Sunday, December 21, 2025
More
    Home Blog Page 328

    New Weapons at Farnborough 2008

    Farnborough 2008 provided a stage for several teaming announcements that have the potential to change the course future missile of developments. Two industry groups, from both sides of the Atlantic announced plans to pursue collaborative developments of common multi-role missiles, seeking to improve missile performance utilizing state-of-the-art sensors and processors, improve life-cycle management, and introduce cost saving through economies of scale – features sofar absent from current missile systems.


    The UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) launched at the airshow a long-term cooperative strategy with the missile industries, aiming at streamlining of research, development and future acquisition of missile systems, defined under the common term as “Complex Weapons”. These are tactical weapons reliant upon guidance systems to achieve precision effects. Tactical complex weapons fall largely into five categories: Air-to-Air; Air Defense; Air to Surface; Anti-Ship/Submarine (including Torpedoes); and Surface to Surface. The new initiative is part of the Defense Industrial Strategy (DIS), announced in 2005.

    MoD has launched the Assessment Phase for Team Complex Weapons (Team CW), under partnership with a UK based industry group including MBDA, Thales, QinetiQ and Roxel. The current assessment phase valued at around £74 million for the first year is expected to help defining future military requirements for the next generation guided weapons. This effort covers multiple contracts awarded to MBDA and Thales aiming at streamlining current missile development programs within the scope of a long-term partnering arrangement, aiming to better use approximately £6 billion expenditure in this sector over the next 10 years.

    These programs will help assess a modular approach which has been developed for the delivery of future missile programs. This approach aims to reduce the number of different weapons in service by migrating to a smaller number of weapon families and variants with optimum modularity and re-use of sub-systems/technology. It has the potential to offer a greater level of capability while achieving value for money for MoD and maintaining UK operational sovereignty over the armed forces’ Complex Weapons.

    Six ‘complex weapons’ projects are already underway at MBDA and Thales, under the CW umbrella, including the Fire Shadow Loitering Munition developed by the MBDA-led ‘Team LM’, development of a Sea-Skua successor for Future Anti-Surface Guided Weapon (Heavy) for Royal Navy helicopters (under development at MBDA). This new missile will become the lead member in a new 100Kg weapon family. MBDA is also developing a 50Kg weapon family, augmenting the current Brimstone, to meet Air-to-Ground Attack requirements (MBDA). An even lighter weapon included in the program is the Future Anti-Surface Guided Weapon (Light) developed for Royal Navy helicopters by Thales UK. An air defense system known as ‘ Future Local Area Air Defense System’ is also included in the complex weapons program, being a successor for the Sea Wolf, to be deployed on T23 Frigate and the Future Surface Combatant. This weapon will be a derivative of MBDA’s Common Anti-Air Modular Missile (CAMM). Other thrusts of the ‘Complex Weapons initiative focus on modernization and enhancement of existing systems, such as the Storm Shadow currently used on the Tornado GR4.

    Future Dual-Role Air-Dominance Missile (DRADM)

    Another collaborative weapons development announced at the show, was a new team by Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LM), Alliant Techsystems (NYSE: ATK) and the Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE: NOC). The three companies signed a teaming agreement to jointly develop and market multi-role weapons.  Optional fields of cooperation cover all aspects of development, operation and support of future missiles including sensors, automatic target recognition, guidance navigation and control, air vehicles, propulsion, lethality, survivability, mission planning, platform integration, system engineering, and program management. The team plans to exploit common technologies that could apply to different missions, in an effort to introduce common missiles addressing different target sets. Of particular importance are advanced radar sensors that could be programmed to match specific mission requirements and form and space restrictions of future missiles.

    As the F-22 Raptor, F-35 Lightning II, unmanned aerial systems, and future aircraft platforms are envisaged over the next decade, the team believes that an advanced multi-role weapon requirement will emerge in the future that covers both the air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. A possible application for such weapons could be the Joint Dual-Role Air Dominance Missile System (JDRADM) considered as one of the future weapons for 5th Generation Fighters (F-22, F35) and unmanned combat aircraft. JDRADM is currently at an early concept development phase at Boeing, where future sensor and warhead designs are being evaluated. JDRADM will pack both air/air and air/ground capabilities in a single airframe. Boeing is already working on risk reduction programs to demonstrate key technologies associated with the dual-role warhead and terminal seeker, including the Seeker Integrated Target Endgame Sensor (SITES) guidance and integrated fuse, the Guidance Integrated Fuzing (GIF) technology and Multi-Role Responsive Ordnance Kill Mechanism (MRROKM).

    Meanwhile, after producing over 3,000 missiles, Raytheon is preparing to shift its AIM-9X production to the more advanced ‘Block 2’ variant, which adds a ‘one way’ datalink, enabling the launching aircraft to update the missile with up-to-the-second target location, enabling the pilot to launch AIM-9X before the missile’s imaging IR seeker ‘locks on’ the target. This procedure extends the missile’s range and maneuverability to the maximum kinematic envelope of the missile. The missile is currently undergoing flight testing, to be followed with qualification tests on all platforms including F-16, F-15 and F/A-18. With Lock-On After Launch capability confirmed, AIM-9X could be cleared for the F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II fighters. These stealth fighters are currently limited to carry only LOAL missile, since the weapons cannot acquire targets when stationed inside the weapons bay.

    Toward Smaller Weapons

    Modern weapons are no longer compared on the size and power of their warheads. In a world where illusive targets take cover amongst innocent civilians, and friendly forces are located across the street or behind a wall, the smaller, more “surgical” effect a weapon has is better. To successfully engage targets under such restrictions, an attack should be pursued swiftly as soon as a target is exposed and while nearby friendly forces and non-combatant elements are least vulnerable. A range of such new weapons were on display at this year’s airshow.

