Point, Miss. The VTUAV is based on a commercial-off-the-shelf Schweizer 333 manned helicopter manufactured in Horseheads, N.Y. The baseline design has proven a highly reliable and effective platform with extensive operating history.

    With Northrop Grumman as prime contractor, the MQ-8B Fire Scout industry team also includes Schweizer Aircraft Corporation, the platform’s designer and airframe manufacturer and Rolls-Royce Corporation, delivering the engine.

    Avionics providers include Rockwell Collins supplying avionics, GE Fanuc produces produced the vehicle management computer, Kearfott Inc. supplies the guidance and navigation systems and Cubic Defense Applications delivering the communications systems. The BriteStar II EO payload is supplied by FLIR Systems.

    Ship integration is performed by Lockheed Martin Corporation, which integrated the unmanned common automatic recovery system from Sierra Nevada Corporation. Raytheon Company supplied the tactical control system.

    MQ-8B Complete First LRIP Deliveries for the U.S. Navy

    By November 2009 Northrop Grumman delivered the first three production MQ-8B Fire Scout Vertical Takeoff and Landing Tactical Unmanned Air Vehicle (VTUAV) produced for the U.S. Navy. The delivery completes the program’s first year of Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) program. Two of the three vehicles were deployed aboard the USS McInerney for use on a scheduled operational deployment to complete a Fire Scout Military Utility Assessment (MUA). Prior to the current deployment, Fire Scouts have been aboard the USS McInerney four times since December 2008, completing 110 ship takeoffs and landings and 45 landings with the harpoon grid, accumulating over 47 hours of flight time.

    T-95 Main Battle Tanks & Tank Support Vehicles to Augment Russian Armor Units

    In 2009 the Russian Army is scheduled to receive a new main battle tank, claimed to be superior to existing designs. The new tank will introduce a new hull, power plant and drive train. It will also have improved firepower, comprising of new armament, target acquisition, fire control and surveillance systems. The Russian Army is also planning to field the long awaited Tank Support Vehicle, scheduled to enter production at Uralvagonzavod next year. The first armor units are expecting the new BMPTs by 2010.

    In 2009 the Russian Army can expect to receive the first examples of a new, locally designed main battle tank, claimed to be superior to all existing designs. According to General Nikolai Makarov, director of procurement department and Deputy Defense Minister Army, the new tank (assumed to be designated T-95) has a new hull, power plant and drive train, and firepower, comprising new armament believed to consist of an unmanned turret carrying the gun, an automatic ammunition loader, and elevated pedestal comprising target acquisition multi-sensor day/night systems. The tank is equipped with advanced, fire control system. The tank is under development at Ural based Uralvagonzavod plant. Apart from the Russian Army, Saudi Arabia was reported to be interested in the new tank, according to a Sept, 2007 French News Agency report. However, since actual testing in Saudi Arabia were conducted with T-90s, it is assumed that the saudis are evaluating the T-90 rather than the radically new T-95.

    According to Jane’s, the T-95 (currently known as “Object 775”) will have a weight of about 50 tons, with length and width similar to the existing T-72, T-80 and T-90 MBTs. Jane’s believs this model will be equipped with a smoothbore 135 or 152mm cannon. The three crewmembers are seated in a hull mounted capsule seperated from the ammunition by an armored bulkhead.

    The 'Black Eagle' (Object 640) Design of a future Russian Main Battle Tank. Another main battle tank under development in Russia, the “object 640” (also known as ‘Black Eagle’), is also under development at the Omsk-based Design Bureau of Transport Machine-building. Unveiled at an arms exposition in Omsk, Siberia, in 1999 Black eagle has not been seen since. This Black eagle also features a new chassis and turret but uses a manned turret with an automatic loader.

    According to Makarov the new tank is expected to complete the current test series in 2008 and enter production in 2009. Makarov claimed the new tank will be competitive and superior to current main battle tanks. He admitted that while the local industry can deliver highly sophisticated weapon systems, there is still a shortage of high quality military components for such systems that resulted from years of neglect of military industrial infrastructure since the collapse of the Soviet military industry enterprises.

    BMPT on display - Photo: www.rusarmy.com The unmanned turret design is already incorporated in another vehicle designed at Uralvagonzavod, known as ‘Tank Support Vehicle’ or BMPT. By 2010 the first Russian armor units are scheduled to be equipped with this vehicle, dubbed ‘Terminator’ – Russia’s Ground Forces Commander, Colonel General Alexei Maslov, told news media that the first tank company will be equipped with BMPT by 2010.

    The ‘Terminator’ will enter production in 2008. Uralvagonzavod developed the vehicle based on combat lessons learned during the war in Chechnya, but its implementation has been subject to delays. According to Novosti news agency, Uralvagonzavod Director General Nikolai Malykh, confirmed that his company received the first orders for the new vehicle, the first two BMPTs will be produced in 2008.

    The BMPT uses the T-72 tank chassis. It is equipped with enhanced armor and improved armament for the engagement of airborne and surface targets, including light and medium armored vehicles. Its main armament consists of two 30-mm 2A42 automatic cannons, a coaxially-mounted 7.62-mm PKTM machine gun, and four launchers with laser-guided Attack-T anti-tank missiles. According to the Vzglyad business newspaper quoted by Novosti, “Several foreign countries have already expressed an interest in buying the Russian-made BMPTs”.

    ‘Smart Entities’ define Computer Generated Terrorists for Simulation Training

    These interactive, Terrorist Computer Generated Forces (TCGF) embedded into computer models, implement decades of operational experience and research, conducted with Israel Ministry of Defense. “Smart Entities” incorporates a broad range of terror and urban warfare scenarios and will provide Israel’s Defense Forces with a level of high fidelity training that’s as real as it gets. These models are based on Israel Defense Forces validated operational experience in dealing with terrorist threats, as well as research conducted with Israel’s Ministry of Defense on terrorist behavior in low intensity conflict (LIC) and homeland security (HLS) scenarios. It is also the outcome of years in collaboration with professionals in cognitive Human Behavior Research & Modeling using unique AI technologies.

    “Smart Entities” features independent goal directed operational missions, dynamic decision making in reaction to threats and environmental changes, real-time path and location finding, cognitive capabilities, teamwork, and operationally researched mass behavior in normal and riot control scenarios.

    The TCGF application enables enhanced HIC, LIC and HLS full-spectrum operation scenarios in all terrains for training, mission rehearsal, operational research and decision support systems. It features AI decision-making, using Soar cognitive architecture (created by John Laird, Allen Newell and Paul Rosenbloom at Carnegie Mellon University), enabling non-deterministic TCGF behavior. It also includes smart and accurate real-time point-finding algorithms and path-planning algorithms including “Hiding Location” from threats and “Firing Locations” to eliminate the target. Additionally, “Smart Entities” provides realistic teamwork mechanisms and hierarchy according to operationally researched terrorist doctrines.

    A direct result of the need to rethink training against terrorism, “Smart Entities” is an effective way to meet today’s simulation challenges assuring optimal training for current and future engagements. It generates a dynamic, realistic and diverse combat arena while enhancing training efficiency and providing simplified scenario preparation and training management processes.

    COSMO SkyMed – Dual-Use SAR Satellite Constellation

    On June 7th, the Boeing successfully launched the first element of four SkyMed radar satellites comprising the Constellation of Mediterranean basin Observation (COSMO). The entire constellation will be deployed in space by 2009. The SkyMed satellite was launched to a low-Earth orbit by a on a Boeing Delta II rocket. These dual-use (civil and military) satellites were developed by Thales Alenia Space Italia under a joint Italian Space Agency and the Italian Ministry of Defence program. The system will take imagery of the Earth using an X-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar instrument capable of operating in all visibility conditions at the request of institutional and commercial users, including members of the defense, civil and scientific communities.

    According to bilateral agreements, COSMO resources will also be available for use by the French government and by under an inter-governmental agreement (ORFEO), as well as with Argentina, with whom the Italian Space Agency (ASI) is cooperating in the civilian sector to develop the SIASGE program – Sistema Italo-Argentino de Satélites para la Gestión de Emergencias. SIASGE was initiated in 2005 under an agreement between ASI and its Argentine counterpart CONAE in the scope of natural disasters management. The data that will be collected by the COSMO-SkyMed constellation will also be augmented by Argentine SAOCOM constellation, comprising 2 L-band SAR satellites offering uniquely large datasets for environmental monitoring, surveillance and risk management, environmental resources management, maritime management and science applications.

    Bhutto’s Murder Spurs Al Qaeda’s Quest for Islamic Nukes

    The assassination of opposition leader Benazir Bhutto has thrown Pakistan and its 165 million people into one of the worst crises in its 60-year history, raising the specter of widespread civil unrest and the cancellation of elections. Counterterrorism experts warn that the assassination of Benazir Bhutto brings closer the ultimate nightmare of Al-Qaeda and its affiliates being armed with nuclear weapons. In fact, Democrat US Senator Joseph Biden went so far as to claim, that an out-of-control Pakistan would be far more dangerous to the United States than a clerical ruled Iran. The most disturbing element is its nuclear arsenal that makes an unstable high-risk Pakistan the most dangerous country in the world: its stockpile of at least 30 and perhaps as many as 45 nuclear weapons has for years caused sleepless nights in worldwide security establishments.