    This review covers the following topics:

    Chilean Air Force Opt for Brazilian Super Tucano Trainers

    After Brazil and Columbia, Chile becomes the third Latin-American Country to fly the Brazilian Super-Tucano Trainer

    Following the selection of the Brazilian Super Tucano in a public bid held by the Chilean Air Force (FACH), the Air Force will field 12 aircraft for tactical training missions. According to the contract signed between FACH and Embraer, the aircraft manufacturer, the first trainer should be delivered in the second half of 2009.

    The Brazilian proposal chosen by the FACH includes a broad Integrated Logistic Support (ILS) package and an advanced Training and Operation Support System (TOSS), for the aircraft and ground support stations including the including the navigation and attack Mission Planning Station (MPS), Mission Debriefing Station (MDS) and Flight Simulator (FS). Super Tucano is currently operated by the air forces of Brazil and Colombia, where these aircraft are also used as light attack aircraft on internal security missions.

    Embraer considers the choice of the Super Tucano by the Chilean Air Force as an opportunity to expand cooperation with the Chilean aviation industry, primarily Empresa Nacional de Aeronáutica de Chile – ENAER, established over ten years ago for developing the ERJ 145 regional jet.

     

    F-22 with SDB Means Improved Global Strike Capability


    The F-22A Raptor is undergoing flight qualification at Edwards Air Force Base (AFB) where its capability suitability to carry and drop the GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb is being evaluated. As part of the flight test program, weapons carriage and drop are performed through an enhanced flight envelope, including supersonic speed. In a recent test the F-22 Raptor dropped a 250 pound GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb traveling at supersonic speed. This first supersonic SDB drop was part of a safe separation test currently being performed to integrate the bomb with the F-22.

    “An SDB has never been dropped from a supersonic aircraft,” said Maj. Michael Starr, 411th FLTS test pilot. “Supersonic separation testing will give the F-22 the ability to drop the SDB at supersonic speeds, which synergistically enhances the Raptor’s air-to-air mission.” Currently, the F-15E Strike Eagle is the only aircraft outfitted with the SDB weapon system. On ‘Global Strike’ missions the F-22A’s currently takes two internally carried 1,000-pound Joint Direct Attack Munitions.

    Configuring the Raptor for SDB will increase the number of precision weapons carried on each sortie up to eight, each individually programmed from the cockpit to strike a specific target. Furthermore, the SDB with its ‘diamond back’ glide kit can be launched from an extended stand-off range, further increasing the aircraft survivability.

    Boeing Tests an Airborne Laser System on C-130

    Boeing has successfully completed the first ground test of the entire weapon system integrated aboard the Advanced Tactical Laser (ATL) aircraft, a modified C-130H, achieving a key milestone in the ATL Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration program. During the test held last week (Aug. 7) at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., the ATL aircraft fired its high-energy chemical laser through the beam control system.


    The beam control system acquired a ground target and guided the laser beam to the target, as directed by ATL’s battle management system. The laser passes through a rotating turret on the aircraft’s belly. After conducting additional ground tests, the aircraft will demonstrate the system’s military utility by firing the laser in-flight at mission-representative ground targets later this year. On May 13, the high-energy laser was fired aboard the ATL aircraft for the first time, demonstrating reliable operations previously achieved in a laboratory. During that test, an onboard calorimeter captured the laser beam before it left the aircraft.

    According to Scott Fancher, vice president and general manager of Boeing Missile Defense Systems, this ATL will be able to provide ultra-precision engagement capability that the warfighter needs to dramatically reduce collateral damage. The laser weapon will be capable of destroying, damaging or disabling targets with little to no collateral damage, supporting missions on the battlefield and in urban operations. Boeing’s ATL industry team includes L-3 Communications/Brashear, which made the laser turret, and HYTEC Inc., which made various structural elements of the weapon system.

    The Boeing-led Airborne Laser team successfully exposed the ABL aircrafts conformal windowfor the first time during flight in May. The exposure of the conformal window is a maneuver necessary for the weapon system to complete its mission of shooting down a ballistic missile during the boost phase of flight.. Photo: BoeingIn May 2008 another Boeing led team began testing a larger system known as Airborne Laser (ABL) designed for strategic missions. The ABL aircraft consists of a modified Boeing 747-400F whose back half holds the high-energy laser, designed and built by Northrop Grumman. The aircraft’s front half contains the beam control/fire control system, developed by Lockheed Martin, and the battle management system, provided by Boeing.

    During a series of tests, the ABL’s missile defense capability will be evaluated, under a Missile Defense Agency (MDA) program. According to Fancher, a first ABL missile shoot-down demonstration is planned for 2009. The aircraft is currently stationed at Eduards Air Force Base, where its on-board laser systems are being activated, ensuring all high-energy chemical plumbing and laser beam directing elements have been properly integrated aboard the aircraft and is ready to produce enough power to destroy a ballistic missile. As the activation tests are complete, ground firings of the laser will commence, followed by flight tests of the entire ABL weapon system. The test phase will culminate in an airborne intercept test against a ballistic missile in 2009.

    The Boeing-led Airborne Laser is preparing the  ABL aircrafts conformal windowfor the first time during flight testing. Photo: Boeing

    Nellis Heats Up for Red Flag 08

    The last phase of 2008 Red Flag exercise began today (August 11, 2008) at Nellis U.S. Air Force base in Las Vegas, Nevada. The two week exercise will include, for the first time, a flight of Russian made, Indian Air Force Su-30 MKI fighters. The Slam eagle (F-15K) from the Republic of Korea is also making its debut at Red Flag. Other international members among the strike teams include the French air force Rafale fighters. Singapore Air Force F-16’s operating out of their training facility at Luke AFB in Arizona will also support the operation. The aircraft arrived here last week, and will participate in the exercise as part of the strike group, conducting air/ground missions.