    As for Benazir Bhutto’s untimely demise, Al-Qaeda and those who sympathize with them both in and out of the Pakistan government could well be responsible for her death. But certainly they are not alone in the deadly task. The notorious Pakistani Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI) has many Islamist sympathizers among its senior ranks and getting through the security that surrounded Bhutto, could have been facilitated by the professionals in the highly politicized military establishment. Since 9/11 The United States has lauded Pakistan as a partner in the war against terrorism, particularly against Osama Bin Laden’s Al-Qaeda network. President George W Bush has even praised the Pakistani leader Pervez Musharraf for his hard work in helping to reign in members of the Al-Qaeda group, in an effort to curb their terror activities all over the world.

    However, a look inside Pakistan, particularly into their government, would show that they are in leaning more towards militancy and into a radical Islamic society, with a ruling government much like Iran has now. The Islamic party Jamiat-e-Ulema-I-Islami (JUI) along with other smaller Islamic groups has already taken over the majority in the central government of Pakistan. Their views are similar to those of the Ayatollahs and radical Islamists in Iran. Retired General Naseerullah Babar became key person in Pakistan creating the Taliban. The general, a Pashtun was a leader in the fundamentalist JUI party and served as interior minister under Benazir’s late father, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, the founder of Pakistan’s nuclear program.

    “Often alleged to be an invisible force in Pakistani politics and responsible for countless incidents around the world, ISI is one of the most significant and secretive intelligence agencies existing today. Critics of the ISI say that it has become a state within a state, answerable neither to the leadership of the army, nor to the Prime Minister or even the president himself.”


    According to Western intelligence sources, based on inside reports from Pakistan, Thursday’s assassination in Rawalpindi bore the hallmarks of a sophisticated military operation. This report, which varies from others, claims the attack opened, by a suicide bomb which turned out to be a decoy. The explosion followed an ambush by multiple snipers, using sophisticated armor-piercing bullets. They hit, and penetrated the armored limousine, fatally killing Mrs. Bhutto. Whether this version or all the others are accepted, the very fact, that such a deadly attack could have taken place in Rawalpindi, should raise eyebrows throughout intelligence communities. The city is the stronghold of Pakistan’s military establishment and center to its dominant Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI). However, counterterrorist experts have warned, that Al Qaeda or affiliated Islamic Jihadist groups, are known to have effectively penetrated at least one unit of Pakistan’s Special Services Group, if not actually infiltrating into the very sanctum of the powerful ISI itself. In fact, two attempts on President Pervez Musharraf himself were made in Rawalpindi city. One of these was believed the result of a conspiracy involving Al Qaeda and some army officers. The president has already survived several attempts on his life and another; more successful cannot be ruled out, after the brutal murder of his political opponent.

    Often alleged to be an invisible force in Pakistani politics and responsible for countless incidents around the world, ISI is one of the most significant and secretive intelligence agencies existing today. Critics of the ISI say that it has become a state within a state, answerable neither to the leadership of the army, nor to the Prime Minister or even the president himself. As result, no effective supervision of the ISI, corruption, narcotics, and big money have all come into play, further complicating the already highly complex political scenario. Drug money was used by ISI to finance not only the Afghanistan war, but also the ongoing proxy war against India in Kashmir and Northeast India. The ISI continued to actively participate in Afghan Civil War, supporting the Taliban in their fight against the Rabbani government. Backing of the Taliban should have ended officially, after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and US rapprochement; however, there are persisting suspicions that sympathetic elements of the ISI continue to aid Taliban fighters.

    Proof that ISI is providing support for Taliban in the southern province of Balochistan was received when NATO forces captured 160 Taliban, many of them Pakistanis, who described in detail the ISI’s support to the Taliban. These mentioned ISI- run training camps near Quetta including huge ammunition dumps, serving as transit points for Taliban’s new weapons and meeting places of the shura, or Taliban leadership council. An especially troubling development deeply concerning NATO fighting in Afghanistan was an ISI sponsored peace pact with Taliban in South Waziristan. This later brought about the Pakistani government signing another deal with the Taliban in North Waziristan, effectively ceding an entire region of Pakistani territory on the Afghanistan border to the Taliban and, therefore, Al-Qaeda, which now virtually gained a safe haven inside Pakistan’s territory.

    US Intelligence sources point to former president Zia-ul-Haq loyalists among the retired officers of the Pakistan army and ISI which have long conducted a bitter campaign against Benazir Bhutto. They were determined to see that she did not return to power in the elections scheduled on January 8. Benazir, herself was quoted shortly before her death, that all the Jihadi organizations were opposed to her coming to power, firstly because she was a woman and, secondly, because of her statements, that she would allow US troops to hunt for Osama bin Laden on Pakistani territory and let the International Atomic Energy Agency interrogate the notorious nuclear scientist A Q Khan, the “father of the Islamic Bomb”. As recently as the day before her murder, following a visit to Peshawar, some explosions occurred, over which she expressed concern over her lacking security arrangements, complaining that the electronic jammers, provided by the authorities for protection against remote-controlled explosives, were considered faulty by her security staff.