    A crewman performs a post-flight check on a French air force Rafale fighter at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., on Aug. 7. The French team is at Nellis for Red Flag 08-4, an two-week exercise that pits forces in a realistic aerial "battlefield" to hone the fighting skills of American and allied airmen. Republic of Korea, Indian, Navy and Air Force teams are joining the French air force in Red Flag 08-4. (U.S. Air Force photo by Chief Master Sgt. Gary Emery)While international participants are making the headlines, the majority of participants are naturally U.S. Air Force aircraft, is Red Flag will include multi-service and coalition aircraft, comprising some 80 aircraft ranging from the B-1B Lancer to the F-22A Raptor. The U.S. Navy will deploy its EA-6B Prowler to provide electronic combat support, Canadian C-130 and an airborne warning and control system aircraft from the United Kingdom will also support the operations.

    The aircraft will be flying missions during the day and night to the 15,000 square-mile Nellis range where they will simulate an air and ground war. This Red Flag is a realistic combat training exercise involving the air forces of the United States, Canada, UK, France, South Korea and India. The first segment of Red Flag 08 included a British contingent of Typhoons. The second segment held last month involved 65 aircraft, hosting Swedish Gripen fighters from the Swedish Air Force, F-16s from Turkey and F-5s from Brazil. During this exercise, an F-15D flown by the 65th aggressor squadron commander Lt. Col. Thomas Bouley crashed killing Col. Bouley. An RAF pilot flying the back seat escaped with minor injuries.

    An F-15K Slam Eagle from the Republic of Korea Air Force's 122nd Fighter Squadron arrives at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., Aug. 5, to participate in Red Flag 08-04. ROKAF aircraft and crews are participating in their first Red Flag exercise. Red Flag provides a peacetime "battlefield" within which U.S. and allied aircrews train to fight, survive and win. (U.S. Air Force photo by Chief Master Sgt. Gary Emery)

    Ramjet Propulsion, Advanced Seeker to Enhance the Navy’s Radar Killers


    The U.S. Navy, and the Italian Air Force performed two missile firing tests of the AGM-88E Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM) n August 2008. The tests were performed at the Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, as part of the missile’s Operational Assessment, preceding a forthcoming ‘Milestone C’ Decision to begin Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP). The recent test involved an operationally realistic scenario, where AARGM’s demonstrated its lethality against modern, advanced air defense systems employing shutdown tactics.

    Launched from an FA-18D Hornet, the AARGM detected, identified, located, and guided toward the emitter target using its Anti-Radiation Homing (ARH) receiver. After target radar emissions were purposely shut-down during the missile’s flight profile, the missile utilized its GPS/INS to guide to the final ARH cue, employed active Millimeter Wave (MMW) radar tracking for terminal guidance against the shut-down air defense site. The firing was the fourth of eight planned developmental and the final missile live-fire tests. AARGM is designed to be the successor to the U.S. Navy AGM-88 HARM system. When fielded in FY10, AARGM will be the only extended range tactical supersonic multi-role strike weapon in U.S. and Italian inventory. It will be cleared for operation on FA-18C/D, FA-18E/F, EA-18G and Tornado ECR aircraft. The missile is also designed for compatibility with the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, EA-6B Prowler and U.S. and Allied F-16 Falcon aircraft.

    Testing Ramjet Powered HSAD

    Under a technology demonstration flight test conducted earlier this year the Integral Rocket Ramjet (IRR) propulsion system developed by Aerojet performed a successful test flight earlier this year at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico. The IRR incorporates a nozzleless booster and Variable-Flow Ducted Rocket (VFDR) ramjet. The new propulsion system was developed for the High-Speed Anti-Radiation Demonstration (HSAD) program, a future long-range, high speed anti-radar weapon. Development of the HSAD is sponsored by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) Air Warfare and Naval Weapons Applications with the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division/China Lake (NAWCWD/CL) serving as the program lead and system integrator.

    The missile was rail-launched from a QF-4 drone aircraft, accelerated to supersonic speed, and transitioned to supersonic sustain-phase ramjet flight using Aerojet’s VFDR ramjet propulsion system. The VFDR ramjet system features a responsive energy-management capability that provides the missile with active propulsion throughout the entire sustain flight, enabling flight at speeds much higher than standard solid propellant rocket-powered systems.

    IDF Displays New Robotic & Remotely Controlled Systems

    Israel’s IDF & Military Industries 60 years exhibition included a number of robotic and remotely controlled systems. Some systems are already operational, such as the Tanin and TAGS robotic vehicle described below. Others, like the Guardium, have just been fielded this year and are about to enter operational service soon. Among the miniature robotic systems under development by the Israeli industry were the Viper, developed by Elbit Systes and four-wheel Eye-Drive by ODF. Among the larger systems on display here were the FrontRunner robotic engineering vehicle, developed by IAI Ramta, Zoko industries and InRob.

    Remotely controlled sniper weapon-mount was unveiled here by the IDF special projects development unit Yiftach. The system, dubbed Tanin (Alligator) mounts a Barret 0.5″ semi-automatic heavy sniper rifle, positioned on an electrically powered, remotely controlled fixture capable of aiming the rifle at targets up to 3 km in range. These weapon are typically positioned near remotely operated observation posts, enabling operators to rapidly engage targets within their area of responsibility. The system is equipped with a firing safety features inhibiting inadvertent firing of the weapon. The system weighs about 120 kg and is designed for operation at fixed sites. The unit has also developed a deployable, lightweight system designed for automatic sniper rifles. Other remotely controlled weapon stations (RCWS) on display at the exhibition included the Wave system, developed by IMI, demonstrated on IMI’s up-armored M-113 and the Samson RCWS, developed by Rafael, shown mounted on the Namer.

    Several UGVs were displayed at the exhibition, among them the Tactical Amphibious Ground Support vehicle (TAGS), built by Dumur Industries of Canada. The original system that weighs about 1.7 tons was enhanced in Israel increasing the curb weight to two tons, increasing payload capacity to 1 ton. The IDF is considering using the TAGS in support of infantry units operating in urban operations, utilizing the robot to transport some of the equipment used by the infantry unit, and deliver critically needed supplies such as ammunition, in areas threatened by hostile fire. TAGS can also be used to carry casualties under fire, in conditions that would expose the medical team to high risk.

    The Israeli configured TAGS mounts an elevated a video/flir sensor payload, utilizing an IAI/Tamam miniPOP payload, a forward looking driving camera and illumination system, an electronic control package and payload carriage rigs. The TAGS can operate at a range about one kilometer from the control station, located inside a specialized armored vehicle. However, the IDF does not limit the use of TAGS to support missions only. A new configuration recently entering field testing mounts a lightweight weapon station, complemented with an EO payload, enabling units to utilize the robot as a forward deployed fire base.

    Further coverage from the exhibition:

    How Should Israel Reinstate its Land Maneuver Capability?

    Better armored vehicles, more affordable guided weapons employed by ‘multi-purpose’ units could better handle future maneuver warfare in high intensive, asymmetric warfare.

    Major. General (ret) Yair Naveh, former commander of the IDF Central Command during 2005-2007, outlined at the ‘2nd Latrun Conference for Land Warfare’ some of the lessons learned after the 2006 war, offering some of his recommendations for the ground forces command. Following the conference theme, General Naveh considers the land maneuver as the ONLY option Israel can use to win in future conflicts. “There are different approaches to the Golan, Lebanon and Gaza fronts, but all theaters require a significant, powerful, short and decisive land maneuver, at the operational level – such maneuver should be employed with fire, primarily precision fire.” said Naveh.

    From Combined Forces to Organic Assets

    “The modern battlefield is not homogenous as it used to be”, General Naveh indicated, “a target set usually includes a mix of armored, fortified, mobile, underground, commando and irregular elements, armed with stand-off, and close-in anti-tank weapons and Improvised Explosive Devices (IED), operating in close vicinity, or within the civilian population. Therefore, all the means necessary to conduct battle under all these different scenarios, should be ‘owned’ as organic assets by the unit (brigade).”

    This concept stands in contrast to the traditional, Modular ‘combined arms’ approach, currently employed by the IDF, where specialized assets are allocated by higher echelons, for specific tasks. Naveh’s approach has already been implemented by the US Brigade Combat Team concept, but tested to a limited scale by the modular IDF ‘Yata’ battalion, designed specifically for asymmetric warfare. “Future land operations should not rely solely on tanks or infantry, but the brigade should determine, according to the operational scenario ordered, which element should lead the force” General Naveh added. Therefore, tank or infantry units should lead the brigade and shape its entire operational plan.


    Heavier Armor Against Growing Threats

    Overall, Gen. Naveh favors the return of heavy armored vehicles, as operations are facing numerous, more capable anti-armor threats. General Naveh considers the new Namer AIFVs being fielded with the Golani brigade an essential protection, facilitating their mobility in areas dominated by anti-tank and IEDs. “Threats prevailing in an urban terrain are different from those encountered in open area” says Naveh.

    “An AIFV should adapt for both terrain options; relying on tanks only does not provide an effective answer to the challenges of urban area, as they lack the mobility and capability to engage target at elevated angles. I would rather enter an urban area with a minimum number of tanks and provide mobility and support for the infantry by a dedicated armored vehicle, more adaptable for urban warfare” He added.

    Smarter Brains for Tougher Muscles

    Modern tactical intelligence should be enhanced and adapted to provide target intelligence, in addition to its traditional role, this should be regarded as a pre-requisite for the deployment of precision guided munitions (PGM).

    Overall, General Naveh calls for further improvement of ‘sensor to shooter’ kill chains, already established at the IDF counter-terror operations. An essential component of modern land maneuver battle is the employment of effective, precise firepower to create decisive effects only where they count, maintaining collateral low and minimizing the risk for friendly forces. A key for such capabilities is the transformation of statistical fire into ‘cost effective precision fire’. Naveh did not elaborate on how this could be achieved, but indicated that “the C4ISR is already in place for such capabilities”.

    To facilitate better targeting for maneuver forces, new sensors and intelligence collection elements such as tactical UAVs are being fielded. However, to employ them to their full extent, the IDF and Israel Air Force (IAF) should reach a compromise about airspace management. “The land component should share responsibility and control of the aerial dimension over the battle area, a factor now controlled exclusively by the air force. This requirement will be more critical in future operations, as the IDF plans to field UAVs at battalion, brigade and division levels, providing critical capabilities to the lower echelons.

    Affordable PGM for the Lower Echelon

    To further extend direct support by PGM, Naveh recommends an extensive deployment of laser designators at the lowest operational level. However, Naveh indicated that guided weapons should be of low-cost and simple to operate. “The IDF focus on ‘high end’ very accurate but expensive Electro-Optical guided weapons should be offset by simpler, more affordable GPS and laser guided weapons. Laser guidance is particularly suitable for short-range engagement, where targets are usually in sight.” Another factor is the high proficiency level required for the weapons operator. “Employing laser guided weapons require a single person and a single skill in the loop” says Naveh.

    He considers electro-optical (EO) guided weapons an essential asset for the division and corps level, where such capabilities become an operational and strategically determinant factor. “EO guided weapons should only be used, after lower cost alternatives are discarded.” said Naveh. He recommends fielding a mix of weapons employing different guidance systems to match a wide range of operational and strategic requirements – “The lower echelon needs a simple and accurate weapon that could be easily integrated within existing forces” said Naveh.