    Benazir Bhutto’s assassination is an earthquake in Pakistan,” says Dr. Isaac Kfir, an international relations lecturer at the Israeli Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya and a noted Pakistan expert. Dr Kfir regards the murder as an immense achievement for radical Islam, significantly boosting the power of Islamists in Pakistan under the leadership of Al-Qaeda activists. The Bhutto assassination could prove that radical Islam have already shifted from Afghanistan into Pakistan and is moving from rural areas into the large cities and right into the center of its military establishment. Al Qaeda has openly called for Bhutto’s assassination in the past and has also claimed responsibility for attempts on the life of Pakistan’s powerful president, Pervez Musharraf. Osama bin Laden’s lieutenant and spiritual mentor Ayman al-Zawahiri has challenged both being western puppet, unfit to fit into an Islamic leadership position.

    But real concern should be over future repercussions of Benazir Bhutto’s demise, which brings the nightmare of Al-Qaeda and its affiliates being armed with nuclear weapons much closer to reality. The growing unrest in an already highly unstable Pakistan, will present the real danger that Taliban and Al Qaeda will eventually gain control of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal. If the ongoing infiltration of such subversive and fundamentalist elements continues, then some day in the future, Al Qaeda might well make this doomsday vision fait accompli! Al-Qaeda or its affiliates could well be holding clandestine positions inside the military establishment right now, some of them could even be in control of some nuclear sites already.

    They may not use (those weapons) right away, but that’s the danger,” says former CIA official S. Eugene Poteat, president of the Association of Former Intelligence Officers. “They’ve let it be known publicly what their plans are: their intentions are to kill us.” warns Poteat. On the other hand, Dr Kfir believes that at this point there is no fear of radical regime change in Pakistan. In fact, the assassination could even further boost the army’s power: “President Musharraf would now be able to say that he cannot lead significant changes in the country because he is dealing with terrorism,” Kfir says. “Bhutto’s death will strengthen the army, which will be telling the citizens: This is the reason why we need to stay in power. We are the only ones who can cope with the situation.” But who will guarantee Pervez Musharraf’s own survival? The president has sofar survived miraculously numerous assassination attempts, the last on July 6, 2007, when an unknown group fired an anti-aircraft gun at Musharraf’s plane as it took off from a runway in Rawalpindi. Allegedly, 39 people were arrested, detained and put at an undisclosed location after trying to instigate anarchy in order to seize nuclear weapons.

    So what can the United States do in order to safeguard Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal falling into terrorist hands? Whatever critics may say, General Pervez Musharraf is still the principal, if not sole barrier to stop the process of ‘Talibanization’ of his own country. He is the only one with sufficient power to contain an escalating chaos, which might endanger stability. But based on past experiences, his own future is highly unpredictable and if he joins the Bhutto clan fate, being killed by the extremists, who have tried before, anything can happen. If Musharraf is eliminated, it seems doubtful that Pakistan’s military establishment can prevent an eventual takeover by ultra-radical Islamic elements, in an Al Qaeda, or Taliban instigated revolt, creating total chaos in the already unstable and divided nation.

    General Ashfaq KiyaniThe fact is that U.S. and NATO policy in Pakistan has run into a dead end. Having put all its eggs in Musharraf’s basket, the U.S. finds itself with no Plan B and no where to turn — except to cultivate a new potential military dictator in the army. The army’s new chief of staff, General Ashfaq Kiyani, 56, may eventually fit this role. As former director of Pakistan’s ISI , the Ft. Leavenworth graduate, the four star general knows all the ropes to become a dominant figure in Pakistan’s political establishment. Whether he becomes powerful enough to replace Pervez Musharraf remains to be seen – if the necessity arises.

    When the CIA learned in 2001 that Pakistani scientists (A Q Khan) had shared nuclear secrets with members of Al Qaeda the alarmed Bush administration responded with tens of millions of dollars worth of equipment, including highly classified specialized intrusion detectors and ID systems to safeguard nuclear weapons. But the Pakistan authorities remained suspicious of U.S. aims and declined to give U.S. experts direct access to the half-dozen or so bunkers, where the components of its arsenal of about 50 nuclear weapons are stored. In fact, even now there is no reliable intelligence about the precise locations of these sites available. The Pakistan military are deeply suspicious, that the secret goal of the United States was to gather intelligence about how to locate and, if necessary, integrate sophisticated technology in their warheads. This could include a secret “kill switch,” enabling the Americans to disable nuclear weapons at will.