    He explained that EO guided weapons are more suitable for divisional and territorial command operations since their operation requires specialized operators and the high “cost per kill” could be justified only by eliminating high priority targets, prioritized by the higher echelons. “Guided to accurately attack a specific location, GPS guided weapons would be most suitable for the attack of fixed targets. The more advanced ‘smart GPS’ combining at least two types of seekers, will be best to pursue illusive targets such as Surface/Surface missile launchers.” said Naveh.

    Further Reading from the conference:

    Addressing the call for better maneuverability, the IDF Plans to Increase Land Forces Survivability

    Speaking at the ‘Land Maneuver in the 21st Century’ conference, Col. Yizhak Elimelech, head of Land R&D Division at the Ground Forces Command said that passive (armor) protection has reached the top. Any further addition of armor protection endangers degrading the platform’s performance. The IDF identified this trend 20 years ago and launched the development of active protection systems which are now matured for fielding. “Such a system transforms the tank from “prey into hunter”, as active protection provides the crew a better situational picture, highlighting battlefield threats in real time, and enabling rapid engagement and elimination of such threats, before they come into effect.


    The ground forces command launched a comprehensive program to improve the survivability of the forces, addressing the ever growing capabilities of weapons and methods, employed by all symmetric and asymmetric threats. While improving the armor protection for vehicles and personnel is central to this approach, thorough consideration is given to other survivability aspects, like, pre-emption by standoff detection and avoidance of potential threats, denying target acquisition, disruption, suppression and elimination of threats.

    Obtaining a higher level of survivability and maneuverability, such units will be better prepared to pull enemy forces out of their hideouts, through movement, fire and surprise. By engaging enemy forces at their hideouts, conventional forces can better engage targets in an ’empty battlefield’, where guerrilla forces remain hidden until being threatened or directly engaged. The IDF plans to utilize rapid target location and engagement processing, already employed in counter-terror activity, to dramatically reduce the life span of enemy targets as soon as they expose themselves and open fire.

    Units prepared for ‘Land Dominance’ will be equipped and trained to operate as tightly synchronized and coordinated elements. Employing networked sensors, such as radars, electro-optical systems and gunshot locators etc) they will be able to rapidly and accurately locate and engage threats. Such capabilities will be provided both at the unit level as well as the individual units.

    While the IDF has already established highly capable air mobile elements and have demonstrated the capability to launch brigade scale air-mobile operations, land-maneuver capability will be provided by a balanced force of heavy armored vehicles. According to the Brig. General Yaron Livnat, head of the MoD Merkava tank directorate, the IDF is planning to balance between the key maneuver force’s elements, through measured procurement of Merkava Mk4 tanks balancing it with the acquisition of a significant number of Namer Armored Infantry Fighting Vehicles (AIFV) currently being built.

    Namer AIFV are designed to operate well both individually and as a unit, equipped with mobility, firepower, protection, sensors, command and control to effectively pursue missions independently (at the individual vehicle level) as well as part of a networked operation. According to Gen. Livnat, the program has now been established to sustain continued production of tanks and AIFVs through the year 2020, which is necessary to ensure production capacity and availability of long lead time elements (engines, ballistic steel etc.) for the Merkava/Namer program. To enable troops to take advantage of the advanced capabilities of these vehicles, they are being provided with comprehensive training and logistical support.

    In parallel to the protection of individual combat elements such as tanks, AIFVs and dismounted warfighters, the IDF is seeking to improve the protection for entire combat units, including command, and combat service support vehicles. This enables continuous support for combat units throughout the battlefield. Such protection ‘services’ will be provided with a dedicated platform capable of detecting, countering and defeating incoming threats affecting the protected unit while stationary, or on the move. Operating in a manner similar to a mobile air defense, such platforms will be fitted with sensors and networked elements to provide early warning of potential threats. Based on intelligence reports and real-time sensor data, the system will be able to warn the forces about missile ambushes, Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) or mines, planted along the road. The platform will also employ various IED and mine-defeating systems to counter potential threats. Moreover, this platform will also provide protection against anti-tank missiles or RPGs launched against members of the protected unit, employing active protection means designed to protect light armored or unarmored vehicles over a large area.

    A typical system considered for such ‘flank protection’ is the Tactical Amphibious Ground Support system (TAGS) robotic vehicle, which has already been tested equipped with sensors and remotely controlled weapon station.

    Further Reading from the conference:

    Boeing Develops JDAM Based Countermine Weapon for the US Navy

    August 10, 2008: Boeing has been awarded a $153 million contract for the development of an aerial Assault Breaching System (ABS) Countermine System (CMS). The program continues previous work known as Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) Assault Breaching System (JABS), conducted by Boeing’s Phantom Works for the US Navy Office of Naval Research. The CMS weapon will be developed for the Naval Surface Warfare Center at Panama City, Florida.

    The CMS, part of the Navy’s effort to field a comprehensive Assault Breaching System, will help minimize mine-related combat losses during amphibious landings.

    “The CMS will neutralize mines in the beach and surf zone in advance of an amphibious assault by the Marines,” said Keith Burns, Boeing CMS acting program manager. “This capability will greatly enhance the sea service’s ability to project power and successfully complete a Ship-to-Objective maneuver.”

    The new weapon will be contained as a ‘cargo’ in a JDAM shell, delivered by U.S. Air Force strategic bombers will use the CMS to clear assault lanes while Navy tactical fighters perform localized mine neutralization. The weapon will be programmed prior to launch to scatter its darts over a designated aim-point.

    Unlike explosive devices currently used for mine clearing, the new weapon’s payload will comprise of 4,000 dart shaped submunitions, designed to attack surface laid and buried mines placed on land, in water or on the surf zone.

    The payload will comprise of different darts, comprising chemical materials, high-explosives or reactive materials that neutralize the mine by deflagrating mine’s explosive charge without detonation. The weapon’s development is expected to be completed by 2013. The Navy plans to integrate CMS into the ABS System of Systems providing a mine neutralization capability by 2015-6.