    Among the proposals was the ‘Permissive Action Links’, or PALS, a technology integrated into nuclear weapons to force any potential user to enter an authorization code before the weapon can be armed. But while many nuclear experts in the federal government favored offering the PALS system because they considered Pakistan’s arsenal among the world’s most vulnerable to terrorist groups, some administration officials feared that sharing this technology with an already unstable Pakistan military establishment, could pose counter productive and even dangerous to US national security. But there are new and more advanced technologies available to safeguard the Pakistan nukes these days. Some of these are kept top secret under all circumstances.

    Although precise details are classified, some information indicates that the system hinges on what is essentially a switch inserted into the firing circuit, requiring the would-be user to enter a secret numeric code that starts a timer for the weapon’s arming process and its ultimate detonation. While most switches already disable themselves if the sequence of numbers entered turns out to be incorrect, a newly installed link sets off a small explosion in the warhead rendering it unserviceable. The very design of this sophisticated system is what worries the Pakistanis most: if US special agents will bury the link deep inside the weapon system, this would, in fact enable Washington full round-the-clock supervision of Pakistan’s nuclear network.
    But matters are far from simple. “We cannot say with absolute certainty that we know where the Pakistani weapons all are located,” said a former U.S. intelligence official who closely tracked the security upgrades. Therefore, experts warn that any attempt by the United States to seize the weapons to prevent their loss, “could become extremely messy“.

    Nevertheless, as long as the Musharraf administration is in control, US intelligence officials believe that Pakistan’s nuclear stockpile is relatively safe. But they worry that its security could be weakened if the current turmoil persists or even escalates further into totally uncontrolled chaos. US military officials are particularly concerned by early signs of fragmented loyalties among senior Pakistan’s military and intelligence leaders, who currently share responsibility for protecting the arsenal.

    Reports circulating in Washington mention that early 2008, US Special Forces are expected to vastly expand their presence in Pakistan, as part of an effort to train and support indigenous counter-insurgency forces and clandestine counter-terrorism units in an effort to guard the sensitive nuclear sites. It may be, as usual as happens in this volatile region, too little and too late. Moreover, if the US military is planning to seize the nuclear weapons sites in an emergency, their fate could be much worse than in Operation “Eagle Claw”, the abortive Iran rescue mission in April 1980, which ended in total disaster.

    One matter is crystal clear: Al Qaeda’s quest in gaining access to, at least some of Pakistan’s “Islamic nuclear” arsenal, under these stringent circumstances must be taken very seriously. A thought that a stateless terrorist organization will possess nuclear weapons can become the ultimate nightmare to all free nations. Only determined and wise statesmanship can avert such a doomsday prophesy before it materializes. But is there such a leadership in sight during 2008?

    Operationally Responsive SAR Satellite Offered by a US-Israeli Team

    Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) and Israeli Aerospace Industries (IAI) have teamed to build and launch surveillance satellites carrying an Israeli Synthetic Aperture Radar payload. The US government is seeking operationally responsive capabilities to address the challenge posed by the proliferation of anti-satelite capabilities, particularly in China.

    “An all-weather, day/night system like this adds an operationally responsive capability to the U.S. inventory that is critically needed… [such an] airborne assets will enable us to hold the high ground on a global scale when dealing with the threats we face today.” said Jeff Grant, vice president of Business Development for Northrop Grumman’s Space Technology sector.

    TECSAR satellite carries a multi-mode X-band radar imaging payload which can provide significant, near-term, day/night and all-weather point and area collection capability to meet the immediate needs of warfighters in theater as well as those of the broader intelligence community. The a space-based radar imaging system will provide an all-weather, day/night imaging capability, offering US military and government users a rapid response, low-risk and affordable access to space.

    “This new system provides a capability that complements both existing and U.S. military and intelligence community capabilities being developed,” said Alexis Livanos, corporate vice president and president of Northrop Grumman’s Space Technology sector. “When they want to move quickly on any given contingency, users now have an option that offers greatly reduced timelines for deploying tactical satellites at low cost and at very low risk.”


    As other Israeli built satellites, TECSAR is a low weight mini-satellite weighing about 660 pounds (300 kg). In the US configuration it could weight up to 800 pounds (363 kg). The projected cost is expected to be around $200 million per satellite, including launch costs. IAI’s TECSAR is a high-resolution, synthetic aperture radar imaging satellite developed under an Israel MOD Defense Research & Development Directorate (DRDD) funding. The satellite uses a generic bus system developed by IAI Space Systems Division, to fit both EO imaging and SAR payload. The 220 pounds (100 kg) EL/M-2070 SAR payload employs multi-beam electronic steering was developed by IAI/Elta Systems. While the specific resolution of the payload is classified, it’s advertised capabilities include multiple modes of operation, including high resolution spot, strip, mosaic (Electronic Steering) and wide area coverage. Image enhancement for better target discriminantion is also supported, by employing Multi-polarization.

    Northrop Grumman is planning to have the satellite ready for operational use within 28 months after authorization to proceed. The satellite will be stored for quick preparation for launch, on a 30-day call-up. TECSAR satellites ordered by the US Government could be individually launched from a low-cost Minotaur or Falcon 1 rocket, or as a group of four or more on an EELV-class launcher.

    The first TECSAR satellite was launched on an Indian satellite launcher in January 2008. Northrop Grumman plans to demonstrate the new rapid response capability following the launch. The company proposes to modify the Israeli multi-mode X-band SAR carrying platform to incorporate additional equipment required by the US government, including mission assurance systems and secure communications. The new satellite program is dubbed ‘Trinidad’. Northrop Grumman will also conduct final integration and testing for Trinidad satellites, at its facilities in Redondo Beach, Calif.

    “We are confident that the high resolution imagery provided by Trinidad can become an important part of the U.S. inventory, providing global awareness,” said Jeff D. Grant, vice president and general manager of the company’s National Systems Division. “Northrop Grumman is ready to quickly deliver Trinidad to help the U.S. gain a more complete picture of the threats we face today on a global scale.”

    The space based radar will provide 24-hour surveillance in all weather conditions from a low earth orbit. The satellite can be controlled by multiple ground stations to address user requirements in different locations. It will be operated with a compact, portable ground system that provides the flexibility to perform tasking and data dissemination from the continental U.S. or from any operational theater. The payload control system is designed to facilitate tasking to dissemination cycles in less than 3 hours. The ground station supports various automated processes including Registration to Digital Map or Orthophoto, Automatic Target Detection, Automatic Cluster Detection, Automatic Change Detection, Report Generation and Dissemination.

    After Brit’s Withdrawal – Basrah Province Ready for Iranian Takeover

    Last Sunday the British forces in Iraq transferred security authority over Basra to the Iraqi Army. Unfortunately, the only thing which took place during the transfer ceremony was its orderly fashion. What the British leave behind is one of the worst security nightmares in that troubled land, which could well end up in disaster. The turnover marks the end of Britain’s nearly five-year-old principal mission in southern Iraq, a region the British had previously occupied during World War II, to prevent the oil-rich country from siding with the Germans. Basra’s ports and oil fields generate more than three-quarters of Iraq’s revenue today. Retired Colonel Tim Collins, who led the victorious Royal Irish Regiment into Basrah back in 2003, sadly compared Sunday’s pull-out to the US retreat from Vietnam: “the Army was never given a clear mission. If anything this has been a political failure”, the colonel said.


    The real event of British handover had already happened last September, when a lone bugler from 4th Battalion The Rifles battle group rang out at Basra Palace Base, shortly before 1am local time on 2nd September 2007, sounding ‘the advance’ for the last British convoy to leave the base, virtually clearing all British troops from the city.
    As the huge armored column, led by Challenger 2 tanks and stretching back a mile and half, trundled out of the compound – Saddam’s former bastion, close to the Shatt al-Arab waterway – RAF helicopters circled overhead. The withdrawal left the city largely in the hands of warring Shia militias, with the bloody prospect of more killings and kidnappings as they battle for power.

    In realistic terms, nothing could disguise the fact that the British withdrawal was, in reality, a retreat from the battlezone, without its mission having been accomplished. Indeed, “Operation Blenheim” was the code name for the transfer of 550 troops from the last base in the city to the relative safety of the airport. Despite the heroism of the British soldiers, many regarded it as a humiliating withdrawal. The pullout came after four and a half years – and the deaths of 174 brave servicemen and women – tackling the hopeless task of trying to bring peace to Iraq’s second largest city. It turned out to be a clear “Mission Impossible”, bungled, as so often happens these days, by irresponsible politicians.

    Although nearly a thousand miles to the West, many Israeli soldiers were reminded of a similar fiasco, when in May 2000 they were also forced out of South Lebanon, in a hasty retreat, by political shortsightedness, which brought about chaos and destruction inside Israel and the Second Lebanon War last year.

    No one in Basrah, whether Brit’ or Iraqi, will deny that the city and the province that the British are handing over, is plagued by violence between militias and criminal gangs, all of then seeking for power in this highly strategic city. The only clear victors in Basra’s political scene have been the gangster politics of al-Sadr Jaish al-Mahdi and the Badr Organization that virtually have taken over police and politics in the province. In fact a senior British army commander in southeast Iraq has admitted, that U.S. forces might be needed in future Basra in emergencies after Britain will finally reduce and ship out its remaining contingent, planned early next year.

    The Americans are especially concerned with the prospect of Basrah Province turning into a chaotic region. And they have all reason for this fear: Not only is Basra is the sole maritime port in Iraq, but also the main coalition military supply route from Kuwait to Baghdad, running through that province. Even if American forces will redeploy to Basrah Province, they will, undoubtedly face difficulties. As U.S. forces have not been directly involved in that region, they will find it extremely hard to fill in the void created by the Brit’s withdrawal, when an emergency will arise, for example a growing involvement from Iran, to threaten the vital lines of communications, from Kuweit into Northern Iraq.