    The Boeing-led team includes General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems for mine neutralizer testing, alternate neutralizer design and the modular payload system; Lockheed Martin for the baseline explosive neutralizer; and Nammo-Talley Defense Systems for the dispenser system.

    Israel is Seeking to Achieve ‘Land Dominance’ in the Battlefield

    Israel’s land forces command outlines a strategic thrust to achieve ‘land dominance’, by employing combined maneuver and firepower to gain decisive victory in future wars

    The IDF intentionally refrained from large-scale ground maneuver operations during the 2006 Lebanon War. This was one of the causes of it’s poor showing, which left the scene, for the first time in it’s history, without clear and visible decision, both militarily and political. As the war was examined in depth by the so-called Winograd Commission, it became clear to decision-makers, that extensive ground operations, relying on large-scale, rapid maneuver warfare remain significant elements in any future warfighting, both high-intensive and asymmetric, in which the IDF will have to defend it’s nation against looming threats, both at the frontline and especially in the vulnerable rear zone.


    To regain it’s capability to maneuver effectively in threat infected areas, the IDF is preparing its forces to achieve ‘land dominance’ throughout the battle area, during high intensity as well as asymmetric warfare operations. This topic was discussed in details at the ‘2nd Latrun Conference for Land Warfare, organized this month by ‘Yad Lashiryon’, Israel’s Armor Association and Memorial Center.

    ‘Land Dominance’ has not been achieved during the 2006 Lebanon War, despite extensively rehearsed plans and preparations; the political level and IDF high command was reluctant to launch a ground campaign, opting in favor of employing a standoff attack strategy, by statistical and precision guided weapons. As the stand-off firepower based operational concept dominated the IDF warfighting concept, through the recent years, the IDF land forces overtasked with security and counter-terror operations suffered continuous degradation in training, resulting in the loss of essential knowledge and capabilities, primarily at the middle rank tactical command level.

    Lack of training, and inadequate equipment became key to the overall poor performance demonstrated by the ground forces during the conflict. On the other side, extensive preparations by Hezbollah, instructed by Iranian and Syrian experts, challenged IDF ground forces. Whenever the Israelis entered hostile territory, they encountered extensive maneuver inhibiting measures, including well-prepared anti-tank threats, IEDs as well as sophisticated electronic and information warfare elements, designed to prevent the IDF from accomplishing significant ground gains. The main problem, which persisted throughout the entire war, was an unimaginative and indecisive conduct of ground operations at a larger scale, inserting insufficient forces into focal points of strategic and operative value.

    The lack of focus to achieve ‘Land Dominance’ – a situation where land forces perform a series of rapid and decisive operations, employing maneuver forces throughout the battle area, precisely, lethally and effectively, to defeat the enemy, was identified soon after the war in after action reports. Lacking area dominance, and recognizing the vulnerability of the individual elements, the IDF response to threats was incomplete, insufficient and deliberate tactical moves were rapidly reduced to evacuation of casualties after initial engagements with the enemy. In an attempt to reduce vulnerability to stand-off anti-tank missile threats the IDF limited operations to night time. Furthermore, movement of lightly armored vehicles was prohibited throughout the theater while heavy armor was ordered to move off-road, which was proven highly challenging for the inexperienced crews. These factors had a negative effect on combat support and combat service support to forward forces, severely degrading their operational effectiveness and combat flexibility.

    Having been clearly identified by in-depth research and after-action lessons, these deficiencies are being addressed through an aggressive overall training and force build-up process, determined to achieve and maintain ‘land superiority’ through all types of future conflicts. According to Col. Yizhak Elimelech, head of Land R&D Division at the Ground Forces Command, the IDF determined the element of survivability as a critical aspect for ‘land dominance’. “If we invest adequately in means and R&D we can gain land dominance capability within 10 years” Elimelech concluded.

    Further Reading from the conference:

    Grand Challenge UK – 2008 Characterizing the Mission

    Some of the concepts evaluated during the UK Grand Challenge competition focused on different combination of aerial and ground autonmous systems operated in synchronization and mutual support. Others focused on ground swarms, constellations and formations of ground vehicles or unmanned hoevring aerial vehicles.

    Patrolling in urban environments against an evolving and rapidly changing threat is an ongoing element of current operations for UK Armed Forces.
    Recent developments in unmanned systems have seen a revolution in the way intelligence is collected and relayed to commanders. However, current in-service systems focus on long-range, high-flying operations providing a strategic surveillance and reconnaissance capability.

    Recent advances in the technology, safety and flexibility of unmanned systems mean their great potential to assist short-range, reactive operations, such as urban patrols can be realistically considered. Such systems need to be operable by small numbers of troops at very short notice, with the minimal amount of user input. This requires the system to have a high degree of autonomy and to be effective it must have the capability to reliably identify threats to the troops and relay them quickly to the commander.

    Copehill Down Village is the largest fighting in built-up areas (FIBUA) training facility in Europe. The village is used for pre-deployment training for UK and Allied armed forces, providing troops with essential skills for urban operations. Built in 1986, Copehill Down resembles a small northern European town, complete with a church, school, hotel and bar. The site is approximately 350m by 450m. The village contains around 80 buildings and includes a more recently build section based on an Iraqi village.

    Unmanned Systems Technologies at the Grand Challenge UK – 2008

    Some of the concepts evaluated during the UK Grand Challenge competition focused on different combination of aerial and ground autonmous systems operated in synchronization and mutual support. Others focused on ground swarms, constellations and formations of ground vehicles or unmanned hoevring aerial vehicles.