    In fact, the strategic importance of Basrah Province cannot be overestimated: Basra governorate is the only region enjoying maritime access into Iraq, making it the country’s de-facto economic capital and a lucrative prize for local political actors, not to mention Iran. Sandwiched between Iran and the Gulf monarchies, at the intersection of the Arab and Persian worlds, the region is strategically one of the world’s major key points, especially, as long as US military presence in Iraq is maintained.

    US General Jack Keane, who is close to the White House and was the architect of the American troop “surge” in Baghdad, earlier this year, said the British policy was helping to turn Basra into a city of “gangland warfare”. His remarks represented the first public questioning of British strategy by a senior US military official since Mr Gordon Brown became British Prime Minister at the end of last June. But the last thing the Bush Administration would want to do at a time, when it faces growing domestic pressure to bring home troops, is sending the already overstretched troops into this Shi’ite sizzling powder keg. No wonder that the British withdrawal would be regarded in Washington as little short of betrayal.

    The area of the Shatt-Al-Arab, as shown on the Middle-East map published by the National GeographicThe full scale of the chaos left behind by British forces in Basra City, was revealed only days ago, as the city’s police chief described a province in the grip of well-armed militias strong enough to overpower security forces and brutal enough to behead women, considered not sufficiently Islamic. Major General Jalil Khalaf, the new Iraqi police commander, said the occupation had left him with a situation close to mayhem. “They left me militia, they left me gangsters, and they left me all the troubles in the world “. Khalaf, who has already survived 20 assassination attempts since he became police chief six months ago, must certainly know what he is talking about. Only last October, the main police station in the city centre was over-run by Mahdi Army militiamen, chasing his officers out of the compound. Order was only restored by British intervention.

    It does not need much imagination what will be in store, now that the “peace-makers” have gone! To further illustrate this point: Some 27 Iraqis died and 150 were wounded only seven days before the handover ceremony in Basrah, when three car bombs ripped through Amara, the capital of Maysan province, which the British Army has left last April and local authorities have taken over security responsibility from the British military. Soon after the last British soldier left, rival Shiite groups have been battling for control of oil and power. For years, British presence has been the buffer holding back these factions from sparking an all-out Shia-on-Shia militia war in Basra. Now Basra is already in the midst of a power struggle among Shiite parties. The Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI) party and its Iran-friendly affiliate, Badr, are competing with the Fadhila party, which holds the governorship of the province, and the movement of radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, whose Mahdi Army militia is regarded as the most potent force on the ground. The fledgling police force and most government institutions in the province have been divided by these forces into warring fiefdoms. Iraqi officials claim that out of the 17,000 policemen in Basra, about 14,000 are beholden to militias and many even loyal to the Iranian secret service.

    A major factor in ant future instability in Basrah Province and for all purposes, Southern Iraq as a whole, will be instigated from Tehran, which was only waiting for the British to withdraw and leave chaos behind. For several years Iranian intelligence has been preparing for complete dominance of southern Iraq by penetrating Basra’s security network and political parties. Iran has found it easy to build alliances with fellow Shiites who form the majority in southern Iraq. The Iranian-backed insurgents have found willing recruits among the city’s jobless. “The Iranians, in fact, have virtually taken over all of south Iraq,” said a senior tribal leader from the south who spoke on condition of anonymity because he feared for his life. “Their influence is everywhere, from top to bottom.

    With the border from Iran only short distance from outside Basrah city, one should keep a wary eye on Khuzestan, which is only a stone’s throw across the Shat-al-Arab waterway. The clerics in Tehran have always regarded Britain’s presence as transient and are well prepared for their departure- for the next round of an almost inevitable conflict.

    Over the years, Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) elite Qods Force have infiltrated the Iraqi security forces in Basra by trained militias. Captured Iranian documents originated in the Iranian regime’s Fajr Garrison in Al-Ahwaz in Khuzestan indicate that Tehran is already employing about 40,000 paid agents inside Iraq. The importance of Khuzestan as a spring-board for asserting Iranian control over provinces such as Basra, has thus become a major springboard for any future operations in southern Iraq. The Iranian regime has long been using Khuzestan as a base for launching insurgency operations in Iraq and it seems only logic that these will eventually intensify, now that the British withdrawal is creating a dangerous void in that volatile region.