    The London based Barnard Microsystems team employed two types of remotely controlled model helicopters acting as aerial scouts. A different light weight ‘tricopter’, capable of hovering and perching whilst surveying the area of interest with imaging sensors was developed by Students from Middlesex University as part of the I-Spy team (photo). A different helicopter platform was employed by team members from Thales and the universities of Reading, Cranfield, Exeter and Loughborough and three schools from the Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Network (STEMNET). They have used commercially available helicopters and two custom built ground vehicles (photo) equipped with audio, visual and thermal imaging sensors and laser range finder to detect potential threats.

    A combination of air and ground systems was employed by the Stellar team, using multiple systems flying at different altitudes (photo above) as well as a ground autonomous vehicle, all controlled through the SATURN (Sensing & Autonomous Tactical Urban Reconnaissance Network) and guided autonomously by mission planning software.Comprising Stellar Research Services Ltd, Blue Bear Systems Research Ltd, SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems, Cranfield University, Marshall SV Systems Design Group and TRW Conekt, this.

    The Silicon Valley team introduced a combination of vehicles including a remote controlled UAV, a glider and two ‘Moonbuggy’ UGVs (photo) operating autonomously in full synchronization, controlled and managed semi-autonomously from the APHIDS mission management system. The system combines the RoboHumatics principles and tuned image recognition software being developed by the Kingston University, University of Reading, and a novel solution developed by IDUS Consultancy to detect IED command wires. Silicon Valley team members are drawn from Silicon Valley Group, IDUS Consultancy Ltd, Smith Engineering (GB) Ltd (UGV designers Cumbria), and Bruton School for Girls. A matrix of multiple vehicles was demonstrated by the Mindsheet team (photo), employing four unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) fitted with thermal imaging and motion detectors.

    Swarm Systems used a ‘swarm’ of ‘Owls’, four-rotor (quadrotor) micro aerial vehicles (MAV) each weighing less than 1 kg.The Swarm is tasked to rapidly reconnoitre an area. A swarm approach, when compared to an individual approach, brings the benefits of emergent behaviour, in particular robustness to unforeseen events. As Professor Owen Holland at the University of Essex explains: “Swarming has many proven advantages. Most importantly, it can survive unexpected events. If one vehicle is suddenly lost, then the swarm reconfigures itself to complete the task.” The team’s concept is simple. It uses a swarm of eight quadrotors called ‘Owls’. Their operator uses 3D planning software to swiftly plan and rehearse routes for the Owls over Copehill Down village. The Owls then fly those routes, taking around one thousand high-resolution images. On return, these images are processed by a cluster of ten powerful multi-processor PCs, which analyze each image using the University of Surrey’s threat recognition software. Within minutes, the operator can produce a map of Copehill Down showing the location and type of all recognized threats. Swarm team members drawn from Swarm Systems Ltd, University of Essex, University of Surrey, Orrcam Ltd, Ardware Ltd and Scarzon Ltd.

    Members of Team Tumbleweed included the University of Manchester, AV-I Ltd, BAE Systems and MBDA has designed a small six-rotor lightweight UAV, (model is shown on the left) with rotors held in a circular frame (making a spherical ball) and fitted with visual and infra-red sensors. The vehicle is fitted with a stabilized electro-optical sensor system.

    MIRA, ERA Technologies, BAE Systems, GFS Projects, University of Warwick and pupils from Royal Grammar School, Guildford formed the Mira team, which presented a combination of a “flying saucer” like UAV and a ground carrier/launcher platform (see photo above) which also operates as an autonomous ground sensor, both equipped with infra-red cameras and laser scanners. Mira also offered a land based platform carrying mainly optical sensors with a tethered aerial camera for situational awareness.

    A group of young engineers from the Cortex team, sponsored by QinetiQ designed a two-rotor, highly maneuverable and lightweight winged unmanned air vehicle, (picture) capable of vertical take-off, landing and hovering. The system qualified for the final phase but failed to compete due to technical problems. Another system that failed in the last phase was a pocket-sized, lightweight and easily transportable foam UAVs developed by Team Locust, (see picture above) formed by members of Advanced New Technologies (ANT) Scientific Limited, Portsmouth University and Satmap Systems.

    SMArt Sensor-Fuzed Amunition for 155mm guns

    SMArt 155 (DM702) is produced by GIWS – a subsidiary of Diehl and Rheinmetall. SMArt is an intelligent, autonomous fire and forget artillery projectile designed to accurately engage stationary or mobile battlefield targets. By utilizing smart Submunitions, such targets can be engaged with standard artillery units, at significant range and high kill efficiency.

    Each SMART 155 munition is composed of two sensor fused submunitions designed for automatic target acquisition and engagement by an Explosively Forged Penetrator (EFP). After the submunitions are expulsed from the shell case, opening parachutes and arm the warheads, each weapon scans a specific sector in a spiraling pattern, as it auto-rotates under a parachute, scanning the area underneath it with IR and mm radar or millimeter wave radiometer sensor. Once positive indication of a target is provided by both sensors, an aim point is calculated and the EFP is activated, attacking the target from above. According to the manufacturer, The SMArt 155’s fusion of signal processed from IR sensors, radiometers and active radars is spanning a broad range of wavelengths, performs well in adverse conditions such as fog, smoke or precipitation; conditions that impede the performance of single sensors or single wavelength suites of sensors.

    The 47 kg Smart 155 round is designed for 155mm guns including M-109/39 and M109/47 and PzH-2000/52 and Paladin self propelled artillery reaching 22.5 (39/47) up to 27.5 km (155/52). The Smart Submunitions are also applicable for MLRS rockets and aerial dispensers, as well as sensor fused ground mines activated by IR, Milimeter Wave (mmw) Radar or acoustic triggering. SMART is fielded with the armied of Germany, Switzerland and Greece. Additional countries are evaluating the weapon, among them the UAE. In a recent test, SMART ammunition was fired from a UAE G6 self-propelled howitzer and scored kills of 67 percent of the armored target. Test results also show that the SMArt(R) 155 is capable of distinguishing a hot target from a cold background as well as a cold target from a hot background. This functionality is particularly important in desert climates with “crossover” times of day that can impact thermal imaging performance. ATK is teamed with GIWS to market and produce the SMArt if selected by the US Forces.

    In the UK, SMArt was proposed for the Royal Artillery’s a Guided Artillery Ammunition (GAA) program, part of the Indirect Fire Precision Attack (IFPA) program. The team proposing the SMArt included RO Defense, Rheinmetall Defense and Raytheon . In November 2007 the MoD announced a first order for these munitions. They will be fired from current or future 155mm howitzers, and effectively engage targets at maximum range greater than 45km (with 155/52cal guns) at an accuracy of less than 20m’ CEP.

    The projectile will reach this range by determining the specific flight trajectory using inertial sensors and GPS guided flight, utilizing canards deployed at the highest point of its ballistic trajectory (apogee). The mid-course trajectory will be optimized for range and time of arrival, while the terminal trajectory will be optimized for the type of warhead – either direct impact or submunition dispensing. Such accuracy enables firing at close proximity with friendly forces, and in scenarios where rules of engagement prohibit the use of wide area fire missions. GAA will be offered with two payload options – the SMArt Sensor Fused Munition (BSFM) or a new combined effect Blast Fragmentation submunition, designed by BAE-Royal Ordnance.

    DARPA Develops Better Battle Damage Tolerance Flight Control for Unmanned Systems

    Can an airplane fly with part of its wing ripped off? Two decades after a young Israeli pilot made history by landing an F-15B after losing the starboard (right) wing after midair collision with an A-4H, the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and Rockwell Collins are working on an new damage tolerant flight control technology that can automatically reconfigure the aircraft flight controls after significant loss of control due to battle damage.

    An Israel Air Force F-15B recovered safely at an IAF base after losing its right wing in a mid-air collision. Photos: Israel Air Force magazine
    DARPA’s Damage Tolerant Controls (DTC) program completed the most recent test series in April 08, culminating in a demonstration of recovery from loss of the majority of the right wing of a sub-scale F/A-18, verifying the ability of adaptive control methods to continue control of an aerial platform in the event of battle damage. According to DARPA’s Program Manager Lt. Col. Jim McCormick, the system provides an autonomous aerial vehicle an ‘air sense’ that would allow them to deal with the unexpected, the way a human pilot might. “Damage tolerance approach will reduce the burden of training on our operators, limit the impact of pilot error, and lessen our dependence on pre-positioned ground equipment.” Col. Don Hazelwood, Project Manager for Army Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

    During the recent test, an F/A-18 sub-scale model equipped with the flight control system developed by Rockwell Collins demonstrated safe recovery from catastrophic wing damage, as it regained stable flight within seconds after losing its right wing. Over the next few minutes the flight control system reconfigured itself to restore most of the original flight quality, allowing the aircraft to complete a flawless autonomous touchdown. The next phase will integrate damage tolerance into an operational unmanned air system, paving the way for future fielding of this unconventional capability.

    Skunk Works and XTEND Simplify Multi-Drone Command

    0
    Lockheed Martin Skunk Works® and XTEND have achieved a major milestone in JADC2 by integrating the XOS operating system with the MDCX™ autonomy platform. This technical breakthrough enables a single operator to simultaneously command multiple drone classes, eliminating the friction of mission handoffs. From "marsupial" drone deployments to operating in GPS-denied environments, explore how this collaboration is abbreviating the data-to-decision timeline and redefining autonomous mission execution.

    From Ukraine to Taiwan: The Global Race to Dominate the New Defense Tech Frontier

    0
    As traditional defense primes face mounting competition from agile “neoprimes” such as Anduril, Palantir and Helsing, the balance of innovation is shifting toward software-defined warfare and scalable, dual-use technologies, while global industry consolidation—marked by Boeing’s integration of Spirit AeroSystems and other strategic mergers—signals an intensified race to secure control over the defense technology value chain. Our Defense-Tech weekly report highlights these trends.

    Europe’s “Drone Wall”

    0
    In early October 2025, a coordinated wave of unmanned aerial system (UAS) incursions—widely attributed to Russia—targeted critical infrastructure across at least ten European nations. The unprecedented campaign exposed the fragility of Europe’s air defenses...

    Weekly Defense Update & Global Security Assessment

    0
    Executive Summary The past week (September 18-25, 2025) represents an inflection point where strategic defense concepts have transitioned from doctrine to tangible reality. An analysis of global events reveals four primary, interconnected trends shaping an...

    U.S. Air and Space Forces Push Next-Gen Programs at the AS&C 2025 Conference and...

    0
    At the 2025 Air, Space & Cyber Conference, U.S. Air Force and Space Force leaders unveiled major updates on next-generation fighters, bombers, unmanned systems, and space initiatives, highlighting both rapid innovation and critical readiness challenges as the services race to outpace global competitors. A short version is available here, with a more detailed version for subscribers.

    TADTE 2025: Reflecting Taiwan’s Strategic Themes

    0
    The Taipei Aerospace & Defense Technology Exhibition (TADTE) 2025 crystallized around four dominant strategic themes that collectively illustrate Taiwan's comprehensive approach to defense modernization amid escalating regional tensions. Based on a detailed report by Pleronix (available upon request). Includes a Podcast discussion on TADTE 2025's highlighting Taiwan's four strategic themes beyond the post's coverage.

    Iron Beam 450 Completes Testing, Soon to Join With Operational Air Defense Units

    0
    Israel’s Iron Beam 450 high-power laser system has completed final testing, marking a major leap in air defense. Developed by Rafael, it offers precise, cost-effective interception of rockets, UAVs, and mortars, and is set for IDF deployment by 2025.