    Intelligence reports indicate that Fajr Garrison, near the Arab-populated city of Ahwaz, is the main headquarters of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) in southern Iran. It hosts the IRGC’s Quds Force, which runs a vast underground network of agents and insurgents inside Iraq. Under such a challenging foray, which may well be risky, but also promising lucrative results, Iran’s first objective implementing its aim, would be controlling the strategic Shat-al-Arab waterway and next, Al Basrah province, which not only dominates all access routes in that region, but would place the US led coalition forces in Iraq in dangerous jeopardy, by virtually threatening their vital logistical supply life-line into central Iraq. In a recent restricted intelligence report, which was circulating throughout Mid- East, Israeli academic experts estimated that, while world attention is focusing on Iran’s nuclear ambitions and Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s fierce rhetoric, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps were quietly destabilizing southern Iraq, unhinging British military control of Al-Basrah being their first objective, which has now, to their surprise materialized much sooner than expected.

    Basrah Milestones :

    • 6 April, 2003 Basra occupied by British troops after several weeks of fighting on city’s outskirts.
    • April 21, 2004 Car bombs rip through the city, killing more than 70 people. First major attack in occupied Basra.
    • May 2004 British troops clash with hundreds of Iraqi militiamen loyal to the radical Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr. Two Iraqis are killed and three coalition soldiers are injured.
    • 31 May, 2006 A month-long state of emergency is declared after sectarian clashes and factional rivalry that killed more than 100 people in the space of a month.
    • 3 September, 2007 British troops hand over control of Basra city.
    • 20 December, 2007 handover of Basra province.

    Further reading:

    Unmanned Vehicles Demonstrate Convoy Movement Skills for FCS

    General Dynamics Robotic Systems (GDRS) successfully completed Phase I of the Future Combat Systems (FCS) Robotic Convoy Experiment (RCX) at White Sands Missile Range. The robotic experiment is being funded under a contract to develop the Autonomous Navigation System for FCS.

    This of the experiment is designed to test basic robotic convoy functionality and accuracy with obstacle detection and avoidance technology. During the experiment, an unmanned Stryker vehicle reached speeds up to 55 kilometers per hour (34 mph). Also included in the experiment was and Light Medium Tactical Vehicle (LMTV). The experiment is part of the Autonomous Navigation System program pursued by GDRS under contract with the U.S. Army; Phase II experiment will commence in July 2008 which will also involve the Stryker and MTV.

    Skunk Works and XTEND Simplify Multi-Drone Command

    0
    Lockheed Martin Skunk Works® and XTEND have achieved a major milestone in JADC2 by integrating the XOS operating system with the MDCX™ autonomy platform. This technical breakthrough enables a single operator to simultaneously command multiple drone classes, eliminating the friction of mission handoffs. From "marsupial" drone deployments to operating in GPS-denied environments, explore how this collaboration is abbreviating the data-to-decision timeline and redefining autonomous mission execution.

    From Ukraine to Taiwan: The Global Race to Dominate the New Defense Tech Frontier

    0
    As traditional defense primes face mounting competition from agile “neoprimes” such as Anduril, Palantir and Helsing, the balance of innovation is shifting toward software-defined warfare and scalable, dual-use technologies, while global industry consolidation—marked by Boeing’s integration of Spirit AeroSystems and other strategic mergers—signals an intensified race to secure control over the defense technology value chain. Our Defense-Tech weekly report highlights these trends.

    Europe’s “Drone Wall”

    0
    In early October 2025, a coordinated wave of unmanned aerial system (UAS) incursions—widely attributed to Russia—targeted critical infrastructure across at least ten European nations. The unprecedented campaign exposed the fragility of Europe’s air defenses...

    Weekly Defense Update & Global Security Assessment

    0
    Executive Summary The past week (September 18-25, 2025) represents an inflection point where strategic defense concepts have transitioned from doctrine to tangible reality. An analysis of global events reveals four primary, interconnected trends shaping an...

    U.S. Air and Space Forces Push Next-Gen Programs at the AS&C 2025 Conference and...

    0
    At the 2025 Air, Space & Cyber Conference, U.S. Air Force and Space Force leaders unveiled major updates on next-generation fighters, bombers, unmanned systems, and space initiatives, highlighting both rapid innovation and critical readiness challenges as the services race to outpace global competitors. A short version is available here, with a more detailed version for subscribers.

    TADTE 2025: Reflecting Taiwan’s Strategic Themes

    0
    The Taipei Aerospace & Defense Technology Exhibition (TADTE) 2025 crystallized around four dominant strategic themes that collectively illustrate Taiwan's comprehensive approach to defense modernization amid escalating regional tensions. Based on a detailed report by Pleronix (available upon request). Includes a Podcast discussion on TADTE 2025's highlighting Taiwan's four strategic themes beyond the post's coverage.

    Iron Beam 450 Completes Testing, Soon to Join With Operational Air Defense Units

    0
    Israel’s Iron Beam 450 high-power laser system has completed final testing, marking a major leap in air defense. Developed by Rafael, it offers precise, cost-effective interception of rockets, UAVs, and mortars, and is set for IDF deployment by 2025.